Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agents told to be silent on details of border plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ruby Romaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 03:48 PM
Original message
Agents told to be silent on details of border plan
Agents told to be silent on details of border plan

January 21, 2004

BY TAMARA AUDI
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

The Bush administration's proposal to offer amnesty to illegal immigrant workers has prompted federal officials to instruct border patrol agents not to disclose information that might reflect poorly on the idea, a government document shows.

Meanwhile, U.S. border patrol agents have been told to ask a series of questions when they capture illegal immigrants, including whether the immigrants have heard of President George W. Bush's proposal.

http://www.freep.com/news/metro/border21_20040121.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good googley moogley
huh?

including whether the immigrants have heard of President George W. Bush's proposal.

and if they have? Will Zogby be polling them?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would speculate that most people are aware that there is a proposal

to give them the opportunity to register their fingerprints with the regime, and become a crusader or an indentured servant of some kind, in return for not having to worry about the migra for 3 years, at which point there is no guarantee that one will not be deported, and on re-entry face risks that one does not face on re-entry today.

the idea will be of limited appeal to people who have been working in the US without papers, or prints on file, for 5, ten or twenty years, as well as those who are doing so in order to support dependents whose interests would not be served by having the family breadwinner designated a disposable crusade asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jukes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And
You can bet they'll be registered for the draft @ the same time:
cheaplabor/voting pool for the Benevolent White Father/conscript 'foreign legion" for the Imperial Expansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, just as the worker is better off as he is now, so is the company

who would have to do more paperwork, pay more money per worker than they currently do, even if the plan, as you can bet it would be, is weighted heavily in the company's favor, there would still be additional costs involved, the workman's comp costs alone would, for a company who employed a large number of workers, constitute a substantial cut into profits.

While there might be some individuals currently in Mexico and Central America who are desperate and naive enough to sign onto such a death-ship, thus affording the regime a few extra disposable assets, I am not sure that the scheme was ever intended to be put into place at all.

Its value is not in its actual implementation and the relatively small benefit to the military, but as a political tool: cognitive dissonance as public policy, and as such, it will probably be very effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC