Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: US Jews back Democratic candidates over Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:48 AM
Original message
Poll: US Jews back Democratic candidates over Bush
U.S. Jews would overwhelmingly support any major Democratic candidate over President George W. Bush if the election were held today, according to the 2004 Annual Survey of American Jewish Opinion.

Joe Lieberman, the only Jewish candidate, would defeat Republican Bush by the largest margin, 71 percent to 24%, the poll found.

In one-on-one matchups with the president, Howard Dean, Wesley Clark, John Kerry and Richard Gephardt would each receive about 60 percent of the Jewish vote, compared to about 30% for Bush, according to the survey conducted for the American Jewish Committee and released Monday.

(snip)

Still, Republican leaders have been courting Jews, and the poll did find a slight increase in the percentage who considered themselves Republican, from 9% in 2000 to 16% in 2004.

However, more than half of those surveyed identified themselves as Democrats. About one-third said they were independent.

more…
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1073881738148&p=1008596981749
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. And this is going to continue as soon as people
realize that Presscott Bush funded I G Farben
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's just ridiculous
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:15 AM by mobuto
George Dubya should be held to account for his own failings, not those of his grandfather. To do so flies in the face of the principles on which are country was built - that we are judged by who we ourselves are, and not who our ancestors were or where they came from.

I have to make this point on pure principle. I have no use for this President. But this claim is totally spurious. And I have to oppose it, just as I oppose those who attack Jack Kennedy because his father was not pure as the driven snow.


((On edit: Not that I think its really relevant, but I might just add as an aside that I am Jewish and that relatives of mine were slave workers for I G Farben.))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. some things run in a family
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:36 AM by nu_duer
simple, I know, but doesn't a doctor ask if heart disease, for example, runs in your family.

bush* has done far enough on his own to deserve impeachment and whatever comes after that, so I agree that judging him by his family isn't right, but the comparision is valid, imho, because some things run in the family, some families have less than laudable agendas. Greed and power can create monsters. Does that apply to bush, or the other one?

Not to mention Camp X-ay (who thought that up?) and free speach zones and patriot act and unprovoked war and... When taken together, his regime's current actions and that of that era, it seems a valid comparison to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Guilt does not run in families
We are not stained by the crimes of our forefathers. If we were, I know I for one would be in a whole heap of trouble.

You can quibble all you want, but there are no shortage of substantive reasons for voting against George W. Who is grandfather was is simply not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yeah, that's my cousin's argument.
I'll just point out that the Kennedys have instilled in their wealthy, trust-funded young a sense of public service. Teddy, who is never going to be president doesn't have to put in all those hours on all those committees. Neither do the sundry other Kennedys who have gone into public service work.

The Bush family, however, has no intention of doing anything for the public good. The record is frighteningly clear on that. They are in government for power and money and it doesn't matter who dies so they can get it.

Me, I detect a subtle difference between the two families and the paths they have taken since their unsavory beginnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. I have to agree with the public service mentality being a Kennedy value
and not a Bush one. A lot of the young Kennedys are involved in various public service programs. Teddy's oldest son is an advocate for the disabled, one of Robert's sons is involved in environmental causes, etc.
Granted, some of them have had their problems with drugs and alcohol over the years, but it seems like all of the Bush youngsters are screwed up, at least W's and Jeb's kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, this is great news!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's why
Dennis Preager, Michael Medved, Richard Perle, David Horowitz, Bernard Goldstein, et. al. can kiss my jewish ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. We should do fine with Jews
Clark or Kerry will poll just as well as Clinton or Gore (high 70's) with Jews. Dean? he could put us back into Carter/Mondale/Dukakis territory with Jews (low 60's to 70).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Let`s see. His Jewish wife going to deflect Jews like you say? I do not
buy that bull manure for a nanosecond. It does not compute. Plus anyone who is not hoodwinked or a neo-con can tell Bu$h Inc. have the muslims to persecute. And most Jews I know believe in freedom of all religions. Bu$h and his maggots want to push their christianity on everyone. And the way my fascist brothers in law have turned my gullible sisters into pickles type stepford wifes. I know that is what they are up to. And so do most intelligent people.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Do you have proof of those voting statistics?
enquiring minds...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yeah, you're right
We need to prove our loyalty

It's not enough to be the preponderance of the civil rights movement, including the non-African American deaths; including in 1979 when only Jews and African-Americans were murdered by KKK and police in Carolina.

Schumer, Boxer, Wellstone, Feingold; you're right; we are suspect. Especially when Nixon was so anti-Semitic!


It's obvious to any thinking person that only Jews must go through the inquisition again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I beg your pardon
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 11:01 AM by RogueTrooper
What do you mean?

I just wanted to know if the poster could back up their assertions, regarding Jewish-American voting patterns with facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_random_joel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Jews have CONSISTENTLY and HISTORICALLY
voted Democratic/Progressive.

The facts are out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. An article on Jewish voting trends from a Jewish
source...

I post only the first three bullet points...

http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp509.htm

An overwhelming majority of American Jews - 73 percent - describe themselves as moderate or liberal; 23 percent label themselves as conservative. Only 19 percent voted for Bush in the 2000 elections, but there are indications that Jewish support for the Republican Party is on the rise.

The growing Orthodox communities in the New York metropolitan area and elsewhere are distinctively Republican. In addition, Jews raised in households with a non-Jewish parent and who identify nominally with Judaism also tend to vote Republican.

Among Jewish voters polled during the 2002 New York governor's race, 47 percent indicated they would consider supporting George W. Bush. A Luntz Research Poll in April 2003 showed that 48 percent of Jews surveyed said they would consider voting for Bush in 2004.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Suck on that Brooks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. A 7% difference among 3% of the population
IS insignificant. I mean what is that 0.21% over all?

Remember that Muslims, who make up about 3% of the population as well voted 60 - 40 for the GOP in 2000. Those numbers will probably be reversed this time (or worse for the GOP) so the difference is much greater.

All in all, I say we pick up 1% or so from these two groups combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenFranklinUSA Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Sampling Small (1,000), But Probably Okay
...seems inline with what we usually hear.
I wouldn't bet my paycheck on the numbers, though :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. most national polls...
... use a similar sample size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. It matters in many states
Since Jews make up a significant proportion of the population in several states. If it is so insignificant, why do you think Rove has spent so much time courting the Jewish vote. This poll is great news!

I haven't seen a poll in a long time, but I predict Muslims will support Democratic candidates in both Presidential and other races. In tight races, these shifts will matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Hi, cally!
www.jews4clark.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. Jews in America have always led the way in liberal causes
They have been at the lead for civil rights reform in this country for as long as I can remember. That is just the facts.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. then again: are civil rights in need of reform?
it doesn't look like the reform that's taking place now is for the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Right!
Remember Thurgood Marshall's assistant Greenberg while they fought for Brown v. Bd of Ed?

Remember the 2/3 of Goodman, Schwerner and Cheney?

There were more Jews in the NAACP than any other group for years.

Take a look at the ACLU as well.

Damn fine legacy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. "The Chicago Seven"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Here are the 3 paragraphs most important to me:
U.S. Jews would overwhelmingly support any major Democratic candidate over President Bush (news - web sites) if the election were held today, according to the 2004 Annual Survey of American Jewish Opinion.


Jews also overwhelmingly oppose government funding for social service programs operated by religious groups, the survey found. Allowing faith-based organizations to compete for such funding is a top Bush initiative.

and

Nearly 70 percent said anti-Semitism was a greater threat to Jewish life in the United States than intermarriage, and said that among U.S. religious groups, Muslims and the "Religious Right" were the most anti-Semitic.


Thank you for the post!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
23. Another way to look at this
Only 60% of one of our strongest support groups backs any candidate other than Lieberman. That transfers not just into votes, but candidate funding. The Jewish community has always been a strong supporter of our party. But as our support for Israel declines, so appears does their support for most of our candidates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Thanks, MuddleoftheRoad;
I think that's why I did single out the following to be be 1 of the 3 paragraphs which stood out most for me:

Nearly 70 percent said anti-Semitism was a greater threat to Jewish life in the United States than intermarriage, and said that among U.S. religious groups, Muslims and the "Religious Right" were the most anti-Semitic.



:pals: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. When Israel's policies become supportable, (Is a Labor Government
too much to hope for?), then it will receive more support from the Democrats. Don't forget that the right wing is in power not only in the U.S. but in Israel as well.

Let there be change in both places. I don't think support for the Democrats should be tied to support for a right-wing government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. I'm sure you realize the modern
state of Israel was founded by socialists. Israelis still have universal health care, even under their present r/w govt.

However, I can't see Israelis voting Labor back in when they have a darn good chance of not returning home whenever they go out. Can you imagine what it might be like if every time you took the bus to work, you might be blown up? Can you imagine that if you ate your lunch in a public place or coffee shop, you might be blown up? Can you imagine what it might be like if every time you took the bus back home from work, you might be blown up?

With some empathy for a nation in fear, one can more easily see why they are voting their fears and not their principles.

Hopefully, one day, they will not have to vote on the level of pure survival. I'm certain you are aware of Maslow's hierarchy of needs: one cannot develop w/o having basic needs met. Therefore, it only makes sense that if one fears for one's life 24/7; one would be voting r/w.

Sad, but true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Agreed, except that these questions could be more tied to a Sharon-led
Likud and Settler government than a Labor-led coalition:

Can you imagine what it might be like if every time you took the bus to work, you might be blown up? Can you imagine that if you ate your lunch in a public place or coffee shop, you might be blown up? Can you imagine what it might be like if every time you took the bus back home from work, you might be blown up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Israel had a different government
Arafat and the terrorists caused the change. Israelis simply REACTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westman Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is this moving in the wrong direction?
70% sounds overwhelming, but hasn't the Democrat-voting percentage been higher in the past?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Yes, while Jewish support of the Democratic party
remains high, there is an increase in the number of Jewish Republicans. There was a saying that went "Jews live like Episcopalians but vote like Puerto Ricans" but that is proving less and less true.

I think as Jews move further and further from their immigrant roots and up the income and corporate ladder they tend to identify with the Republicans around whom they live. I think the primary thing keeping Jews Democratic IS the antisemitism of the religious right.

That being said, however, the orthodox Jewish community which is the fastest growing segment of American Jewry, tends to support Republican policies primarily because the pugs support vouchers and the orthodox tend to send their kids to private religious schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. okay, as another posted above
but coming from the other side:

provide links, not empty assumptions, please.

thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Here's a link
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp509.htm

From http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/Publications.asp?did=468&pid=1102

Voting Patterns

22. In politics, as of today, do you consider yourself a Republican, a Democrat, or an Independent?
Republican 9
Democrat 59
Independent 30
Not sure 2

23. I'm going to read you a list of political views that people might hold. They are arranged from extremely liberal to extremely conservative. Where would you place yourself on this scale?
Extremely liberal 4
Liberal 23
Slightly liberal 18
Moderate, middle of the road 36
Slightly conservative 9
Conservative 8
Extremely conservative 1
Not sure 2






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marian Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Yes!
IMHO, it's due to fear of the anti-Semitism so prevalent at so many otherwise progressive demonstrations, etc.

The last one I attended had people with signs of a Star of David with a Swastika superimposed over it.

People's hatred for Israel is overlapping and Jews sometimes see anti-Semitism as = to anti-Zionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Not sure how well I would have handled that
But if I saw some asshole walking around with a star of David with a swastika over it, we'd have words, that's for damn sure. And I'm not Jewish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRClarkesq Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. Good News? 9% to 16%?
Repubs show a significant increase in a traditional bastion of Dem voters. How many states would this have made a difference in 2000?

Why are Jewish voters trending away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC