Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Nixes Appeal Over 9-11 Detentions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:26 PM
Original message
Court Nixes Appeal Over 9-11 Detentions

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court refused Monday to consider whether the government properly withheld names and other details about hundreds of foreigners detained in the weeks and months after the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

snip

Most of the more than 700 detainees at issue in the case have since been deported. Some picked up after Sept. 11 were charged with crimes, and others were held as material witnesses. Only Zacarias Moussaoui, who was detained before the Sept. 11 attacks, is being prosecuted in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks.


A Washington study center critical of the Bush administration responses after Sept. 11 sued to learn names and other basic information about the detainees. The appeal raises constitutional questions under the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and legal questions under the federal Freedom of Information Act.


"The Justice Department (news - web sites) is keeping the names secret to cover up its misconduct," said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies.


"The Justice Department is keeping them secret to cover up the fact that they rounded up innocent Arabs and Muslims instead of suspected terrorists."


Twenty-three news organizations and media groups, including The Associated Press, joined in asking the high court to hear the case.

more
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=558&e=4&u=/ap/20040112/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_detainee_names
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. SCum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. need any more signs?
Any rollback or release of information of Bush crimes will signal their defeat. That is one line the SCOTUS will not cross, showing further signs of being a specifically partisan agenda. The Gay marriage thing was of no consequence except to stir up flame issues against Democrats. No contrition or retreat here. Only O'Connor is concerned people might later spit on her grave, so she tosses a few useless crumbs she know a later Bush court, one she is protecting, will trash anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was that the decision of the entire Court or just Rheinquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC