Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fraud crackdown comes with a loophole (overseas work exempt)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:15 PM
Original message
Fraud crackdown comes with a loophole (overseas work exempt)
Source: Associated Press

Fraud crackdown comes with a loophole
By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A Bush administration plan to crack down on contract fraud has a multibillion-dollar loophole: The proposal to force companies to report abuse of taxpayer money will not apply to work overseas, including projects to secure and rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan.

For decades, contractors have been asked to report internal fraud or overpayment on government-funded projects. Compliance has been voluntary, and over the past 15 years the number of company-reported fraud cases has declined steadily.

Now, the Justice Department wants to force companies to notify the government if they find evidence of contract abuse of more than $5 million. Failure to comply could make a company ineligible for future government work.

The proposed rules, which are in the final approval stages, specifically exempt "contracts to be performed outside the United States," according to a notice published last month in the Federal Register.

Critics including the watchdog group Taxpayers Against Fraud said the overseas exemption raises suspicions.

"I hate to sound cynical, but what lobbyist working for a contractor in Iraq wanted this get-out-of-jail card?" asked Patrick Burns, spokesman for the government watchdog group.






Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080212/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/contract_fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which lobbyist?
Probably someone Mark Penn hired. The fix is in. If the Clintons are let back in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. But the monkey will stomp his foot over "pork barrel spending" add-ons....
Such and idiot. Didn't bat and eye when the repugs were running away with it. Even did it himself. But now he's adding a new loop hole for the corporate heads to get away with more murder.

Do any of his sheep have reasoning skills at all??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R because I'm just so shocked by this!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. shall we call this the "let Cheney get richer, yet" loophole?
we know that the size of fraud already discovered and reported by Haliburton in Iraq far surpasses 5 million.

And how about reenstating the Clinton era exec order that contractors that commit fraud against the US govt taxpayers lose the ability to secure new contracts for 3 (or was it 5) years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why transfer this responsibility onto a worker who will certainly lose their job?
Restore the inspector generals staffs to their correct staffing levels and let them enforce current laws that protect the current whistleblowers who are hanging on the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's a control without a loophole?
I ask you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. We can intercept phone calls but we can't track the money?
Seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. There's the way to look at it.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. America
wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC