Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq courts order prisoner amnesty (20,000 prisoners to be freed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:41 AM
Original message
Iraq courts order prisoner amnesty (20,000 prisoners to be freed)
Source: AAP

Iraqi courts have ordered around 20,000 prisoners be freed under a sweeping amnesty law that is a pillar of efforts to reconcile the country's divided Shi'ite and Sunni Arab communities, an official says.

"Releasing this many detainees enhances and gives national reconciliation efforts a real boost," Abdulsatar al-Bayrkdar, spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council, which oversees the country's courts, told Reuters.

Bayrkdar said he did not know how many inmates had actually been freed under the amnesty law and prison officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

The 20,000 comprises convicted inmates as well as those in jail awaiting trial or being held for security reasons.






Read more: http://nz.news.yahoo.com/080622/9/6a0a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure there'll be no blowback to this action against our troops.
Can we leave yet?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure al Sadr is seething from his classroom in Iran
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 01:07 PM by ohio2007
All those future Sunni voters are going to skew the election results.
oh wait...
he is calling for an election boycott as the current polls indicate he has a snowball chance in Baghdad of increasing his seat count in Parliament


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3244022&mesg_id=3244022
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Perhaps those Sunnis who were
detained in our ever so cordial establishments will more likely want to vote with a bullet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. or perhaps not as
26,000 will remain under detention as per the article;

Charges had also been dropped against an additional 31,800 people who either had arrest warrants against them or who had been accused of crimes but were not in detention.

Bayrkdar added that nearly 26,000 cases had been rejected for amnesty.



http://nz.news.yahoo.com/080622/9/6a0a.html


For the past three months, the #s of civilians killed shows a decline;

http://icasualties.org/oif/IraqiDeaths.aspx

So in a few months, maybe some of those included 26,000 will have their cases up for review if the trend continues since almost 50,000 have been released or had warrants dropped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Does the review board process go something like this.
We have detained you for x amount of time and we know you are innocent. We will let you go free on one condition, you vote for who we say, so we can blunt the Iranian influence that our botched invasion has created.

All snarkiness aside, I have to ask, what type of process is in place that lets that many people be detained and then says, OK you can all go now and as for the rest of you, don't worry about it.

To a mean ol cynic like me, it looks a lot like election rigging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. This article is confusing.
It makes it sound like the 20,000 prisoners are "insurgency" prisoners that fought against US occupiers. But those prisoners would be held in US military installations and would not be subject ot Iraqi laws. So are the 20,000 normal law breakers (theft, vandalism, assault, etc.)that would otherwise have been incarcerated if Hussein were still in power? The US is hardly going ot release someone held in a military prison so that he/she can run up to the first US soldier and blow him//her up. This article is probably more propaganda than anything else. Also the so called insurgents that are patrolling their neighborhoods are being paid by the US Government to do so--to 1) keep enemies close at hand and 2) to keep unemployment down to less than 50%.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe the Repugs will forget the accounts of torture by Nov.
I wonder if there will be a fire at GITMO, where there are no survivors to tell tales. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I had a fleeting thought that they were waiting for a
Category V to vindicate themselves but it got NOLA instead. Didn't some believe that this natural catastrophe and subsequent ambivalent response to the storm's destructiveness was due to the evil/in-humanity that existed there???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaffyMoon Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. It`s about time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is it just me or does it seem like after nailing down oil deals,
the Iraqi government is telling Bush to get lost?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. "Day laborers wanted"

An Iraqi oil worker adjusts some controls at an oil refinery in the southern Rumaila area in 2007. Iraq wants massive development of its oil production in the medium term, seeking to more than double the average number of barrels per day, an oil adviser to Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has said in an interview with Der Spiegel.
(AFP/File/Essam al-Sudani)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080621/wl_mideast_afp/iraqeconomyoil_080621104509;_ylt=AjaQCjROtbrdNyZ9IW.FbH5X6GMA

They'll need guards to cover the night shift no sense keeping a willing labor pool locked up when that oil can't flow to China and Europe on its own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Can you imagine working in a desert contaminated with DU?
Whether it is Iraqis or imported contractors, the environment is now heavily contaminated.

We have gone so far beyond insanity....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Agreed-Great Point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You got that right-they know he is a lame duck too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. that's 20,000 really pissed off people. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC