Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terror groups 'raise funds through drugs'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:02 PM
Original message
Terror groups 'raise funds through drugs'
Source: The Australian

Terror groups 'raise funds through drugs'

From correspondents in Herzliya | September 10, 2007


NEARLY half of the 42 groups considered by the United States to be terror organisations fund their activities through drug trafficking, a top US official said in Israel today. The Drug Enforcement Administration's Michael Braun told a conference on The Global Impact of Terrorism, organised by the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism, that the DEA "linked 18 of the 42 officially designated Foreign Terrorist Organisations (FTO) to drug trafficking activities of some sort".

The DEA's assistant administrator, chief of operations, told delegates the phenomenon is due to the fact that state support for terrorism has receded, and that terror organisations - al-Qaeda in particular - have "shifted from a corporate structure to a franchise structure".

Mr Braun said nothing is more profitable than drugs in raising cash for such groups. The United Nations estimates that narcotics trafficking is worth $US322 billion ($388.96 billion) annually across the globe, and $US65 billion ($78.52 billion) alone in the United States, according to federal figures.

<snip>

"That's what the Taliban are doing now in Afghanistan," Mr Braun said. "They are taxing farmers, but we have indications that they started providing security. That's what happened to the FARC 15 years ago."



Read more: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22391495-12377,00.html



Mission accomplished!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is news?
Our government turned a blind eye to the Contras when they weren't raping women and killing humanitarian activists, decided to ship crack cocaine into the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
siri2k Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, the Taliban had *zero* poppy production. It's the Bush bin Laden....
drug cultivation and trade that's taking place in Afghanistan, and all over the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. ? "zero" ?
They had zero tolerance for unregulated heroin production. They controlled the poppy production with an iron fist when they came to power in 1995 until they were kicked out in 2001, which,in turn drove the price of heroin through the roof.
That price hike gave rise to meth lab pharmaceutical industry that thrives so well in the west today.

The Iranian poor are suffering the most from this boom time harvest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yeah, near zero at the time the West invaded. the Taliban had outlawed
poppy growing, and they enforced it Nationwide, except in the pockets controlled by the Northern Alliance, our allies.

what does a "meth lab" have to do with heroin?


http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jir/jir011022_3_n.shtml


By the way, almost all the heroin in the states is from Columbian poppies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. near zero "at the time of the invasion" yet the experts say
Afghanistan produces 90% of the world consumption .
from your articl link;
...traditional opium poppy cultivation grew significantly during the anti-Soviet war of 1979-89 and accelerated rapidly in the first half of the 1990s.

With an estimated 2,485ha under cultivation in 2000,

http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jir/jir011022_3_n.shtml

During the time of your Taliban buddies reign,they allowed small quantities that fetched high prices. They also received foreign aid to clamp down and dry up the drug trade.
So
They did dry up the poppy growth in non Taliban tribal regions.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I think you are confused. The Taliban didn't come to power until 1995.
Edited on Sun Sep-09-07 11:52 PM by John Q. Citizen
The US financially supported the anti-soviet fighters (and hence, the poppy trade) during the Soviet Period. After the Soviets withdrew, a civil war commenced. Once the Taliban took over control of almost all the country, they suppressed the cultivation of poppies. The part of the country the Taliban didn't control, in the far North East, was where the opium was coming from.

The 2485 figure is mainly from the North -East which wasn't under Taliban control.

It's not all that difficult to understand.

The Taliban in the late 90's suppressed Opium production where they had control. Where they didn't, it grew, as a source of money for arms for the Taliban resistance.

Why do you say the Taliban are my buddies? I think you are just an enemy of the facts. And you willingly distort the facts because.....????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. As per what JQC said
I think you'll find that the Taliban being religious fundamentalists had zero tolerance for all the fun things in life, including drugs (although I tend to agree with them in the case of heroin).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. lol
Some people need to do a little reading before they post.

Poppy production has increased exponentially, every single year, since the US invasion of Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. As you you said
Mission accomplished !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. and the fake Chinese viagra
sapping the confidence of the American journalists and Hummer drivers everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Drug war creates the profit incentive.
Edited on Sun Sep-09-07 04:58 PM by nebenaube
If everyone who wanted too; could grow their own weed. There would be no market for meth or coke or opium or it's derivitives. edit... and the CIA would probably go bankrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. there would still be a small market
Don't get me wrong, I try to grow my own in the woods every year. But you must admit that some folks are not happy with just weed, they want that knocked on their ass heroin high or some good speedy crack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. I Expect History Will Find the Bush Family Evil Empire Tops in This Field
both in terrorism and drug running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. dunno, he is behind a tough act previously in Afghanistan
Taliban treatment of women

While in power in Afghanistan, the Taliban became notorious internationally for their treatment of women. Their stated aim was to create "secure environments where the chasteness and dignity of women may once again be sacrosanct." The way women were treated was reportedly based on Pashtunwali beliefs about living in purdah.

Women were forced to wear the burqa in public, because, according to a Taliban spokesman, "the face of a woman is a source of corruption" for men not related to them.

snip




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban_treatment_of_women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Bush is responsible for the deaths of around 500,000 women in Iraq alone.
How many women are you claiming the Taliban was responsible for killing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Afghanistan was abandoned by Bush Sr.
Once the US had achieved the goal of driving the USSR out of Afghanistan in 1989, the CIA packed up and left.
Old Bush was President at the time.
His appalling, short-sighted stupidity left a power vacuum in Afghanistan.
Six years of chaos, lawlessness and war lord fighting ensued.
The Taliban, aided by a nervous Pakistan, took over in 1995 and, at first, were welcomed for restoring order.
The Taliban then went to the extremes in your photo, as well as many other outrages.

Why can't the Bush family do anything right?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Terror groups like the CIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. I thought a similar thing
every time I read this thread's headline. I kept seeing:

"Terror groups 'raise funds through oil'"



Your mentioning of the CIA also reminds of intelligence-agency privatization:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=1771746
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
askeptic Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is an attempt to link the drug war and global terror war
So that the war on terra can be used to incarcerate all under it's laws - don't need evidence, court orders - none of that "due process" crap...

...and those who openly advocate decriminalization or legalization are advocating for TERRA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Damn, I thought the justice dept.
Edited on Sun Sep-09-07 10:25 PM by ProudDad
was finally busted for creating and supporting the phony "war on drugs" to fund CIA dirty dealings.

Decriminalize, end the phony "war on drugs" and you'd find that annual "trafficking figure" cut by 2/3 overnight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. The pharmacutical industry has been funding Bush for years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. legalize
If most countries would just legalize the production, sale, possession, and use of these drugs their values would drop and "normal" businesses would take over the trade instead of criminal organizations. This is really the only solution because folks are not going to stop getting high any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. "Terror Groups Raise Funds Through [Drug Prohibition]"
That would be the more accurate title.

Yet another unintended consequence of the global drug prohibition regime.

Any Democratic candidates addressing ending drug prohibition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tchunter Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. GRAVEL!!
he supports ending the war on drugs, granted he's old and sometimes a little crazy he is a man who deserves much respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
22. Another case of projection: Bushies make most of their Black Ops $$$$ by pushing
Look at Contra-Cocaine, at the very least, and as the circle moves out in terms of "tinfoil", (i.e. lesser probablility of certainty) to things like the story of the introdutcion of crack to the African-American community, which has never even been investigated other than the first story that got the Full Spectrum Infoganda Dominance Bushie reaction that they reserve for truth-tellers who can't easily be discredited like Richard Clarke.

Projection here (not that it would surprise me if the CIA got their Black Ops $$$$ the same way terrorists raise their cash...what a METAPHOR!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. Sure, bad guys make money off illegal drugs.
Just like they did off of illegal alcohol during prohibition.

The US war on drugs is a huge money maker for bad guys around the world. However, too many people in seats of power are profiting from this for them to attempt a real solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. Well we know the Contras did - and the CIA let them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
28. Pot is the largest cash crop in how many US states? I forget. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes, and it's spelled..C...I...A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC