Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Cusp of Senate Telecom Immunity Passage, White House Admits Phone Companies Spied

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:57 PM
Original message
On Cusp of Senate Telecom Immunity Passage, White House Admits Phone Companies Spied
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 11:02 PM by BadgerKid
Source: Wired Blog Network

Just hours before the Senate is about to pass a bill giving amnesty to spying telecoms and legalizing the government's warrantless wiretapping program, the White House finally came clean and admitted what everyone already knows: the phone companies helped the government datamine your phone records and wiretap Americans.

At today's press briefing, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino responded in a non-sequitor to a question about whether telecoms were asked to spy on Americans months before 9/11 by saying:

"The telephone companies that were alleged to have helped their country after 9/11 did so because they are patriotic and they certainly helped us and they helped us save lives," Perino said.

It's unclear why Perino felt obliged to use the word alleged, though it may be just out of sheer force of habits.



Read more: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/02/on-cusp-of-sena.html



Edited to add original source material:

Q They don't have to have warrants to wiretap?

MS. PERINO: That's not what this is about, Helen. Anyone in America who would require a wiretap that -- you have to go through the process of getting a warrant. This was about dealing through the FISA court to make sure that our intelligence gaps remain closed when dealing with phone calls overseas.

Q But were the telephone companies told that it was legal to wiretap six months before 9/11?

MS. PERINO: The telephone companies that were alleged to have helped their country after 9/11 did so because they are patriotic and they certainly helped us and they helped us save lives.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/02/20080212-2.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. She is as dumb as a rock. Okay they just admitted they broke the law.
What now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You said it. I thought Helen was off limits.
WTF was she thinking taking a question from Helen Thomas? "DUH" doesn't begin to cover that faux pas.

I wonder if Dana's going to be out sick tomorrow - the next month even, or if she's going to decide she needs to spend more time with her family in the very near future.

Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Patriotic Companies... That sounds like something out of COINTELPRO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. the Brownshirts were patriotic too....allegedly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Fascism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. And, of course, the services were provided pro bono.
"The telephone companies that were alleged to have helped their country after 9/11 did so because they are patriotic and they certainly helped us and they helped us save lives," Perino said.

If you can come up with a more outrageous statement than this, I will buy the next round.

Tom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Was Dana furiously waving American flags when she said this?
Because I can picture that.

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Starting Feb 1, 2009...
We need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, one with powers to bring charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Question is are they still doing wholesale wiretapping, internet tapping, fax tapping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. yes, why wouldn't they be, they call it "impersonal surveillance." As in they just look through all
the data en mass. Then filter it out. Make connection (with the software from Las Vegas) between "target" words or phrases or names and then "predict and protect"

I like that "predict and protect" do you think the homeland security will pay me for that? or just steal it from my Internet carrier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey Dana.....
...were these the same patriotic, life-saving telecoms that cut off the wiretaps to the FBI over unpaid bills like a single mom cutting off visiting priveleges to a deadbeat dad???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Like totally stop asking such like hard questions and stuff. I mean like our President is like great
:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. And don't ask me about the Cuban missile crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesota_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Patriotic, my ass!
The spying telecoms saw either an economic opportunity in spying and a potential downside to operating within the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. I feel vindicated. Mail also, just wait. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ok, I've got two questions...
1. What the fuck is Harry Reid thinking???
2. Is there a list of what Telecoms went along with selling us out and which ones balked and did not?
I'm on Nextel now, but I sure as hell will switch to whatever company told the criminals to fuck off and I will tell them why.
I don't have a lot of cash to throw around but I'll let my pocketbook do the loudest talking since that's what the corporations understand.
Rat bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. Didn't this wiretapping start BEFORE September 11, 2001?
Did they bother to ask Dana No-braina that question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nilram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Oh, yeah,
From the OP,

Q But were the telephone companies told that it was legal to wiretap six months before 9/11?

MS. PERINO: The telephone companies that were alleged to have helped their country after 9/11 did so because they are patriotic and they certainly helped us and they helped us save lives.

---

To which Perino gives a total non-answer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Oh, duh.
Thanks. I should've read a little more carefully. Guess I have no room to call her dumb. (But I do know the difference between the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Bay of Pigs operation.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Isn't that the one where the Cuba terra-ists stuffed a bunch of pigs with bombs...
then floated them to Washington, causing the simultaneous assassinations of JFK, RFK, MLK and Abraham Lincoln (everybody forgets Lincoln 'cause he doesn't have a 'K'"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yep, that's the one!
We are smarter than Dana. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Ms. Perino, are you saying that in this whole secret squirrel operation
involving the military, MZM and the patriotic phone companies, you can assure the public that no one at any time abused this power to spy on, oh say, a Senator?

That's correct. You are safe with us. We would never, never, never abuse power. You have our word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Perino should have been called on her non-answer.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 03:30 PM by Uncle Joe
On edit, too late to recommend.

Thanks for the thread, BadgerKid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC