Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fed Chair Says U.S. Economy Needs New Regulatory System

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:17 AM
Original message
Fed Chair Says U.S. Economy Needs New Regulatory System
Edited on Tue Jul-08-08 09:29 AM by flashl
Source: Washington Post

The government should create a new system to ensure that major financial firms can fail without creating risks for the larger economy, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said today, in a sweeping speech that outlined his views on how regulation of the financial system should be overhauled.

"Congress may wish to consider whether new tools are needed for ensuring an orderly liquidation of a systemically important securities firm that is on the verge of bankruptcy, together with a more formal process for deciding when to use those tools," Bernanke said in a speech in Arlington to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s forum on mortgage lending for low-income households. A model may be the FDIC's current system for disposing of the assets of failed commercial banks, he said.

In the absence of such a formal system, the Fed made the decision to rescue failed investment bank Bear Stearns in March in the middle of the night, in an improvised fashion, and using emergency authority. Bernanke acknowledged that his decision to extend loans to investment banks, using that emergency authority, created new risks.

"The Fed's decision to lend to {investment firms}, although it was necessary to avoid serious financial disruptions, could tend to make market discipline less effective in the future," he said.

Washington Post


edit: removed advertisement icon

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/08/AR2008070800905.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is nothing like closing the door after the horse has gone...
this is more like trying to find the door after the tornado blew through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. So much for laissez faire (license to steal) economics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. The problem isn't disposition of assets
Quite often as in the RTC, the issue was the disposition of OVERVALUED assets. Oh wait, so we're not bailing out inflated real estate this time? Just inflated mortgages?

Bernanke go home you dumbass. I have a toenail clipping that's smarter than you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are you closely following this? "The GOVERNMENT should create a new system." Now read this:

Fed, SEC Team Up On Bank Oversight



Deal Formalized to Coordinate on Wall St.

Two top regulators reached a formal agreement to coordinate their oversight of Wall Street yesterday, as the government attempts to build a new system to guard against a meltdown of the financial system.

Leaders of the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission signed a memorandum of understanding that explicitly allows for the two agencies to share information about the inner workings of investment banks. The move formalizes what has been a reality since the rescue of Bear Stearns in March and marks an end to an era in which the two agencies held information close to their vests.

Washington Post


Did I somehow missed the "Congress may wish to consider whether new tools are needed" part? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Apparently So
Bernanke called for Congress to give the agencies that regulate Wall Street firms more explicit authority. Currently, large investment firms agree voluntarily to broad oversight by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

If an agency is calling for a change, one would expect them to propose what that change would look like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. As I read it, the Feds made a "call to 'Government/Congress' for change" then
announces the Fed/SEC "change" in the form of a MOA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Agencies Often Have Generally Defined Powers
and I would assume there is a lot that the Fed and the SEC can do on their own. But part of their plan may require changes in the law. That was how I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Understood. This seems similar to the Fed Reserve exercising emergency powers
when bypassing establish procedures or regulations to conduct auctions.

In Dec 2007, the Fed bypassed procedures to gain auction authority, the procedures required prior notice and public comment to conduct the auctions.

The FR request to Congress and then the announcement of the MOA seems to be more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. The plunge protection team needs plunge protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. No.. we Just Need A Regulatory System Period
Edited on Tue Jul-08-08 09:45 AM by fascisthunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Exactly. Corporations need strict government regulation and oversight
Edited on Tue Jul-08-08 02:07 PM by Zorra
What Benny Boy is proposing is putting the cart before the horse.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Easy! Simply limit the size and one company can be.
Break the bastards up - Anti-Trust?

Go back the the original Corporate charters that stated that a Corporations CANNOT OWN another Corporation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Would "failed investment banks" also mean
the Federal Reserve System?

Bernakespeak? We don't particularly care about helping homeless poor folks or common citizens, but when one of our important entities gets in trouble, corporate-welfare efforts to save them will be effected immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. DOH!
Gosh... what gave them that big clue???

ARGH!!!!!!!!! :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. NO FUCKING SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. reads more like redistribution of wealth to me...
...he just wants an orderly robbery the average low-life citizens to bail out the corporate behemoths and their VIP leaders.

Why not just go back to the good ol' days of regulations against outright fraud, antitrust, etc.

Oh wait a sec. Silly me. That's what created that pesky middle class that has taken babyBush a full 7 1/2 years to dismantle. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. So is the choice between no one guarding the hen house or the fox guarding the hen house?
Just like the rethugs to try to falsely limit the options in any choice to their shitty ideas.

Idiots and a$$holes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick for later and an R for more exposure/discussion n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is akin to saying the Titanic became "increasingly moist" after striking the iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Howzabout we change the fact that coropations have more personal rights than
actual,living, persons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Agreed.
Corporations and vampires have eternal lives.

Potentially eternal, that is. They slowly die if they can't feed off someone else's blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. To be popularly known as:
Edited on Tue Jul-08-08 02:16 PM by Turbineguy
The Rolls-Royce and Bentley Dealers Reconciliation Act of 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. How about less fake "assets" and less fake money?
The economy needs to be something better than a Ponzi scheme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veracity Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. Reminder: Just who really owns the Fed?
More power? Amazing. The fed is not a government institution... it is a private bank. So few people really understand, and they want even more power. Important read:

http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/editorial/jesse-richards-commentary/19-jesses-thoughts/665-dear-lou-dobbs-who-owns-the-federal-reserve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC