Source:
Yahoo FinanceThe secretary general of OPEC says the oil producing group cannot replace any shortfalls if Iran is attacked and its crude is taken off the market.
Abdalla Salem El-Badri also says OPEC has no contingency plans to produce more if Iran is attacked.
He spoke Thursday at OPEC headquarters in Vienna. Iran is OPEC's second-largest oil producer.
Both the United States and Israel have not ruled out a military strike on Iran as a last option if it does not give up uranium enrichment and heed other U.N. Security Council demands meant to dispel the fear Tehran wants to make nuclear arms.
*Note, this is complete content of Yahoo article
Read more:
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080710/eu_opec_iran.html?.v=1
Newshoggers has a great analysis of this titled "Iran War Hype Creates Energy Policy SNAFU":
Excerpts:
*You can forget drilling in Alaska or in US offshore waters as a method of reducing medium term gas prices. All the production such wells could give wouldn't match the loss of OPEC production so prices will rise anyway. And within a decade all that US production would have dried up and OPEC would still have lots of black gold in the ground - which they can then sell at even higher prices for plastics production even if the West converted to renewable energy sources on a massive scale.
*Meanwhile, OPEC producers like Jordan, the Saudis and the UAE are quietly going nuclear under cover of the focus on Iran's nuclear program.
*It's a move that Israel isn't too happy about - they simply don't want anyone breaking even a part of their regional nuclear monopoly (maybe especially the Saudis, who bought nuke-capable intermediate-range missiles from Russia a decade and more ago and have quietly kept them in their silos ever since) - but right now they can't make too much of a stink about it simply because the US and the West need to show they can play "good cop" to Muslim nuclear aspirations too.
*It's a real SNAFU situation, over an entirely fictitious crisis which the War party are using to push for war or conditions leading to war. Iran doesn't have a nuke, has no real prospect of getting bomb-capable material using their current enrichment facilities, has no workable design for a weapon and has such unreliable delivery systems that a full quarter even of their tried and tested shorter range missiles apparently fail so badly they have to photoshop their publicity pics. But we're all paying - and will continue to pay ever increasing amounts - for the dreams of those who always said "real men go to Tehran" even before the first tank rolled across the Iraqi border back in 2003.
The conclusion is obvious - energy policy making will continue to be a hopeless mess until those who want war at any price are contained.
To read entire the entire article
http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2008/07/iran-war-hype-c.html