Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The soft underbelly of non-proliferation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 04:47 AM
Original message
The soft underbelly of non-proliferation
The soft underbelly of non-proliferation

By Paul Reynolds

The secret acquisition by Iran and Libya of nuclear centrifuge technology has revealed a gap in the policing of weapon development which needs closing, according to experts.

There are concerns about the nature of Iran's nuclear programme
The attempt to prevent more countries from building the bomb is matched only by President George Bush's war on terror as the number one priority in US foreign policy, strongly supported by Britain.

Recent revelations have demonstrated that the soft underbelly of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - designed to allow countries to develop nuclear power but not a nuclear bomb - is a black market in the technology to build centrifuges. These are used to spin uranium material and separate the parts needed to make a nuclear explosion.

Under the NPT, countries are allowed to enrich uranium to a level needed to fuel nuclear power stations, so long as this is under the control of the UN's nuclear agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Most countries simply buy the fuel from the small number of recognised supplier governments.

The problem occurs when a government secretly develops the ability to enrich uranium to the higher levels needed for a nuclear bomb.......cont'd

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/3375953.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. "so long as this is under the control of the UN's nuclear agency" - but
.
.
. "so long as this is under the control of the UN's nuclear agency" -but

but the USA has "branded" the UN as irrelevant, especially by "doing" the war in Iraq without the UN's blessing

sooooo , in some nation's eyes, - they are "justified" in ignoring whichever part of the UN's mandate that does not suit them

GeeDubya set the "example" with his "pre-emptive" sh*t

So ya know,

. . "What's good for the Goose - - - ?" :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice_of_Europe Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. How difficult can it be to build a centrifuge?

It just takes time....
Time is the only problem. Not to be discovered long enough...

I think the bomb itself isn't that much of a problem...

Delivery is.. few have the missile technology... unlike a ceartain east asian country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC