Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McClatchy: America's prison for terrorists often held the wrong men

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 09:40 AM
Original message
McClatchy: America's prison for terrorists often held the wrong men
Source: McClatchy Newspapers

... Akhtiar was among the more than 770 terrorism suspects imprisoned at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. They are the men the Bush administration described as "the worst of the worst."

But Akhtiar was no terrorist. American troops had dragged him out of his Afghanistan home in 2003 and held him in Guantanamo for three years in the belief that he was an insurgent involved in rocket attacks on U.S. forces. The Islamic radicals in Guantanamo's Camp Four who hissed "infidel" and spat at Akhtiar, however, knew something his captors didn't: The U.S. government had the wrong guy.

... An eight-month McClatchy investigation in 11 countries on three continents has found that Akhtiar was one of dozens of men — and, according to several officials, perhaps hundreds — whom the U.S. has wrongfully imprisoned in Afghanistan, Cuba and elsewhere on the basis of flimsy or fabricated evidence, old personal scores or bounty payments.

... The investigation also found that despite the uncertainty about whom they were holding, U.S. soldiers beat and abused many prisoners.

Prisoner mistreatment became a regular feature in cellblocks and interrogation rooms at Bagram and Kandahar air bases, the two main way stations in Afghanistan en route to Guantanamo.

... The McClatchy reporting also documented how U.S. detention policies fueled support for extremist Islamist groups. For some detainees who went home far more militant than when they arrived, Guantanamo became a school for jihad, or Islamic holy war.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/detainees/story/38773.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are just now figuring it out?
They could have read this in The Guardian in 2002 and 2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They didn't just figure it out.
they are only just admitting it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. At least McClatchy still has real reporters. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Our local paper is McClatchey
They printed a similar article and the online readers' comments are mostly repulsive and ignorant.

http://pod01.prospero.com/n/pfx/forum.asapx?msg=30959&nav=messages&webtag=kr-kctm

These guys need to be kept in a cage forever. The entire muslim religion is a terror organization.

I think that there are some reporters that deserve a fair trial and if found quilty... a rope.

When 99% of the male population is named Mohammed, Muhammad, or Mahammed it's easy to make mistakes in identity. Cut them some slack.

They all should be beaten...and then killed ...just costing us more money to keep them in prison..also we should deport all Muslims

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's disgusting. The comments at our paper are just the same.
It's like there are 10 freepers who go from site to site posting the same spew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doug.Goodall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush inverts William Blackstone
better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer

This is not the Bush philosophy. Bush seems to be more along the lines of 'Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. bush knew it, but held them anyway because doing so helped him politically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. with the help of a compliant rah-rah television media : victory is easily declared AND often
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's a long article and I only scanned it quickly looking for the TOTAL
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 12:49 PM by defendandprotect
numbers of people we netted in ---

Wasn't it something like 80,000????


PS on this . . .
I think we've also got a very serious situation in our own prisons ---
too many seem to be people reigned in for drugs --- which should be a health issue ---
too many are people of color ---
much of it looks like a new industry based on cheap labor ---






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. There were some Bush apologists here on DU the other day
insisting that the U.S. doesn't have any prison camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm not surprised
There's been more than enough buzz about this for years.

Shame on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Summer93 Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. From time to time
I see a few men from time to time released from Guantanamo quietly. Some sent back to England some to other countries. If they were innocent how was that determined? When? How was it decided to pick up a particular person? If they were bought - we paid money for innocent men and jailed them that would seem to be a method that has failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Cynic Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hope they sue them American-style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. This travesty is the completely predictable result of ignoring habeas corpus.
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 03:12 PM by drm604
If you don't allow people the chance to challenge their detention and defend themselves then it is inevitable that innocents will be imprisoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. THE WRONG PEOPLE.... quick... alert the media !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC