Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain Frequently Used Wife’s Jet for Little Cost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:52 PM
Original message
McCain Frequently Used Wife’s Jet for Little Cost
Source: NYT

April 27, 2008
McCain Frequently Used Wife’s Jet for Little Cost
By BARRY MEIER and MARGOT WILLIAMS

Given Senator John McCain’s signature stance on campaign finance reform, it was not surprising that he backed legislation last year requiring presidential candidates to pay the actual cost of flying on corporate jets. The law, which requires campaigns to pay charter rates when using such jets rather than cheaper first-class fares, was intended to reduce the influence of lobbyists and create a level financial playing field.

But over a seven-month period beginning last summer, Mr. McCain’s cash-short campaign gave itself an advantage by using a corporate jet owned by a company headed by his wife, Cindy McCain, according to public records. For five of those months, the plane was used almost exclusively for campaign-related purposes, those records show.

Mr. McCain’s campaign paid a total of $241,149 for the use of that plane from last August through February, records show. That amount is approximately the cost of chartering a similar jet for a month or two, according to industry estimates.

The senator was able to fly so inexpensively because the law specifically exempts aircraft owned by a candidate or his family or by a privately held company they control. The Federal Election Commission adopted rules in December to close the loophole — rules that would have required substantial payments by candidates using family-owned planes — but the agency soon lost the requisite number of commissioners needed to complete the rule making.

Because that exemption remains, Mr. McCain’s campaign was able to use his wife’s corporate plane like a charter jet while paying first-class rates, several campaign finance experts said. Several of those experts, however, added that his campaign’s actions, while keeping with the letter of law, did not reflect its spirit.

“This amounts to a subsidy for his campaign, which is notable given how badly they were struggling last year,” said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that collects and analyzes campaign data.

<SNIP>

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/us/politics/27plane.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yet Obama is the "elitist"
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 07:58 PM by djohnson
Each of his adversaries have 100 times more money, yet they continue to try to peg Obama as elitist!

I hope they continue this shrill so the public can see what's really going on in the campaign and elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I hear that Cindy can fly really fast on her new broom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well - he does have to stay married to her - that's worth something...
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 08:07 PM by pinkpops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have a question. If a candidate has his own plane, is that still a
a campaign contribution? I know that's not the case with McCain, but it got me thinking how stupid our campaign laws are. For instance, Rushbo has his own rather large jet that has quit a distance capability. If someone like him (not him god forbid) were to run for office, could he use it the same as they can use their own car?

I really have no idea if anyone in Congress has their own plane, but out of 500+ people in both houses, I'd be surprised if some didn't. Not so much in the House, but certainly in the Senate, many of them are millionairs+. I can understand why they would want their own plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. no, take Romney as an example
although i don't know if he owned any plane but he was able to spend his own money as he wanted. Steve Forbes is another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Don't they have to stay within limits if they opt for matching funding?
If they do don't they have to at least report the transportation as in-kind contribution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Seems like it is in the family and not illegal.
If it isn't it should be legal. It's both their money.

Pelosie insisted on her own jet (paid for by us).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's OK because he is a republicon and America has double standards
There are no rules for republicon candidates where the rules are tighter for Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. All men are created equal but some are more so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcollier Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The end once this gets out
Attack ad or true ad? You be the judge...

Right here ==>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yjcLCDUrAk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForPeace Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That is a private video
Can't see it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC