Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC's Jerry Nachman Dead at 57

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:12 PM
Original message
MSNBC's Jerry Nachman Dead at 57
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 02:13 PM by economic justice
Anybody who remembers the "Nachman" show on MSNBC will remember him as a dry, but bright observer of politics.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4008960/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lefty_mcduff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Geebuz. Wasn't he on TV last week.
As a commentator on Hardball.
Man, you never know when your number is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. He seemed to enjoy...
attacking "liberals" from what I remember. In any event, may he rest in peace, and I wish his family well during this time of their loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yes, he clearly was anti liberal....
He was a talking mouth for the Bush White House. He was chief editor for MSNBC and recently took a leave of absence because of health reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Yeah, he went negative on some liberals...but he was
a pretty good, "traditional"(old style) newsman. Rest in peace Jerry.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't remember him quite like that...
but it's bad form to speak ill of the departed. My condolences to his family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Indeed.
They say that if you can't say something nice...

This space intentionally left blank


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. I'll do the same (sigs don't count)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #37
54. Agreed, RIP
This is a sad day for his family, if not for the possibility of real journalism in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Reply to post #2?
Did you mean this as a reply to post # 2? The original post wasn't negative to Mr. Nachman....and I agree with your sentiments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. No, I was replying to the original message
"Anybody who remembers the Nachman show on MSNBC will remember him as a dry, but bright observer of politics (italics mine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. ???
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 05:28 PM by economic justice
"Dry" is hardly knocking somebody. "Dry" is exactly as Nachman described himself on more than a few occasions while he had his show....yet....he always felt there was a place for "old-fashioned journalism" on television. A Dry wit is not a bad thing, a dry style can be very successful if it's accompanied by a sharp mind. I certainly meant no disrespect to Mr. Nachman at all.....sorry if it came across that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. (sigh)
I was focusing on the "bright" part more than "dry", but.....ah hell, let's just drop it, shall we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder if his weight
had anything to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. died of cancer n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I think you may be thinking of Jerry Nadler, NY representative
He's quite heavy. Nachman wasn't heavy at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. May he rest in peace.
If Nachman is who I think it is, he was a little on the heavy side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Hmmmm ...
I was confused about which one also.

There was a heavy set Jerry Nachman who hosted a show (Nachman Show?) on MSRNC.

There is an author named Jerry Nachman (might be spelled different, but it sounds the same). I recall from an interview that he wrote a book about comedians of the 20th century (I forget the name of the book).

I think the one that dies (based on the posts) seems to be the one that host a show on MSGOP.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. The book was "Seriously Funny"
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 05:53 PM by kskiska
and a good one, too. I recommend it.

The NY Congressman, Jerry Nadler, has had surgery to correct his weight problem, but the guy who died had been heavy, too. He'd lost weight, though, probably because of the cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Nachman wasn't heavy at all?
I guess that depends on your definition of heavy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. He wasn't thin
appeared to be overweight to me -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Nachman lost a ton of weight during his illness.
He was ill for quite a while.

His early work on MSNBC was disturbing, it was as if he had a real preoccupation. He was NOT nimble mentally, actually. He was overfocused. It was uncomfortable trying to listen to him, so I didn't.

When I learned he had a brain tumor, it occured to me he may have not really been quite himself during the time I had heard him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
45. Oh, yes he was heavy.
Not Gerald Nadler-type heavy, but heavy.

Am I sad? One less Repuke in the world. Tears me up.

Sarcasm mode off.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought23 Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #45
53. He was a boring fat swine.
Peace be upon him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. How harsh!
Well, truth be known, around our house we used to call him Nachoman. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. I had the impression
that he was a good man who was well liked by his colleagues. He was obviously very, very bright. Fifty seven is too young but cancer is unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. the New York Post had a policy of only hiring good men as editors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. He was a conservative, and helped make MSNBC into MSRNC..but
I never really hated him--not like Tweety, for example.

He has been ill, and it is too bad that he couldn't make it.

He seemed much older than 57.

The set of his show was very 1940s, and he lead with some banter about the "old tine" journalists"--invoking Murrow, Cronkite, Winchell, etc.

Sad, such a short life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bummer...I actually liked his show.
He wasn't as hateful as Weiner or the Lori-Killer...

RIP, Big Guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. a dry, bright observer of politics...
..who did everything he could to promote the junta, before and after 2000, in his network position.

There's no point in avoiding the truth, despite his unfortunate demise.

We can only hope that MSNBC will take a new direction now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. ...as did the rest of the media whores
At least with Nachman, I had the feeling that he never sold out, that he was always a conservative attempting to push his rightwing viewpoint regardless.

The entire mass media establishment is complicit in promoting the junta. At least Nachman had reasons other than lucre to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. This guy--editor-in-chief msnbc


Not the really heavy guy with the show.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=3080440&p1=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Or is that the same guy?
Decided I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Same guy.. He lost a lot of weight with his illness
I never particularly liked his show, but no one deserves to die that young.. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Will this help?
From the article:

(snip) Jerry Nachman is Vice President and Editor-in-Chief of MSNBC. Nachman's career has spanned radio, television and print. He's worked in front of the camera and behind; on the street, in the newsroom and in the front office. Nachman has served as the news director for WNBC-TV in New York City; Vice President, News, WCBS-TV, New York and Editor-in-Chief, New York Post. He also served for many years as an on-air street reporter for both WCBS Radio and WCBS Television in New York, and was a columnist for The New York Post. In separate assignments he was Vice President and General Manager of WRC Radio and WRC Television, both NBC-owned properties in Washington, D.C. (snip/...)

Accompanying photo:


http://www.nbccableinfo.com/insidenbccable/networks/msnbc/prog/people/nachman.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yep, thanks. Same guy
Msnbc is using a more flattering (younger thinner) photo in his obit/bio. Same guy.

And my condolences. He certainly had a brain, which is ususual over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. one neocon taking whore down
condolences to his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. can't say I'm sorry to hear it
...actually the news brought a smile to my face.

I do feel for the family and I am sorry for their loss...

From a wider view I think the world is a slightly better place with him gone.
Anybody here who claims it isn't is just being polite.

He wasn't:
'intelligent'
or 'insightful'
or a 'bright observer'

He was a blow hard.
He capitalized on fear, coercion, and media manipulation. More so than any other garden variety fundie or neocon, he really helped to created the current culture of division and rampant nationalism.

good riddance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. That's ridiculous
It is really embarrasing that so many people on this message board rejoice in the death of others who have different political views. However, I was hoping that I could read through this thread and avoid any threads like that but I guess there is always one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Only the true defenders of free speech, their free speech.
It happens every time someone who isn't "progressive" dies. I guess progressive means celebrating a families loss if you don't like their family members political views.

No free speech for fascists, right "deep thinkers"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. Free speech??? Hell, Nachman and Co. ram it down our throats!
And I'm sorry, but having just listened to the Smirking Bastard and his vision of a hard-rightwing Amerika on the SOTU, I'm not feeling particularly sympathetic to any Pukes tonight.

I'm sorry for Nachman's family. I really am. But the world is better off tonight by one less Puke.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. not at all ridiculous
I am not 'rejoicing' in his death because he and I had 'different political views. I would not have made the statement if he did not hold the position he did.
I am being blunt.

- He was editor in chief of MSNBC.

That means he had a large degree of discretionary control over MSNBC's content.

Under his command MSNBC took a decided turn not only to the right, but away from journalistic standards and towards WWF style political programming.
This was NOT beneficial to our country.

Do you believe he had NOTHING to do with getting Savage a show on national TV? Or keeping Tim Russert happily employed?

Do you think that these kind of shows have NO effect on our country or world?

No, this isn't just because I didn't like his politics...

I'm not out in the streets dancing or throwing a party, but I'm not going to feign sorrow either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. You are VERY WRONG
How very sad. You must think that there is nothing in life but politics and base your feelings on that alone. Take a walk in the park and watch the birds! Now, to correct your negative and inflammatory post:

Nachman was the Editor-In-Chief of MSNBC long before the changes. In fact, the changes started happening about the time he stepped aside to fight his cancer. His kept the title, but was uninvolved except as an (infrequent) on-air contributor. I would suggest that next time you take a deep breath before blasting a person who has just died with inaccurate information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I usually do a search at the Daily Howler to get a lowdown on someone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. your opinion, your entitled to it
I'll keep mine.

In my universe a walk in the park doesn't stop the police from tapping my phone; nor does it keep soldiers out of Iraq.

A trip to the woods does not mean that I will no longer be accused of being a terrorist by people who mainline idiots like Savage or Limbaugh.

Playing hippy dirt farmer and dancing naked in the forrest is enjoyable on occassion, but politics is what determines if that forrest stands or is clear cut.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. But why did he REFUSE to report Bush's WMD lies?? 500 dead troops...
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 10:08 PM by Dr Fate
is what we have because this "journalist" refused to do his job. Why am I supposed to like this guy again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Why did Nachman REFUSE to report Bush's WMD lies??
And why should I give a FUCK about this Bush enabler? I'm not "glad" he died, but I could really care less. Dont worry- some other pro-Bush liar will take his place, and I wont be sorry when whoever that is dies either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. Don't call yourself a "liberal"
Please, don't call yourself a "liberal" or a "progressive" with outrageous, over-the-top views like you are posting. You are basically saying that if anybody works in journalism and didn't become an anti-Bush crusader, then they don't deserve compassion to fight a long Battle with cancer, and ultimately lose their life. Unbelievable is all I can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
66. Anti Bush crusader? I just wanted to hear the simple truth about WMDs...
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 12:11 PM by Dr Fate
No one wants journalists to be "anti Bush crusaders." I just want objective facts, like the ones Nachman refused to report.

I just want journalists like Nachman to at least TALK ABOUT the fact that Bush forged & lied his way into the war.

Nachman refused to report the WMD lies, now we have 500 dead troops.

Bush lied about WMDs, but you say that only "Anti Bush crusaders" are responsible for telling us this? How about just regular old objective journalism???

500 dead troops vs. One fat guy who refused to report the lies that killed them.

Where was Nachman's compassion for my friends over seas when he was pumping up this war?

Anti Bush Crusader! PLEEEASE!! I just want simple, objective facts, and this "journalist" could npot even supply that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. Can't say I'll miss him or even care.
Condolensces to the family, is about all I could say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. He was never fair to DEMS, and refused to report Bush scandals...
...I hate the media with a passion, and I hate Nachman too. Not sorry that one more lying, war-mongering media whore has left the earth. I'm sorry. Honest, but sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Amen to that. Any Dem who feels sorry for him is a sucker.
Nachman was no friend of the truth or of professionalism in TV journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. That's just outrageous
Jerry Nachman was nothing if not a PROFESSIONAL. Seldom, by the way, did he ever inject his own views into things. He was a journalists journalist. To say anything different is to engage in outright character assassination. You wrote: "Any Dem who feels sorry for him is a sucker." The man DIED. I am a Democrat and am no sucker. Didn't we used to be a party of COMPASSION? So many posts in this thread are simply outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. What f'ing network were YOU watching???
Professional? Journalist's journalist??? In what universe??? Holy jumpin' Jeebus!!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. MSNBC........
What network are YOU watching? Damn right he was a professional! Can you, be specific, tell me ONE instance of his not being a professional? Just ONE. He was highly regarded in the industry and Jerry Nachman was always talking about the incivility in our public discourse. Many of the posts in this thread should be EXHIBIT ONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. As a talking head, he was OK for a Puke, but not as a journalist.
He was SELDOM, if ever, objective or balanced. He basically carried water for this misAdministration. Can I quote chapter and verse? No, because I usually flipped the channel when he got going. And no, because I don't remember a single instance of Nachman asking the tough questions to those in power -- and THAT is the primary job of a journalist! Nachman: A blowhard gasbag. That's what he was. He may have been a serious, professional journalist at one time, but that time passed long ago.

Bake
Liberal, but not bleeding heart for the Pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #50
61. Speaking of "incivility in our public discourse, your post seems to...
...also be in the running for "EXHIBIT ONE".

20-30 years ago, professionalism used to be defined in the mainstream media as being honest and fair to all political viewpoints. When a conservative like Nachman is given a platform from which to disagree with ALL liberal thought and those that think them, that's when professionalism flies out the window.

How many political Liberals currently have shows on television? And that punching bag used by Hannity doesn't count.

And why are you watching MSNBC, or ANY of the so-called "news" networks for ANY reason?

JMHO, and I really don't care if you like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #46
58. What's outrageous is your substandard standard for professionalism.
Perhaps you've caught the "propaganda is news" bug that pervades all TV news "journalism" today. Nachman was one of the miserable, rotten bastards who helped bring it about. He is one of the Limbaugh/Gingrich manichean, anti-intellectual, triumphalist, news-as-entertainment yellow journalists who have helped hasten the destruction of the once proud, Murrow-American tradition of journalism-with-integrity.

Dead is just fine with me. It will take decades to restore what he helped to destroy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #46
64. Just answer the question- why did he refuse to report WMD lies?
500 dead troops vs. one fat guy who could have told the truth about Bush's WMD lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
52. Executive Producer of "Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher."
"Nachman also worked in late 2001 as a staff writer for the NBC television series "UC: Undercover" and was a staff writer and executive producer at "Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher."
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nat-gen/2004/jan/20/012004603.html

For those who think Nachman was "far right" and a "Bush mouthpiece"....Executive Producer of a REAL right wing show!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #52
68. Deleted by poster
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 02:30 PM by economic justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #52
69. Having posting problems......Deleted By Poster
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 02:32 PM by economic justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleofus1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
56. One down
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 04:22 AM by cleofus1
Jerry was an asshole, the damage he did to Democrats was commensurate to the importance of the positions he held...I just regret he didn't go sooner...And by the way Dr Fate is the man...and you really shouldn't tug on his cape (or spit in the wind). I'm a Liberal and a Democrat and I've known jerry n was a slug for a while now. Now if only rush would get hit by a bus....:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. I, as a DU'er, am awash with outrage!
The very idea of suggesting rush......bus.........scandalous. A loss we just couldn't afford. Every gibbering hate-filled loon is precious.

Run, , run, RUN!



BONUS LIMBAUGH:
Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr.
Chief Justice
Supreme Court of Missouri
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleofus1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #57
72. ha ha aha
you are precious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #56
62. show a little respect
the guy's dead, for chrissakes. if you're a liberal and a democrat as you say, be above that kind of crap. otherwise, you sound like the kind of people who listen to rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. I respect the 500 dead troops that Nachman helped murder...
...by refusing to report Bush's WMD lies & scandals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arlib Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. Hey man
2112 rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R Hickey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
59. His last assignment was covering the Michael Jackson story
Nachman was a right-wing media whore. He pretended to be thoughtful, but nothing he ever said on TV ever really amounted to more than GOP propaganda.

I'm sure he will be quickly replaced by someone with equally fascist leanings. His corporation, MSNBC, will not miss him, because their stable of paid shills is large.

Nachman's fluff stories like the Michael Jackson trial, will not be remembered for long, because they were, like Nachman, not very important.

When I first saw him move his mouth on television, I expected fairness, but was soon disappointed. He devoted his life to hiding real news from the public, and that, in my view, is not a nobel cause.

My condolences to his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
60. order 1 double wide coffin.
another junta enabler goes subterranean! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
63. If you can't say anything nice about the departed
no text
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
70. Thanks to THIS THREAD
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 02:34 PM by economic justice
Having just read through this thread (all 65 posts) it has helped me to make a decision I have needed to make for a long time. Some of the posts here, that seem to be thrilled over the death of Mr. Nachman, prove to me that I need to take seriously the old adage, "You are known by the company you keep." The immaturity of thought and flame-throwing radicalism expressed in this thread has been eye-opening. A thought from a man who tried to bring civil discourse to his nation:
"A person's character is not revealed by how they talk of their friends, but how they speak of their enemies."
- Vaclav Havel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #70
73. Tell that to Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the bums...
who you feel we ought to be so godam civil toward. Tell it to the ones who first poisoned the well we all must drink from. I'm sick and tired of listening to voices like your which keep telling us to be civil and nice while we are having our lunches eaten by the people you so guilelessly heap praises upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidpleasant Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
71. one reason to remember him
Whatever his faults may have been Nachman deserves credit as the author of perhaps the greatest tabloid newspaper headline ever: "Headless Body in Topless Bar".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC