Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Shocked by Cameraman's Further Detainment for 'Security' Reasons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:18 AM
Original message
AP Shocked by Cameraman's Further Detainment for 'Security' Reasons
Source: Associated Press

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- An Associated Press television cameraman who was detained by U.S. and Iraqi forces in early June was ordered held for at least six more months Tuesday for "imperative reasons of security," the U.S. military said.

The decision came as a surprise to the AP, which had earlier been led to believe that the cameraman, Ahmed Nouri Raziak, was likely to be released because of lack of any evidence against him.

Raziak, 38, who has worked for AP Television News since 2003, was detained by U.S. and Iraqi soldiers at his home in Tikrit on June 4. He was transferred last month to the U.S. military's detention facility at Camp Cropper near Baghdad International Airport.

The AP has been in regular contact with U.S. military officials about his case. In notifying the AP that Raziak would continue to be held, the military provided no details about any allegations against him.

Read more: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003825789
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. "the military provided no details about any allegations against him."
Pish tosh! This might've been considered an abomination back when habeas corpus (born 1305. died 2001) was taken seriously. But that stuff is just soooo 20th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. AP is shocked? They've been helping perpetuate this crime for seven years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. That's the first thing I thought of!
It seems disingenuous for AP, which has been a cheerleader for all things bush for years and years, to complain so bitterly when the consequences of the policies they dishonestly advocated come back to bite them in the butt.

Welcome to Bushtopia, AP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. So it's interesting to sit here and watch them shrivel in shock over this.
They stopped being news media a while back. So why do they expect special treatment now? Maybe they're just figuring out that they signed a deal with the devil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe the Associated Pukes will wake up and stop being so....well...
...pukish.

When hell freezes over, I know--and all of them are in fucking indefinite detention without charge for the terrorist activity of daring to publish the Junta's handouts. Then maybe they'll WAKE UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Do journalists &company have a union?
I know that newspaper line employees have a union. My brother lost his job in a lockout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is that the same AP that runs the Bush/McCain cheerleading squad? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Message to Journalists everywhere: "Only Pentagon ass-lickers need apply"
to be "journalists" covering the war zone.

All others will be considered "terrorist suspects" and are subject to being "detained" indefinitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. He must have seen something that scares the military silly...
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 02:24 AM by 1monster
What did he witness that the Admin and the brass don't want us to see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. What did he film that the Admin and the brass don't want us to see?
Poor man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Well, that and all the torture he's almost certainly suffered. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds like Beavis and Butthead jumped straight into torture with this one.
Now they've got to hold him long enough for him to "forget" what they did. Healing time, psychotherapy, plastic surgery... God knows. Bet no one's allowed to see him either.

We're going to have to release all the non-violent offenders if we're going to have enough prison space for the war criminal psychopaths stationed overseas - and those at the WH, of course.

I am so ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. They're holding him because they can
and they can because no one is offering up any serious challenges to the abuses and crimes being carried out on the orders of the Bush government.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. At least six more months -- January 2009
When Bush is gone ---- hmmm. What's the connection?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faith No More Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. BUSH IS NEVER GOING TO BE GONE!!! DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND!!
We are just two clicks away from Marshal Law in this country. THERE WILL BE NO ELECTION!!! After we attack Iran and the full effect of the floods in the midwest drive the price of food beyond the reach of the average person, gas continues to go up and the jobless rate continues to climb, the United States as we know it is GONE!!! Do you honestly think these assholes have been giving themselves all this power just so they can turn the White House over to Obama? It's not going to happen people, open your eyes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Martial Law, Marshall Plan, Marshal Dillon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. "Marcia, Marcia, Marcia!" - Jan Brady
mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bathandbeyond Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I can't believe I'm beginning to agree with you.
I never thought I would say this, but for the first time in my 55 years of life I think you may be on to something. Who would have ever thought that habeas corpus would become toilet paper for this administration?
Who would have ever thought that we could attack a sovereign nation based on speculation and innuendo? Now, with the global economy tanking who knows what might happen next? These evil bastards scare me. By the way, welcome to DU from a fellow newby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. i'm not
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 09:25 AM by beezlebum
welcome to DU to you both. and on that note, i strongly disagree with you both.

The bush administration is not going to become a full blown dictatorship.
yes habeas corpus is null and void. yes the constitution has been used as toilet paper. yes war and torture have become staples of american policy. yes the global economy is tanking. yes the whispers of "war with iran before * leaves office" have become drum beats.

but this kind of fear is exactly what they want. they want us to be afraid and draw paranoid conclusions and be distracted.

bushco was about profit, changing the climate among americans, convincing them that their economic freedom didn't matter, nor did their civil liberties, dividing and distracting with wedge issues while they set the stage for their grand middle eastern takeover, and if anyone got or gets in their way, well, now they can make those little roadblocks disappear and continue on their merry way. now cheney et al can retire to luxurious dubai.

i ask again- what would be the point of unleashing an open dictatorship when the dog and pony show is so effective? why openly hijack when you the whole plane including the cockpit convinced you're the pilot? when you have scapegoats and red herrings and strawmen? and you've got enough of a populace convinced that it was all about some greater good? and retirement to look forward to?

you don't need to be dictator to have extreme amounts of power- this cabal were probably already more powerful than most dictators anyway. these people HAD absolute power as a partnership and probably aren't interested in being a one man show. that would disappoint their minions, it would cause too much disillusion and then they wouldn't be able to get away with as much.

i remain convinced that W never really wanted the "presidency." he treated the office as as corporation, and took advantage of that whole "leader of teh free world" status to make more money and make the powerful more powerful and the rich more rich and the poor and middle class more poor and less middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. of course we understand.....all too clearly
More and more of us having been saying this over the past year.
Bush the puppet may go.
The real rulers will not budge. McCain the even dumber puppet has already said Cheney will stay in the Government.
McCain will be given the election, one way or another.
And you are correct...this is why the price of gas and food and everything is allowed to go sky high.
We are going to be poor, cold and hungry when they turn the screws.
There will be another "terrorist" attack, if Obama's lead looks too big.

I have NO trust in this cabal.
None.
And Obama is a fool if he thinks he can "fix the Constitution later".








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. I don't think so
Bush will go right after the next military-industrialist-security complex enabler is selected via election fraud for the White House. The mission/agenda of government to serve the interests of that complex will continue unscathed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Bingo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. They might not be so shocked if they'd actually been doing any, I don't know, reporting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. "Hey, we just did a big story on which Presidential candidate pet lovers prefer." - AP
"So we've been to busy to do anything about the war, or the Sex Crims and Torture trickling down from the Bush White House. Ok, time to get back to the pet lovers story."

- AP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. The camerman's name is Ahmed...he'll be lucky to ever see the light of day again..
Poor guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
23. Where are all the apologists?
The ones that say, "I don't do anything wrong so I don't need to worry?" Dumb asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
24. There is an old saying:
"If you lie down with dogs, you rise up with fleas."

Did the M$M think they would be immune to the fascist intentions of this administration? Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. Takes one to know one.
--Saddam arbitrarily arrested Iraqis; tortured Iraqis;
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/decade/sect4.html

So does bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
26. Well, when he was arrested, he was innocent. But now...
... after a few years of being tortured by the United States Government, he harbors these misplaced feelings of anger and resentment towards America, which have turned him into a terrorist.

At least, that's according to the information they tortured out of the guy in the cell next to him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubicleGuy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
29. Evidence?
We don't need no steenking evidence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC