Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman details abortion, relationship with "pro-life" congressional candidate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:23 AM
Original message
Woman details abortion, relationship with "pro-life" congressional candidate
Source: The Seattle Times

A woman who dated congressional candidate Mike Erickson seven years ago said she asked him directly whether he wanted to have a baby. He shook his head no, she said, and paid for her abortion.

In interviews with The Oregonian newspaper, the Oregon City woman said she met Erickson in September 2000 and that she had the abortion in January 2001. They saw each other afterward, she said, even going on a trip to Mexico in March, before the relationship ended. She spoke on the condition that only her first name, Tawnya, be used.

Erickson agrees that he gave Tawnya $300 for medical help, and a ride to a doctor's office, but said he didn't know she was pregnant or planned to get an abortion.

Erickson, a Lake Oswego businessman, is the Republican candidate in Oregon's 5th Congressional District and is running on an anti-abortion platform. The charge that he provided money to Tawnya nearly derailed his campaign for the May 20 primary and could hobble his chances in the Nov. 4 general election against state Sen. Kurt Schrader, D-Canby.

Read more: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008013912_erickson24m.html



Please, don't act so surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yet, he and his party would deny that choice to others...
GOP = "Gang Of hyPocrites"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. For repukes, reality always gets in the way of pandering to the fundies.
It's either lust or greed that always gets the better of them. It's in the blood I think. They have no more moral fiber than the rest of us, they just lie about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Far too many "pro-lifers"
are that way only until faced with an unwanted pregnancy in their own life. Then, suddenly an abortion is acceptable in this case, but not, of course, for anyone else.

It's the hypocrisy that I despise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I think that the moniker "pro life"`
is nothing more than a vehicle which they use to get over on the gullable.

They are pro life until an unplanned pregnancy hits home, then they understand exactly what 'choice' means and how important it is.

But always watch out for those who are spitting-mad intolerant of anything---usually they are up to their eyeballs in that very activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Against Abortion Except In Cases of Rape, Incest, Life of the Mother, AND
One of the cynical jokes that hits all too close to home down here in red-state Texas is that the anti-abortion activists are all firmly opposed to abortion except in cases of rape, incest, the life of the mother, AND THEIR OWN PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I didn't know the gun was loaded!
Suuuuuuuure, Erickson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Please don't act so surprised????? who could possibly be surprised?!!


Erickson agrees that he gave Tawnya $300 for medical help, and a ride to a doctor's office, but said he didn't know she was pregnant or planned to get an abortion.


hmmm $300 and a ride to a doctor's office and he couldn't put 2 and 2 together? What is he.....a rocket scientist?!!!!!

Clearly being smarter than a 5th grader is not a prerequiset for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not to mention she asked if he wanted to have a baby.
Sooooooooo, what, she just asked that out of the blue without telling him why? Then she asked for a ride to the doctors office and $300 without telling him why? And he did it, no questions asked?

Is it better to be a lying hypocrite or a clueless moron? I guess Republicans don't worry about such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. And the GOP said that 'don't ask, don't tell'
doesn't work in real life. Seems like Erickson was perfectly happy not to ask his lady friend what was up and didn't want her to tell him either. Sort of like Newt Gingrich's preference for blow jobs from his lady friends so that he could say that he hadn't slept with them. It definitely is a working definition of hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. He totally knew. What other medical procedure costs $300?
He's lying to his constituents, his fellow parishoners, his pastor, and himself. I'm glad she came forward to get the truth out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. He must have thought
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 12:27 PM by SemperEadem
the $300 was for the co-payment, health care being what it is and all... :sarcasm:

but this goes to a far deeper issue about his lack of judgement: he's having unprotected sex? In the 21st century, is he really that far past common sense? We can now see with what head he thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh golly, another Rethug hypocrite.
I'm shocked and appaled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sure, I'm surprised.

NOT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Mike Erickson is possibly the stupidest man alive.
In my neck of the woods, we HAAAAAAATE this man.

They're called vasectomies, asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surf Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. As a pro-lifer, Erickson is a used tampon.
That would be an insult to tampons. I shouldn't be surprised a politician says one thing and does another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. This hypocrite beat Kevin Mannix in the primary!
Edited on Wed Jun-25-08 02:12 AM by quantessd
Kevin Mannix was enthusiastic about increasing the incarceration rate by about double, but voters didn't share his enthusiasm for spending exorbitant amounts of money on an enlarged prison system.

I remember quietly rooting for Erickson, over Mannix. And that's only because I've seen enough of Mannix and I don't want him elected for anything. I actually think it's good news that Erickson beat Mannix in the primary, because come General election, both these jerks will have lost.

I get to vote in the 5th congressional district election! Ah, victory will be sweet.

Edit: I was mistaken about Kevin Mannix's previous career in government. He is not an incumbent, just, a persistent campaigner for many Oregon govt. offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC