Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O.J. SIMPSON OFFICIALLY CHARGED WITH ROBBERY, ASSAULT AND KIDNAPPING

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:24 PM
Original message
O.J. SIMPSON OFFICIALLY CHARGED WITH ROBBERY, ASSAULT AND KIDNAPPING
Source: ABC news

O.J. SIMPSON CHARGED WITH 10 FELONY COUNTS INCLUDING ROBBERY, ASSAULT AND KIDNAPPING. CLICK HERE TO READ THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED BY THE NEV. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/?CMP=EMC-1396
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. And this helps the country how???
I am so sick of OJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. so exactly why would you click onto this topic and enter a reply
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
102. I click it! to check out the absurdity of the O.J. circus crowd.
I'm very very tired of hearing about this murderous freak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Then use the "Hide Thread" option.
I'll never understand people that post into Threads saying "Why are we talking about this?".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Don't forget those who post
to say "what a waste of bandwidth"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. by getting an angry violent
person off the street...

also if you're sick of O.J. WHY didn't you skip this thread??? I get sick of lot's of subjects I see again and again in the DU...I don't open them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Oh, I don't know, maybe GETTING A KILLER OFF THE STREETS? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Didn't some of you understand the verdict ...

I still can't get over how soooo many "Liberals" and/or "Progressives" are soooo willing to discount the verdict of a system that cannot not be described as racially unbiased and substitute their own uninformed judgement.

The jury said NOT GUILTY folks ... get over it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. The verdict was wrong.
Just like this war/occupation in Iraq is wrong. But I guess we should just get over that too. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. I think that verdict was the result of bad prosecution and police work
as well as the fame effect.

Makes me wonder how he will get a fair trial this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allisonthegreat Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. Well crap he was still the killer...
Nobody else was found...duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Nobody else was found
but OJ is still looking for the murderer on golf courses all around the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #62
79. Not now he's not! He's buggered!
Figuratively speaking of course...:sarcasm:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070919/ap_on_re_us/o_j__simpson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allisonthegreat Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #62
99. i can't believe they set bail if these are such
serious charges!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #99
111. Well, that's what they usually do. Set bail.
Even those accused of murder can get out on bail a lot of times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yava Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. no comment!
Charges against Marine in Haditha case dropped Updated at 1:29 AM

Source: AFP

<snip>

"A Marine Corps officer accused of failing to properly investigate the alleged massacre of 24 Iraqi civilians in the town of Haditha has been cleared of wrongdoing, the military said Tuesday.

A statement released from the Marines Camp Pendleton base in southern California said all charges against Captain Lucas McConnell stemming from the Haditha investigation had been dropped.

The charges against McConnell had been dropped following a ruling by Lieutenant-General James Mattis, commander of the US Marine Corps Forces, who was last week named by the Pentagon as head of the US Joint Forces Command.

"(Mattis) determined that administrative measures are the appropriate response for any errors or omissions allegedly committed by McConnell," the statement said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. So how come the police stopped looking for the "real killer"
after the case was over. If he was truly innocent, don't you think they might have kept at it? Oh, the police and prosecution screwed up plenty but I haven't ever seen anyone come up with another credible suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
61. Not to mention the wrongful death suit
The one OJ lost shortly after the trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #48
117. There was no killer, besides O.J.
Everyone knows it. It wasn't prosecuted badly, they had enough evidence to convict ten men. A mountain of evidence. The jury wasn't going to convict, it is simple. No matter what.

I hope they get him this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
60. Because the prosecution couldn't find their ass with both hands behind their backs
Honestly the people who handled that case could have nailed him without the evidence that the racist cop handled if they knew what the fuck they were doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal renegade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. Exactly!
The defense created reasonable doubt and the jury as instructed, could not find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

No, it doesnt mean he's innocent but the prosecution fucked up....


BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT! It protects all of us......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
72. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
78. No one needs to "get over it"
but we reserve the right as supposedly free Americans to think what we want. The same goes for you. If you want to believe there's some dastardly Nicole murderer out there besides the Juice, you are entitled. As far as I'm concerned, he is innocent until proven guilty on this one and if found guilty, he should do time. Karma and revenge I imagine are best served cold as they say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
80. Well, the jury in the civil case thought otherwise - a preponderance of the evidence showed that OJ
murdered two people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #33
87. Uh huh. So why isn't he still in the movies?
And what was the result of the CIVIL trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
106. I still can't get over how many people don't understand that Not Gulity is NOT the same as...
INNOCENT...

Big, BIG, FRIGGIN' HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE difference...

OJ did it and almost got away with it....

Nothing to get over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. "And this helps the country how?" Well, getting a murderer off the streets is a good place to start!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Oh, you won't have O.J. to kick around much longer. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainMama Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. As I've said.....
ever since the whole double murder went down and I realized he did it......any day O.J. Simpson is in jail is a good day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. Maybe now he'll finally be sent away for SOMETHING.
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 06:54 PM by Dulcinea
Even if it should have happened in 1995.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. I wonder how many potential jurors might find him guilty just to send him away
Which he so richly deserves. I know you are not supposed to consider anything other than the case at hand but how easy is that to do?

Believe me I am not losing sleep over whether or not he gets a fair trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
86. So he can do whatever he pleases because of your short attention span?
What exactly are you objecting to? The celebrity news coverage? The arrest itself?

As for your remarks, they help this country how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
93. Because he's a criminal, and we're supposed to enforce the law.
Glad to see you don't care about crime. You remind me of the lady who said, during the Clarence Thomas hearings, that she wished they would all shut up so she could go back to watching her soap operas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
94. Maybe it brings hope to some of us who want to believe that
people eventually get what they deserve, even if the system itself fails us when we expect it to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
103. self delete
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 01:40 PM by barb162
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
104. It helps by getting criminals off the streets.
The country needs violent criminals on the streets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow
Like the kidnapping after hearing the tapes. They were definitely being held there by force. May his arrogance be his downfall. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let me guess:
He will be given forty-eight hours to turn himself in, and he still has Al Cowlings on his speed dial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought kidnapping was the wrong charge; I thought it was some term of art that means
you're not free to do what you want (meaning no one was allowed to leave the room)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Maybe "unlawful detention"?
That term is usually used in conjunction with the police and Wal-Mart security when they're stealing babies, but it may also apply to citizens detaining other citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. False Imprisonment, but that's a non-violent felony. This involved force/threat of force.
That's kidnapping or taking hostages. In Nevada, it's apparently kidnapping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
113. I believe legally kidnapping could just be preventing someone
from going somewhere if they want to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. But now he won't be able to find his wife's real killer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Perhaps he will find the real killer in the prison system...
if he has a mirror in his cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. It's all part of his plan
He can hunt them in there so he won't have to hunt them out here. Oh wait. :blush: I think I'm confusing my media events. Never mind. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Lol!
Good one!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did you see the film of the people holding the "Free OJ" sign written
on a sheet? It's already beginning.:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. heh, if I was there I would do that..
Just for the reactions... Yeah, I know it's messed up, but trolling the internet isn't fun any more. It's time to troll the world. :P

*no, I don't troll DU because I know it's not tolerated here... well, at least to the extreme. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. O.J. is an idiot
and he is getting his just desserts. I hope they lock him up for ten years at least. Ten years is a long time!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, 10 years or longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. He could get ten years on just one of those charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Yeah, but there is always the plea bargain
and time off for good behavior,bla bla bla...I want him behind bars for ten years!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. NOT GUILTY. HA !!!!
Do you realize how many people wouldn't have jobs in broadcasting if O. J. had been convicted. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. O.J. is an old guy and he will be definitely elderly when
he gets out of the slammer. But as my grandfather said in referring to some of his contemporaries, "There's no fool like an old fool!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Glad to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh dear. He's gonna have more than a little trouble with a Vegas jury, I suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. bwahahahahaha!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. CALL CONGRESS!! RIGHT F#*&ING NOW!!!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
96. And Wendy's HQ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PianoBlack Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, it is certanly ironic...
That he got away with killing his wife, but he is now going to go go jail for the rest of his life for stealing memorabilia that was probably seized and sold after he killed his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Oj was my sports hero many, many years ago and I'm not a sport's person.
Tsk tsk!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #26
83. Yes, he was a great football player
Not so good person. To say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I think it's cocaine
from what I understand, coke makes you do crazy stuff like that. Even with the wrongful death conviction, he still had a comfortable life. but they always want MORE.....MORE....MORE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #28
84. I think it was coke too.
O.J. seem like a pretty good guy when he was playing in the NFL. I think he got involved with the Hollywood scene and started taking drugs and well, we know the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Hey, the way the Feds finally got Al Capone was for Tax Evasion!
And, I'm sure it was an innocent omission, but O.J. killed TWO people -
his wife and Ron Goldman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PianoBlack Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Oh!
I forgot to add him in my rant. I'm sorry X_X; I am rather forgetful sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
74. I personally don't see the irony there.
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 09:53 PM by lizzy
Right now he is accused of a totally different but serious crime.
And he is not accused of stealing, he is accused of robbery. Different things. Stealing (theft, larceny), in my understanding, would be someone taking things when the owner was not present, for instance. Robbery is a different crime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PianoBlack Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #74
95. It's more the idea that...
He is under arrest for robbing a man of the same type of memorabilia he would NOT have lost if he had not killed His wife and Ron Goldman. I wouldn't doubt if it was some of the same pieces of memorabilia.

It's like a guy walks into a bank and robs it and is picked up 4 months later for a speeding ticket in the new car be bought with the money he got from robbing the bank and then was found to be in connection to the other crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kidnapping? Who does O.J. think he is, an employee of Circuit City?!
They should've shown their receipts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. Some are saying that he was setup because the whole incident is recorded
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 05:44 PM by eagler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Doesn't make him any less guilty. And if one is INCLINED to commit a crime, it isn't entrapment.
O.J. was inclined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Was he inclined to commit a crime - after all he was found innocent (choke)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. oh not, not framed again. Probably by Mark Furman.
If the sports jersey doesn't fit, you must acquit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
65. It does seem like OJ gained some weight since his last mug shot.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. So will the cable news networks stop talking it about 24/7?
I mean, I have no problems with them reporting on it here and there, but why must they constantly talk about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
40. zomg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. Sounds like the perfect setup
White People Leave OJ Alone!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op6lTQdyacE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
52. Does anyone else think that OJ has tried to bring himself to some justice --- ???? I do!!
How could he be living with his conscience . . . I think it was obvious that he had been trying to tell Rose Grier the truth -- as overheard by a prison guard -- and that it is impossible for him to live with what he did.

At least, perhaps that would speak for something of this human being being left.

Also think the recent book was another attempt to try to tell the truth.

Who could stand living with this truth of what he did?

His lawyers kept him pumped up with drugs during the trial -- how else to keep such awful secrets???

"If the gloves don't fit, you have to acquit."

Except, the gloves did fit.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. O.J. is a sociopath, and a sociopath does not have a conscience. Although you may like to
think that he agonizes over things he's done (e.g. killing two human beings, for starters), he
does not experience those emotions and, therefore, does not have any remorse whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
67. No, like many sociopaths, Simpson is going to be done in by hubris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #67
90. How is OJ like a republican?
No, like many sociopaths, Simpson is going to be done in by hubris

Eventually, their greed and arrogance bring them down, which if you subscribe to current congressional Dem philosophy, one need do nothing.

Did anyone see Dan Abrams the day after this happened? He posited that OJ put the sports memorabilia in the custody of these guys to keep them from the Goldman's warrant. He was trying to cheat the Goldmans out of what is their due, as determined by a U.S. court.

Then the crooks didn't want to give it back and you know the rest.



Cher


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
53. One of his alleged victims has suffered a heart attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Probably all those zeros on his paycheck from TMZ sent him reeling
Puh-leez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Hah? I don't think that is the alleged victim that was talking with
TMZ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
54. There is absolutely NO reason to use ALL caps
PLEASE refrain unless making a point with specific word(s) as shown in the subject section.

If the source uses all caps then either find another source or use your word processor to convert to sentence caps.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
55. Ridiculous
Prosecutor over-charging as per usual.

Yeah, the guy killed his Nicole and Ron Goldman, but this is a separate incident. Smells like a prosecutor trying to advance politically. People on DU supporting this nonsense should be ashamed of themselves. You don't get a fake mulligan, and it certainly doesn't equal "justice." Justice requires strict adherence to procedure, not fucking metaphors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Whatever gives you the idea this DA isn't adhering to
procedure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. Keep something in mind
That for the charges to stick the indictment has to be upheld, and to do that the DA had to convince a judge (I think Nevada is not a Grand Jury state) that there was merit to the charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
68. Well, if a non-OJ did it then they would get similar treatment from the law...
they just wouldn't get the same media attention... which sucks, I'm already tired of hearing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
66. The postman does always ring twice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
69. .
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 09:30 PM by BrightKnight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. No, he is not being charged with spitting on the sidewalk.
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 09:31 PM by lizzy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. sorry
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 09:47 PM by BrightKnight
I deleted the message before I realized that someone replied. I would put it back but I don't remember exactly what I said.

The gist of it was that I care that he actually did everything that they say he did. I don't want to see them go after him with everything they have because they want to get him for being wrongfully acquitted.

Other than that I don't give a damn about Mr. Simpson's legal problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
75. I want to know who the hell rec'd this thread
Why is this BS news?

I swear Fox must pay OJ to pop up every once in a while to do/say something stupid.

And before the lynch mob comes after my ass: Jesus on a trailer hitch, I don't defend OJ. I think he did it and got away with it because the LAPD is one of the most racist (and incompetent) orgs in existence. I'm just questioning the blind, incoherent rage people get into when someone so much as utters the man's name. I question why there isn't the same level of national outrage at Robert Blake, Phil Spector.

There was a fascinating documentary on HBO called OJ: In Black and White (or something to the effect) that was even-handed and focused on how people reacted to it, and I think everyone (whether you think he did it or not) should watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #75
97. But did Blake and Spector play the...uh...little short freak card?
I think O.J.'s "I'm being persecuted because of my race" defense angered many (both black and white)
Wow, O.J...you ARE just like the Scottsboro Boys!
For the record:
I certainly agree with you about both the racism and incompetence of the LAPD
Both Blake and Spector are also guilty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #97
101. This "race card" BS gets me
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 01:18 PM by Chovexani
His defense did what every smart defense would have done given the situation, and it worked. Was it right? No, it wasn't, but smart is not always the same as morally justified. OJ's so fucking stupid I'm not sure why they felt the need to tamper with evidence, all they needed to do was bide their time and he'd have folded like a card table. (I tend to think OJ put a hit out on her, which explains why it looked gangland style, but that's neither here nor there) Yes, OJ got away with murder. Yes, it's outrageous. Welcome to life as a black American, where the justice system is inherently broken and you will never see justice done for anything.

I think the OJ case was good for one thing, and that was exposing the absolute racial dysfunction in this country for the world to see. OJ was a "safe" black man, prior to that chase on the freeway. His public image was clean-cut, "all-American", non-threatening. He was a dumb jock that didn't really challenge anyone's racial perceptions; you'd never catch OJ at civil rights march with Al Sharpton or speaking out like Cosby. He was the kind of black person white America could get behind because he was no threat to the status quo. Then he killed a white woman and her boyfriend. I really am not trying to excuse his crimes...the man is a wife-beating, woman hating sociopath and bully who belongs in jail. But I am fascinated by the reaction to what he did. His was a heinous crime, but so was what Spector did, and the evidence is damning. The fame thing isn't even really as big a factor as people make it out to be, OJ was a D-lister at best and if he hadn't committed murder he'd likely be on the Surreal Life or Dancing With the Stars or some other workfare program for pseudo-celebs. (Too bad reality shows weren't big back then, it might have kept his dumb ass off the streets and out of trouble)

I've said it once, I'll say it a million times: if OJ had killed a black woman, no one would give a shit. How many people gave a shit when it came out that Mike Tyson was beating on Robin Givens? Or that poor black woman who was beaten, raped and tortured by those crazy hillbillies in West Virginia?

I just...god as soon as I saw this, I was reminded of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAVI16FSjxU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. But it also revealed the hypocrisy of Mr Simpson...
as you point out, OJ was a "safe one" A role that he wholeheartedly embraced. Why he just loved Mr Charlie and saw nothing wrong with Mr Charlie's system. Until...it was oh so convenient to deplore Mr Charlie's system and how it had been keeping him down all of his life.
OJ did not put out a professional hit on her nor did he wield the knive. Let's just say that while OJ was indeed a terrible ex-husband, he has proven to be a VERY protective father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal renegade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
76. Something is awful fishy...
Thomas Riccio is a 4 time convicted felon with an agenda...Don't be surprised if OJ walks right out the door.....


I don't care for the sorry SOB and like most of us I'm certain he did murder 2 people, however, blame his freedom on 2 very stupid prosecutors......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. I don't think being set up is good legal defense.
After all, even if someone is encouraged to commit an alleged crime, how is that an excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
81. He's got to be a crackhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel2008 Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
82. Too bad for O.J. that Cochran bought the farm!
Maybe now he'll finally be locked up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #82
88. There's always this guy...


Sure, he didn't get Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer off, but you win some, you lose some.

"OJ a kidnapper? Outrageous, Egregious, Preposterous!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
85. As if they'll ever find an unprejudiced jury. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #85
91. O.J. didn't have an unbiased jury the first time either
He just had one that was biased on his side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #91
107. (and that's precisely how the prosecution wanted it: ...
the prosecution's case against OJ was never meant to be won.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #107
110. And why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #110
115. Did you follow the prelim hearing and/or trials?
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 03:27 AM by tiptoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrokenBeyondRepair Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
89. meh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
92. Hooray!
:party:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyj999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
98. I Believe Once Again He Will Walk
It may take a while but that is what I believe. I would like nothing better for karma to be biting him in the butt but I just don't think it will happen.:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #98
100. Well if the jury is a bunch of star-struck idiots and the prosecution is inept like last time
It's possible that O.J. could beat the rap. However, I think the prosecution will use the last trial as cautionary example to make sure they have all t's crossed and i's dotted before presenting their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #98
112. I guess we will have to wait and see. But it seems to be
very difficult to convict a celebrity, so, I would say, the chances are probably pretty good he won't be convicted. But then again, you never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
108. OJ's okay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
109. Some people are claiming "celebrity injustice"
when he was originally held without bail (now changed to be established at $125,000)

They forget the last time he was given the "courtesy" of having a day to turn himself in, he grabbed a gun and "ran" for it (in the slow Bronco chase). He's established himself as a flight risk. Why the bail, and why the objection to "no bail"? Because he's so frickin' famous he can't hide?

They should put his ass behind bars. I'm not sure this particular offense (although I'd like to see him pay for the previous, yet "unofficial" one) qualifies for life imprisonment, but he needs to spend some time in the cooler.

15 years might not be a bad idea, and he's what - 60 now?

Works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pesky_Hound Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
114. Looks like it is going to be a long time until trial
I hope that this story goes away somewhat. But, I think we are going to hear about this until the day OJ is sentenced. That being said, I don't think the failure to prosecute should bear any weight in the case that is now before us. It isn't a non-issue, but it is a separate issue, and OJ looks as guilty as charged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #114
118. I have some faith that this will disappear somewhat until we get closer to a trial
Yeah, it's O.J., but what's the angle on this case beyond robbery?

With the Goldman/Brown case there was tons of evidence to discuss, spousal abuse, and the general over-the-top violence of the murder.

There's just no "OMG" factor to this case. Even with it being O.J., how much air time can you spend analyzing an audio tape for evidence? There are no witnesses beyond the principals and I have a feeling that none of them will be telling their stories on TV since they all have somewhat shady pasts themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
116. It's such a relief to know that people here don't pay attention to non stories like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC