Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contractors accused of firing on civilians, GIs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:10 AM
Original message
Contractors accused of firing on civilians, GIs
Source: MSNBC

There are now nearly as many private contractors in Iraq as there are U.S. soldiers — and a large percentage of them are private security guards equipped with automatic weapons, body armor, helicopters and bullet-proof trucks.

They operate with little or no supervision, accountable only to the firms employing them. And as the country has plummeted toward anarchy and civil war, this private army has been accused of indiscriminately firing at American and Iraqi troops, and of shooting to death an unknown number of Iraqi citizens who got too close to their heavily armed convoys.

Not one has faced charges or prosecution.


Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20231579/



That's great. Real nice to hear. Our soldiers getting killed by sub-contractors in Iraq. Very nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Blackwater
Edited on Sun Aug-12-07 11:18 AM by Turbineguy
looking to increase domestic work.

We shoot you over here so we won't have to shoot you over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. except in New Orleans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. If the Iraqi government was in control they could arrest, try and execute them
The Iraqi government should take control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not only that but don't these guys
get paid like close to six figures per year while our troops are paid minimally? Plus I am sure they have 401(k's), solid health insurance, etc.

What the hell is wrong with us? Maybe the Dems should be looking into this instead of screwing around some of the other projects they can't seem to get off the ground. I'd like to see what the yellow ribbon fucks think when they find out these chuckle-nuts are killing their beloved troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. no-----it would not be that way-------"they are exempt from prosecution by Iraqis for crimes committ
Murky set of rules
They operate in a decidedly gray legal area. Unlike soldiers, they are not bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Under a special provision secured by American-occupying forces, they are exempt from prosecution by Iraqis for crimes committed there.

The security firms insist their employees are governed by internal conduct rules and by use-of-force protocols established by the Coalition Provisional Authority, the U.S. occupation government that ruled Iraq for 14 months following the invasion.

But many soldiers on the ground — who earn in a year what private guards can earn in just one month — say their private counterparts should answer to a higher authority, just as they do. More than 60 U.S. soldiers in Iraq have been court-martialed on murder-related charges involving Iraqi citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. The Iraq government, were they in control, could make its own laws about anyone
who commits crimes within its borders and throw the self-serving foreign laws out.

(That's right I used the word "foreign" to describe the US, because in Iraq, the US is a foreign power.)

The security firms could, then, insist all they wanted that their rules supercede all of US and Iraqi laws, but that would be a dog that would not hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. yes, you are right (but that is a long way from happening)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Bremer gave mercs extraterritoriality for the duration of the conflict
That might have actually been the single dumbest thing done in the whole damn war, possibly even including the act of starting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Murky set of rules---read this:
Murky set of rules
They operate in a decidedly gray legal area. Unlike soldiers, they are not bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Under a special provision secured by American-occupying forces, they are exempt from prosecution by Iraqis for crimes committed there.

The security firms insist their employees are governed by internal conduct rules and by use-of-force protocols established by the Coalition Provisional Authority, the U.S. occupation government that ruled Iraq for 14 months following the invasion.

But many soldiers on the ground — who earn in a year what private guards can earn in just one month — say their private counterparts should answer to a higher authority, just as they do. More than 60 U.S. soldiers in Iraq have been court-martialed on murder-related charges involving Iraqi citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. My god
I didn't realize how scary these people are. I knew they didn't adhere to the same rules/laws, but didn't realize that had free-range of doing whatever the hell they want to.

This must end. Take the $4 billion and distribute to our soldiers for pay, armor and equipment, vet health care and mental health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. much of Iraq is still ruled under the Paul Brenner rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Security firms earn more than $4 billion in government contracts, but the
Security firms earn more than $4 billion in government contracts, but the government doesn’t know how many private soldiers it has hired, or where all of them are, according to the Government Accountability Office. And the companies are not required to report violent incidents involving their employees.

Security guards now constitute nearly 50 percent of all private contractors in Iraq — a number that has skyrocketed since the 2003 invasion, when then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said rebuilding Iraq was the top priority. But an unforeseen insurgency, and hundreds of terrorist attacks have pushed the country into chaos. Security is now Iraq’s greatest need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Security overruns in Iraq cost U.S. millions

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20231197/

Security overruns in Iraq cost U.S. millions

Contracts signed with British firms have mushroomed by $200 million
Related Stories

Updated: 10:30 p.m. CT Aug 11, 2007

BAGHDAD - The U.S. military has paid $548 million over the past three years to two British security firms that protect the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on reconstruction projects, more than $200 million over the original budget, according to previously undisclosed data that show how the cost of private security in Iraq has mushroomed.

The two companies, Aegis Defence Services and Erinys Iraq, signed their original Defense Department contracts in May 2004. By July of this year, the contracts supported a private force that had grown to about 2,000 employees serving the Corps of Engineers. The force is about the size of three military battalions.

U.S. officials and company representatives attributed the overruns to the cost of protecting a largely civilian workforce amid an escalating insurgency, as Corps of Engineers commanders demanded more manpower and increasingly expensive armor to guard their field staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Nearly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. Security overruns in Iraq cost U.S. millions

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20231197/

Security overruns in Iraq cost U.S. millions

Contracts signed with British firms have mushroomed by $200 million
Related Stories

Updated: 10:30 p.m. CT Aug 11, 2007

BAGHDAD - The U.S. military has paid $548 million over the past three years to two British security firms that protect the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on reconstruction projects, more than $200 million over the original budget, according to previously undisclosed data that show how the cost of private security in Iraq has mushroomed.

The two companies, Aegis Defence Services and Erinys Iraq, signed their original Defense Department contracts in May 2004. By July of this year, the contracts supported a private force that had grown to about 2,000 employees serving the Corps of Engineers. The force is about the size of three military battalions.

U.S. officials and company representatives attributed the overruns to the cost of protecting a largely civilian workforce amid an escalating insurgency, as Corps of Engineers commanders demanded more manpower and increasingly expensive armor to guard their field staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onewholaughsatfools Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. just maybe we just located the missing weapons
200,000 weapons unaccounted for, maybe we should look at the private contractors and ask, where did you weapons come from..........blessings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. Mad Max
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Pat Tillman anyone? I vote that these goons killed him.
And that's why the cover up.
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. The contractors are enemy combatants
and presumably one day Iraq will have them all banged up in their equivalent of Gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC