Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guantanamo Spy Cases Evaporate (Muslim Chaplain Not A Spy)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:12 AM
Original message
Guantanamo Spy Cases Evaporate (Muslim Chaplain Not A Spy)
Last September, top officials of the Navy prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, told a military judge in Florida that the prison's Muslim chaplain, Army Capt. James Yee, would soon be charged with mutiny, sedition, espionage, spying and aiding the enemy -- crimes that could lead to his execution.



Based on those allegations, Yee was held in solitary confinement in a Navy brig in South Carolina for 76 days. But authorities never charged him with any of those offenses. Instead, Yee will face much less serious charges, such as mishandling classified materials and adultery, when the case against him resumes at a hearing at Fort Benning, Ga., scheduled for Feb. 4.

At the same time Yee was being detained, Air Force Senior Airman Ahmad I. Halabi, who worked as an Arabic translator at Guantanamo Bay, was also in solitary confinement 3,000 miles away, held in California on charges of espionage and aiding the enemy. In time, the most serious of those allegations have been withdrawn as well.

Some experts on military law and the men's lawyers say the prosecutions of Yee and Halabi have been riddled with inconsistencies and oddities that cast doubt on the government's original fears that a spy ring was operating in the high-security prison for alleged al Qaeda and Taliban fighters.

more...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44930-2004Jan24.html?nav=hptoc_n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. shows what I've felt all along
the military is very uneasy about Muslims in its ranks. And there is an anti-Muslim bias in this country. I've experienced it personally, as have other Muslims I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That is probably partly true...
...but, I think that, in this case, it was easy to use Yee as a pawn to stir up more of the old "Hold Americans hostage to fear", and to show that the Kingpin theives in the WH are so on top of getting the "bad guys". Many are in the unfortunate position of pawn when it comes to the BFEE and the PNAC pushing their agenda forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. In some places there must be a hysteria greater than the McCarthy
and HUAC era about godless communism.
Spies?
How about some adultery for the priest/mullah?
His military career is toast now IMO.
Discrimination and war on terror hysteria in action=injustice, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. He's an imam, not a mullah
Sufis don't have mullahs. Yee is an Islamic scholar, which is what an imam is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanx!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. He's accused of "adultery?" What? The article doesn't explain that one.
"......But authorities never charged him with any of those offenses. Instead, Yee will face much less serious charges, such as mishandling classified materials and adultery.."

Since when does the Military charge folks with adultery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Also thought that was a strange item/twist in the article
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plurality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. all the time
A friend of mine got booted we he was serving in Kosovo because of a homemade movie he made with his girlfriend. It's commonly used when they're looking for an excuse to get rid of you. He ended up serving 30 days in the stockade before he got a less than honorable discharge over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Adultery is a Violation of Military Law
Actually it is a violation of the UCMJ and the Manuals of Courts Martial.

It's just not used a lot, and in this case it's being used because they have to save face. And there might be something to the charge
of bias against Muslims in the military.

As for the Airman, the man was a supply clerk, he was picked for the job because he spoke Arabic. The problem with that was he was never
given any training as an interrogator(sp). It's sort of like taking
a quarterback off of a football team and making him a goalie for a
womens soccer team, it ain't going to work!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plurality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. maybe they were documenting abuses there...
and the Army had to find some way to shut them up.

We can't have the world thinking we run concentration camps can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. When the story of arrests broke in September...
that was my first thought. I thought it was more likely that arrests were made because of trying to get information to groups such as the International Red Cross, which was also in the news at the time as not being allowed access to Gitmo and prisoners. The IRC had major concerns about violations of the Geneva Convention, and quite soon after that, they "dropped" trying to get into the camp. When that was reported, I suspected that there had been more bullying going on from BushCo, and the IRC had to back down since it was going to be "proven" that those arrested were part of a spy ring. The IRC would be implicated as "combative participants", e.g., "bad guys", and possibly be held suspect for the reasons of wanting to make conact with the prisoners.
IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Another twist to the story, exhibiting that's there is no end to the evil
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 12:04 PM by Angel_O_Peace
From the article:
In an unusual episode last month, military investigators raided offices used by Halabi's military lawyers at an Air Force base in California, temporarily seizing one computer and copying its hard drive in a search for evidence against the airman.

Rehkopf protested the search in a letter to Air Force officials, calling it "bizarre" and "a conscious disregard of the attorney-client relationship."


Apparently, that incident was under the radar. At least, I never read a story about that happening. Anyone else have that info?


on edit: Found only this one blogspot about that incident, and this is from an AP story:

Government searches defense attorney's office in Gitmo translator case

The AP reports this morning that Air Force investigators, holding a search warrant from a military judge, searched the offices of an attorney who is representing Airman Ahmad Halabi, charged with misconduct at Guantanamo Bay. The article didn't say exactly what was searched or what was seized, or why the search was executed.

Air Force investigators searched the offices of Halabi's military attorneys Thursday at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, his civilian attorney, Donald G. Rehkopf Jr., said yesterday. The investigators, who had a military warrant, copied the hard drive of one lawyer's computer, Rehkopf said.

The search raised the possibility that two military defenders, Majs. James Key III and Kim London, could be called as witnesses against Halabi. That could mean they would have to be taken off the case and new defense attorneys would have to start from scratch.

Air Force agents also burst into a room where Halabi was meeting with his attorneys last Wednesday and took hours to return documents and a laptop computer to him when he was taken from a jail at Vandenberg to Travis Air Force Base, Rehkopf said. Travis, also in California, is Halabi's home base, where proceedings against him will be held.

more...
http://philcarter.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_philcarter_archive.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Tee hee, as I've always said, Bush and Asscroft can't kick
a duck in the ass unless they stand on a brick; and even then, the odds are 50/50 they'll miss.

All that headache and heartache over nothing.


:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC