Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Adopts Lower Standard for Iran Threat as Critics Question Credibility

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:19 AM
Original message
Bush Adopts Lower Standard for Iran Threat as Critics Question Credibility
Source: Bloomberg News

Dec. 5 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush, his credibility under fire because of intelligence that Iran halted its nuclear weapons drive in 2003, adopted a new argument yesterday to justify tougher sanctions: Just knowing how to produce a bomb is dangerous.

Bush, speaking at a White House news conference, said a new report by U.S. intelligence agencies concluding that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program four years ago changed nothing because Iran was still producing enriched uranium that could be used to make a bomb.

``I view this report as a warning signal that they had the program, they halted the program,'' the president said. ``And the reason why it's a warning signal is that they could restart it. And the thing that would make a restarted program effective and dangerous is the ability to enrich uranium.''

That argument resonated among U.S. allies in Europe, who are frustrated over what they regard as Iranian intransigence and may be skeptical about the accuracy of American intelligence. It drew no support from China and Russia, whose backing will be needed for any new United Nations sanctions, or among the president's domestic political adversaries.

--
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, a Delaware Democrat, said the president's anti-Iranian rhetoric in the face of the new intelligence ``undermines America's credibility around the world'' and erodes Bush's trustworthiness with the American people.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ajbc1oohfyRY&refer=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. This worked on Iraq.
They went from "Had weapons of mass destruction" to "had the means to create a WMD program", and the slimy fascists inthe press lapped it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuckin hell!
They might start up again? What if somebody else starts up a program? Where does preemptive war stop? Answer never! Jesus hell somebody save us from the is clown!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. This just in...
Moron* just announced that Iran is exporting BlackCat firecrackers to China. He* stated, "um er, firecrackers, are, um, illegal in, ahh, areas that...that are under heavy drought, um, rules. and this is in direct violation of the...the anti-firecracker in drought prone areas international agreement. Yeah, that's it, the AFIDPAIA!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. "erodes Bush's trustworthiness with the American people."
what the hell are you talking about, Joe? Bush doesn't have credibility with Americans. Only with capitulating congress folk, like you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bet * would like to taser Iran just about now.
i.e., punish somebody just because that somebody might do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Germany "might" re-start WW-2
Let's hit them with some sanctions just to make sure they don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. How can you prevent a country from "possessing knowledge"?
Does Bush plan to bomb the universities and libraries of the world now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. as Stephan Colbert says
(paraphrased) ...what president bush believes on Monday is the same thing he believes on Wednesday...no matter what happens on Tuesday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. he blathered on about it today too
"The Iranians have a strategic choice to make. They can come clean with the international community about the scope of their nuclear activities and fully accept the longstanding offer to suspend their enrichment program and come to the table and negotiate, or they can continue on a path of isolation that is not in the best interest of the Iranian people. The choice is up to the Iranian regime."

- and yet again they forget that enriching uranium is permitted. funny though, considering china has jumped on this NIE as a good excuse to oppose bush's march to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC