Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some in D.C. suburbs taking public land

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:13 AM
Original message
Some in D.C. suburbs taking public land
Source: Richmond Times-Dispatch

CHANTILLY -- Officials in the Washington suburbs are struggling to keep up with people who are taking over small pieces of public land for their own use, such as building a fence or putting up a disc golf course.

The incursion of public space by private landowners has caused consternation among neighbors and some park officials.

"We call it encroachment. That's just a very kind, politically correct word for trespassing," said Michael Rierson, resource protection chief for the Fairfax County Park Authority.

Officials say they lack the resources to keep up with all the violations, meaning they can linger unchecked for years.



Read more: http://www.inrich.com/content/cva/ric/news.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2008-06-24-0059.html



I know this is minor in the grand scheme of things, but this flat-out rubs me the wrong way just on principle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. The opposite of "public domain" seizure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Adverse Possession
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession

You take possession of certain real property, use it "openly and notoriously" without being ejected or removed for ten or twenty years, and it becomes yours without paying for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. You also have to say it is YOUR PROPERTY and the doctrine does NOT apply to the State.
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 02:10 PM by happyslug
Adverse possession applies when someone holds himself out as the OWNER of property. It does NOT apply if he is only a trespasser. Thus the person who uses a piece of property for his own use, does NOT become the owner of that property UNLESS he excludes others. If he just mows when he mows his lawn, knowing it is NOT his, Adverse Possession does not come into play.

Furthermore Adverse Possession does NOT apply to the State or other Governmental units, on the grounds the state can not always occupy its property (i.e. not know someone else has a claim to the property so to challenge that claim within the time period for Adverse possession).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wouldn't mind doing this
and planting fruits and vegetables as a community garden coup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Better buy a gun because you will need it to keep others from stealing your food.
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yep, I agree. Ya know it ain't all the "brown people in DC" that......
....are doing this, it's the rich motherfuckers in the "Chevy Chase suburbs" that are doing the APPROPRIATING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have a little of this, sort of.......
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 10:30 AM by new_beawr
My house backs up to an open space designed to help funnel rain water away slowly rather than have all that water head straight to Seneca Creek, and then to the Potomac. There is a flat area which is partly my lawn and partly the open space before it drops off to the drainage area. If I were to build a fence, it would appear to cut my back yard in half. Now, I am expected to mow and otherwise maintain this area right up to where the land drops off, and so I do without any problem. However, I have planted a garden that encroaches on this space, as have many of my neighbors. But, it's the space which I am expected to maintain, not the publicly maintained space. There have been no complaints, but if someone wants to get officious on me, I have no recourse.

However, a group of the neighbors (Chinese Immigrants, many of whom survived the Cultural Revolution) appropriated a larger flat space on the other side of the drainage ditch, put up a fence and managed to grow vegetables until well after Christmas. This garden was banned and the fence removed, although I supported the Gardeners, since they were often out there working and keeping an eye out on all our back doors, noticing all the toddlers and just generally being good neighbors.

In another instance, an airline encroached on one of our neighborhood parks by dropping a piece of a jet on it.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. If it were "homeless" people . . . they'd be attacked immediately ---!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It sure seems so.
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 12:27 PM by SimpleTrend
Some of the surrounding 'property owners' would call and write letters, even to the newspaper folks.

Yet, don't they homeless folks have JUST AS MUCH right to that PUBLIC land as the surrounding owners? No, because homeless don't pay taxes? Yes, because the homeless have a first amendment right to show their class status?

Money talks, constitution walks? That's my guess. Seems an old story of transgressions and usurpations....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. The "gentry" have always done this. This is how the Enclosure Acts started, that starved and made
outlaws of millions of peaceful villagers.

These people's sense of personal privilege and entitlement is so overweening that they can't imagine how their taking could be a problem, much less a crime. They're the "opportunist psychopaths": they're perfectly capable of obeying the rules, and do so except when they think they can get away with transgressing. Like other kinds of stupid people, they're nearly all rightwingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. a sort-of similar case in my hometown
a little different, though, because the laws regarding the dunes are murky and lax in enforcement...




Norfolk officials say dune projects are often illegal


From a public access ramp at 13th Bay Street in Ocean View, evidence of people enjoying the beach abounds.

There are tables and chairs, boats, observation decks, fire pits, flag poles, tiki torches, picnic tables, fountains and even swing sets.

Problem is, most of these items sit on public land or on fragile sand dunes, harming them, city officials said.

Residents need the city's permission to build on the dunes, which Norfolk spends about $2 million per year replenishing. The dunes protect beachfront property from storm damage.

But few residents have asked for that permission, said Lee Rosenberg, who manages the city's environmental services bureau. Rosenberg told Mayor Paul Fraim's Ocean View Task Force recently that a survey of the beaches found nearly 400 residents have illegally intruded into the dunes. He said the problem in Ocean View has never been worse.

"Essentially what you have is people homesteading public land," Rosenberg said. "In some areas, it's out of control."



http://hamptonroads.com/node/469160
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC