Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lutherans to allow pastors in gay relationships

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:04 PM
Original message
Lutherans to allow pastors in gay relationships
Source: reuters

Lutherans to allow pastors in gay relationships

Sat Aug 11, 2:00 PM ET

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Homosexual Lutheran clergy who are in sexual relationships will be able to serve as pastors, the largest U.S. Lutheran body said on Saturday.


The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) passed a resolution at its annual assembly urging bishops to refrain from disciplining pastors who are in "faithful committed same-gender relationships."

The resolution passed by a vote of 538-431.

"The Church ... has just said 'Do not do punishments'," said Phil Soucy, spokesman for Lutherans Concerned, a gay-lesbian rights group within the church. "That is huge."

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070811/us_nm/religion_lutherans_dc;_ylt=AhJ.K6AfI6Fuve4HxKB7QOys0NUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. That IS huge!
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since When Do They Need Permission? Or Anybody, for that Matter?
Awfully high-handed, noblese oblige of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I guess they get to make the rules, since it's their club.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Thanks for pissing all over the hard work of a LOT of people who have been fighting for this cause
Edited on Mon Aug-13-07 12:29 AM by kysrsoze
To get where the ELCA is right now took an immense amount of work from both gay and straight ELCA members, working together. But what do we all know, compared to your vast ability to read all our minds and effectively pass judgment? Read up on "Reconciled in Christ" before you go shooting your mouth off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. yes, to me this is huge too!
one by one their (denominations) wall of lies and separation will fall! God bless us all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. So "the Rock of Ages" will not be used to stone them ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Goddamn Kremlinites
First gay preachers, next health care for everyone. It's a slippery slope to the 21st century!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Finally! Some Black Collar DoGoodery!
So, pretty much, this is a "grandfather clause" for gay clergy who have already settled-down?

If you're gay and single and a member of the Lutheran clergy, you can forget about dating?

Still, that's pretty good news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oversimplification of the motion..
That's not exactly what happened.

The assembly voted to encourage bishops to exercise restraint
in the discipline of already ordained pastors who are in
'committed self-sex relationships.'

Since the formation of the ELCA (Evangelical Lutheran CHurch in America) there is a statement of policy of expections of lifestyle for pastors and those candidates for rostered ministry.These expectations are simple: if married, stay faithful to spouse. If not married, then live the celibate lifestyle.

Those pastors who live outside these guidelines- heterosexual or homosexual- are charged with violating these guidelines, and thus must face the discipline board. Which in itself is proper: how many children had been abused by Roman Catholic priests, and the facts were swept under the rug for generations?

The 'pebble in the shoe'for many is that the church views marriage as a heterosexual relationship- one man, one woman. The reason why many of the ELCA struggle with this change is that it implies that if clergy can be in a committed relationship to a same-sex partner, then everyone else should have that option, and thus opens the door to same sex blessings/marriage, whatever word you use to describe this bond of fidelity.

The ELCA is pretty much a 'big tent' kind of denomination, comprised of the various ethnic traditions that brought to the colonies the strands of the Lutheran tradition during the two vast migrations in our history. There are liberal theological wings, there are conservative theological wings, and there are centrists. Lutherans tend to be polite, and try not to cause a scene (If you've heard Garrison Keillor's monologues, he's not too far from reality).

The struggle with this for many is that the ELCA holds up scripture as being the normative model for how we live. Heterosexal marriage is the typical model set in scripture (although that in itself is open to interpretation: in the Old TEstament, the norm was multiple wives with a patriarchal figure as the head of the family.. but pardon my disgression). Scholars say there is no scriptural model of a same sex 'marriage.' Thus one part of the issue.

The ELCA is NOT one of those denominations that claims that homosexuals are bound for hell. Lutherans preach that all are welcome through Christ's mercy. There are movements and organizations within the ELCA that support and welcome GLBT peoples. This issue is based on standards for leadership, which most organizations have. Being a private, not public, organizations, churches don't fall into the pervue of the law and its standards for equality.

Before the church body would agree to any change (and this includes the ordination of women in the 1970's), there must be biblical and theological reasons for this change. This is what the church body is struggling with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. well, the could use the relatioship of jesus and john.
but the closeness of those two seems to make ''normal'' christians uncomfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Which John...?
The gospels have several characters named JOhn.

And really none of them have any relationship with Jesus that could be termed more 'intimate' than any other disciples. Much of the supposed
'close' relationships with Jesus are simply conjecture. If you examine the scriptures, Jesus is pretty much who is he. There is conjecture that Jesus was married, because mose rabbis of that time were- in fact, if he wasn't married, he would be suspect. But the Bible doesn't say. If you're referring to the 'beloved disciple,' a term used in the gospel of John, most scholars now believe that unnamed disciple was Lazarus. But I digress...

We can't jump to conclusions about the relationships Jesus had. The author of "The DaVinci Code" did a number on the culture by pointing to things in scripture (and things in Leonard's {his proper name, his Name is NOt DaVinci.. that's where he came from}... that are simply fiction.
When folks bring that up, I say: find it in the Bible. And they can't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. ok -- the one he slept with --
the one that he slept chest to chest with him.

it's right there in the new testament -- he is also described by jesus as ''beloved''.

the john that jesus left the care of his mother to when he was dying on the cross.

the disciples also said that john was described by jesus as beloved.

sounds like a person of pretty intimate acquaitence to me.

and i'm not talking about ONE DAMN THING that isn't right there for anyone to see.

as much as jesus was divine -- he was also that much human.

and that's the beauty of his divinity -- jesus was us.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, Jesus was one of us.
That's the beauty of the gospel; He was one of us. The great thing about Jesus is that much of his life is left to the imagination. We tend to see in Jesus what is important to us. But we must be careful not to paint him into a corner.

Howevr, your reasoning doesn't work; There's nothing in the Bible about Jesus sleeping with john;
Please tell me where in the New Testament it says that.
"chest to chest'? Sorry, it ain't there. If you are referring to artwork, its just the artist's interpretation. But its not in the Bible.

No, JOhn is not designated as the 'beloved disciple.' That terminology is left kind of obscure.

Yes, Jesus hands over the care of his mother to a John, one of the younger disciples, but not because they were lovers. It was because in that culture, women had no rights, could not own property and needed to be looked after by a man.

And which John do you mean?
John the Baptist?
John, the son of Zebedee?
John of Patmos?
John, the author of the gospel of John?
There are many people named John in the New Testament.

The disciples never referred to anyone as the 'beloved disciple.'
That term comes from the narrator of the gospel of John, and itsn't necessarily someone named John. Read the gospel of John for yourself, and see what I mean.

Plain to see? Sorry. I don't . Tell me chapter and verse.

Much of biblical interpretation can be molded to fit certain agendas.
I dont' like much of what is in the Bible, but the best way to know it, is to know it, to read it, and learn the culture and background.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. ...
John and his brother, James, were sons of Zebedee (some feel that Salome was Zebedee's wife, basing their identification on Matt. 27:56 and Mark 15:40), and the men of the family were fishermen at the Sea of Galilee. Their business prospered to the extent that they employed servants (Mark 1:19-20) by the time Jesus called the brothers to the full-time ministry. Although the Gospels of Matthew and Luke list Peter, Andrew, James, and John at the beginning of their lists, Mark and Acts place Peter, James, and John at the beginning of the list of the Twelve. These three apostles were alone with Jesus on special occasions, such as at the raising of Jairus' daughter (Mark 5:37-43), on the Mount of Transfiguration (Matt. 17:1-9), and at Jesus' suffering in the garden of Gethsemane (Matt. 26:37-45). The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that these three ancient apostles received the keys of the priesthood during the transfiguration experience (TPJS, p. 158).

John is usually identified as one of the two disciples of John the Baptist mentioned in the Gospel of John who became disciples of Jesus after his baptism (John 1:35-40). James and John were called Boanerges ("Sons of Thunder") by Jesus, perhaps because of their strong and impulsive personalities. Either they (Mark 10:35-40) or their mother on their behalf (Matt. 20:20-23) asked Jesus to grant them places of honor in his heavenly kingdom. Although rebuked for their ambition, they averred their willingness to share in his trials and suffering, and Jesus affirmed that they would do so.

John describes himself as "leaning on Jesus' bosom" during the Last Supper (John 13:23); later, when Jesus was bound and taken to the high priest, John (who "was known unto the high priest") and Peter followed along (John 18:15). John continued to follow the Savior through the ensuing events and was the only one of the Twelve recorded as being present at the Crucifixion. Jesus asked him to take care of his mother, Mary, and John took her to his own home (John 19:26-27).
http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/basic/bible/john_beloved.html


A series of articles on

"John" in the Bible


Johannine literature
Gospel of John
First Epistle of John
Second Epistle of John
Third Epistle of John
Revelation
Authorship of literature


Names
John the Apostle
Disciple whom Jesus loved
John the Presbyter
John the Evangelist
John of Patmos

Related Literature
Homosexual Reading
Apocryphon of John
Egerton Gospel
Signs Gospel
Logos


A tradition that has developed since the 16th century has interpreted the story of Jesus and John the Apostle as an erotic romance and their love has been held up as an exemplar of same sex love that created a social and ethical space in which other men and youths could have romantic and physical relationships.<1>

Though this possibility has not received much attention in Christianity and Johannine studies, recent scholarship in gender studies has built upon the lengthy historical tradition of seeing their feelings for each other as passionate.<2>.
Contents

1 "Beloved disciple"
2 Historical references
3 Gender studies scholarship
4 Reception
5 See also
6 Notes



"Beloved disciple"

Main article: Disciple whom Jesus loved



Jesus and the Beloved Disciple, polychromed and gilded wood, c 1320.<3>

One of the factors leading to the assumption that Jesus and John loved each other is the phrase the disciple whom Jesus loved or Beloved Disciple, which is used several times in the Gospel of John, but in none of the other accounts of Jesus.<4> In John's gospel, it is the Beloved Disciple who asks Jesus during the Last Supper who it is that will betray him. Later at the crucifixion, Jesus tells his mother "Woman, here is your son"; that he indicates the Beloved Disciple is the common interpretation. To the Beloved Disciple he says, "Here is your mother."

In art, the Beloved Disciple is portrayed as a beardless youth – the figure of the Student – but often mistaken for a woman. He is usually shown in major scenes from the Gospel of John, especially the crucifixion and the Last Supper. Many artists have given different interpretations of John 13:23–25, in which the beloved disciple is resting his head against Jesus' chest.

Since the Beloved Disciple does not appear in any of the other New Testament gospels, it has been traditionally seen as a self-reference to John the Evangelist, and this remains the mainstream identification. An issue is the identification of the Evangelist with John the Apostle; that is, whether the apostle is the same man as the evangelist.

Saint Aelred of Rievaulx referred to the relationship of Jesus and John as a "marriage".<5> The view that the two were lovers, considered a blasphemy, evolved during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries; it has been claimed that it was held by Francesco Calcagno, who was investigated on that account by the Venetian Inquisition in 1550. Christopher Marlowe was accused of it in 1593, as was Manuel Figueiredo in a Lisbon Inquisition trial of 1618, as well as many others.<6>


This was not a new idea, and da Vinci was not letting his sexual impulses dictate his theology. The Gospels testify to an intense intimacy between Jesus and John. The beloved apostle himself says that on the cross, Jesus tells his mother that John is now her son, and the non-canonical Secret Gospel of Mark portrays an explicitly sexual relationship between Jesus and John as well as between Jesus and other men. In contrast with much medieval and Renaissance art, da Vinci’s The Last Supper is, if anything, a modest portrayal of the relationship. Jacopo Bassano’s The Last Supper (1542), for instance, pictures a sleepy, seated, barely adolescent St. John who seems to be physically attached to the Jesus standing behind him. Late-15th-century Dutch painter Meister des Hausbuchs’s The Last Supper shows the beloved apostle’s head resting firmly and lovingly in Jesus’s lap.
http://thephoenix.com/article_ektid12613.aspx

Jagannath" interprets the Gospels differently. He argues that Jesus may have been bisexual. He wrote:



"In the Book of John a word is used eight times that means 'is in love with' with the implication of sexual intimacy. Five times it is used with reference to Jesus' relationship with John. Once it is used to define Jesus' relationship with Lazarus. And it is also used to describe his relationship with Mary and with her sister Martha." 7


During the crucifixion, in John 19:26-28, Jesus is described as seeing his mother and an unidentified man: "the disciple standing by, whom he loved." Again, Jesus probably loved all of his 12 or 70 disciples in a non-sexual manner. But this particular disciple is identified as "the" disciple who Jesus loved. That might indicate a special intimate relationship with one special disciple.

Mark 14:51-52 describes the incident when Jesus was arrested by the religious police. It describes how one of Jesus' followers was scantily dressed. The King James Version says he had a linen cloth cast on his naked body; the size and location of the cloth is not defined. The New International Version says that he was "wearing nothing but a linen garment."  When the police tried to seize him, they were able to grab only his cloth; the man ran away naked. Reverend Peter Murphy wrote: "We don't know from the sources what really was going on, but we do know that something was very peculiar between Jesus and young men." 11 (Emphasis in the original.)
Michael Kelly wrote of Jesus' attitude towards a same-sex couple as described in  Matthew 8:5-13: and Luke 7:2: "One day a Roman Centurion asked him to heal his dying servant. Scholars of both Scripture and Ancient History tell us that Roman Centurions, who were not permitted to marry while in service, regularly chose a favorite male slave to be their personal assistant and sexual servant. Such liaisons were common in the Greco-Roman world and it was not unusual for them to deepen into loving partnerships....Jesus offered to go to the servant, but the centurion asked him simply to speak a word of healing, since he was not worthy to welcome this itinerant Jewish teacher under his roof. Jesus responded by healing the servant and proclaiming that even in Israel he had never found faith like this! So, in the one Gospel story where Jesus encountered people sharing what we would call a 'gay relationship,' we see him simply concerned about — and deeply moved by — their faith and love." Kelly implies that Jesus' sensitivity towards the gay couple might have arisen from his own bisexual or homosexual orientation. 1
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jegay.htm

and some reading

Michael B. Kelly, "Could Jesus Have Been Gay?," at: http://kspark.kaist.ac.kr/
2. Peter Tatchell, "Was Jesus Gay?," at: http://www.petertatchell.net/
3. George Broadhead, "Jesus and Homosexuality," Gay and Lesbian Humanist quarterly, at: http://www.galha.freeserve.co.uk/
4. Patrick Goodenough, " 'Gay Jesus' Claim Draws Fire," Crosswalk.com, 2003-MAY-29, at: http://www.crosswalk.com/
5. Hank Hyena, "Was Jesus Gay: A search for the messiah's true sexuality leads to a snare of lusty theories," 1998-APR, Salon.com, at: http://www.salon.com/
6. James Holding, "Leaning on a broken reed," Tektonics Apologetics Ministries, at: http://www.tektonics.org/
7. Jagannath, "Was Jesus Gay? Or: Can We Finally Let Him Out of the Closet?," at: http://www.geocities.com/
8. J Richards, "Jesus Speaks of Homosexual Acts," Rainbow Alliance, at: http://rainbowallianceopenfaith.homestead.com/
9. "Jesus was gay, says academic," smh.com.au, 2003-MAY-29, at: http://www.smh.com.au/
10. "Was Jesus gay?," at: http://www.angelfire.com/ct/gayjesus/
11. Reverend Peter Murphy, "The Sexuality of Jesus?," at:  http://kspark.kaist.ac.kr/
12.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Thank you for your 'research' BUT....
I know all the different "Johns" in the New TEstament. I wanted you to tell me which one you were referring to.... Listing them all doesn't show to whom you meant.

{Before I go forward, I want to thank you! YOu've given me so much enjoyment in this discussion! Seriously! There's a lot of opinion out here in the ethers, and most folks make fun of Christians, and the Bible, but to really delve into the scripture, and to have a conversation of depth, it's great! And please don't think I'm beating up on you or your point of view... I support and love GLBT folks, and support gay clergy! but I don't like the bible being misused; we need more literacy! Besides, you might sense this.. I'm a teacher.}

All these quotes- although seemingly very adequate- are not mainstream scholarship, none of these are acceptable to real Biblical scholars.
You can find anything you want on the internet; These citations you quote (good for Google!) are agenda driven... all of these come from those who really want to find evidence thereof, and thus come up with odd claim that aren't really in the Bible. Some of this is the historical critical method. But most of this is anedotal, and someone's opinion, NOT actually in scripture. Did you consider looking in the Bible yourself to find those things which you claim?

If I might break a few things down:

First quotation: +++"John describes himself as "leaning on Jesus' bosom" during the Last Supper+++ (John 13:23);

This comment doesn't carry any truth. Scholars believe that the narrator of the gospel of John probably wasn't any John at all. Many surmise
the author of "John" could have been a woman! And the EXACT line for line from the RSV translation says: "One of his disciples- the one
whom Jesus loved- was reclining next to him..." (JOhn 13:23-
you picked the quote but I gave you the exact words from the Bible)
NO NAME is mentioned at all. I don't read JOHN at all.
IT says "the disciple whom Jesus loved"... and as I said before,
If you read John yourself (and not google someone else's opinion)
you'll see all it says is "the disciple whom Jesus loved." NO names.
Scholars ponder just who this was. Many say it was Lazarus...
some even say it was Mary. But no one comes out and says it was John. Except people who want it to be JOhn. And as to 'reclining..."
it doesn't mean anyone was in bed together. History tells us that
when Jews ate the Passover Meal(which is what the Last Supper was.. it was a Seder meal), they did not sit upright in chairs, but lounging, in the reclining position. No one is laying with another..

And this quote: +++" John describes himself as "leaning on Jesus' bosom" during the Last Supper"(John 13:23); later, when Jesus was bound
and taken to the high priest, John (who "was known unto the high priest") and Peter followed along (John 18:15). "+++
First of all, John doesn't describe 'himself'- the narrator in
John 18 :15 says this (this is the exact quote):+++"Simon Peter and another disciples followed Jesus, since that disciple was known to
the high priest, he went with Jesus into the courtyard of the high priest;"+++
I don't see the name John in that quotation from the gospel.
I see "another disciple." Could be John, but if it was, and if it
was so important, it would have said so. There is no evidence in scripture that John would have had been known to the High PRiest.
The only disciple who might have been known to the priest might have been Lazarus himself (read John chapter 13).

If you remember from my first post, I referred to various works of
art throughout history who portray a youth near Christ in paintings.
16th century paintings, like all artwork throughout the ages,
is the interpretation of the artist, and has little reflection of scripture: the artist wasn't there at the last supper!
Here is your quote to me, which agrees with me...
+++ "In art, the Beloved Disciple is portrayed as a beardless youth – the figure of the Student – but often mistaken for a woman. He is usually shown in major scenes from the Gospel of John, especially the crucifixion and the Last Supper. Many artists have given different interpretations of John 13:23–25, in which the beloved disciple is resting his head against Jesus' chest."+++
Did you read the words; "Different interpretations"?

Here's more tripe:
"The Gospels testify to an intense intimacy between Jesus and John." Uh? I don't think so. Have any of these commentators read the gospels? The disciple Jesus was the closest to was Peter!

Here's more questionable scholarship:
++"the non-canonical Secret Gospel of Mark portrays an explicitly sexual relationship between Jesus and John as well as between Jesus and other men. " ++++
Do you know what a "non-canonical gospel is'?
Non-canonical means it wasn't acceptable to the church because there's no way for it to jive with scholarship... there are many 'non-canonical gospels' in circulation (Like the controversial gospel of Thomas
which gives lots of juicy details about Jesus relationship with Mary!), many of them written just to gain notority, just like the 'National Inquiror' writes phony stories to get cash. Throughout history there have been many 'non-provable' stories on Jesus, and just about
everyone else. That's exactly what we find on the internet, lots
of fiction about things we can't prove, and because they don't
really use the Bible as their source, but use their own opinions,
we can't rely on their veracity.

Here is more conjecture, based NOT on scripture, but on an artwork:
+++" In contrast with much medieval and Renaissance art, da Vinci’s The Last Supper is, if anything, a modest portrayal of the relationship. Jacopo Bassano’s The Last Supper (1542), for instance, pictures a sleepy, seated, barely adolescent St. John who seems to be physically attached to the Jesus standing behind him. Late-15th-century Dutch painter Meister des Hausbuchs’s The Last Supper shows the beloved apostle’s head resting firmly and lovingly in Jesus’s lap."+++
These are not biblical truth, but artists' interpretations. I can't buy that as gospel. You've seen pictures of celebrities 'photo-shopped'
on the internet, to portray them in all kinds of unbelieveable situations. Do you believe them to be true also?

Here's another one I question:
+++"In the Book of John a word is used eight times that means 'is in love with'++ WHAT word does he mean? Tell me.
I've read the gospel of John in the language it was written, In Greek, and sorry, I don't know what Word he was referring to...
In Greek there are at least 6 words for love... unless someone is a specialist in koine Greek, its easy to get confused..

More with that quote
++ "with the implication of sexual intimacy. Five times it is used with reference to Jesus' relationship with John. Once it is used to define Jesus' relationship with Lazarus. And it is also used to describe his relationship with Mary and with her sister Martha." 7 "
What word does he mean? As I said, there are at least 6 words for 'love' in Koine Greek; I need more information to accept this.

Well, my lecture for today is over.
As I said, thank you so much! YOu made my day!
Now, go read the Bible! (LOL)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Thank you for the info.
The only Lutherans I was acquainted with were associated with the Missouri Synod, and they became rather conservative back some 30 years ago when they began purging moderates from their Concordia seminary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes, ELCA and Missouri Synod (and Wisconsin Synod) are miles apart
It's all pretty confusing, especially when the "E" in ELCA stands for "Evangelical," because ELCA churches are nothing like your typical "Evangelical" Christian church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'll admit that everytime I hear the word "Evangelical" I cringe
and it is all based upon my experiences with the Evangelicals such as James Dobson and others like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. Huge News!! A a giant step for social evolution!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC