Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yoko Ono sues in NY over song in movie challenging evolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:45 AM
Original message
Yoko Ono sues in NY over song in movie challenging evolution
Source: AP

In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Manhattan, Ono accuses the producers of "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" of suggesting to viewers that those who guard John Lennon's legacy somehow authorized or sponsored the film.

The producers of the film, which features Ben Stein challenging Darwinian theories that prevail in academic circles and suggesting that life could have emerged through intelligent design, said they used only "a very small portion of the song."

"Based on the fair use doctrine, news commentators and film documentarians regularly use material in the same way we do," Premise Media said in a statement. "Unbiased viewers of the film will see that the 'Imagine' clip was used as part of a social commentary in the exercise of free speech and freedom of inquiry."

Ono's lawsuit claims the producers did not ask for permission either because they knew they couldn't get it or because they did not want to pay for the rights. It objects to the way "Imagine" is listed in the film's credits, saying it suggested to members of the news media and others that the song's use had been approved.

Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080424/D90870980.html



I think it's okay to put this in breaking news, I found it interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Rotten Tomatoes has this Ben Stein Bomb at 11%
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 07:46 AM by Joe Bacon
Hmmm, Maybe B.S. will get a RAZZIE nomination out of this!

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/expelled_no_intelligence_allowed/

Read the posted reviews! They're hilarious!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
42. Lol! Thanks for the link. Here's a few that I liked:
One of the sleaziest documentaries to arrive in a very long time, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is a conspiracy-theory rant masquerading as investigative inquiry.

Junk science meets even junkier filmmaking in Expelled -- a no more shameless, stupid and loathsome piece of propaganda has ever skulked its way into the theater.

t shows us bogus security files, as if some cabal is spying on everyone. It shirks the facts. And it madly edits images to equate Darwin with Hitler, and Ben Stein with -- yes -- Ronald Reagan. Typical of all propaganda, it also distorts language.

For a film about American freedom of expression and the necessity for open dialogue, it's hard to imagine Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed being more one-sided, narrow-minded, and intellectually dishonest.

The man made famous by Ferris Bueller, however, quickly wades into waters far too deep for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Terrible error in the article's headline.
Expelled doesn't even come close to "challenging" evolution. It's an utter joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Good point. Even "Christianity Today" says the movie fails to actually challenge Evolution. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
66. The movie isn't about challenge evoultion
The movie is more about what happens to any professor or scientist that brings up ID than challenging evolution, which the movie pretty much says is valid but fails to account for how "life" actually began.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. It's unfortunate that academia seems to discriminate against stupid people teaching stupid ideas.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. I don't think some of the people they interviewed were stupid
DISCLAIMER : I do not agree with the movie or the views of the people they talked to!

Some of the people the talked to had to be pretty smart to get into and graduate from the universities they went to. One guy was a neurosurgeon and I don't think there are many stupid people qualified to operate on brains. Others defiantly seemed a little whacked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. I don't think they actually believe their own bullshit if they're not stupid.
I think the smart people know it's bullshit, but they're being dishonest and using it to try and recruit stupid people into their little cults.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric Condon Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
38. The fact that it was made in the first place might make a pretty convincing case against evolution.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good for her! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Now there's an episode of "Win Ben Stein's Money" I'd like to watch... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. hi rooboy!
I haven't seen you in forever. I hope all is well down under. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
70. Hey!
I lurk every day, just don't post much these days... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't blame her.
It's a great song and should not be used by religious fanatics trying to deny reality. I hope she wins what little profit the movie makes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. You go, girl, I say.
I can't say I'm a big fan of Yoko, but I am a big fan of defending John's legacy. Stick it to him good, I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. used by religious fanatics
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 08:19 AM by AlbertCat
It's interesting that those who used the song apparently haven't listened to the song all the way thru. Some lyrics:

Imagine there is no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky


How about:

Imagine there're no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too


They really should listen to the song before they use it....as well as pay for its use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Hmm
Leave it to stealth-fundies and their paid celebrity to not notice the actual lyrics to the song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
52. Apparently you don't know much about this film
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 10:51 AM by moggie
Their thesis is, approximately: evolution and atheism are synonymous, and inevitably led to Nazism and the holocaust. The song, complete with the "no religion too" line, is used to illustrate what a terrible world they think denial of religion leads to (they're saying, in effect, "you don't need to imagine a world without religion, because we've seen it, in Auschwitz"). Yes, it's crazy, as well as blowing intelligent design's flimsy claim to not be religiously based, but you wouldn't expect rationality and honesty from creationists, would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. I rather judge would rule that they have to remove every mention...
of the song whether audio or video (credits). That would require them to do some editing. How much of a hassle would that be for them? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Anything that hassles those Religious Idiots is fine with me.
Here in Florida, they won't be happy until they have a Chapel in every classroom.
The Politicians still use the ol' "Evolution is just a Theory" Bullshit to influence the dim-witted voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Yet it's okay for absolutely no proof there is a god. Just belief is required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hope Yoko Ono Wins Ben Stein's Money! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Me too
Ben Stein thinks his shit doesn't stink. From what I've hear his movie does. I hope she gets as much as she wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Mmm, gotta love the smell of fresh-brewed snark in the morning! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. I'm willing to bet real money
(several cents, anyway) that, if she does win this law suit, any money awarded will be contributed to "green" organizations or to causes promoting the end of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Carly Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
65. LOL good one!
Carly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Crap. Now I have to like her a little...
Oh well. I'm down with anything that can cause harm to these morons.

I don't have the link handy, but there's a great website debunking the entire movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. That would be "Expelled Exposed"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keith the dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Thanks for the great link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. Yes. That's the one.
It's very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pappy Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Hehe, I was thinking the same thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. What is there NOT to like?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. off topic, sort of- why not like Yoko? John loved her...
and it was Linda Eastman and her father Lee who caused Paul to leave The Beatles...

i've grown to really appreciate, if not love, Yoko. i even had a "Still Pissed At Yoko" bumper sticker on my sax case until i tore it off when John was slain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Look at my handle...
I live in the Midwest. Yoko doesn't play well in Milwaukee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. wow! i never knew she even toured there?!?!
did you see the show? what year was it???

:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
59. She was the opening act...
for the 1999 Philip Glass "Pretentious Twit" tour. Yeah. I bought the t-shirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. Yeah, the breakup was nearly 40 years ago
Let it go (or should that be "let it be"?)

That crossing is just down the road from me, BTW. Still gets a lot of tourists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. i could have waved to you if i had known... darn it!
my best friend "Beatle Tracy" took that pic and this one just after-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. Yeah, I've never really gotten it either
Some bands last for decades, some for years, some for weeks. I don't think anyone can deny they had a good run. Considering the work that each member did post-Beatles, they were on divergent paths, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. Great Picture, but to paraphrase Paul
when asked if it was Yoko's fault (while promo-ing his latest album), repeated the question, thought, and then gave a long dismissive, wink and smile, "noooo!" That meant, I think, it was no more her fault than anyone else involved. John was heavily into drugs and anti-War stuff, Paul was heavily into music and "the band," George was heavily into spirituality and emerging as a musician in his own right. Yoko was and is a possessive and controlling person; that doesn't make her a bad person. But she and Paul clashed; try as Paul might to make peace (in the late 60's - see some of his songs and John's comments on them), he was going to lose. The wife/woman wins over the war buddy every time. Paul said as much in an early 80's interview.

Between Lee Eastman and Allen Klein, Eastman was the better manager and man. John, George and Ringo later admitted it was a mistake to hire Klein, who "done them wrong." Lee Eastman would have favored Paul, and given his forceful personality, would not have worked out, even though I think Eastman would have tried "to do right" by the others. Linda kept Paul stable and was instrumental in getting him and John back together, because she calmed him down.

What Paul meant by his "nooo" was that unlike every other group, the Beatles had to break up, because the pressure became too great. They all married, had families, reconciled (well, I don't know if John and George repaired their relationship completely before John was killed, but the others did). If you see the clips from the Anthology in the mid-90's, when they talk about the talk of a reunion, and maybe Sean or Julian taking John's place, Paul says, why would anyone want to do that to them, you begin to realize the pressure they were under. George and Ringo have both made comments that acknowledge the group could not maintain itself. And a reunion would have been a nostalgia act.

I think that had John lived, given where he and Paul were in the early 80's, we would have seen some collaborations - a few real Lennon/McCartney songs on a John album and a few real McCartney/Lennon songs on a Paul album and maybe a collaborative John & Paul together. That would be contingent on Yoko's paranoia, but I suspect that Linda might have been able to ease that - either both women or neither. Ringo would come in for drums. And George would, very, very reluctantly, get in on a song or two. It would be a loose collaboration, but very powerful.

one can only dream.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
63. thanks for the insightful post! yeah- it's no good laying blame for the inevitable...
seeing the "Concert For George" a while back it struck me that a "Beatles, Jr." tour would be fun! the line-up might be the musical progeny of the original fab four! let's see, there's....

Zack Starkey currently playing with The Who
Dhani Harrison of thenewno2
Sean Lennon of Cibo Matto and solo works
or Julian (but i think Sean is more musically inclined).

and for Paul...

can anyone think of Paul's kids who write/play music?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #63
74. Paul's son James
They've done some work together and I think James will shortly have an album of his own out. He's supposed to be pretty good, but very shy.

I wouldn't wish it on the kids, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. James, huh? Yeah it's just kinda like "fantasy football"...
you know it'd never happen.

i wouldn't wish it on them, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. The fundies are actually organizing church field trips
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 08:23 AM by sharesunited
to go see this POS.

That kind of lemming activity made Passion of the Christ a huge commercial success. As though eternal truth can be established through ticket sales.

These people should watch the two-hour Nova episode which explores ID and the Pennsylvania ID-in-the-classroom case.

There's nothing new to see or discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. Passion of what?????
made Passion of the Christ a huge commercial success

**************

Yeah....and now a COMPLETELY forgotten stupid film. Thank whichever god you want these films don't stand the test of time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ptolle Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
50. pharyngula
It's worth looking around on the intertubes to find the story about P.Z.Meyers, the proprietor of the pharyngula blog at scienceblogs, being turned away from a screening of this POS but they admitted his companion Richard Dawkins. I guess when you've sorta put your intelligence down for a nap on one thing it's hard to get it alert for another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
60. Well, not many of them...
It's opening weekend box office was $3 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. Interesting challenge to the fair use doctrine.
I don't think she can challenge their use of the song as long as it stays within the law. It could be precedent setting if she gets a favorable ruling regarding the way fair use stuff is credited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
40. well fair use is a pretty slippery deal
It really depends on how much of the song they did use. There is also the idea that the use damages John Lennon's brand as it where by implicitly implying that they had permission to use the song and thereby linking John Lennon with this mush wit gibberish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
43. Bingo
this could, in the long run, backfire if there is a significant change in the definition of fair use.

personal ideology has to take a backseat for the greater good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. Go get 'em, Yoko! n/t
:toast: -"Cheers!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. GO Yoko
fair is fair... anybody remember when the religious right claimed "Imagine" was a Blasphemous song?

"and no religion too"

"All the people living life in peace"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
35. These people appear to be pathologically dishonest
If their use of "Imagine" were the only issue, it might be just an honest disagreement about "fair use", which AIUI is a deliberately grey area in law. But they also misled The Killers over their use of a Killers song, leading to the band asking for the song to be removed from the film: sadly, too late. They also ripped off XVIVO's animation "The Inner Life of the Cell" - twice! - and were forced to remove that scene before the film's release. But, since the basic premise of the film is itself dishonest, I don't suppose we should be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. Ben Stein = Intelligent Design
NOT!

Seriously, I realize the guy has to make a living, but he really hasn't done anything but be a right wing shill for the last 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
39. where in the world is Osama Ben Laden is a more attractive movie than expelled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
44. Take every dime they profit, Yoko. Which will be just that. A dime. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
P0pEye Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
45. Lennon's album ... "Milk & Honey" ...
He was Yoko's Honey, and she milked him for his Money!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Really? How did she do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. You're equating Yoko with Heather Mills????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
P0pEye Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. No, Yoko was a hell of lot more successfull that Mills!
Really, ... I was just joking! I really luv John! PLEASE DON'T REPORT ME!!

You know ... just a l'il joke to ease tension ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #45
51. What makes you say that? n/t
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
48. "That prevail in academic circles"???? Talk about bending over
backwards to make it seem like evolution isn't science but opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
49. as much as I detest stein, if he paid for the use of the song via ASCAP
Yoko doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. that's the whole point
they didn't pay - they didn't even ask. we'll see if their fair use defense works - (not very likely since the law is heavily slanted toward the copyright holders) and it really depends - again - on how much of the song they used -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Ahhhh, then that's very different.
You are right, the whole fair use thing really doesn't hold up well in court.

A prime example is, ugh, Vanilla Ice when he ripped off the David Bowie song, "under pressure". Ice claimed that the song was different by one note so their for it was open to fair use and under a different interpretation. The court thought otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #57
71. not equivalent
the 'ice ice baby' riff was integral to the song. Fair use is a slippery slope. Look at all the siglines on this board that use copyrighted words or imagery. Heck, look at all the threads that are based on snippets of copyrighted material, as long as it is a snippets, and sourced, and used for commentary (even if profit is made) it's not a great idea to ban that, right? Just because you don't happen to like the commentary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randomthought Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
53. Spooky sentence at the end
""Expelled" earned the No. 10 spot at the box office this weekend, bringing in nearly $3 million in its first weekend in wide release. Stein, an actor, quiz show host and former speech writer for Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, has been visiting some state capitals to screen the movie for lawmakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. well that's trying to spin it
trying to make earning less than 3 million (on over a 1,000 screens) and coming in 10th on the top ten list sound like a good thing.
just to add some persepctive here - Leathereads and Horton Hears a Who earned more than they did that week - and the top grossing film Forbidden Kingdom earn $21 million in the same period.

in short - the puppy is a turkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallydem Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. Movie Math
For anyone that’s interested. Having booked films in Florida for years.
It cost a little over 3k to strike each print. On average the film company gets 55% in total return from the box office gross. Independents normally get an even lower rate (as low as 35%).
So a 3 million dollar box office would not even pay for physical media much less advertising and making the film. That is the reason most docs are released on a few dozen screens and then travel around. It is simply too expensive to strike hundreds of prints.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
55. Sent this link to a couple of my favorite science bloggers.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helas girl Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
64. no evolution
The makers of this "documentary" don't believe in evolution because they haven't actually evolved yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
72. Ben Stein is an idiot. Sue him long, sue him hard!!! Take every dime from the asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
73. GOOD. BREAK THEIR BANKROLL, YOKO!!! This is wonderful news!
It's high time we bankrupted the Xtian IDIOTS who wish to surplant science with religous dogma. Fuck 'em.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
75. Quote this one, Ben...
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 01:56 AM by onager
"Magical Misery Tour." A FAIR-USE PARODY from the old National Lampoon.

But it sounds just like Lennon! And all the quotes were taken from Lennon's interview with Rolling Stone, during his "Working Class Hero/Primal Scream Therapy" period...

I resent performing for you fuckers!
Tell me, what do you know?
A lot of faggot middle-class kids
Wearing long hair and trendy clothes.
Look, I'm not your fucking parents
And I'm sick of uptight hippies coming knocking at me door
With a fucking peace symbol
Get this, fuck that, I don't owe you fuckers anything.
And all I've got to say is "Fuck you!"

The sky is blue...

And Mick Jagger
I think that Mick's a joke with all his stupid faggot dancing
I always did.
Wiggling his ass, you know, its just a lot of bullshit.
And where does he come off saying all those tarty things about the Beatles?
When every fucking thing we ever did Mick tried to copy
And you know we even wrote his second fucking record for him
No, the Stones, aren't in the same fucking class as the Beatles,
Either music-wise or power-wise and never ever were.

Pardon me sir...

Paul said he hated Yoko
Tell me, why should Yoko have to take that kind of shit?
Shit from those fucking sons of bitches?
George said she gave off evil vibes,
I should have beat the fucking shit right out of him,
Him with his fucking Hare Krishnas.


Me Auntie she tore up me fucking poems
She just threw the bastards out.
I can't forgive her `cause she didn't treat me like a fucking genius.
Fuck you bastards, I'm a genius!
Like Shakespeare and Beethoven and Van Gogh.
Don't you DARE criticize my work!
"Don't Worry Kyoko" is one of the fucking BEST rock and roll records ever made!
I'm a fucking artist! I'm sensitive as shit!
I throw up before I go on stage! I could make a guitar SPEAK!
If I could be a fisherman, I would, But I CAN'T because I'm a FUCKING GENIUS!

I was the Walrus - Paul wasn't the Walrus!
I was just saying that to be nice, but I was actually the Walrus!

You know that rubbish he's been singing?
EASTMAN WAS AN ANIMAL! A FUCKING STUPID MIDDLE-CLASS PIG!
I WON'T LET FUCKING ANIMALS LIKE THAT NEAR ME!
Yoko is a supreme intellectual!
I'll tell you why nobody likes her music
because she's a woman, and she's Oriental, that's why!

Where are you Mother?
They're trying to crucify me!

Genius is pain, genius is pain,
Genius is pain, genius is PAIN!!
YOKO!!!! MOTHER!!!!
{Fade out on howling and gutteral screaming)

Yoko's voice: The dleam is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC