Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Resolution Opposing Media-Ownership Changes Introduced in House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:22 PM
Original message
Resolution Opposing Media-Ownership Changes Introduced in House
Source: Radio Ink

Resolution Opposing Media-Ownership Changes Introduced In House

WASHINGTON -- March 14, 2008: Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) is the lead sponsor of a resolution of disapproval that aims to nullify the FCC's recent change to the media-ownership rules to lift the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership ban in the top 20 markets. The resolution is the House companion to a resolution introduced by Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) earlier this month.

"Consolidation already has brought us to the point where two companies control 70 percent of market revenue in an average radio market," Inslee said. "We need to use every tool available to prevent further weakening of media-ownership rules."

Co-sponsoring the resolution are Reps. Dave Reichert (R-WA), Louise Slaughter (D-NY), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI).

Read more: http://www.radioink.com/HeadlineEntry.asp?hid=141419&pt=todaysnews


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank You... I'm Sick of Living in a Blue State That Only Has Right Wing Garbage
on the radio. This media monopoly is forcing right wing propaganda down our throats 24-7!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. What happened, did they get a backbone transplant...
bout bloody time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why it took so long?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. are we bringing back the "Fairness Doctrine"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nels25 Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If we try Bush
said he will veto it.

Not going to get past the senate this year anyway.

Better to wait to next year when we have a Democrat for president (or so I hope).

BTW: I have been contemplating this and has anyone considered the fact that 10 seconds after President Obama or Clinton signs this bill, Clear Channel et al will be in federal arguing for a restraining order based on violation of their first amendment rights. We all know that in the end this is more than likely to end up at the Supreme Court. And at present make up of the court it will be likely found unconstitutional.

We shall see.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ermm
The Dems have been just as much complicit
in the media bloc travesty as anyone...
and it's a bit late in the regulation game
to do much good.

I suppose any new regulation and restrictions
would be a good thing, but I don't think we'd
actually see much actual change in the whorish
joke that is now our current media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC