Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: Army failed to perform tests on body armor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:31 PM
Original message
Report: Army failed to perform tests on body armor
Source: MSNBC

The Pentagon’s Inspector General has found that the U.S. Army repeatedly failed to follow federal contracting rules in procuring billions of dollars worth of body armor for American soldiers, according to an IG report obtained by NBC News.

In nearly half of the body-armor contracts given out between January 2004 and December 2006, according to the report, the Army failed to require or perform so-called ‘first article testing’ designed to catch and correct any defects in the body-armor manufacturing process. What’s more, the Army failed to maintain appropriate records to justify why a number of contracts were awarded in the first place, the report said. It is scheduled for public release tomorrow.

As a result, the report states that the Department of Defense “has no assurance” that 13 of 28 Army body-armor contracts--worth an estimated $2.98 billion--“met the required standards” or that 11 of 28--worth an estimated $3.92 billion--“were awarded based on informed procurement decisions.”

“This is astonishing,” said Congresswoman Louis Slaughter (D-N.Y.), the chairwoman of the House Rules Committee. She first asked the IG to examine the Pentagon’s body-armor procurement practices back in April 2006. Slaughter told NBC News: “Army’s officials have a responsibility to the soldier and the taxpayer and they failed in both areas. Whoever is responsible for this needs to be fired.”



Read more: http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/01/848659.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rec'd-heavy on the outrage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, they tested it, all right.
They just tested it on 18-year old kids, is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh slam. The ugly truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Quote: "Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used in foreign policy."
- Henry Kissinger

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is NO EXCUSE. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. 22 year-old that sold U.S. bad armaments to Afghans & Iraq Waxman hearing April 17th
This report goes right along with the bad arms sold by the 22-year-old that were out of date and not tested by the Army:

Supplier Under Scrutiny on Arms for Afghans
By C. J. CHIVERS
Published: March 27, 2008

This article was reported by C. J. Chivers, Eric Schmitt and Nicholas Wood and written by Mr. Chivers.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/world/asia/27ammo.html?hp=&pagewanted=all

Since 2006, when the insurgency in Afghanistan sharply intensified, the Afghan government has been dependent on American logistics ........to arm the Afghan forces that it hopes will lead this fight, the American military has relied since early last year on a fledgling company led by a 22-year-old man whose vice president was a licensed masseur.

(snip)

....when the Army wrote its Afghan contract, it did not enforce either NATO or Russian standards. It told bidders only that the munitions must be “serviceable and issuable to all units without qualification.” What this meant was not defined. An official at the Army Sustainment Command said that because the ammunition was for foreign weapons, and considered “nonstandard,” it only had to fit in weapons it was intended for. “There is no specific testing request, and there is no age limit,” said Michael Hutchison, the command’s deputy director for acquisition. “As the ammunition is not standard to the U.S. inventory, the Army doesn’t possess packaging or quality standards for that ammo.”

When purchasing such munitions, Mr. Hutchison said, the Army Sustainment Command relies on standards from the “customer” — meaning the Army units in Afghanistan. And the customer, he said, did not set age or testing requirements. With the vague standards in hand, AEY canvassed the field. One stop was Albania, a fortress state during Soviet times now trying to join NATO. Albania has huge stocks of armaments, much if it provided by China in the 1960s and 1970s.

The quality of these stockpiles vary widely, said William D. G. Hunt, a retired British ammunition technical officer who assessed the entire stock for Albania’s Ministry of Defense from 1998 to 2002. He said a military planning to use the munitions had reason to worry: at least 90 percent of the stockpile was more than 40 years old.

“If there was any procurement made for combat purposes from that stockpile, I would be very dubious about it,” he said. “I am not suggesting that all the ammunition would fail. But its performance would tail off rather dramatically. It is substandard, for sure.” Problems with Albania’s decaying munitions were apparent earlier this month, when a depot outside Tirana, Albania’s capital, erupted in a chain of explosions, killing at least 22 people, injuring at least 300 others and destroying hundreds of homes.

Before the Army’s contractors began shopping from such depots, the West’s assessment of Albanian munitions was evident in programs it sponsored to destroy them. Through 2007, the United States had contributed $2 million to destroy excess small-caliber weapons and 2,000 tons of ammunition in Albania, according to the State Department. A NATO program that ended last year involved 16 Western nations contributing about $10 million to destroy 8,700 tons of obsolete ammunition. The United States contributed $500,000. Among the items destroyed were 104 million 7.62 millimeter cartridges — exactly the ammunition AEY sought from the Albanian state arms export agency.

Albania offered to sell tens of millions of cartridges manufactured as long ago as 1950. For tests, a 25-year-old AEY representative was given 1,000 cartridges to fire, according to Ylli Pinari, the director of the arms export agency at the time of the sale. No ballistic performance was recorded, he said. The rounds were fired by hand. On that basis, AEY bought more than 100 million cartridges for the Pentagon’s order. The cartridges, according to packing lists, dated to the 1960s.

..........

More info at link. This makes one sick to their stomach to see not only our tax payer money being thrown away but the reckless and dangerous ammunitions that were given to people in Iraq and Afghanistan.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/27/asia/27afghan-react.php

WASHINGTON: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will investigate the award of a federal contract for nearly $300 million to provide ammunition for Afghanistan army and police units, the panel's chairman said Thursday.

The chairman, Representative Henry Waxman, Democrat of California, said the committee would hold a hearing on April 17 to scrutinize the contract awarded to AEY Inc., a company that The New York Times reported had supplied ammunition that was often obsolete or defective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. They refused to buy armor that was lighter, more flexible, provided
protection for the side, and could actually stop a bullet.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KTrTrsJu3pk

VIP's and high ranking officers can us Dragon Skin.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. the Philistines used the same design in their armour
that was what? 3000 yrs ago....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. So is it "War Profiteering" yet? This is
beyond outrageous this is criminal. How many of our soldiars lives could have been saved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder if Ollie North will rear his ugly head in this?
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9502E0D71F39F937A15757C0A960958260

"In a deal whose unusual pedigree is drawing attention on Wall Street, Mr. North, the flag-waving former marine who was the central player in the Iran-contra affair, is seeking to sell to the public part of Guardian Technologies International, a maker of body armor, including bulletproof vests, in Sterling, Va.

"Mr. North founded the company in 1989 with Joseph F. Fernandez, the former station chief of the Central Intelligence Agency in Costa Rica who also became known for his association with the Iran-contra affair. Mr. Fernandez is Guardian's only other executive officer, and together, the two men will own 23.5 percent of the company after the offering."

That was twelve years ago. They were still making vests as of 2003. They moved the armor biz to a subsidiary in 2001.

Interestingly enough, as of 2005, the CEO of Guardian was a fellow with a name that oughta prick up some ears: Bill Donovan. The great grandson of "Wild Bill"? I don't know.

But I wouldn't be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. They are willing to harm our own soldiers for their filthy money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yet more gross corruption from defense contractors.
I want to see some serious charges for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC