Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debate Erupts on Techniques Used by C.I.A. (Rockefeller: 'Unfathomable' More Info from NYT than DOJ)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 09:58 PM
Original message
Debate Erupts on Techniques Used by C.I.A. (Rockefeller: 'Unfathomable' More Info from NYT than DOJ)
Source: New York Times

Debate Erupts on Techniques Used by C.I.A.
By DAVID JOHNSTON and SCOTT SHANE

Published: October 5, 2007
WASHINGTON, Oct. 4 — The disclosure of secret Justice Department legal opinions on interrogation on Thursday set off a bitter round of debate over the treatment of terrorism suspects in American custody and whether Congress has been adequately informed of legal policies.

Democrats on Capitol Hill demanded to see the classified memorandums, disclosed Thursday by The New York Times, that gave the Central Intelligence Agency expansive approval in 2005 for harsh interrogation techniques.

Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, the West Virginia Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote to the acting attorney general, Peter D. Keisler, asking for copies of all opinions on interrogation since 2004. “I find it unfathomable that the committee tasked with oversight of the C.I.A.’s detention and interrogation program would be provided more information by The New York Times than by the Department of Justice,” Mr. Rockefeller wrote.

The ranking Republican on the panel, Senator Christopher S. Bond of Missouri, said Thursday night in a statement that the committee had been briefed on the administration’s “legal justifications” for interrogation. Mr. Bond said he understood that the administration did not want to turn over the opinions themselves because they had confidential legal advice.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/washington/05interrogate.html?hp


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rockefeller isn't paid to be that credulous. Don't be surprised!
Do something about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. "I find it unfathomable"
Geez, I expected better from Rockefeller. But he's as clueless as the rest of them as to what we're dealing with here -- an administration that is, in fact, a criminal enterprise.

I guess the DC cocktail-party circuit is really a bubble unto itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bond...what a waste of carbon and water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC