Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polygamous sect's kids in hospital, moms want answers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:12 PM
Original message
Polygamous sect's kids in hospital, moms want answers
Source: Salt Lake Tribune

At least nine children taken from a polygamous sect's ranch are or have been in the hospital and attorneys for most of the mothers say they have received little or no information about their conditions.

Attorneys for Texas Rio-Grande Legal Aid (TRLA) are working to identify the children and the hospitals, and to arrange for the mothers to visit the children. "We can't seem to get anyone on the phone with authority to make that happen and the mothers don't even know the seriousness of the situation," said Amanda Chisholm, a TRLA attorney. The legal aid society, which represents 48 mothers, said one 2-year-old child lost a severe amount of weight while staying at the San Angelo Coliseum.

TRLA said the organization was told two days ago that the child was in shock and lethargic, but has received no new information since then about where the child is or regarding her current health situation. The mother is not being allowed to be with this child or her other nursing children, Chisholm said. "We don't seem to be able to get in touch with anyone who can tell us," she said. Depending on the assigned caseworker, some FLDS mothers are being allowed to see their children and some are not, Chisholm said.

Texas Child Protective Services said Friday that one child had been hospitalized because of dehydration. A CPS spokesman Sunday said he had no information on the children.

Read more: http://www.sltrib.com/ci_9079761
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Funny how the "mom"s didn't seem to care when they were malnourishing and abusing their kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I was just thinking the same thing.
Obviously, their idea of 'abuse' is radically different from yours and mine. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
77. Did anyone else research these claims? Or are the mothers claims, presented by the OP being taken as
fact? I did a bit of research and dug up more articles down in #75
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3287454#3288064
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And Your Evidence for this Accusation
I guess by your statement that you have information that these children were not being fed appropriately?

And what is your proof that the "moms" didn't seem to care, besides your obvious hatred of the FLDS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. The mothers belonged to a sect in which the children, with and without
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 02:50 PM by pnwmom
the mothers, were swapped from family to family upon the will of the Prophet. There's evidence that many of the children at the ranch were there without their biological mothers (or fathers). Children were seen as a sort of community property, rather than as being tied to the birth parents. As a consequence, a number of the children aren't even sure of their parents' names.

I do have to wonder about the depth of maternal-child ties under the circumstances.

Concerning evidence of abuse, Carolyn Jessop, a former wife of the current leader of the YFZ ranch, has described his practice of "baby breaking," which was designed to teach them not to cry. She said he would spank the baby until it cried, then hold the face under running water, which would make the baby instinctively hold its breath. She said the sessions could go on as long as an hour until the baby was exhausted. Her husband taught that this would train the baby without hurting it because the baby would have no conscious memory of what had happened to it.

Concerning abuse by the mothers themselves, many former members have said that the problem isn't so much with mothers abusing their own biological children as it is with mothers turning their anger and frustration on the children of their sister-wives. All the children living there with multiple mothers were vulnerable to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
68. I think we better start Blaming The Dudes
don't you?

Why isn't anyone talking about the perverts?

The men that have been abusing and brainwashing the women and children seem to be getting off scott free.
At least they're not really being talked about much.

What the fuck is everybody protecting these men for? :shrug:

Seems to be a common phenomenon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
73. My evidence for this accusation is overwhelming, thank you for asking.
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 06:45 PM by Rabrrrrrr
All you need do is a google search, and you will avalanched with data.

Hell, you don't even need to do a google search - you only need to open your ears and eyes when around a radio or TV or newspaper, and it will fill you simply by its sheer volume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. have a link?
not to condone the ALLEGED acts of the sect leaders here, but I would caution any wild-assed speculation considering nobody really knows what the fuck is going on here aside from what we're being spoon-fed by governmental agencies in full-on CYA mode through a sensationalistic corporate-run media. we were told a lot of things about Ruby Ridge that turned out to be bald-assed lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Google "Carolyn Jessop," who has given testimony in court about FLDS
practices, and is a former wife of the current leader of the YFZ ranch, Merrill Jessop. There are clips of her speeches on youtube as well, and she has written a book called ESCAPE.

She is one of many former members who have given testimony in open court on the practices of the sect and its leaders. You could easily find more. This isn't "wild-assed speculation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. google "Warren Jeffs"
they have his picture on the wall of every room in their living quarters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. There is a great deal of information out there
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:06 PM by Marrah_G
From NON governmental sources. This is a dangerous and criminal cult.

I posted an entire thread with videos from people who have escaped as well as the words of Jeffs himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. Thanks for posting these!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
74. Not just *a* link, but shitloads.
Others have posted enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. A bit more from the article:
The sect made another appeal to Texas Gov. Rick Perry this weekend for help. n a letter to the governor, FLDS member Willie Jessop said many children "have been left in critical medical conditions, resulting in permanent damage through threats, intimidation and ultimately separating them from their parents." Jessop writes that even the state's expert witness advised against separating the youngest children from their mothers. He asks for an emergency meeting with Perry.

So far, Perry has declined to meet with the FLDS and has praised Child Protective Services' actions.

<snip background info>


Chisholm said a master list of placements is missing names of two children taken from the ranch and TRLA has so far been unable to determine their location. She also said mothers who were nursing children older than 12 months were told their toddlers would be kept close by so they could continue to nurse or provide breast milk for them. But some of those toddlers have been moved hundreds of miles away and Texas Child Protective Services has not yet given permission for the mothers to visit them.

"I've been scrambling for the past two days to find out the name of the person I need to call to get permission for my client to enter that facility to nurse her children," said Chisholm, who represents four mothers. "All we've been told is to wait until Monday when they assign caseworkers to individual families."

Some mothers have been unable to confirm where their children have gone and others have learned their children have been split up and sent to different locations. TRLA learned Sunday that a child thought to be in a group home was actually in a hospital.
Some mothers, Chisholm said, "are trying to, sadly, figure out which child needs them more, a child in the hospital or a nursing baby," she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. A nursing child should be able to
continue to nurse IMO and a mother should be able to find out if her child is in the hospital. Splitting up families is awful too. They shouldn't have to pay for what their parents have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Perhaps it would be simpler to determine who's who if the mothers
didn't lie continually about even their own names as well as their children's.

The children were already paying for what their parents are doing: "marriage" at 13, excommunication of young males as too much competition for the old dogs, no toys.

Removal from their parents is a good thing. I'm glad that your parents must have been good, but I can assure you not all are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. I can't imagine what I would have felt like if my brother had been
kicked out at the age of thirteen. I would have been devastated. This cult is sick on so many levels it boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
43. And some of the mothers who went on TV crying about the breakup
of their families had probably watched while their sons were kicked out, or taken in new children who had been "assigned" to them by Jessop.

You're right, it boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Exactly. I saw part of the legal notices, and at that time quite a number
of the children had no first and/or last names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. Couple things
They don't even know which child really belongs to which parent.

These families are split up over and over again by the will of the Prophet.

These concerned parents smile and say nothing as their daughters are married into servitude to much older men, sometimes cousins, uncles and stepfathers with a couple hours notice.

These concerned parents say nothing when their young teenage boys are banished and left by the side of the road so they won't compete for the girls.

These parents proudly lie to social services so they can obtain services without the male having to pay any support.

These parents say nothing when their children are denied education and forced to work for free instead.

These parents say nothing when their children do not even know which woman gave birth to them.

These parents say nothing when their children are sent away to different compounds on order of the Prophet.

I could go on and on.

You are mistaken if you think these children belong to a family as you understand a family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
46. They are doing
dna testing or so I read a while back. Children who are nursing should be allowed to nurse. Having the moms come in and nurse their children under supervision should be a given. I don't care if their parents lie or what they do. It is the smallest of the children who are paying the price. There is also no reason to split up siblings during what has to be horribly traumatic for these children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. They have allowed mothers to continue to nurse
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:30 PM by Marrah_G
The lawyers are trying to gain sympathy for the cult, nothing more.

Frankly most of these children do not even know who their real mother is and many were taken to the ranch without their parents.

CPS needs to learn the REAL relationships to these children before they proceed.

I have a thread on GD with a half dozen links showing the truth about this cult. Please check some of them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. I don't care about the cult
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:33 PM by Mojorabbit
The article says the mother's are not being allowed to nurse. That they don't know how their hospitalized children are. A hospitalized child should have an adult they know near them especially after a trauma of being removed from their home.. Otherwise,I could give a fig about the parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. The article says that is what the lawyers say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. And I am hoping it
is not true as it would be a travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. If you have time check these out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. I have perused some of these
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:43 PM by Mojorabbit
and will look over the rest. Thanks. As a pagan, I am very wary of the state snatching this many children. There may be good reason for doing this I agree, but the children should not suffer during the transition if at all possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. As am I, as am I
I have had DSS in my living room questioning my religion.

But this truly is a criminal and very harmful cult that enslaves and oppresses women and children to a horrifying extent.

This group uses religion as a shield.

Unfortunately this cult is made up of two large families. There really wasn't any other way to do it.

I also suggest reading "Under the Banner of Heaven" and "Escape" if you have time both show what life inside the cult is like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #50
78. Are they hospitalized?
Being away from your family is traumatic for kids. Reading further, it sounds like some kids have gotten sick, a group with chickenpox, but I wonder how many (other than the 1 that seems to be real) are actually hospitalized. More articles in this link (post #75):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3287454&mesg_id=3288064
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Those kids have been through a lot. Why were the mother's
seperated from children two years of age and younger? If they suspected abuse, there could of been some supervision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. I don't know why, and it wasn't my preference either. But
when push came to shove, 25 more underage mothers were identified. They had pretended to be over 18 as long as they could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. Because when they find abuse they remove all the children
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. Isn't a one year old a bit old to be nursing?
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:54 PM by superconnected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Not at all, but most moms who are still nursing at that age are giving
their babies other nourishment as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. Many nutritional benefits to nursing for at least a year
according the Amercian Academy of Pediatrics and the World Health Organization. However, by six months, most babies could use some supplemental food.

There is absolutely no reason to think that a twelve month old is too old to nurse except for personal preferences or personal hangups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. This gets worse everyday
I wondered how the authorities would cope with so many children being introduced to the system at one time. I can imagine that resources are strained at the moment. At any rate, when children are detained, the parents don't always have access or information as to what is going on with them if they get sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hope they took pictures of all the children in their custody - immediately
With all the lying about names, parents, ages, etc., how hard will it be to defend that CPS DIDN'T lose any children? Can you prove a negative?

And if they did, I hope they have hell to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. I'm sure they did
And fingerprints or footprints. Especially since there aren't any birth certificates because no one registers births from this place. I doubt they ever go to a hospital or see a doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. They had a medical clinic at the ranch where they probably
went for most things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. And bill medicaid for?
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:13 PM by Marrah_G
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
65. How do they get welfare with no birth certificates?
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 04:00 PM by superconnected
I'm thinking the kids may not be honest about what familys they are in because they're taught to lie as part of the FLDS welfare scheme. Those kids should know which family and father they originally had to begin with if you look into the cult and the way they are housed - at least to the age of 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. They do not list the fathers on the birth certificates
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 04:05 PM by Marrah_G
The fathers are not always their original father, women and children are passed around when a man is thrown out. many of these fathers don't know their own children's names or which child belongs to which mother. These are not any form of normal families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. I read somewhere that they made up a file for each child with
any available names (of child and parents), a photo, a fingerprint (I assume footprints of the babies), and the DNA swab info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Travesty. They should have locked up the men, left the women
and kids alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
52. Please take a few minutes and watch these
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. BINGO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. This was a CPS investigation - not a criminal investigation
so officials can't do anything to the men until they find enough evidence and charge them with a crime.

It sucks, but this was "in the best interest of the children." Any other action would have been unconstitutional at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. They couldn't. That wasn't ever a legal option.
They couldn't lock up all the men, because they couldn't legally accuse any of the men of a crime.

OTOH, CPS was required by law to investigate the allegations that had been made, and the only way to do that was to take the children from the ranch while they pursued their investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. WRONG- the women would have simply run back to one of the other compound with the kids
And then Texas would have a horrible time locating them in different states and countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. why were children still nursing taken away from mothers?
Why????? What sort of idiocy is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. This really hurts me just to think of it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I read that the judge in the case ....
told the woman who were nursing that this is what working woman have to deal with when that have to return to work after six weeks. This is awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. How sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. And working women know that they can pump to provide milk in
some, if not many, situations. Oddly enough, even though the state of texas promotes breastfeeding, some of the worst cases of workplace abuse towards new mothers has been by the state of Texas, in my experience. I have run into countless numbers of moms employed by the state who have had to prematurely wean because they couldn't get pumping breaks even though smokers got smoking breaks. The hypocrisy is quite shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. The judge had CPS work out arrangements to allow them to nurse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. You are right ....Thanks ..I hadn't seen this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Early stories said that children under 5 were kept with their mothers
when the mothers were known.

What changed? Are the attorneys for the cult lying? If so, why is there such surprise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. That was earlier. Subsequently, all the adult mothers were separated
from the children, except for breastfeeding mothers of babies under a year old. Mothers of breastfeeding toddlers were given the option of staying near them and continuing to nurse them and/or provide milk. At that point, 40 out of 47 decided to move to wherever the state wanted them to go to be near the babies. Seven went back to the ranch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Nursing babies under a year stayed with their mothers.
I don't know why they drew the line at age one. I also don't know how long the sect mothers nurse their toddlers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. I bet the "Prophet" made a rule for how long babies can nurse. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. That is assuming the lawyers are not lying
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:34 PM by Marrah_G
This cult thrives on lying to the government. They are putting on a big show to try and make people such as yourself pity them.

I suggest doing some research before falling for the stories of these con artists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJAvqc5u9KM

Polygamous Prophet WARREN JEFFS on the Negro Race #3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXo8qNxUlCU&feature=rela...

BANKING ON HEAVEN Polygamy Trailer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI6pBftroEc&feature=rela...

Inside Warren Jeffs' world

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0RV4fKtKp0&feature=rela...

The Underground Railroad Escaping Polygamy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnhvcGH6fFE&feature=rela...

Underground Polygamy Railroad Fawn & Fawn Run!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HonSp_Lmjrk&feature=rela...

DAMNED TO HEAVEN - Warren Jeffs -FLDS- POLYGAMY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1cTk2cJQac

Warren Jeffs Instructing Child Brides on Marriage!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGqJIqe6LEE&feature=rela...

Former FLDS Member - "Life In A Cult"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHAbjuLT-Ic&feature=rela...

Damned to Heaven

http://www.freshfilm.com/damnedtoheaven /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. "Toward Better Solutions to the Texas Child Welfare Crisis"
A report from the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform:

http://www.nccpr.org/reports/texasreport2.pdf

This report DOES NOT DEAL WITH THE CURRENT FLDS IMBROGLIO but with problems in the Texas CPS. Makes for some eye-opening reading, and it is releveant in relation to the claims being made by the FLDS members. Enjoy.

Chapter titles include:

Wrongful removal is not rare 06

You’re only damned if you don’t 08

Wrongful removal hurts children 11

The myth of due process for families 12

Wrongful removal is not inevitable 15

The price of panic 16

What the data really show 18

What Illinois can teach Texas 19

The stakes 22

Angela’s story 25

Forgotten fatality: The death of Eric Hernandez 27

Overuse of institutions 29

Milwaukee vs. the “institutions lobby” 31

Drugs 33

The limits of adoption 36

Spend more –but spend smarter 37

New Jersey’s better idea--Extended families 39
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. A child-advocacy group called Justice for Children has been in the
forefront of investigations of the Texas foster care system. The head of this group, Jim Shields, recently called for people to give the system time to work.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/5729137.html


The organization I work for and I have been very critical of the systems (child welfare, criminal justice and the family courts) that we taxpayers fund to protect our children. So make no mistake, I am not a defender of "the system."

That being said, I think that we all need to take a deep breath and allow "the system" to do its work. And I am very hopeful that the children of Eldorado will be well served this time because it is my experience that "what's watched, works." In other words, the cracks, or gaping chasms if you prefer, in our child protective systems will be closed because the whole world is watching.

Some are criticizing Child Protective Services (CPS) because it removed 437 children from an environment that the agency deemed dangerous.

CPS was doing its job. Our laws give CPS this extraordinary power because we citizens want protectors of children to have as few obstacles as possible to do their jobs.

SNIP

Was there ample evidence in the FLDS case for CPS to take such drastic action as removing the children from their homes? In a word, yes. The system failure is not that CPS acted too quickly but that it took so long to act, knowing what has been known for years.

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. I wonder who will be held accountable
if any of these kids die or develop serious medical problems due to the CPS action.

Maybe their excuse will be that they had to kill the kids to save them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
31. Frankly I don't believe anything these liars say. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
76. Please check out other articles on hospitalization claims
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3287454#3288064
post #75 down at bottom.
Claims by mothers are being presented as fact, though "officials have said that about a dozen children had chicken pox and that others needed prescription medications but had not said whether any were hospitalised."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
42. If the state takes your kids away from you
in a 'normal' abuse situation (leaving out any cult involvement), they are NOT going to let you know where your kids are, are not going to let you have contact with them except for (possibly, considering the extent of the abuse and the parent accused) supervised visits at a neutral location, and they are NOT going to contact you if medical care is needed. You might get to come in and say goodbye if the kid going to die, but even that depends on the case worker.

Why should the cultists receive any different consideration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. The cult is a master at playing the victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
57. But all these mothers have not been
accused of abuse have they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. They are being investigated
There is no way they could have left the children there while they investigate.

You really have to understand the depth of this cult for the actions of the state to make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #57
71. They would have to be suspect
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 05:29 PM by China_cat
at least of allowing the abuse, which is also a crime.

Like I said, if the state takes your child for allegations of abuse, both parents are considered at fault until there is absolute proof that one is innocent or also a victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
75. MORE articles on these claims...
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 07:55 PM by uppityperson
First some mothers say their kids have become sick and require hospitalization. Then "officials" say about a dozen kids had chickenpox, and others needed Rx meds. Are claims and fears being presented as fact when truth is some kids are sick and need med care but not atypical for a group of kids?
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2305237,00.html
The mothers of children removed from a polygamous sect's ranch in West Texas after an abuse allegation are appealing to Governor Rick Perry for help, saying some of their children have become sick and even required hospitalisation.

(clip)
The mothers said they want Perry to examine the conditions in which the removed children have been placed. "You would be appalled," the letter said. "Many of our children have become sick as a result of the conditions they have been placed in. Some have even had to be taken to the hospital. Our innocent children are continually being questioned on things they know nothing about. The physical examinations were horrifying to the children. The exposure to these conditions is traumatising them."

Asked about claims that children were hospitalised, state Child Protective Services spokesperson Marissa Gonzalez said she had not seen the letter and would have to review it before commenting.

Officials have said that about a dozen children had chicken pox and that others needed prescription medications but had not said whether any were hospitalised.


Then this one
http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695274226,00.html
Martinez is the communications director for Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, which represents 48 FLDS mothers. Seems part may be HPPA (pt privacy, no info given to anyone except guardian) combined with trying to figure out *who* the mother may actually be.

(clip)CPS workers have repeatedly complained that some children and women have provided different names than were given the day before. Together with the unusual family sizes and the number of different mothers caring for the children from the polygamous families, it's been difficult to sort out who's who.

"I don't know if this is a matter of simply not being matched up properly," he said. Such confusion is why a judge ordered all mothers, fathers and children who lived on the ranch to submit to DNA testing. But those results aren't expected for another month.

Martinez said her office received information from one of the foster facilities Saturday that a 2-year-old child from one of the mothers they represent was hospitalized and in the intensive care unit. Yet when the child's guardian ad litem called the hospital, she was told there was no one there with that child's name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC