...a (probably) partial enough account, nonetheless true in its information, in
Time, Sarkozy's First 100 Days, in an article signed by By BRUCE CRUMLEY:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1655515,00.html"Polls also indicate French voters are aware the upcoming period will be less happy than during Sarkozy's first 100 days — and are adjusting their attitudes towards the president accordingly. After setting record highs for popularity during his 100 days, Sarkozy's approval ratings have now fallen five points in the space of a week. However, at 61%, Sarkozy's support remains comfortable — and largely derived from his public-pleasing reputation as an active and determined leader. Indeed, so many French voters say they had gotten so disgusted with the lack of movement and modernization under previous governments that they'd be willing to accept Sarkozy-led reform, even if they aren't initially happy about its content."The article considers also home affairs but what I had in mind was the series of accidents since the beginning of his Presidency.
Don't forget his start: it was the supposed censorship of the news about his wife not going to vote in the second turn. A trifle in itself, but a shadow as to the independence of French media - and you know Bayrou accused him to be a danger for democracy.
Then - and most important to me - the choice of his governing team.
Kouchner is a "big mouth". Yes, and worse. He has always made things his own way.
But France's foreign policy can't be performed by a "one man band" in a world like our own. We got one in Italy, Berlusconi, who caused repeated crisis with Muslim Countries and cultures because of his inopportune words - and Italy had always had historically good relations with Muslim countries. Imagine the damage done.
I think the Iraqi mission for France was a failure. First Iraq rejected France's plans, then accused Kouchner of meddling.
The American holiday and Sarko's "closeness" to the Bush's family - something less than formal that caused bad feelings in France - counterbalance a couple of diplomatic successes - at least in my opinion.
If he would be considered a US Democrat - I don't know. Probably, yes, you're right. A moderate one.
Just when US economists look with growing interest at the European and Japanese welfare system and when the US welfare system is mostly criticized for hitting the poorest...
Maybe the USA need a lightly leftist Dem President, not a moderate one, and an "I have a dream" manifesto to get started again after all these years of injustice. As to Kouchner, "comments I heard from Iraqis I talked to" - is a typical escape when you have to justify some way.
Again, Berlusconi's more common words in these cases is "I was misunderstood".When, obviously enough, he wasn't!
:hi: