Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Jersey civil union law draws criticism (failed to end discrimination)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:04 PM
Original message
New Jersey civil union law draws criticism (failed to end discrimination)
Source: UPI

PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 18 (UPI) -- A study commission has found that New Jersey's year-old civil union law has failed to end discrimination against same-sex couples.

In a report due to be released Tuesday, the 12-member Civil Union Review Commission says employers are still discriminating against people in same-sex relationships and civil unions have created a "second-class status," The Philadelphia Inquirer reported Monday.

The newspaper obtained a copy of the 21-page report that also says the law has had "a particularly disparate impact on people of color."

At hearings conducted by the commission, Lynn Fontaine Newsome, the president of the New Jersey State Bar Association, testified that lawyers faced "countless additional hours of work" in representing gays, lesbians, bisexual clients and their families."


Read more: http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2008/02/18/new_jersey_civil_union_law_draws_criticism/2825/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's legally the same as "marriage" here, but not calloing it such leads to some bad stuff
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 04:01 PM by LostinVA
Employers denying benefits, mayors refusing to marry same sex couples, etc. Haruka and I were married in September, and we both have employers that understand that our union is the SAME thing as a heterosexual civil union. But, the wording needs to change NOW to close the faux loophole some are using.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't know
I mean, I agree the wording should be the same. I just think that pieces of garbage that are offended/threatened/afraid of someone else's choice on who they want to be married to will still be the same. They will still discriminate, and intimidate, and attack and murder them. Its f'ing disgusting.

I also seem like I feel at this great loss for a solution. I can't even understand the mindset that causes people to react they way they do to something that HAS NO F'ING IMPACT ON THEM... I can never think of anything that would help them understand and get rid of the problem once and for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I have a solution
The same solution that was used to secure rights for every other beleagured minority that eventually got them: put it into law and let the bigots go fuck themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Your one of the lucky couples

Congratulations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was a nice idea, but now that we know it's a failure, it's time to give full equality to gays and
lesbians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. No surprise
What's surprising is that so many seem to think that we can keep trying "separate but equal" and one time it will work. Haven't we done that already enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC