Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mortgage Lender's Bankruptcy May Threaten Thousands of Homeowners (American Home Mortgage)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:22 PM
Original message
Mortgage Lender's Bankruptcy May Threaten Thousands of Homeowners (American Home Mortgage)
Source: WSJ

Mortgage Lender's Bankruptcy May Threaten Thousands of Homeowners
By PEG BRICKLEY
September 12, 2007; Page A15


Thousands of homeowners face an "imminent risk" of losing their homes because of clashes between American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. and its former financial backers, according to Freddie Mac, a government-chartered housing financier.

In documents filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Del., Freddie Mac said it seized $7 million that homeowners sent to American Home to cover principal and interest payments, property taxes and insurance just before the company's Aug. 6 collapse. American Home quit making payments to tax authorities and insurance companies Aug. 24.

Freddie Mac said 4,547 loans valued at nearly $797 million are at stake. It said it doesn't have the loan files necessary to pay insurance premiums and property taxes on them, however. "Therefore, there is the imminent risk that borrowers' insurance policies may lapse for nonpayment, subjecting the borrowers to a risk of loss of their mortgaged properties," Freddie Mac said.

Property-tax bills will go unpaid, Freddie Mac said, "resulting in increased tax liabilities and possible tax-foreclosure sales." It added it needs a court order allowing it to seize American Home's loan files "to avoid these serious consequences stemming from AHM's inability to service the Freddie Mac mortgage loans." The wave of mortgage-lender bankruptcies in the past few months has disrupted loan-servicing arrangements and triggered court fights over who should get control of the files necessary to service the loans, court documents show.


Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118955540976824460.html?mod=loomia&loomia_si=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even with an impound account, homeowner is always responsible for keeping T&I current
An impound account is a crutch. Homeowners should take control of their finances and not trust a mortgage company to keep up with those critical payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's called an escrow account
and not all homeowners can manage their own escrow. You have to have at least 20% equity in your property before you are allowed to manage the escrow account; otherwise the mortgage company has control of it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Impound account is also a widely accepted term
http://www.citifinancial.com/glossary/defin/ImpoundAccount.htm

You have to have at least 20% equity in your property before you are allowed to manage the escrow account; otherwise the mortgage company has control of it.

It varies from lender to lender. I was able to shut mine off when my LTV ratio got below 90%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Point remains the same; you can't just do it because you want to
Never heard is called an impound account before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Many people who CAN get out of T&I escrow/impound don't do it
My point is that everyone who CAN take control of those things SHOULD do so at the earliest possible opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. Actually you can for an extra .25 hit to rate. That was
the policy of a lot of mortgage companies. Also, a lot of sub prime lenders didn't collect escrows at all, even when the LTV was 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. After a refinance in 1996...
...and we were just below 20% equity, so the bank set up escrow automatically: the refinancing BANK missed the summer tax payment during the refinance. It might have foreclosed our home had we not caught it...but then we didn't catch it until 1999! It was awful. Lots of penalties we should NOT have paid. A lawyer agreed that the bank was at fault, but said suing them would cost us more in attorney fees (than the penalties on the real estate) to prove our case. Yay. In retrospect, I should have sued and asked reimbursement for attorney fees. I didn't, and it's over now.

That said, the MINUTE we had enough equity, we pulled the taxes, insurance, etc., back. No way do I trust those people with my home. We pay it all ourselves and check the insurance plus the tax rolls for city and county every year to make sure we're paid up. No problems since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Impound is CA, AZ, OR, HI, WA
the term for everyone else is Escrow. (I can't remember what AK does)

Both mean to include tax and insurance (or just tax) in monthly payment and the lender or who is servicing the loan will make the monthly tax payment.

If you chose not to impound (or escrow).. then you are responsible for your monthly taxes.

Unfortuantely many lenders sell the "servicing" of their loans to other lenders or other service companies and these companies might or might not make your monthly tax payment so it is good to check and make sure they do. call your local county office.

* with the bankruptcies it would be good to make sure your lender is still in business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Homeowner is responsible for T&I even if there is an escrow (impound) account
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 01:25 PM by slackmaster
That is very clear in the fine print of every Deed of Trust I have had or read (we use those in CA rather than Mortgages). Even if the lender or servicer screws up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. I didn't know that
You have to have 20% equity?

I signed up for an escrow account when we bought the house because I figured it would be convenient. Now, every time I get a tax bill with the notation that it's been sent to my mortgage company, I wish I could pay it, instead, so I'd know it got paid. So far, the company has been fine. I actually like them much better than my first mortgage company.

I have Chase now, and I somehow doubt J. P. Morgan's outfit is going to go belly-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. Impounds/escrows = same thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. A lot of the time, an escrow account is required.
When I bought my first house with a VA loan, and 10% down it was required.

I feel sorry for those homeowners. They'll have to pay taxes and insurance twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, and many people keep those in place even when no longer required to do so
I feel sorry for those homeowners. They'll have to pay taxes and insurance twice.

They will be made whole in the long run, but they will be screwed for cash for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. T and I are sometimes required in mortgage payments...
particularly those that are guaranteed by the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. dramatic story
... for an article about mortgage lending.

Just days before American Home's bankruptcy filing, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae terminated the company's loan-servicing rights. They also sent representatives to collect loan files from American Home's servicing facility in Irving, Texas.

In court documents, American Home said Ginnie Mae representatives "stood in a line in front of the doors and sat on the stairs, preventing AHM Servicing employees from entering the office." Freddie Mac said American Home "had its security personnel escort the Freddie Mac representatives out."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. All hail Bush's 'ownership society'!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. well thats about two days spending in iraq.
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:31 PM by madrchsod
so we are fighting them over there so we can throw people out on the streets over here? is that what it`s all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. What happens when the holder of your mortgage goes belly up?
Say you are a homeowner with a mortgage, making payments on time, but then your mortgage holder goes out of business. What happens then? Are you home free on the loan, or do you still have to pay it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Typically your loan is sold to another company
And you have to start making payments to the new mortgagee under the terms of your note.

Read the fine print on your mortgage. It explains what is supposed to happen if the note is sold.

You do have to cover yourself. Sometimes errors by the lenders prevent you from getting proper notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. If you've been paying in a timely manner
meaning you've never been a day late, your paper will be bought by another lender. You'll just have to put a different name on the monthly check.

If you've got a spotty record, then you might be put into the position of looking for refinancing, yourself. You may simply be foreclosed.

If you're in an upsidedown position, owing more on the house than it is worth, you'll have to pay the difference up front in order to refinance.

There are going to be a lot of people declaring bankruptcy over this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Anyone with a mortgage will have to check every year
now to make sure the insurance and taxes have been paid out of the escrow account.

This sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Everyone SHOULD be checking anyway.
I pay mine to Countrywide every year, and they still missed one of my tax payments right after I refinanced. When the county finally sent me a notice the following year, I had to pay it myself...WITH PENALTIES...and pursue a refund from Countrywide. I got the tax money back, but they refused to refund the penalty amounts. I lost money because they f'd up.

When I went back and looked at my records, I noticed that my annual tax assessment fliers from the county had a small warning that the property had delinquent taxes. Since Countrywide was supposed to be paying the taxes for me, I never even bothered opening them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I was lucky
because my yearly notices came though marked "paid."

Now I own the place and pay it all myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why would people current on their payments face losing their homes?
Just because the mortgage company and Freddie Mac can't figure out how to apply their payments for insurance? This isn't the fault of the home owners, nor is it under their control. Why should they face any fallout?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Mortgages always require YOU to keep taxes and fire/flood insurance current
You have to keep an eye on the lender if you have your taxes and insurance impounded. Even if they screw it up, YOU can be in default if your insurance or taxes aren't current.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sounds like another SCAM foisted on those who are paying the bills.
The government seizes the payments, but then claims it can't forward those to the note-holders, in turn the note-holders go after the mortgage holders (homeowners) for failure to pay, and the best case scenario is the homeowners pay more in increased costs and for lost payments.

Therefore, the government seems complicit in a scam to foist responsibility of higher future costs to those who have been paying their bills, unless they take full financial responsibility. Perhaps it will all be wound down with a minimum of disruption, but that wouldn't be in accordance with Murphy's Laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. I get an annual statement detailing how the escrow was dispersed.
I'll take a very close look at it this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. how does one
check the liquidity of their mortgage company? this is making me nervous, even tho i've been current on my own mortgage (and no forseeable problems) for the last 11 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm with you Shanti.
I've been current for the last almost 6 years. Never, ever late and this is horrifying. I have my mortgage through Citigroup but any of these lenders are subject to go belly up. This is some scary shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. i heard that!
i used to have citicorp, but when i refinanced in 2004, it was sold to another lender, HomeQ. i also have an escrow account, and i like it because it's done automatically, which lowers the worry quotient....so far!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Try these
www.bauerfinancial.com

www.bankrate.com/brm/safesound/ss_home.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'm thinking of buying a home. Should I do it now? I'm scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. If I were you, I would rent. Wait to see what happens with the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. get a normal mortgage and have at least 20% down pmt. no reason to be scared
and don't buy more than you really afford, if anything buy less of a house than you can afford and don't forget to factor in monthly costs like utilities and upkeep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Yeah, if one can afford that route and can stay put for the long haul, it's probably a good idea.
The only other exception would be if you live in a rapidly imploding market like some parts of Florida and California (Stockton and parts of San Diego, for example.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. indeed, Elk Grove here and it's not a good time to be selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. How's your local market?
Around my home prices are in a freefall. Homes that sold for $500,000 a couple of years ago are now selling for around $350,000, and they are still dropping. If your area is the same, I'd watch the local numbers for a while before buying. Wait until prices level off and THEN buy.

I know that prices are a bit lower in Texas, but it would suck to spend, say, $200,000 on a nice house today, and have the house next door sell for $150,000 a year from now. If waiting a year or two might save you a substantial amount of money, it would be silly not to wait.

If you're in an area where the market is merely flat, or worse, where it's still climbing, you should buy immediately.

Overall, there is little danger for homeowners themselves in this crisis as long as you buy a house that you can actually AFFORD (no interest only ARM loans). I'm not even averse to 100% or 103% loans without a down payment, as long as it comes with a fixed interest rates and doesn't have any balloon payments attached.

Here's a suggestion for you from someone who has bought and sold a lot of properties over the years. Go to a lender and get preapproved for a home loan BEFORE you go house shopping. This used to be the standard way of doing things, but was largely forgotten when everything exploded. Find a loan with a rate and terms you like, and get preapproved for an amount with a payment you can afford (to to stay under 1/3 of your monthly income on the house payment). That will give you a solid ceiling on the amount of house you can buy, and ensure that you don't overspend.

Too many people overbought because they took a walk through some pretty model home and got excited when the salesman told them that "We can finance anybody!" They rushed into home ownership with whatever loan company their realtor or salesmen suggested, and never did the math on whether the homes were affordable in the longer term.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Can somebody explain to me these bankruptcies in simple, dumb-downed terms?
Why are mortage companies going out of business?

OK, lots of people are defaulting on their loans, I get that. But then the mortgage companies get to repossess and resell the houses.

OK, so the houses are being devalued, and the mortgage companies can sell them at the same price they bought them, I get that too. So the mortgage companies haven't got liquid assets. But shouldn't the principles and mortgage insurance and so on more than make up for it? Is this really the bad housing market, or is it really bad business practices coming back to haunt them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. And now specific British lenders have problems:
The Bank of England has agreed to give emergency financial support to the Northern Rock, one of the UK's largest mortgage lenders, the BBC has learned.

However this does not mean that the bank is in danger of going bust, Business Editor Robert Peston says.
...
The firm's shares have almost halved in value this year and talk that it may be in further trouble left it as the biggest loser on the FTSE 100 on Thursday, closing down 4.9%.

Northern Rock has loans and other assets on its balance sheet of £113bn. The value of deposits placed with it by retail customers is £24bn.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6994099.stm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. I'll tell you what...
If we lose our home because of a tax-lien foreclosure because my escrow is lost due bankruptcy from predatory subprime mortgage lending, I can GUARANTEE you that I will not leave on my own accord.

I'd be willing to bet that I am not the ONLY one either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC