Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rather Files $70 Million Lawsuit Against CBS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
SecularMotion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:37 PM
Original message
Rather Files $70 Million Lawsuit Against CBS
Source: NY Times

Dan Rather, whose career at CBS News ground to an inglorious end 15 months ago over his role in an unsubstantiated report questioning President Bush’s Vietnam-era National Guard service, filed a $70 million lawsuit this afternoon against the network, its corporate parent and three of his former superiors.

Mr. Rather, 75, asserts that the network violated his contract by giving him insufficient airtime on “60 Minutes” after forcing him to step down as anchor of the “CBS Evening News” in March 2005. He also contends that the network committed fraud by commissioning a “biased” and incomplete investigation of the flawed Guard broadcast and, in the process, “seriously damaged his reputation.” As plaintiffs, the suit names CBS and its chief executive, Leslie Moonves; Viacom and its chief executive, Sumner Redstone; and Andrew Heyward, the former president of CBS News.

In the suit, filed this afternoon in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, Mr. Rather charges that CBS and its executives made him “a scapegoat” in an attempt “to pacify the White House,” though the formal complaint presents virtually no direct evidence to that effect. To buttress this claim, Mr. Rather quotes the executive who oversaw his regular segment on CBS Radio, telling Mr. Rather in November 2004 that he was losing that slot, effective immediately, because of “pressure from ‘the right wing.’ ”

He also continues to take vehement issue with the appointment by CBS of Richard Thornburgh, an attorney general in the administration of the elder President Bush, as one of the two outside panelists given the job of reviewing how the disputed broadcast had been prepared.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/business/media/19cnd-rather.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1190226880-ou+TDELicQBcfWAyZjv0pQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well done, Mr. Rather. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. It's not enough money.
Should have been $100 million at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetalCanuck Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
59. I wish we could ALL sue the media companies for lying to us.
That would straighten the "news" out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. Welcome to DU MetalCanuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetalCanuck Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Thank you:) You will hopefully see more of me!
I will be gone for about a week tomorrow. But then I will be
all over the place on topics. I am a centrist with liberal
social views and conservative fiscal views. I hope to bring
something new to the conversation here:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #66
79. Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #59
83. I doubt it. ...
Back in 1998, 2 Fox TV reporters in Florida (Tampa Affiliate) sued Fox
network for firing them after they refused to broadcast false reports
about Monsanto's controversial genetically engineered Bovine Growth
Hormone (rBGH or rBST).

It made it all the way to the Florida Supreme Court, which ruled,
unbelievably, that Fox network does not have to broadcast true stories.

David Boylan, station manager, was blunt in demanding that the reporters
tell the story about rBGH the way Monsanto wanted it told.
"We (the Fox TV network) paid $3 billion for these television stations.
We will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you it is."

So the reporters, lost their jobs and their case.

http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/fox.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #83
138. Dan Rather knows exactly what he is doing
The only thing that suprises me is how long it took Dan to start the suit, it not to hard to figure out, the right wing has been after Dan, since Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #138
142. It probably took this long to get the CONCLUSIVE evidence - but he must have it
or he wouldn't be doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #83
152. another link for that unbelievable story
"We (the Fox TV network) paid $3 billion for these television stations.
We will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you it is."


http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1426
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #83
163. The fruit of a packed court,
that just keeps on giving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherDreamWeaver Donating Member (917 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #163
168. Amen
So, now how to 'lovingly' serve up the 'fruit' of 'the people unite',

that there may be "Dancing in the Streets!"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #163
177. What really annoys me is that ...
the FCC is suppose to work for us.
They grant licenses to corporations to use OUR airwaves.
They should be obligated to use them for the public good.
If they are caught lying, they should be fined.
Get caught lying too many times (subjective or even an objective
number) you lose your license.

The Florida Supreme court can make any ruling they want, but the
FCC should have stepped in, and defended the publics right to
truth in broadcasting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #59
112. The "media" has a constitutionally protected right to LIE to us all.
Read this: http://consumerist.com/consumer/bgh/fox-news-reporters-fired-for-being-too-tough-on-monsanto-milk-197496.php But I very seriously doubt that CBS will use that in their defense!

Compared to many of his more courageous predecessors, Dan Rather seems like a moral midget. But compared to all those other Talking Rectums, ............................ Go Dan, GO!!

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #59
186. Welcome to DU!
Well, pretty much all we've got at the moment for truth-telling and debunking the Press Corpse lies are Media Matters and Keith Olbermann, and occasionally a very tiny mouse peep from Editor & Publisher. And various corners of the blogosphere and such refreshing oasis spots as this one here. That's about IT.

Glad you're here! We can use all the help we can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
130. I hope a jury asks for CBS's worth and hands Dan the keys.
And then adds more for the owners' personal wealth aside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. Amen - go for it, Dan. Cuz you're going for the WH and the complicit,
obedient ceo's at CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
71. YES !!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't wipe the smile off my face.
Am I wrong or is this not brilliant timing. Puts the AWOL story back in the news at a very inconvenient time for Jr. and now his little freepaholic friends who uncovered the 'typeface' debunk don't like little Lord Bushyboy anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. that's a happy thought too--especially after Bush telling mil bloggers he wished he was in Iraq
in the action.

Bush would piss himself if he was there and somebody slammed a car door too hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
120. I clearly recall a story from the time of the 2000 election about why Bush lost flying status.


IIRC, it said that he was removed from flight status because he had crashed two F102s on landing. The Air Force, even the Air National Guard, don't like losing costly airplanes. The crash investigation report said that he was clearly afraid of flying and should not be in command of fighter aircraft in the future.

IMO, the story about his missing his flight physical was nothing but a cover for this. What, a President of the US and Air Force pilot officer who was afraid of flying? How embarrassing! But it certainly fits with the rest of the story of his life, the pampered frat boy who never succeeded in anything he started.

I'm embarrassed that this village idiot was appointed to office. I blame the Extreme Court for all our problems now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #120
164. Interesting tale . . . .
Vague recollection about one crash, but not the comments --
Think you're right about the missing flight physical as cover up.
I presume that Rather knows all of this . . . !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherDreamWeaver Donating Member (917 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #120
170. I heard some guy got his records
back before they were scrubbed. I saw copies on a link. The guy was offering a $1000 to anyone who could report he showed up in Alabama or wherever it was he went campaigning.

Hadn't heard the crash stories before though..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
58. My first thoughts.
This might lead to some interesting places. I am envisioning a renewed investigation with airtime. And in fact, maybe even impeachment? Am I dreaming???


Suddenly I'm realizing how this is kind of like the OJ thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
191. Discovery's a bitch.
If the defendant has something to hide, or (in this case) if an ancillary party has heretofore undocumented dirt.

Let the games begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. "I'd like to go to Iraq and fight but I'm too old." he quipped
Time to eat Crow joe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #60
150. Too chickenhawkshit is what
he's thinking..so he says he's too old. bush just lies to get the soldiers to go to their deaths and he sits back and rides his tricycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #150
165. But . . . the thing is he says this stuff with such confidence that press won't challenge him -- !!
And -- he's right!!! They won't --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #165
180. Trembling little fools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
185. Really? You mean Fuckhead - oops, I mean "buckhead" - finally
saw the light?

That'll be the day.

Anyway, I'm not sure anything will come of this - as far as him winning (fraid I'm a little cynical by now), and I wish he would have pursued this sooner. But I'm with him ALL THE WAY. I love Dan Rather. He's been a thorn in the side of the bad guys for decades. They were gunning for him FOREVER, and wound up fouling him on a technicality (kinda like they did with Clinton, oddly enough). I've been a fan of Gunga Dan's for a long, long time. I hope TO GOD he wins his case. It truly would be justice, of the first order. Dan Rather got ROYALLY screwed. And the sad part is, typefaces or no, the secretary who typed the memo was on the air, interviewed by Rather, and confirming that while that piece of paper might not have been the ACTUAL paper of the memo, what was written on it was what she had once typed. And of course, THAT little fact got completely swallowed up by the shrieking and roaring.

Makes me wonder - WHY THE HELL CAN'T WE SHRIEK AND ROAR AND KICK UP A HISSYFIT??? Why do OUR people always have to be so "above it all" - taking the so-called "high road" all the time? The quiet, understated "above it all" doesn't get you anywhere anymore. Just look at what happened to John Kerry. It's the fussy, cranky babies who get the attention and score the points. Which is why I'm glad MoveOn.org spoke up about David Petraeus, and why they're STILL hitting back as rudy tries to pile on. That's what we ALL have to do. HIT BACK. AND HIT BACK HARD.

Keep fighting, Dan. We're with you. We always were. Because you told the truth in that report, and in everything else you ever covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. CBS should be ashamed of how they treated Mr. Rather & they should lose the suit. n/t
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 01:42 PM by CottonBear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Give Me a D. give Me an A. Give me an N_N_N.
GO DAN. Or would you Rather your news be screened by hannity and limbaugh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
187. D!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
188. A!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
189. N! N! N!
GO DAN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe this'll get some of the NG coverup on the table
Maybe even get the boy king on the witness stand to answer some questions about what really went on. A perfect "perjury trap".

Nah, I realize that won't happen but all this stuff will get talked about again and since it's Rather suing, it will probably get some coverage in the corporate media.

Just the kind of publicity the chimp doesn't need right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. But this time around, we'll have KO to keep the story alive.
In fact, many news types should fight to keep this in the forefront, as they could just as easily have been caught in that trap.

Go, Dan!

We've got your back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. brilliant Mr Rather....thank you for standing up and being heard! and thank you for
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:07 PM by flyarm
all the wonderful years of great journalism..too bad there are too few of you great journalists left!!

I miss you !

and i salute your service to this nation in truth!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ammonium Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:48 PM
Original message
That's interesting
Know how Rather got his start? He was the only reporter allowed to view the Zapruder tape all those years ago and after viewing it he said Kennedy was stop from the back and that he was thrown foward. He lied and his lie became apparent when others were allowed to view the film, but no matter, Rather was skyrocketed into journalistic fame.

You'll have to forgive me for not liking Rather so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
36. i was a young girl then but i remember him through the Vietnam years
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:12 PM by flyarm
and his repoerting and i respect the hell out of him..he had guts where others ( like little lord pissy pants and cheney didn't ) to go to the war zone and duck real live bullets to bring us the facts of the war.

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
43. Did he lie or was that his opinion?
big difference.


the only links I could find on this were from conspiracy theory websites so forgive me for not attacking him for an otherwise stellar career based on what I found online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. I have noticed that there are HUGE numbers of people these days who
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:33 PM by kestrel91316
apparently don't know the difference between a lie, an opinion, and a miistake, and call them all lies.

Stupid people really piss me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #54
160. I've also noticed even huger (hugh!!!er?) numbers who...
don't know the difference between an opinion (theirs), an interpretation (theirs again), and a fact. But nevertheless, what you said is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
48. Sorry....gotta disagree with you, NH4.......
Rather got his start during Hurricane Carla, when, as a reporter for the local CBS affiliate, he was the first to stand on the beach in Galveston recording how hurricane-force winds tear apart our man-made world. For Kennedy's assassination, he just happened to be in the right place at the right time, and made the right decision, and he became CBS' man-on-the-spot when history was made. Then, as a DU'er notes below, he was fearless enough to report from the jungles of Vietnam with bullets flying around his head. Did the same in Afghanistan (leading to the memorable Doonesbury character "Gunga Dan") As far as I'm concerned, he's The Real Deal, and I sincerely hope he wins his case against CBS and their buddies in the Chimpy McFlightsuit camp.

When Dan Rather departed the Big Network journalism scene, the only one left worth his salt was Bob Schieffer. They're both great for "speaking truth to power".

--THB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #48
109. Thank you for your clarification - I grew up in Brazoria County where
Carla came in and we knew Dan from KTRK (I think it was KTRK) and we all felt proud when this coverage zoomed him into national attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
52. Ammounium, please back up this claim.
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:40 PM by jackster
sounds rather fishy to me....

on edit - oops - sorry! I didn't realize Ammonium had already been called out

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #52
131. Is Ammonium one of CBS' attorneys? ;-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
53. He got his start by tying himself to a tree to report on a Hurricane...
There was some quote (by I think Walter Cronkite) that Dan Rather was up to his @$$ in alligators to report the storm.

It got him noticed by CBS.

Then he was the one to (unintentionally) break the story that Kennedy was dead. Read his memoir, THE CAMERA NEVER BLINKS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
82. A link proving your charge would be even more interesting. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
96. Still waiting on those links that support your trashing of the man of the hour. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #96
194. Your question is directed at the OP
I think you meant to direct it to someone else. The OP didn't trash Mr. Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
124. And every considered analysis shows he was right about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
139. Rather became famous for his reporting on Kennedy A.
Not for what you wrote, he was young good looking one of the hardest working reporters of the time, it was reported that not many reporters could stay with him where working was concerned, he would work night and day, Dan Rather came from a working family and valued his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qdemn7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
146. Rather screwed the pooch
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 09:22 PM by qdemn7
Way back when he drank the government's kool-aid in re JFK and the Warren Commission. He later admitted this, but about 40 fucking years too late.

His lawsuit has about as much chance of winning as Westmoreland's suit against CBS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
166. Agree, that's a story that has always worried me about Rather . . .
including some other things --
He was a notorious liberal according to the right wing --
but I never thought of him that way -- those liberal leanings only stirred very infrequently as far as I could see.

Have to agree that his challenge to Poppy Bush was great, but I think, again, it backfired on Rather??

Also, I've heard that Rather owned or still owns some property that Rumsfeld is involved with?
A ranch, perhaps?

Re the JFK/Zapruder thing -- some have suggested that Rather was shown something which suggested shot from the rear -- but I don't see how that could be -- and I don't think he's ever tried to clear that up.

I can only think intense FEAR in the MSM which has probably existed a long time before the public picked up awareness of it. Very intimidating and aggressive political activity in America -- with violence and assassinations, of course.

This had to have been visible to elected officials and journalists LONG before it has become obvious to public.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #166
179. Sam Donaldson's the one who owns a ranch in NM
with rumsfeld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #166
193. that makes a lot of sense
and i never looked at it that way before. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. A round of applause for Mr. Rather
I keep hoping some open-minded network (are there any?) will pick him up. I miss him and all the other true journalists who are now gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. If Fox News were held to same standards Rather was, they'd be off the air.
I read that Thornburg report, and Rather had already done some self-censorship like cutting a bit with David Hackworth on what he thinks of military posers (Hackworth made a point of going after people who claimed to have served in the military and in combat who hadn't, particularly if they claimed they earned decorations they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. I stopped watching my last CBS program, Sunday Morning, after they allowed Ben Stein
to lie about Valerie Plame's covert status w/o retraction. If you can't trust the content-why watch it.

I wish Mr Rather the best of luck. I would love to see a BIG win for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe there can be some nice subpoenas issued. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Dig, dig, dig!
I hope it's all dug up and exposed to sunlight, before this is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
125. I'd love to see subpoenas of the White House
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 07:23 PM by creeksneakers2
Dan Bartlett knew for certain the documents were forged and let CBS swallow the hook on the story. I don't believe the White House was behind forging the documents but once they saw Rather had a bogus story they concocted a plan to discredit Rather and get rid of Rather once and for all.

CBS never did go after the White House for their role in the story. Nobody did. CBS caved to pressure and cut Rather loose. A few subpoenas could bring the truth to light.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #125
195. It was NOT a bogus story
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 07:06 PM by AikidoSoul
Only one document was bogus.

The actual deal to keep Bushie boy out of VietNam is real.

I had heard that the bogus document was planted to make the whole story look bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #195
197. I think the conspiracy was to convince the left on the net
that Rather's report was true. If it was, then the White House didn't plot to get rid of Rather.

Bush's Dad kept Junior out of Iraq but Rather's story went beyond that.

There is extensive evidence that documents used by 60 Minutes II were forged, and also that details of Rather's story couldn't possibly be true. An example is a general referred to in one of the memos who retired over a year before the memo was written.

The only evidence in favor of the 60 Minutes documents being real were the assertions (which changed under questioning) of Bill Burkett. Bill Burkett has zero credibility.

The White House knew the story was bogus so they let Rather go with it. Meanwhile, they planned a big ker-pow from the net and the right wing against Rather.

The White House got away with it because the righties didn't care what was true as long as they could get Dan Rather, and the left locked into a view that the story about Bush's guard service had to be true, so refused to believe that the White House let Rather swallow the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Do you think that 60 Minutes will interview him?
Katie needs something to do.


:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. YESsssssss!
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. I have always hated how Dan Rather was marginalized for his truthful TANG
story, while the AWOL Chimp skated away virtually untouched.
Go Dan!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. yahoo! great news. can't wait to see the media try to hush this one up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. After he's done with CBS
and shows them to be the gutless panders they have become, can he possibly go on to John Hindacker, and Charles Johnson who obviously had inside info.


Go Dan

Best news all week

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. if you remember his reporting during viet nam, where he sat in the
mud with bullets flying around his head with the forward troops, then this is no surprise. go, dan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm one of the viewers that CBS news and 60 minutes lost
for refusing to air the 60 Minutes segment on Bush's guard service.

Good for Rather. I hope he gets the whole 70 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Ditto
Haven't bothered with the network since this travesty. Not that there's anything worth watching on CBS to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
140. I'm with you frog, there is nothing at CBS to w atch
In times like these,
Dan Rather would be the man to listen to, he would tell the truth...heck, the republicans hated Dan and have been after him since Tricky Dickie NIxon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smb Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
107. Huh?
I thought they did air it, and then backed away from it after the document scandal broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. We need ten of him! This is great.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. What took him so long?
And isn't there a statute of limitations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
56. I would imagine his attorneys are fully aware of EXACTLY what the
statute of limitations is here......that and more than a few other things.

I doubt Dan Rather would hire some ignorant loser who had no clue about statutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Other 60 Minutes staff sued CBS as leverage for their severance compensation
But it sounds like Dan Rather is gunning for bear. With bush* at 29% approval, he definitely has the wind at his back on a story like this. Good luck, Dan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Go get em Dan!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
25.  Good news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm glad to see this. Let's get it ALL on the record. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. I haven't watched CBS News since he left
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 01:55 PM by yellerpup
He had credibility and experience like no one since Walter Cronkite. NOW the real story about the draft-dodging chicken hawk will come out. K&R! :kick:

Edited for spelling & to add kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. me either and i will not watch katie ..she is not a journalist! eom
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:13 PM by flyarm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
57. Agreed! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good.
The bastids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bravo, Mr. Rather! I hope this makes one big stink and calls into question
dimson's military duty again, or lack thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. Good for Dan.
Wonder if his fired producer (Mary Mapes) will file also, along with the other two staff members.

Hope to see a lot of people under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coco77 Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. What took so long...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. GOOD LUCK, DAN RATHER!
This is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sufficient Voice Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
35. Go DAN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
37. Dan's the man in the lion's den....you go Dan !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Strong arm me will ya...well in Texas we have a saying....."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. Even in announcing Dan Rather's lawsuit, NYT GETS IT WRONG
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:12 PM by truedelphi
The report For which Mr Rather got himself in deep doo doo was not an unsubstantiated report.

MAry Mapes, who was the first reporter to bring us the news that something fishy was going on at Abu Gharib, was his producer at Sixty Minutes II.

Mapes, who worked for CBS with Rather as her boss, spent FIVE YEARS, researching material related to the story that George W had gone AWOL.

FIVE YEARS

The only reason that the report is found to be unsubstantiated is that insiders to the Bush Evil Empire were put in place as a "news team" evaluating the piece.

They came up with ten or so reputed "gross mistakes" all of which could be refuted - except of course, in America we do not have the type of investigative reporting that ever uncovers the inner connections that the evaluators have to the Powers that Be on any given matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'd love to see this go to court.
He was fired for airing an "unsubstantiated report", yet during the time that Rather was demoted & working for "60 Minutes", they refused to give him editing services:

“He was provided with very little staff support, very few of his suggested stories were approved, editing services were denied to him, and the broadcast of the few stories he was permitted to do was delayed and then played on carefully selected evenings, when low viewership was anticipated,” the filing contends.


Anyone remember Ed Asner's show "Lou Grant" being canceled after his political activism? Same thing happened to "WKRP in Cincinnati" on the same day due to the fact that Howard Hesseman joined Asner:

Through Lou Grant, Asner's own popularity was growing, leading to appearances in the 1980 film Fort Apache, The Bronx and the 1981 TV movie A Small Killing. This level of success was soon to crumble, however, when Asner took part in a fund raiser to send medical aid to El Salvador rebels who were fighting against the Reagan-supported regime. Most disturbing to conservative minds was Asner's direct-mail letter on behalf of the aid organization, which began with, "My name is Ed Asner. I play Lou Grant on television." Conservative SAG members, including Charleton Heston, rose up in arms over Asner using his character to support his own political agenda (of course, one can argue that Heston is so closely associated with his own on-screen persona that his links to conservative causes are just as manipulative).

In his essay on MTM drama, Paul Kerr quoted Allan Burn's assessment of the ensuing anti-Asner onslaught: "I've never seen anybody transformed so quickly from being everyone's favorite uncle to a communist swine." Within weeks, Lou Grant was canceled. While CBS maintains the cancellation was based on dwindling ratings, Asner, and others on the Lou Grant production team, feel this was swift punishment for Asner's political beliefs. Interestingly enough, Howard Hesseman, star of WKRP in Cincinnati, was also involved with the Asner-supported El Salvador rally; WKRP and Lou Grant were canceled the same day.

http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/A/htmlA/asnered/asnered.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:11 PM
Original message
Great news! CBS News is unbearable now. Best wishes and good luck.
They just don't make them like Dan any more! Pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freebrew Donating Member (478 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
72. Remember the 60's?
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 03:01 PM by freebrew
If you are old enough to remember the Smothers Brothers Show, you would know that CBS has been unbearable for a looooong time.


(edited for typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
40. Way to go Rather -- you make us proud of real journalists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
41. GOOD for Dan Rather!!
I hope he gives 'em HELL for what the did to him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
44. K & R'ed BTW Mary Mapes and Dan Rather
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:14 PM by truedelphi
Received the Peabody awards in spring of 2005.

This award is considered to be the highest of journalism awards in the USA.

It was given for the work involved in bringing the torturous conditions at Abu Gharib to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
47. Hah! Karma comes back and bites Moonves in the ass!
That's what he gets for screwing over Star Trek and foisting all manner of crap reality shows on the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
49. Hope Rather is successful
and manages to take down AWOL Junior while he`s at it.

http://www.awolbush.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
50. Excellent! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. Bush's National Guard docs will now be matter for discovery
Delicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #51
196. Delicious indeed! Thank you for bringing that to our attention
It's more to be happy about.:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. Perfect timing, Mr. Rather! K and R
Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
61. Go Dan!!!
:applause::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
62. Lift my jaw off the floor! Rather has regained his backbone!
We should send him some support. Letters? Flowers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dog_lovin_dem Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #62
99. Agreed.
Does anyone have contact info for Dan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #99
134. This is the network he has been working with.....
maybe you could make your comments to him through this.

http://www.hd.net/feedback.html?refPage=danrather
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dog_lovin_dem Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #134
192. Thank you.
I imagine he'd appreciate the support. I'm off to offer my feedback!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
64. GOOD! "pressure from the right wing"! yeah, that fucking liberal media strikes again!
too bad he couldn't put in his lawsuit how cbs tried to throw the election by covering up for fuckhead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
65. Go, Dan! Go, Dan!
:yourock: Go get 'em, Mr. Rather!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #65
75. I 2nd that emotion! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
67. Good!
CBS better hope I'm not on that jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
68. Well done, sir.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
69. GO DAN! And now, a trip down memory lane!
Dan Rather / Poppy Bush Smackdown!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiFE1f4-zRA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherDreamWeaver Donating Member (917 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #69
172. That was almost Eye Candy... Thanks for the link. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
70. I hope he's well protected. It's very brave of him to file this. Bravo, Mr. Rathers!
Book 'em, Danno!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
73. "The network committed fraud"
Proof of propaganda. Thank you Dan Rather! This is what I've thought all along. The American people have come to despise Bush with only half the info provided. Imagine if they had something close to the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
74. Awesome!
I hope he finds some way to get some right wingers deposed and testifying in open court.

I wonder if CBS will settle it, though. It might be in their best interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
76. Good! I hope he INSISTS on a trial!
No bribe "settlement" just to shut him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
77. How could he live with himself if he DIDN'T have the courage to do this?
He's standing up for himself and what he believes, he's standing up for the ideal of journalism as a check on lies and crimes, even when they are being hidden by the most powerful.

He's being a hero.

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
78. Great and I'm with you on this
because why should they kill the messenger as he is not responcible for the content of the message compiled by others that paid no price. It was a setup to get rid of a voice that advocates for the people and what's right and not the rightwing idea of what's right.:bounce: :toast: :woohoo: :applause:
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
80. "It may not be the whole enchilada, but it certainly is a very large taco!"
My favorite Rather quote. He was covering the Clinton/Bush ('92) election when it looked like Clinton was going to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
81. When the Rightwing says "jump"- CBS asks "How high?" GO DAN!!!
Glad to see a fighting Liberal int he media now and then-I'll take 'em where I can get 'em!!

I guess I have to take back everything I said about him "caving"- GO DAN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
84. Go Dan Go!
:party: :bounce:

Good for him!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
85. I hope Mr. Rather hires one kick-ass lawyer and subpoenas all the records
even distantly related to his firing. I hope he drags old KKKarl in the mud so bad that there's not enough water on this planet to wash it all off. I hope Chimpy's military record becomes front page news everyday for a month.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
86. WOW Dan your looking good
How much will CBS give him to shut up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
87. It's heartening.....
Mr. Smith goes to Washington, Mr. Rather goes to New York City. They each in their own way fight for all of the rest of us.

GO, DAN, GO!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
88. go rather!!!!!
in a related story, senator craig is going to sue the minneapolis airport for making him gay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
89. "What is the frequency, Kenneth?"
Remember that? Rather got the shit kicked out of him in front of a restaurant he had just walked out of...I'm writing from memory here...didn't the assailant turn out to be a mental patient or something? According to the trustworthy corporate media? Hmmmmm....

I guess I'm putting on my conspiracy hat here, but that memory just flashed into my mind....watch your back, Dan. Err on the side of caution...and Bravo. Give 'em HELL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pyrzqxgl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #89
103. That was Mike Wallace not Dan Rather!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nclib Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #103
108. No, it was Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #108
167. This was one of the most obvious "swiftboatings" by the right-wing and CBS was scared -- !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #103
141. Dan was attack somewhere in the last few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
90. Great news! I always wanted him to do this!!
Thank you, Dan for your courage and integrity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #90
95. Me too. I feel really bad about trashing him for not doing so.
I take it back. From this point on, one has to get through Dr Fate before he lays a finger on good old Dan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dollface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
91. All you have to do is watch CBS news to find direct evidence of "pacifying the White House."
Their evening newscast has been reduced to talking points. Dan Rather, an actual journalist, got screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
92. Go, Dan!
Remember, the officer-in-question's secretary VERIFIED (and was witness to) the fact of the poor opinion had of Dimson, and the fact that he had not complied with policy, nor had DimSon fulfilled his duties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
93. Whoop Whoop!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
94. YES!!
THIS is what I have been waiting for.
Pass the popcorn, please....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
97. Good for you Dan Rather...doubt it will go anywhere....but Lawsuits seem our only recourse...
given the Bush Appointee Judges...though...it's like whistling in the dark. They've sown up everything while M$M of which Mr. Rather was a part of...are now just peanut shells...drifting in the wind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
98. Hooray for Dan Rather!
Wishing him all the best - it's about time someone stood up to the smear machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SleeplessinSoCal Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
100. It took me a while, but finally found HD.net where Rather roosts now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
101. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
102. Hit them in the pocketbook!!
It's all they understand. Oh, by the way CBS, how's that Katie Couric thing working out for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
104. Way to go Dan!!!
You know, at 75, he really doesn't have to go through the hassle of this. He's doing this for reasons that go far beyond money and reputation.

To add insult to injury, CBS bumped a segment that Ed Bradley did on the fake Niger documents (yellow cake uranium that Iraq was supposedly trying to get) and as far as I know, NEVER AIRED IT. Here's an article that Salon did about it back in Sept. 2004.

http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2004/09/29/cbs_wmd/

"Had Bradley's piece aired, millions of Americans would have seen it in the heat of the presidential campaign. The Nielsen ratings put the Wednesday version of "60 Minutes" regularly in its top 20 most popular shows."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
105. CBS so deserves this
I hope the truth is finally brought out into the open. Rather was Rovered. Bravo, Mr. Rather!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
106. Good for Dan ..... this will keep junior's inconsistent AWOL story
in front for some time now, and how daddy hide junior's cocaine bust in 1972. In 1970 or 1971
junior was dating a woman named Robin Lowman (now Robin Garner). Miss Lowman became
pregnant by junior and he arranged for her to have an abortion. Which was illegal in the great
state of Texas in 1971. Not to mention that junior ran as a pro-life candidate for the presidency.
Robert Carl Chandler is a good friend of junior and a supporter from way back. Mr. Chandler
made the arrangements for Miss Lowman's abortion at the Twelve Oaks Hospital in Houston,
Texas. It is now call the Bayou City Medical Center. The source was threatened by Chandler
and another junior crony named James R. Bath. You may have recalled on the threads you've
read the last few days, as being junior's AWOL buddy from the the guard and junior's business
partner in oil dealings in Midland, and the BBCI scam.

Here is a dialog between Larry Flint and Robert Novak that appeared on CNN some time ago.

"Flynt : Well, during the impeachment debacle, we did an investigation which resulted in the
resignation of Bob Livingston and others and we have continued this investigation and for eight
months we've been looking into George W. Bush's background. And we've found out in the early
1970s he was involved in an abortion in Texas, and I just think that it's sad that the mainstream
media, who's aware of this story, won't ask him that question when they were able to ask him the
drug question without any proof at all, and we've got all kinds of proof on this issue.

Novak : Well, you're ...

Flynt : You know, the guy admitted he was a drunk for 20 years, and if the abortion issue is true
then that puts him lower on the morality scale than Bill Clinton.

Novak : Mr. Flynt, you said if it's true and you have no proof of that. I gather you are a very
strong ...

Flynt : The hell we don't have proof.

Novak : Sir, I gather you're a very strong Gore supporter. Is that correct?

Flynt : I'll vote for the lesser of the two evils. I don't like either one of them.

Press : All Right, Larry Flynt, a man who speaks his word, but we remind you they are Larry
Flynt's words and not ours. Larry Flynt, thank you very, very much for joining us.

This was followed by an online chat, in which Flynt went into greater detail :

CNN : Mr. Flynt, I would like to know how you plan to protect yourself from a law suit by
claiming to have the goods on GWBush.

Flynt : Because we have them and the truth is an absolute defense.

CNN : When and where are you going to publish information about George W. Bush?

Flynt : When I said that we had the proof, I am referring to knowing who the girl was, knowing
who the doctor was that pereformed the abortion, evidence from girlfriends of hers at the time,
who knew about the romance and the subsequent abortion. The young lady does not want to go
public, and without her willingness, we don't feel that we're on solid enough legal ground to go
with the story, because should she say it never happened, then we've got a potential libel suit. But
we know we have enough evidence that we believe completely. One of the things that interested us was that this abortion took place before Roe Vs. Wade in 1970, which made it a crime at the
time. I'd just like the national media to ask him if abortion is okay for him and his family, but not
for the rest of America. We're not looking at it as a big issue, we're looking at it as a situation of
people not being told the truth. I think the American people have a right to know everything there
is to know about someone running for President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
110. Wow! I hope he wins it! In my almost 50 year broadcasting career, I might have had cause
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 06:10 PM by Radio_Lady
to sue at least three employers if the laws had been as they are today.

Ford Foundation, New York City -- (1968) This group let me go because I was seven months pregnant and took a slight fall on their shiny, slippery parquet floor. I wasn't hurt at all, but I was whisked out the door immediately. To be truthful, I worked for a woman manager whose name was Siobhan McKenna who I didn't like much from the beginning. I was just a temporary secretary there but they made the job for a longer term. I was making some suggestions to her, mostly clerical stuff as she was doing grant requests. The job was really kind of borning, but I think she might have felt I was competing with her in some way and was after her job! That was not true. While I wanted to work as long as possible, I definitely wanted to stay at home for a few months and then get reemployed in broadcasting. I had been working continuously in local stations since 1962 when I graduated college, with NBC, 30 Rockefeller Center, NYC in the "Tonight Show" unit. After that, I worked at WPIX as On-Air Promotion Supervisor for a woman named Phyllis who let me go for some spurious reason. In those days, they replaced people without the employee having ANY recourse. Big corporations still find their newer hooks to hang you on, I'm afraid. In my case, it was a slip and fall that did me in.

WEEI Radio, Boston, Massachusetts (owned and operated by CBS at the time) (1972 to ???) I was hired largely due to affirmative action. They had heard that I was looking for work, and was covering for Larry King's overnight show at WIOD in Miami 11 PM to 5 AM (!) a couple nights a week for NO PAY. At that time, I was divorced and the sole support for two babies.

Larry and I had had one date in the late 50s when I was on a TV kid's show and he was a young disk jockey at WAHR. In a very strange twist of fate, he called out for coffee and donuts one night and I brought them over to the station. He didn't remember me, but told me to sit down and answer the incoming calls to keep the people awake. Larry's midnight to dawn program when he was arrested in December 1971 a few days before Christmas. The next day, I called Biggie Nevins, the Program Manager who said, "I have heard you on my air, but told me I wouldn't be able to be considered for the overnight shift because of my two young kids." But, he gave me work at $50 a night a few nights a week, which put some food on the table. Later that spring, I got a call from Bruce Lee, who had done a show with me using live WATS lines. Daniel K. Griffin, the PM at WEEI, was looking for a woman to do 10 AM to 2 PM and would I like to interview? They flew me up to Boston, interviewed me for eight hours (!) and offered me the job.

So, I became the first woman talkmaster in Boston to do a daily four-hour call-in show. I did well there, but then Dan Griffin left to take a management job at WCBS New York as I recall. The new Program Manager, Mike Ludlum, didn't really like me personally and there were rumors he was looking around for another host. Then, CBS changed format to all news, and although I had done news when I took over Larry King's program, I really wanted to be a personality which is more in tune with my strengths. I applied for the newscaster job, but didn't even garner an interview. This was in the days when there were very few women newscasters, too. Later, I did return to WEEI as their movie critic, seeing four or so movies a week and coming in to the studio to record the reviews. That was fine for my schedule.

WMEX Radio, Boston, Massachusetts (1970s sometime) The station was privately owned by Mack Richmond as I recall. He was an older man who took a liking to me. My Program Manager was Pat Whitley. I believe Pat had designs on my job himself, as he was a funny guy with a big personality. He did a successful restaurant rating show on days when I was on vacation or sick. Regrettably, I also had an extreme stress reaction to hour after hour of arguing five days a week, four hours a day 10AM to 2PM with a their largely conservative midday audience. At that time, the listeners consisting of mostly Irish Catholic stay-at-home women and salesmen on the road who listen in their cars. BUT no cellphones! They had to stop on the highway at a phone booth to call!

Furthermore, my lead-in at WMEX was Avi Nelson, a conservative talk show host with an amazing ability to give his smug opinions of me during his shift 6AM to 10AM. One day, I felt steam coming out of my ears as I listened to him driving in to the station. He said I should be at home with my two children baking cookies instead of being on the air! I strode into the studio, sat down next to him, flipped on the microphone, and blasted him. It was kind of a Hillary Clinton moment as I jabbed my finger in his shoulder and in my most authoritative voice told him, "Don't you ever, EVER mention my personal situation during the morning hours in that way. I have every right to have this job and have been trained in broadcasting with a degree in Communications and have been working in the job since January 1957. What are YOUR credentials?" (At that time, I think he may have been a lawyer or a politician, but don't remember.)

Anyway, the audience loved the dust-up between us. The Program Manager was away, and the mice were at play. For the rest of that week, we glared at each other and dealt with the rants from the people who called in. They took sides, of course, as we took each other to task in our separate time slots.

The overnight ratings went through the roof, of course. (People just love a good hang-it-all-out squabble, don't they?) When the Program Manager returned, we were cautioned never do that again. (Remember, this was AM radio, no computers, and few radios allowed in offices.) Finally, I developed the worst flu I ever had in my third year on the air, and the bronchitis lasted for weeks. So there might have been some concern on the part of my doctor that I was overdoing it. It all came to a head when I found out that the men were making much bigger salaries than I was, and to boot, the other talk show hosts had either a company owned car or a car allowance! I gave them six weeks to pull my income up to the level of the men, but it didn't happen and I quit.

All in all, the women in broadcasting who are now my age or older (or deceased) were all broadcasting pioneers -- Barbara Walters, Betty Rollins, Pauline Fredericks, Betty Furness are a few who come to mind. In radio, Sally Jessy Raphael was still in Palm Beach, Florida -- I was a guest on her program there once.

Anyway, forgive the outpouring here, but Dan Rather deserves whatever he gets. Now his suit on top of Don Imus? It's the revenge of the old men of radio! More power to them!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue state liberal Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #110
159. Radio Lady - I was a big fan of yours and listened faithfully
every morning to your saber rattling with Pat on the radio show on WMEX. They were wonderful shows with you being the strong liberal taking on that staunch conservative! I always rooted for you to win the arguments. Happy to see that you are a DU -er and I enjoyed reading your post immensely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #159
183. Wow! What a lift! I have never found another person on the DU who actually heard me in Boston!
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 03:52 PM by Radio_Lady
Ding -- ding -- DING! We have a winner! You've made my day! I worked on a children's TV show in Miami when I was 17-18. The co-host was Chuck Zink, who passed away on 1/03/06. I put a note in his on-line guest book, and guess what? Someone remembered my name and wondered what had happened to ME! That children's show was on the air from 1957 to 1979. I was only part of the group for 1 1/2 years. What are the chances? Well, I was so pleased I tracked that guy down in Orlando and gave him a call. To say the least, he was pretty startled!

So tell me, what ever happened to Pat Whitley? He did his restaurant show for years, and also was part owner of a radio station in -- was it Framingham/Natick? Is he still around?

Long-time host Jerry Williams passed away a few years ago and his children kept up a website for a long time. Not sure it's still there. He was always very kind and helpful to me. I called him once after I had left the radio business, and he put me on the air and we "schmoozed" for about 15 minutes.

A few years ago, I searched on-line for Avi Nelson and got physically ill when I saw his photo. I don't usually wish for something bad to happen to others, but I'd love to know how he ever survived being the person he was. Funny thing was that he was married -- and his wife went to work! Wonder if they ever had kids. Ah, well, let it go... I don't like to think of myself as spiteful. Our local conservative yokel here is Lars Larson. I listen to him sometimes, but only if AAR is totally boring or a re-run.

I miss Boston and usually tune in for the July 4th celebration at the Hatch Shell. When we visited there in 2003, I heard that Natalie Jacobson and Chet Curtis on TV had broken up. Our next trip is planned for next year. We haven't seen the city since the end of the Big Dig (has it really ended)?

Maybe you know what happened to newscasters Diane Stern and Anthony Silva at WBZ. They were both very good.

I can't for the life of me remember any newspeople at WMEX. There was Avi, me, and Jerry W. At least on weekdays.

But my heart still belongs to Laura Carlo, the bubbly gal at WCRB -- Charles River Broadcasting. She was an announcer for that classical commercial station. I think she's still working for some other station. I used to call her on Saturday mornings during her shift to thank her for accompanying my mornings. We have a new woman with KBPS here in Portland who does the morning show. She's MAHVELOUS. www.allclassical.com if you care to listen.

Remember Paul Benzaquin? His birthday is next month, on October 17th. He has survived heart problems for a long time. I talked with him at his home a few weeks ago and he was pretty startled that I'd kept his home telephone number. We did stay in touch in Boston until he remarried the Jewish widow of a Vermont doctor -- that was maybe 1995 - 1996 when I was Radio Advertising Manager for LoJack Corporation. Paul was raised a Catholic, but always thought he was Jewish, but in his Spanish speaking background there were people who were "conversos" -- Jewish citizens who were FORCED to accept Christianity. He was one of the nicest and funniest men I've ever met.

Anyway, you bring back lots of memories, friend! Stay in touch, please.

Sincerely,

Radio Lady Ellen in Oregon

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #183
184. Blue State Liberal, welcome to the DU! Just a few posts... and you found ME.
Don't worry. I won't bite.

Check out my personal journal at:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Radio_Lad

The right hand column will clue you in to my current activities.

Thanks again for checking in.

Making peace a priority,

Radio Lady Ellen in Oregon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spirit of wine Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
111. Now I am seeing what will happen
Fight Fire With Fire. In the business world that Bush wants us all to gesticulate to, an impeachment would not be seen as threatening as a lawsuit. This, perhaps will shake the administrations tree so hard nobody will be left standing. I like it!

When in Rome...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
113. Dan Rather suing CBS for $70 million.
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:17 PM by truebrit71
Source: NY Times

Just on CNBC a report that Dan Rather is suing his former employers CBS

No link yet.



Dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #113
114. Go Dan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #113
115. K&R!!
go Dan go!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #113
116. Hey Dan - if you need ANY HELP AT ALL - we are here for you!!!!
You know there is a core evil to BushInc through your decades of investigations. So does John Kerry through HIS investigations into government corruption.

STOP LISTENING TO THOSE POWERFUL DEMOCRATS WHO BELIEVE WE NEED TO MOVE PAST THOSE CRIMES.

Those people are NOT on OUR side and NOT on YOUR side. They side with secrecy and privilege. You side with the Constitution and the citizens who depend on it.

We will HELP in every and any way possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #113
117. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #113
118. I am sure that Katie Couric will report on this...
... with all the gravitas and professionalism she is known for.
:sarcasm:



Go, Dan Go!
Suck it, CBS!
Stick it in your big, creepy eye!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #118
119. I want to have this fight.
He must have gotten the evidence he needs, or he wouldn't be doing this.

Now - if we can get a whistleblower from Diebold and ESS, or a GOP election fraud specialist on his deathbed and wanting to clear their conscience before they meet their lord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
121. WHAT? No Rove Implication??? The whole thing stunk to
high heaven and had Rove's name written all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #121
129. I'm sure it will all come out in discovery.
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 07:32 PM by Seabiscuit
Rove will commit perjury.

When the neocons couldn't get him with their anthrax, they swiftboated him, and CBS was complicit in the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
122. Bravo, Mr. Rather, Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
123. Go get em Dan! Backing you 110%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
126. Good For Him!
Say what you want about Rather, you gotta know what happened was a total political setup. Hold their feet to the fire and expose them, Dan. I will be in your cheering section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
127. We're with ya', Dan! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
128. WOWZA!!! Go get the bastids, Dan!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
132. I hope they get to present some EVIDENCE-say a copy of B*sh's arrest report??
Just my take. I think he's doing this more to clear his name & expose these bastards in one fell swoop. I hope big!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamasmadashell2 Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
133. wouldn't this be a hoot?
Why not a class action law suit?-such as-People of the USA vs. ABC,CBS NBC and Fox news and others.
With malice to deceive the American people concerning the build-up to this Iraqi war by consistently propagandizing this war and not allowing any form of dissenting views to filter through to the masses. My god even Goebbels would be amazed at the neo-cons success!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moblsv Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
135. The truth needs to come out on this
Mary Mapes should be included in this as well. Two good journalists destroyed by right wing lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
136. LOL too funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blossomstar Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
137. My hero Dan Rather!
I literally cried like a baby when he stepped down. My father always watched Dan Rather and ONLY Dan Rather. After his death, it made me feel so close to my father whenever Rather was on... I'd pretend he was still here with me. Sick probably, but it helped to cope with his loss... till Rather stepped down that is. I KNEW Rather would not let the three years expire without a lawsuit!!!!!! GO DAN GO!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
143. oh, baby
AWOL Bush is back with a vengeance.

go Dan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
144. Good for him!
Damn good reporter who gave CBS so many quality years only to done this way in the end. Asswipes! If something criminal was done, I hope Rather gets everything he is deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
145. Finally some good news
I love Dan Rather and haven't watched CBS since he was forced out. Being the smart, seasoned pro he is, I think there's a good reason he's waited this long to go after the bastards. He's got plenty on them, and knows how to hit them where they're vulnerable. Revenge is a dish best served cold.
Give 'em hell, Dan. We're with you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
147. I LOVE his timing - it couldn't be better.
And I'm so glad he's finally doing this. It's long overdue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
148. Just imagine if the discovery phase includes
a deposition of the RW blogger who posted, within minutes, about the arcane typographical clues (an IBM typewriter of the period's ability to do proportional spacing and superscripting) that sent the story into a spiral of recrimination and corporate CYA that did Rather in, and saved *'s ass.

That's how it gets back to Rove.

Bring it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
149. Good for him - great news...maybe justice will prevail at long last
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
151. I hope KO will interview Rather about this
That would be a keeper.

CBS news once had integrity, with people like Murrow, Cronkite and Rather, not to mention producers like Mapes who investigated (or tried to) serious issues. Glad to hear Rather is calling them to task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
153. Hahahahaha - this is great! Expose Bush as a fraud once again!
And this time make the case stick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
154. This is GREAT NEWS !!!
Dan we're here for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal renegade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
155. Every bully needs their ass kicked
and Mr. Rather has the power to do so. I hope Commander Cuckoo Bananas has many sleepless nights.. Expose these bastards for what they are...


Rock em Sock em Rather.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
156. Go Dan go!
Eat it Bush ass kissers! CBS was doing the bidding of the fascist criminals in the White House. Dan told the truth. It was the 'document' that was provided by a Bush dirty trick operative that was the the canard that brought down Dan. Bush was AWOL
and a coward. Bush is now a traitor and a dictator. Go to hell United States Constitutional Rights haters, better know as republicans.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
157. perhaps all this will unravel the mysteries of W's military service?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
158. Email CBS and tell them what you think. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
161. SIC 'EM, DAN, SIC 'EM. . . .





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
162. We should all send Rather a slingshot.
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 10:45 PM by BigBearJohn
And we will all cheer as he downs Goliath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
169. Go Dan! Go!
I believe he was scapegoated by the Bush Admin, their cronies and the media. Get all of them Dan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pesky_Hound Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
171. Rather Files $70 Million Lawsuit Against CBS
I hope Dan Rather takes a huge chunk out of crimeCBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
173. I have always had the greatest respect for Dan Rather.Go Dan.this is great.
Dan Abrams and others have said the courts are not the place to settle this.That statement confuses me.Where is the place to settle this issue then? And where would Dan go to get back his reputation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
174. Good news! I hope Rather owns the network by the time he's done suing them all.
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 01:54 AM by Liberty Belle
More journalists need to have the backbone to fight back against the White House and pressures from GOP cronies and the corporate media masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
175. Dan Rather recently did one of the most kickass reports I've ever seen, called
"The Trouble with Touchscreens." Look for it at www.HD.net. Just a few weeks ago.

Here's a Bradblog report on it: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4960

And it's not just about the rigged voting machines of 04 and 06--manufactured by ES&S (Diebold's evil twin) in sweatshops in the Philippines, where people make $2.50/hr and less, and from where defective machines were shipped to the U.S.-- it's also about Florida 2000, and how Sequoia (the third biggest election theft corporation) screwed up the punchcards ballots in the Democratic areas--they use inferior paper that got damp, and stretched, so that hanging chads were inevitable! And at least one employee says it was on purpose, to screw up the election.

I was amazed.

This is THE MOST IMPORTANT NEWS STORY OF OUR ERA! --and maybe in the history of the U.S., yet it has been utterly black-holed by the entirety of the war profiteering corporate news monopolies.

Dan Rather DID it! He UN-buried the story of the destruction of our election system by these corporations, and hits all the most telling points, including the "trade secret" code in these machines. And one of the best things about this report is that he goes after the OTHER TWO malefactors--ES&S and Sequoia. Diebold is notorious. These other two lurk in the background, equally as bad as Diebold, if not worse.

Anyway, I had kind of written Dan Rather off, or just forgot about him, until this. And, whoa, is this IMPRESSIVE! He says all the forbidden things. He does boffo investigative work, tracking down employees and talking to experts. It is an incredible report.

And the upshot of it is that these fuckers in the White House set up and stole TWO elections, through their buds at these rightwing voting machines corporations! He doesn't quite come out and say it, but I'm convinced he believes it, given the information he presents and his strong commentary. He leaves it for us to make the conclusion. I think Dan Rather has gone through some sort of transformation since CBS did him in to cover up Junior's AWOL. He is pissed! And he's going for the heart of the matter: how this illegitimate, fascist government achieved power and stayed in power.

Now think back to the AWOL story. The thing is that the story was TRUE, and backed up with documents and testimony. There was only one weird document. It had been re-typed on a later model machine. But the secretary who was familiar with the original document said it was the same information, just re-typed. Nobody knows why or how it got re-typed (wasn't the original). But she vouched for the CONTENT. And this is where the prepped Freepers came in. They jumped on the re-typing immediately, and went through this whole, phony "investigative" mode in which they "discovered" that the type wasn't right for that era. And THAT became the story, rather than the secretary vouching for the content.

The whole thing sure looked like a Rovian "swift-boating" to me. My guess would be that the person who disclosed the docs to CBS first sold them to Bush operatives (who tainted them by re-typing one doc), prepped the Freepers, and then directed the corporate news monopoly coverage.

And--as with his startling revelations about the voting machines and the hanging chads--I think Rather has figured it out.

Consider what the NYT says the suit is about: "He (Rather) also contends (in the lawsuit filing) that the network committed fraud by commissioning a 'biased' and incomplete investigation of the flawed Guard broadcast and, in the process, 'seriously damaged his reputation.'”

"Committed fraud," commissioned "a 'biased' and incomplete investigation." That sounds like CBS execs may have been party to the initial fraud. (Why would they want to cover up a sting against their own news dept?)

Nope, this is not Rather just trying to repair his reputation. He could do that in a book (setting the record straight). Nor is it simple anger or a desire for compensation for lost salary or rep. He smells something. That's what it feels like (--and I am influenced in this feeling by his stunning report on voting machine corps). He's got something figured out, and he's going after them on FRAUD--on an "incomplete investigation," meaning a coverup--possibly meaning collusion. A lawsuit is, among other things, a means of discovery. He first of all has to prove he has a substantive issue. Then he gets to depose individuals and seek more evidence.

This promises to get very interesting. We were, in 2004, hit with several election crimes--the fraudulent, non-transparent vote counting system itself, with rightwing Bushite corporations having gained direct, secret control over the vote tabulation, with virtually no audit/recount controls (for which our own party bears responsibility, as well as the Bushites), massive voter purges and vote suppression, in blatant violation of the Voting Rights Act, and disinformation and coverups by the war profiteering corporate news monopolies, who, you may recall, DOCTORED their exit polls (Kerry won), late in the day, to force them to fit the results of Diebold/ES&S's "trade secret" vote counting software (Bush 'won'). They also acted as the trumpet for the "swift-boat" and other attacks on Kerry (and played a key role in bumping the stronger antiwar candidate, Howard Dean, out of the race, to begin with). And these are just the things we know. What if they were also doing "dirty tricks" for Bush, such as conspiring on this re-typed document and helping set up the sting?

That's what "biased" and "incomplete" investigation, and "fraud," say to me--at least as possibilities. Cuz I can't think of a good reason for them to cover it up. Pressure from the White House? Pressure from the rightwing? So what? News departments always have pressure. It doesn't make sense as a motive for biasing the investigation. Why wouldn't they want to know what happened? Well, one reason would be, they were in on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broadslidin Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
176. As per usual, Quietly Settled Out of Court & Court Documents Sealed Forever More.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
178. Excellent!!! FUCK CBS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
181. Sold out. Hurt us all.

In the article linked to it is stated that:

"By his own rendering, Mr. Rather was little more than a narrator of the disputed broadcast ..."

He, by this admission, confesses to having sold his integrity as a reporter. Yet, he now wishes to whine, complain, and sue his former masters.

In the public view he was not being paid $6,000,000 a year to be a narrator. We the public thought that he was being paid to be a reporter.

Sorry Dan, you sold out, then you got whacked.

Sadly, your fall from public grace did give aid and comfort to the fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
182. I Absolutely LOVE It!!
:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
190. Well done, Mr. Rather. Go get 'em.
:evilgrin: :popcorn: :evilgrin: :popcorn:

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC