Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret spy court orders Bush to respond to request for information on secret ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:36 PM
Original message
Secret spy court orders Bush to respond to request for information on secret ruling
Edited on Fri Aug-17-07 03:39 PM by mikelgb
Source: Raw Story

In an unprecedented order, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ordered the Bush Administration to respond to a request it received last week by the American Civil Liberties Union for orders and legal papers discussing the scope of the government's authority to engage in the secret wiretapping of Americans, according to an ACLU press release late Friday.

The release follows.

...

According to the FISC’s order, the ACLU’s request “warrants further briefing,” and the government must respond to it by August 31. The court has said that any reply by the ACLU must be filed by September 14.

"Disclosure of these court orders and legal papers is essential to the ongoing debate about government surveillance," said Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU. "We desperately need greater transparency and public scrutiny. We're extremely encouraged by today's development because it means that, at long last, the government will be required to defend its contention that the orders should not be released."

Read more: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Secret_spy_court_orders_Bush_to_0817.html



wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Wow!" is right.
Wunner what it means... :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. And if * doesn't respond? What will they do then? Nothing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wouldn't be surprised to see the WH response being a
demand for an apology. Just call me a cynic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You gave me a little chuckle......a cynical chuckle! I wouldn't
doubt the WH might ask for an apology; they're arrogant enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdefalla Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. What will they do?
Sounds to me like the FISA court is saying, "We will release the information if we don't get a good reason from the White House". Of course, Bush is likely to play the "Executive Privilege" card and order the court to simply refuse to release the documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like this is the dump story of the night. Sounds to me FISC
Has a lot more threatening power and power to do things than we are aware of...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush to FISA Court: GFY.
And the Dems will give him a pass on this, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Big-Ass K & R eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. The ACLU made a motion.
The FISC is ordering the US government to respond to that motion. The "briefing" is to be done by the US government and the recipient will be the FISC (of course, it'll probably just be written). The best that the ACLU gets out of this--pending a resolution of the motion--is a copy of the US government's response to their motion. And that might be redacted.

The FISC could quite easily decide that the US government's yet-to-be-announced reasoning as to why no further information should be released is correct. It might decide that the US government's reasoning isn't correct, but that the ACLU's is. Or it may decide something completely different. But that's a DU post we'll be seeing, probably, in September.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. k + r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC