Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain calls Carter a 'lousy president'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:51 PM
Original message
McCain calls Carter a 'lousy president'
Source: CNN

(CNN) — John McCain directed his trademark straight talk toward a former president, flatly calling Jimmy Carter a "lousy" commander in chief.

The Arizona senator has long attempted to portray Barack Obama's policies as in the mold of Carter's, though the Republican has previously held back criticizing Carter so directly.

But in an interview with the Las Vegas Sun published Friday, McCain was decidedly more blunt than he has been in the past. McCain, who is a proponent of nuclear reprocessing, was asked why he thought Carter was against the process when he was president.

"Yes, because Carter was a lousy president," McCain quipped. "This is the same guy who kissed Brezhnev."

Read more: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/27/mccain-calls-carter-a-lousy-president/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Time for Jimmy to call McCain a lousy candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Lousy plebe, lousy aviator, lousy naval officer, lousy Congressman and lousy Senator, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. You forgot lousy husband. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
65. not to mention lousy human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
76. he won't
he has far too much class.


Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_MUST_Go Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nowhere NEAR as bad as his BFF Dubya though. But then NOBODY is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whatever you think of his presidency,
Carter is an INFINITELY better human being than McSame is.

Carter may have had one term, but at least he didn't sell his soul just to get power. I can't say the same about McSame!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. And, the swiftboating he got by the right-wing went little noticed . . .
I've always been particularly concerned with the three rescue missions that failed --

I think there were three/?

And supposedly because the helicopters that went down -- and/or crashed into each other ---

did so because they didn't have the gear which keeps SAND out of the engines ....

and they just happened to be in the desert!!

Also . . . "The October Surprise" ---

not to mention the Ted Koppel show every night slamming away at the hostage situation/

Nightline until the public was yelling every day for us to bomb Iran!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. There was only one US rescue mission.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 10:49 PM by kristopher
There were C130s and helicopters gathered at a staging area outside of Tehran. An sandstorm that weather didn't predict hit just before they landed and continued as they unloaded and prepared the helicopters to go in and bring the hostages out to the waiting 103s. However the visibility in the storm was nil and there was a collision on the ground that resulted in I-forget-how-many-lost-aircraft-and-lives. And worse, they had to abort the rescue.

There was an aircraft lost due to sand in the engine, but that didn't scrub the mission.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No . . . there were at the least two rescue missions started . . .
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 11:10 PM by defendandprotect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw


HOWEVER . . . as I recall this it was also CIA led?

And, they were in the desert and didn't have helicopters properly equipped . . . !!!

It looks to me like they sabotaged the missions ---

And then we had "The October Surprise" . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. No. There was only the one.
Your wiki link doesn't even support your assertion. It is as I described. I got to know Col. Beckwith in year after the mission failed. There was no sabotage and your posts are insulting to the men who lost their lives attempting a difficult and dangerous rescue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. No -- two --- here it is . . .
From the Wiki link . . .

A second rescue mission was planned under the name Operation Credible Sport (a.k.a. Operation Honey Badger), but was never put into action. This second rescue attempt was planned using highly modified YMC-130H Hercules aircraft. Outfitted with rocket thrusters fore and aft to allow an extremely short landing and take-off in a soccer stadium, three aircraft were modified under a rushed secret program. One aircraft crashed during a demonstration at Duke Field, Fl, at Eglin Air Force Base Auxiliary Field 3 on October 29, 1980, when its landing braking rockets were fired too soon. The misfire caused a hard touchdown that tore off the starboard wing and started a fire. All on board survived. The impending change in the White House led to the abandonment of this project.

and re your comments here . . .
Your wiki link doesn't even support your assertion. It is as I described. I got to know Col. Beckwith in year after the mission failed. There was no sabotage and your posts are insulting to the men who lost their lives attempting a difficult and dangerous rescue.

Strange way to think about things . . .
Many of us understand 9/11 as an "inside job" --- we don't blame it on the victims!

Sabotage happens from above. Presumably you might be familiar with the Gary Powers
U-2 incident? You should also be familiar with Gary Sick's later understanding of
how the "October Surpise" was being pulled off.

You should also understand that our MIIC betrayed Eisenhower and JFK in many ways
re operations, their directions; overall goals of the administration.

NOW . . . as I originally said . . . I believe there was a third event ---
I haven't found any info on that . . . so it's just my memory. Might not have
been as high profile as these two.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. You're being screwy...
There was ONE rescue attempt. Planning isn't doing.
You wrote:"I've always been particularly concerned with the three rescue missions that failed -- I think there were three/?
For "mission" to fail, there has to BE "mission".


"...And supposedly because the helicopters that went down -- and/or crashed into each other --- did so because they didn't have the gear which keeps SAND out of the engines ....and they just happened to be in the desert!!..."

You might want to let go of that paranoia a bit and check into the reality based community. You are throwing out half-baked crackpot theories that don''t stand up to even the most casual scrutiny. We had one helo that was abandoned due to mechanical malfunction unrelated to sand. In the middle of a dust storm, another helo had an electrical problem and had to return to the carrier. As the helos landed at the mustering site, another developed a hydraulic system failure. This led to the decision to abort the mission as 6 helos were considered the minimum essential number.

In preparing to depart a helo clipped a refueling C130 and started a fire that destroyed several aircraft and killed 8 men.

It was a clusterfuck, but to claim it was some sort of sabotage is idiocy.

http://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/cadre/aspj/apjinternational/apj-s/2006/3tri06/kampseng.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. Nice of you to say . . . !
Notice that the non-existant "mission" suffered another accident ---

Quite some performance for our Cold War army . . . and secret missions.

While I don't have info on it now, as I recall this there were three incidents.

Lovely discussing this with you --- !!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Secord, Hakim, North -- central figures in the Carter rescue missions ---
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 07:58 PM by defendandprotect
At least three central figures in the Iran-Contra Scandal were involved with the Iranian hostage rescue mission: Secord, Hakim, and North.

General Richard Secord helped to organize the abortive rescue mission. After the first mission failed, he was the head of the planning group that eventually decided against another rescue attempt. Because the whereabouts of the hostages were unknown, the second rescue attempt (the October Surprise that the Reagan-Bush campaign was so worried about) never happened.

Secord was later suspended from his Pentagon post because of the EATSCO probe. EATSCO is a company that belongs to Edwin Wilson, the CIA operative who is currently serving time in a federal maximum-security prison for, among other things, secretly supplying 43,000 pounds of plastic explosives to Kadaffi. <21>

In 1981, he became Chief Middle East arms-sales adviser to Secretary of Defense Casper W. Weinberger. <21>

Albert Hakim is a wealthy arms merchant, an Iranian exile, and CIA informant, who had a "sensitive intelligence" role in 1980 hostage rescue. He worked for the CIA near the Turkish boarder, handling the logistics of the rescue mission in Tehran. Hakim purchased trucks and vans, and rented a warehouse on the edge of Tehran to hide them in until they were needed for the operation. Unexpectedly however, he skipped town the day before the rescue mission. <2> <13> <25> Later on, in July, 1981, Hakim approached the CIA, with a plan to gain favor with the Iranian government by selling it arms. <22>

Oliver North led a secret detachment to eastern Turkey. He was in the mother ship on the Turkish border awaiting the cue from Secord to fly into Teheran and rescue the hostages. <2> <25> After the first aborted rescue mission, he worked with Secord on a second rescue plan.

According to the October Surprise theory, Secord, North and Hakim did not intend Desert One to carry through. The miserable failure of Carter's Desert One rescue attempt may have been deliberate.
SE


In the Shah days . . .
Albert Hakim, an Iranian-born arms merchant, was selling millions of dollars worth of arms to the Shah in the 70's. In 1983 testimony, he boasted of arranging Iran arms deals, setting up swiss bank accounts, and paying off Iranian officials. <20>

General Richard Secord worked at the time in Air Force Military Advisory Group. His job was to represent US arms merchants before the Shah. Hakim and Secord were in cahoots, and ran a company called Stanford Technologies Trading Group International. They eventually became deeply involved in the events of the Iran-Contra Scandal.


http://www.donhopkins.com/drupal/node/104



Just a PS on this . . .

Major General James B. Vaught (US Army) was appointed Joint Task Force commander, and a team of officers was assembled to lead the various components, including: Colonel Charles A. Beckwith (founder of the Army’s new Delta Force counter-terrorist group) to be the ground assault commander; Colonel James H. Kyle (long-time USAF MC-130 special operator) to command the fixed wing contingent; and Marine Lieutenant Colonel Edward Seiffert (an experienced night-vision flyer) to lead the helicopter force. From the beginning the idea that all the services should have a “piece of the action” plagued the operation and led to bad decisions. This was the first major mistake.

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/apjinternational/apj-s/2006/3tri06/kampseng.html



Planning
In the realm of military planning there are plans that might work and plans that won’t work. In the cold light of history it is evident that the plan for Eagle Claw was in the second category, but since the planning process was deliberately kept compartmented and secretive, no outside group could review the finished plan for a “reality check.” This was the second major mistake.



The failure of the various services to work together with cohesion forced the establishment of a new multi-service organization.

The lack of highly trained Army helicopter pilots that were capable of the low-level night flying needed for modern special forces missions prompted the creation of the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR) (Night Stalkers).

And THIS was our Cold War army; the days when NORAD actually responded.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw


The assets in place were a Tehran CIA team led by noted special forces legend Richard Meadows, who were there for two purposes: (1) to obtain information about the hostages and the embassy grounds, and (2) to transport the rescuers from Desert Two to the embassy grounds with pre-staged vehicles. (In reality, the most important information came from an embassy cook who was released by the Iranians and discovered on a flight from Tehran at the last minute by another CIA officer, and who confirmed that the hostages were centrally located in the embassy compound - this was a key piece of information long sought after by the planners.)

Hard to know if this was from the movie version or from an E. Howard Hunt script ---


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Barbara Honegger/Reagan campaign . . . on sabotage of the rescue mission ---
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 10:31 PM by defendandprotect
Honegger: ... and then of course we have Richard Secord, Oliver North and Albert
Hakim. Richard Secord was one of the chief planners for the so- called failed
Desert 1 rescue attempt, North was involved in that rescue attempt, in the
mother ship, which was on the Turkish border awaiting the cue from Secord to fly
discussing the "sabotage" . . .


in and rescue the hostages, and Albert Hakim was in charge of the ground
operations of the rescue attempt, in particular, obtaining the trucks and other
vehicles which were going to be needed. Hakim skipped town, left Tehran 24 hours
before the rescue was to take place, and the reason for that, as detailed in my
research documentation, was that Secord, North and Hakim had no intention of
seeing Desert 1 carry through, and so sabotaged the operation. Narrator: The
hostage rescue team consisted of 8 helicopters, 6 C130 transport planes and 93
delta force commandos. But delta force never made it to Tehran. Only 5 of the 8
helicopters reached the site of Desert 1 in operable condition. According to
General Samuel Wilson, who investigated the many failures of the rescue mission,
the pentagon's review panel found negligence on a level surprising even to those
hardened to military incompetence. This is only one of many strange facts
surrounding the rescue mission. Honegger takes us back to Tehran during the
rescue attempt:

Honegger: There were a number of interesting incidences which occurred in Tehran
that night. The 53'rd hostage, Cynthia Dwyer, who was in Iran and who had not
yet been taken hostage, told Reverend Moore, an american minister who was there
and interviewing her at the time by phone, that the CIA had sabotaged the rescue
attempt. She told him that immediately after the so-called aborted failure.

Narrator: The failed rescue mission left 8 men dead and 3 helicopters in the
desert filled with classified documents which fell into the Iranian's hands.

Narrator: The possibility of Carter's success in bringing the 52 hostages home
sent tremors through the Reagan/Bush campaign headquarters. Honegger was working
for the campaign at the time:

Honegger: Richard Wirthland, who was the campaign's pollster, had determined
that an 'october surprise', which was a successful attempt by Carter to release
the hostages and bring them home before the election, would be the death knell
to a Reagan/Bush presidency. That was determined by Reagan and Bush's pollster
in march of 1980, which, not coincidentally, was one month before the sabotaged
Desert 1 rescue mission. Marshall: The Reagan people were extremely concerned
about what they termed 'The October Surprise', and Reagan's campaign manager,
William Casey, later to become the head of the CIA, was running what he termed
an 'intelligence operation' against the Carter camp. This first came out when
David Stockman revealed that Reagan had prepared for his TV debates with Carter
using a stolen briefing book. We know now that the espionage operation was much
broader than just stealing briefing books. It included former military officers,
CIA people, FBI agents and the like, who tapped into the Carter camp, into the
intelligence bureaucracy, to find out whether this october surprise would
actually happen, because if it did, it would have cost Reagan the election.


http://history.eserver.org/the-october-surprise.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. As near as I can tell,
Carter is the most recent Christian US President. Obama will be the next.

Just my opinion, but I don't see anyone else on the Washington scene with a scrap of decency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittPoliSci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
71. exactly.
i don't really think carter was an effective president, but...WHO CARES?!?!!? He's a great humanitarian, and he's been doing much for the world since he left office.

McCain is a piece of shit, and needs to throw in the towel NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is despicable. The big oily money love to blame Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Reflect on how much the MIIC might have hated Carter . . . the peacemaker . . .
Any peacemaker interferring with the warprofiteering going on was a danger to them!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. "This is the same guy who kissed Brezhnev." Oh, REALLY??? Did Carter hug Fidel Castro?
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 10:23 PM by IanDB1

(Okay, actually that's cosmonaut Uri Gagarian)

But it DOES look like McCain (seen here with his first wife, who he cheated on with his current wife):



But THESE are real...









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I know we have put up with Shrub and his
personality for 7-1/2 years and I have certainly poked fun at him. And, sighed a lot, but I have a feeling that McCain would be even worse. Shrub knows he has been playing a part all these years. I am afraid McCain would actually believe he was invincible if he won the presidency. To be such a small man his ego is monstrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
40. It's the bantam rooster syndrome. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. After the first Jeff Gannon photo . . . it's Bush . .. and ?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stardust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. He's Jim-Jeff Gannon-Guckert givin some luuuuuv....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Is it him in those two photos? Come on . . . ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
42. Tony Blair. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. If we had kept Carter's incentives for solar and conservation
we would be well on our way toward energy independence as well as cleaner energy.

McCain is not worthy to clean the mud from Jimmy's work boots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Carter put solar panels in the White House - Reagan ripped them out --- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oooh, let him talk, let him talk!
We need more of this, McFoot-in-mouth. More juicy things you'll have to take back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hey now, we should all respect McCain for this,
after all if anyone knows lousy it should be McCain seeing as he graduated near the bottom of his class, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoleil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
82. Fifth from the bottom - 894th out of 899 - yeah, LOUSY!
Carter finished 59th out of his Naval Academy class of 820.

McCain started as an opportunist, his Naval career reflects this, his marriage reflects this, his congressional career reflects this and he continues as one as he tries to demean a fellow Naval Academy graduate who worked much harder to get where he got than McCain ever had to, in order to stroke his own ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxer Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Carter has a degree in Nuclear Engineering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. And he's the guy who smooches Bush,
who snuggles up with Evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. That photo of John McCain looks like he is on death's doorstep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. I've got something McCain can kiss, right here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaye45 Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. What a classy guy
that's so junior high bully behavior - name calling, ad hominem attacks. what next, McCain puts vaseline on his front door knob?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. What do we think McCain's reaction would be if we called Reagan . . . "a lousy president" . .. ????
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 10:45 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Loved the comment on the link from a reader
"And McCain is a lousy non-President... let's keep it that way!" :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. And McCain is a lousy human being
So there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Carter was a better President than Dubya and history is proving that Jimmy
had a better vision of the future than St. Ronny.

And Carter became something that McBush never will -- President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. FUCKING ASSHOLES ARE *STILL* RUNNING AGAINST CARTER!! GET OVER IT ALREADY!!
carter was president THREE DECADES AGO.

maybe we should remind everyone what a lousy president NIXON was. and what about HOOVER?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaye45 Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Jeff Tubin said
for his generation Jimmy Carter might as well be James Polk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. yeah. polk got us the northwest, the southwest, lowered tariffs, and established a treasury system
and, much like carter, was reviled for his contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kuratowa Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
72. Napolean of the Stump
Austere, severe, he held few people dear
His oratory filled his foes with fear
The factions soon agreed
He's just the man we need
To bring about victory
Fulfill our manifest destiny
And annex the land the Mexicans command
And when the votes were cast the winner was
Mister James K. Polk, Napoleon of the Stump

In four short years he met his every goal
He seized the whole southwest from Mexico
Made sure the tarriffs fell
And made the English sell the Oregon territory
He built an independent treasury
Having done all this he sought no second term
But precious few have mourned the passing of
Mister James K. Polk, our eleventh president
Young Hickory, Napoleon of the Stump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
55. Aw, give th'senile ole feller a break: ain't his fault he cain't rememba who he's running aginst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good fuck. Carter is a goddamn statesman.
McCain sold his soul the moment he backed torture.

Carter was also prescient on energy.

I merely hope McCain lives just long enough for the public humiliation his trouncing at the polls will bring. Fuck you, McCain. Time to go write your book now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronco214 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Carter
Although I am not a Christian, I applaud President Carter for
trying to show through example how he thinks Jesus wanted
Christians to live. He is one hell of a good man. 
How old is he and he still pounds nails for Habitat? Show me a
rich rethug politician that hits more that two nails after the
cameras go away! Show me a couple of them. No? Then show me
one. Never mind, didn't mean to waste your time. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. And that book will darken my door on the day that my town runs out of toilet paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. HA! (this coming from the piece of shit who sucks off george bush!) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. Carter was right about a lot of things
The environment, energy, peace rather than war...

Right-wingers hate that in a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
36. As my cube mate said a few weeks ago, to be a republican you have to be really stupid
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 12:23 AM by superconnected
or hate people.

Who could hate carter? Someone who hates people. Carters trademark is being peaceful and honest. It says a lot about Mccain that he hates him.

Meanwhile he likes bush - a warmongering murderer.

We really need to build mental facilities for the insanely right wing. I do believe it's a sociopathic disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. exactly! they're against peace and those who push for it
and they're also against those who wish to make energy efficient and usable for the masses - however that will 'take' from the corporations' profits, and people like McSame are paid by them to tow the line.


One thing about McSame... he may be a lot like Shrub, but one thing he won't be if they don't enforce martial law or fake the results of the election - and that's a president!

Haha Johnny, I say... what a laughable candidate they've given us - at least Shrub was likable (not to me, but to the masses), even if he was stoopid!


New Obama Mama & McSame Items!
www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Analitico Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
43. Will he call Dubya the same?
Katrina, Iraq, housing slump, etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nwliberalkiwi Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
44. President Carter And Nuclear Processing
I'd sure trust President Carter with knowledge about nuclear processing than I would, fourth to last in his class at the Naval Academy, McCain. I didn't see McCain being selected for nuclear training by the Naval Academy, but carter's training was in nuclear engineering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
45. McSame needs to focus on today less he be reminded of the
cluster fuck bu$h is leaving us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poppysgal Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
46. Just one question
pops into my head, who does he think was a good commander in chief?:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
47. Imagine if a Democrat had said this about a Republican ex-president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
49. Not As Lousy As Bush
Carter got down to 34% approval rating. Bush beats Carter on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
50. What a sorry POS McSame is...
Carter has more stature and integrity in his pinky than McIdiot has in his entire body. And the statement about kissing Brezhnev - this from a guy that hugged Bush, the same one who slammed him in 2000. This moran really has some GD nerve slamming Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
52. I want McCain to say with a straight face that Bush has been a good president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. If we had listened to Carter thirty years ago, we would not be
paying nearly $5/gallon for gasoline because our cars would go twice as far for the same money and we would already have a viable alternative to petroleum-based fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
54. 30%+ of the electorate probably wasn't politically cognizant during Carter's presidency.
He just looks like an angry old man.

Brezhnev who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesota_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
56. Unless McCain recognizes that Chimpy is an absolute failure...
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 03:46 PM by minnesota_liberal
as a leader, a diplomat and commander in chief, his opinion on this matter is meaningless and his statement is worthless except as a sign that McCain is a partisan, mudslinging asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
57. McCain proves his lack of historical hindsight
oh goodie, a presidential candidate who cannot learn from history!

Carter is probably the greatest-president-who-was-unappreciated-in-his-time. he was way ahead of the curve on a number of issues and the rest of the country was not ready to change with him. if we'd listened at the time, so many of the modern crisis' would have been defused before they began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
58. This shit-for-brains asshole thinks chimpy is a good president, so who cares about his opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesota_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #58
70. Wish I'd said that
Oh. I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #58
75. McCain is a total scumbag
Bush has lower approval ratings than Carter ever did but you won't see his butt buddy McCain call him a "lousy president".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
59. mcblame hates President Carter because
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 04:47 PM by xxqqqzme
1. only graduate of the Naval Academy to become President;
2. finished 59th out of his Academy class of 820; (mcclame was 894/899)
3. accepted into Navy's fledgling nuclear submarine program run by Captain (later Admiral) Hyman G. Rickover;
4. Carter completed an introductory course in nuclear reactor power at Union College starting in March 1953.....This followed Carter's first-hand experience as part of a group of American and Canadian servicemen who took part in cleaning up after a nuclear meltdown at Canada's Chalk River Laboratories reactor.

Carter can kick mcshame's ass on any conversation about nuclear power.

If Carter's renewable energy projections, 30 years ago, had been followed, instead of gutted by st ronnie, we would be well on our way to being ME oil independent by today. Carter was a visionary. The people of the US didn't like hearing that they were going to have to sacrifice a little to get these huge rewards. The stupid sheeple disliked hearing such plain talk & so flocked to the wolf in sheep's clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
60. Insane McSame is a lousy husband.
Look what he did to his first wife. Jimmy didn't do that to Rosalynn. Jimmy has more integrity in his nail filings than McSame has ever had in his whole bloated body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
61. Yeah, Carter kept whining about....

....changing our energy policy, and getting off foreign oil. It was a real drag.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
62. I can't wait until the old dirt bag blows his stack at the debate
Obama might want to prompt him a little by obliquely bringing up the "cunt" incident
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. Obama will never stoop to McSame's level
of ignorance. I don't think it is in his DNA at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
64. I do hope Jimmy responds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
67. OK McSame, you are now officially a scumbag
in my book, you just went too far this time. I know this dumbass has a tendency to be his own worst enemy, he habitually puts his foot into his mouth, but he's just gone too far with me this time.

I have always considered Jimmy Carter as one of the great modern US presidents, on par with JFK. We actually had a chance to deal with "nuclear proliferation" during his day, a phrase which his daughter Amy was the first to use, if I recall correctly. And for a short time, it was actually legal to travel to Cuba during JC's presidency, without fear of being fined by OFAC. JC was a real peace president.

Mr. "Hundred-Year Wars" McSame, he's in the same category as the Old World monarchs, they all wanted the same thing. There was never a lasting and permanent peace, it's always a 100-year war or a thousand-year war or like Hitler, a grandiose 1000-year reich, which would really have been a permanent, never-ending war against anyone who they decide will be the enemy for any particular length of time.

McSame is coming from a time when clubbing a woman over the head and dragging her to a cave was considered both romantic and acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
73. Kissed Brezhnev?
Well, considering that St Ronnie, whom no doubt McCain considers as a hero, was extremely friendly to Pinochet and various other very nasty Latin American dictators, to Botha in South Africa, Zia in Pakistan, and helped to build up the forerunners of the Taliban, McInsane seems a bit selective!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #73
80. Actually, this is a more significant statement...
Once again, McCain is focusing on events and people that most voters today would be hard-pressed to remember. Another indication of how out of touch he is with the current generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
74. McCain has finally gone nuts and thinks he's running in '80
I find his homophobic insinuations to be pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
77. You should honor your elders, John.
There aren't too many of them left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
78. If you've ever wondered about Carter's bad luck with rescue . . .
Secord, Hakim, North -- central figures in the Carter rescue missions ---
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 08:58 PM by defendandprotect
At least three central figures in the Iran-Contra Scandal were involved with the Iranian hostage rescue mission: Secord, Hakim, and North.

General Richard Secord helped to organize the abortive rescue mission. After the first mission failed, he was the head of the planning group that eventually decided against another rescue attempt. Because the whereabouts of the hostages were unknown, the second rescue attempt (the October Surprise that the Reagan-Bush campaign was so worried about) never happened.

Secord was later suspended from his Pentagon post because of the EATSCO probe. EATSCO is a company that belongs to Edwin Wilson, the CIA operative who is currently serving time in a federal maximum-security prison for, among other things, secretly supplying 43,000 pounds of plastic explosives to Kadaffi. <21>

In 1981, he became Chief Middle East arms-sales adviser to Secretary of Defense Casper W. Weinberger. <21>

Albert Hakim is a wealthy arms merchant, an Iranian exile, and CIA informant, who had a "sensitive intelligence" role in 1980 hostage rescue. He worked for the CIA near the Turkish boarder, handling the logistics of the rescue mission in Tehran. Hakim purchased trucks and vans, and rented a warehouse on the edge of Tehran to hide them in until they were needed for the operation. Unexpectedly however, he skipped town the day before the rescue mission. <2> <13> <25> Later on, in July, 1981, Hakim approached the CIA, with a plan to gain favor with the Iranian government by selling it arms. <22>

Oliver North led a secret detachment to eastern Turkey. He was in the mother ship on the Turkish border awaiting the cue from Secord to fly into Teheran and rescue the hostages. <2> <25> After the first aborted rescue mission, he worked with Secord on a second rescue plan.

According to the October Surprise theory, Secord, North and Hakim did not intend Desert One to carry through. The miserable failure of Carter's Desert One rescue attempt may have been deliberate.SE



In the Shah days . . .
Albert Hakim, an Iranian-born arms merchant, was selling millions of dollars worth of arms to the Shah in the 70's. In 1983 testimony, he boasted of arranging Iran arms deals, setting up swiss bank accounts, and paying off Iranian officials. <20>

General Richard Secord worked at the time in Air Force Military Advisory Group. His job was to represent US arms merchants before the Shah. Hakim and Secord were in cahoots, and ran a company called Stanford Technologies Trading Group International. They eventually became deeply involved in the events of the Iran-Contra Scandal.


http://www.donhopkins.com/drupal/node/104



Just a PS on this . . .

Major General James B. Vaught (US Army) was appointed Joint Task Force commander, and a team of officers was assembled to lead the various components, including: Colonel Charles A. Beckwith (founder of the Army’s new Delta Force counter-terrorist group) to be the ground assault commander; Colonel James H. Kyle (long-time USAF MC-130 special operator) to command the fixed wing contingent; and Marine Lieutenant Colonel Edward Seiffert (an experienced night-vision flyer) to lead the helicopter force. From the beginning the idea that all the services should have a “piece of the action” plagued the operation and led to bad decisions. This was the first major mistake.

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/apjinternational/apj...



Planning
In the realm of military planning there are plans that might work and plans that won’t work. In the cold light of history it is evident that the plan for Eagle Claw was in the second category, but since the planning process was deliberately kept compartmented and secretive, no outside group could review the finished plan for a “reality check.” This was the second major mistake.



The failure of the various services to work together with cohesion forced the establishment of a new multi-service organization.

The lack of highly trained Army helicopter pilots that were capable of the low-level night flying needed for modern special forces missions prompted the creation of the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR) (Night Stalkers).

And THIS was our Cold War army; the days when NORAD actually responded.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw


The assets in place were a Tehran CIA team led by noted special forces legend Richard Meadows, who were there for two purposes: (1) to obtain information about the hostages and the embassy grounds, and (2) to transport the rescuers from Desert Two to the embassy grounds with pre-staged vehicles. (In reality, the most important information came from an embassy cook who was released by the Iranians and discovered on a flight from Tehran at the last minute by another CIA officer, and who confirmed that the hostages were centrally located in the embassy compound - this was a key piece of information long sought after by the planners.)

Hard to know if this was from the movie version or from an E. Howard Hunt script ---


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
79. Barbara Honegger on the so-called "failed" rescue attempt ---
Barbara Honegger/Reagan campaign . . . on sabotage of the rescue mission ---
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 11:31 PM by defendandprotect
Honegger: ... and then of course we have Richard Secord, Oliver North and Albert
Hakim. Richard Secord was one of the chief planners for the so- called failed
Desert 1 rescue attempt, North was involved in that rescue attempt, in the
mother ship, which was on the Turkish border awaiting the cue from Secord to fly
discussing the "sabotage" . . .


in and rescue the hostages, and Albert Hakim was in charge of the ground
operations of the rescue attempt, in particular, obtaining the trucks and other
vehicles which were going to be needed. Hakim skipped town, left Tehran 24 hours
before the rescue was to take place, and the reason for that, as detailed in my
research documentation, was that Secord, North and Hakim had no intention of
seeing Desert 1 carry through, and so sabotaged the operation. Narrator: The
hostage rescue team consisted of 8 helicopters, 6 C130 transport planes and 93
delta force commandos. But delta force never made it to Tehran. Only 5 of the 8
helicopters reached the site of Desert 1 in operable condition. According to
General Samuel Wilson, who investigated the many failures of the rescue mission,
the pentagon's review panel found negligence on a level surprising even to those
hardened to military incompetence. This is only one of many strange facts
surrounding the rescue mission. Honegger takes us back to Tehran during the
rescue attempt:

Honegger: There were a number of interesting incidences which occurred in Tehran
that night. The 53'rd hostage, Cynthia Dwyer, who was in Iran and who had not
yet been taken hostage, told Reverend Moore, an american minister who was there
and interviewing her at the time by phone, that the CIA had sabotaged the rescue
attempt. She told him that immediately after the so-called aborted failure.

Narrator: The failed rescue mission left 8 men dead and 3 helicopters in the
desert filled with classified documents which fell into the Iranian's hands.

Narrator: The possibility of Carter's success in bringing the 52 hostages home
sent tremors through the Reagan/Bush campaign headquarters. Honegger was working
for the campaign at the time:

Honegger: Richard Wirthland, who was the campaign's pollster, had determined
that an 'october surprise', which was a successful attempt by Carter to release
the hostages and bring them home before the election, would be the death knell
to a Reagan/Bush presidency. That was determined by Reagan and Bush's pollster
in march of 1980, which, not coincidentally, was one month before the sabotaged
Desert 1 rescue mission. Marshall: The Reagan people were extremely concerned
about what they termed 'The October Surprise', and Reagan's campaign manager,
William Casey, later to become the head of the CIA, was running what he termed
an 'intelligence operation' against the Carter camp. This first came out when
David Stockman revealed that Reagan had prepared for his TV debates with Carter
using a stolen briefing book. We know now that the espionage operation was much
broader than just stealing briefing books. It included former military officers,
CIA people, FBI agents and the like, who tapped into the Carter camp, into the
intelligence bureaucracy, to find out whether this october surprise would
actually happen, because if it did, it would have cost Reagan the election.



http://history.eserver.org/the-october-surprise.txt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
81. Doesn't mean much coming, as it does, from a lousy human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
83. Carter was an Honest President
McCain is a dishonest wannabe....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
84. In any case...
considering that Obama was 19 when Carter's term ended, how exactly are the two connected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC