Pelosi Says House Judiciary May Hold Hearings On Kucinich Impeachment Resolution

[sabra]

Source: CBS News/Politico

(The Politico) Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said this morning that the House Judiciary Committee may hold hearings on an impeachment resolution offered by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio).

Kucinich is expected to offer a "privileged resolution" this afternoon calling on the House to look at whether President Bush should be removed from office for lying to Congress and the American public when he sought congressional approval back in 2002 for taking military action to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein.

Pelosi has said previously that impeachment "was off the table," so her comments this morning were surprising, and clearly signaled a new willingness to entertain the idea of ousting Bush, although no one in the Democratic leadership believes that is likely since the president has only six months left in this term.

"This is a Judiciary Committee matter, and I believe we will some attention being paid to it by the Judiciary Committee," Pelosi told reporters. "Not necessarily taking up the articles of impeachment because that would have to be approved on the floor, but to have some hearings on the subject."

Pelosi added: "My expectation is that there will be some review of that in the committee."

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/10/politics/politico/thecrypt/main4248168.shtml

[CaliforniaPeggy]

1. Well, what do you know?

Maybe the message is finally getting through to her?

The uproar has come to such a level that she's paying attention...?

God, I hope so!

:eyes:

[Lugnut]

8. I won't be holding my breath waiting for it to happen

Talk is cheap. I want to see some serious scrutiny from our so-called representatives.

[TerribleLarryDingle]

54. Exactly

[tbyg52]

87. Hey, TerribleLarryDingle!

Welcome to DU! :hi:

[Radio_Lady]

99. TerribleLarryDingle! Now I've heard everything!

:rofl:

Are You For Real? If so, then this is my Lucky #7 day!

Cordially,

Radio Lady Ellen Kimball in Oregon

[FREEWILL56]

103. Why couldn't he be for real?

He's probably just hanging around and laughing at all he encounters from a rear prospective.:think: :spray: :rofl:
Sorry, I couldn't resist and a good welcome to you Larry.

[Radio_Lady]

108. He could be! "I've got spurs that jingle, jangle, jingle..."

and there's Terrible Larry's Dingle Dangle Dingle.

:rofl:

[woodsprite]

31. My thoughts are she's just figuring it's gonna take more than 6 mo.

to go thru all the shit he's done to our country. It looks good for her now because it's "back on the table".

[MrsBrady]

41. if we can ever get to the actual impeachment...

then maybe I can get my husband to believe there is a just God, finally. :P

[Tight_rope]

82. LMBAO...I truly understand your husbands point of view.

I stop going to church when Chimp got elected. When people ask, I say I have a serious beef with God. :crazy:

[The Backlash Cometh]

49. Harumph. I say, "Harumph."

[Phred42]

94. Then again.....Maybe not......

[superconnected]

98. That describes pelosi exactly!

[FourScore]

111. She knows she's running out the clock.

This is just political posturing after pissing off her base so badly. Nothing more. AND this doesn't come on the heels of FISA for nothing.

[BearSquirrel2]

120. That was my thought ...

She's probably getting heat for the impeachment and FISA issue. So now she's backtracking.

I also think it's telling that now that FISA is out of the impeachment charge, she will allow it. Translation ... Pelosi knew about wireless wiretapping and let it slide. The wiretapping charge in the previous round of impeachment counts threatened Pelosi so she blocked them all.

[mikelgb]

2. holy fuck

[But....]

3. I don't care if it's 6 seconds before it leaves office...

the rule of law needs to be returned to the White House.:banghead:

[cyclezealot]

44. maybe 6 seconds before he bombs Iran

without Congressional approval.

[shraby]

4. I'm still trying to digest this tidbit.

All I can think is "what the hell happened?" Why is she loosening the strings that bound now? Because the hearings might carry us to the election and won't bode well for the pugs? This article raises tons of questions..I hope some answers are forthcoming.

[mikelgb]

6. must be the text of the resolution, hopefully Dennis hit a nerve

[Diamonique]

9. If holding the hearings now.. just before the election... is her reason,

I'm glad to see her finally attempting to use her power for good!

[Nipper1959]

96. exactly!!

It is all about the election. The MSM will be forced to cover the hearings and the general public, that doesn't do their due diligence, will finally be informed about what a fucked up mess the B*sh administration has been. That is my hope anyway.

[eomer]

124. The MSM will be forced to cover the hearings? I doubt it.

They didn't cover the 2004 Presidential Recount in Ohio. It was as if it wasn't happening at all if you went by the MSM. I bet they would do the same for these hearings and pretend they didn't exist.

[jwirr]

63. This way we can have 6 months of hearings - which is what we would

have in an impeachment - and not take the possible backlash that they are afraid of. I think that is what she is doing. I have expected them to wait for the right time all along. Now we need to hope that these hearings are on TV so the world can see the truth. However, the *ss administration will still try to withhold all the evidence. Impeachment would be better as the evidence is easier to get then. This could also lay the ground work for criminal charges after *ss leaves office - when he can no longer pardon any of the criminals.

[enough already]

72. What happened? Easy

She knows it's not feasible to finish before the chimp leaves office. So she 'loosens the strings' now because it doesn't mean shit in the end. She's been a fucking disaster on this issue.

[tridim]

5. Whoa! Back on the table?

[MadrasT]

12. Nice place card

That's great :bounce:

[Jefferson23]

110. OMG I love that picture! LOL

[Diamonique]

7. Well I wonder what bug bit Pelosi in the butt this morning. n/t

[trashcanistanista]

10. "MAY"???

Speaks volumes. I guess she needs to get *'s approval first. x(

[orleans]

35. that's what i thought. "may" my ass!

she's throwing us a fucking bone so we don't start bitching about this impeachment shit again. her office probably got a few too many phone calls on the last round dennis presented.

saying "may" she is hoping her call volume "may" be less as well.

she has lost my trust completely. i do not expect her to do the right thing--she has already shown us her true face/colors.

[George II]

59. To those "nattering nabobs of negativity"...

...

"Can" means they're able to do it
"May" means they're permitted do it

Cynics, all of you! Clamoring for this to happen for almost two years, and now that it's back "ON the table" people still are looking for negatives.

:wtf: :crazy:

[Demeter]

68. It's the Charlie Brown--Lucy--football Syndrome

We've been burned before.

[orleans]

122. well, glad you're so optimistic. when the proceedings begin i will

admit to you i was wrong for being such a doubting thomas in this situation.

[jwirr]

65. Who is on the judiciary committee? The ball is in their court. nt

[onehandle]

11. Oh noes! This can't be true. What will the haters obsess about today?

Quick. Show them a shiny object.

[Bluebear]

16. "The haters"?

What is this, American Idol?

[Solon]

18. For some people, its all about "their guys" winning, what those guys represent means nothing...

to some people, its cheer leading for a sports team, or being a fanatic.

[frylock]

21. more like american dumbass..

holding our elected officials to account is now hating. please pick up your newspeak dictionary at the receptionists desk.

[burythehatchet]

81. A new newspeak dictionary really ought to be compiled.

[glitch]

121. American Idiot. Who would ever think DUers would be speaking bush? nt

[librechik]

13. They must--and keep them going through January

while the hearings are going on, Chimpy can't use the pardon power. Otherwise, they are all scot free, like Bush Sr and his friends.

[DogPoundPup]

14. K&R

:kick:

[Bluebear]

15. "May". nt

[HomerRamone]

17. Like they'd impeach AFTER they made his illegal actions legal nt

[PM7nj]

19. Did Nancy have a stroke?

This is very surprising.

[Lautremont]

20. That Touch of Posi.

[yodermon]

22. EVEN WITH IMPEACHMENT, Bush and Cheney can & will escape justice.

Let's suppose both Bush & Cheney are impeached.
Let's suppose both Bush & Cheney are about to be convicted in the Senate.
Here's what happens:

1) Bush pardons Cheney of all crimes he may have committed. Big-ass list. Doesn't matter how big, Presidents have this power.
2) Bush resigns & Cheney becomes President.
3) Cheney pardons Bush all all crimes he may have committed. Big-ass list. Doesn't matter how big, Presidents have this power.
4) Cheney appoints new VP, then resigns, etc. Doesn't matter at this point bcz pardon-damage is done.
5) All hop on plane to Paraguy to live in permanent Moonie paradise, extradition- and testimony-free.

I'm not saying don't do it. Just understand what would *actually* transpire should we *Actually* do this.

Oh, and somewhere in steps 1 & 3 the rest of the bushco gang will get their pardons too.

[ladywnch]

32. the president can not pardon an impeachment. he can prevent Cheney from jail time

but once impeached neither can EVER hold public office again, so Cheney can not ascend the presidency. And, if they are convicted even a pardon does not prevent them from being tried at the Hague after the impeachment. I believe the impeachment would strip them of their diplomatic immunity as well.

[ladywnch]

33. Also, Paraguy is now under a new democratic leadership and extradition is now

an option. Don't think the Bush family was expecting that! LOL

[The Backlash Cometh]

56. Is it possible that:

A) George Bush can't give pardons UNTIL someone has already been prosecuted?
and
B) He only has a narrow window of time to hand the pardons out.

Therefore, if he gets impeached after he leaves office, there's nothing he can do retroactively?

[Jackpine Radical]

92. No.

Remember Ford's pardons of Nixon? Crafty Richard had been convicted of nothing at that point.

[Senator]

119. The Impeachment IS The Justice

Even without conviction -- or a successful House vote for that matter -- impeachment is a measure of justice for The American People, for that which has been perpetrated in their names without their proper consent. From that point it is only a question of how large that "measure of justice" can grow.

As to your scenario, resignations in disgrace would be an enormous, historical (Nixonian) measure of justice. As would be escape/exile to Paraguay -- in fear of Bugliosian murder charges -- an unprecedented victory.

And FWIW, a couple of other nits. Extradition treaties can be negotiated with Paraguay. But more importantly, pardons are not really magic wands -- though it's easy to think of them that way, even "legally." But politcally, acceptance is an admission of guilt. (Another large measure of justice.)

And just because no one's ever been prosecuted for abusing the pardon power as part of an ongoing criminal conspiracy, doesn't mean it can't be undertaken. Even a right-wing (formerly) Supreme Court would be hard-pressed to conclude that the framers intended the pardon power to be available for criminal purposes, like obstruction of justice.

---

[yodermon]

125. thanks for the points.

I certainly would agree that resignations-in-disgrace would be a fantastic outcome.
As for pardons-as-Obstruction: I wonder if it could be successfully argued that bush Obstructed by commuting Scooter's sentence?

[Senator]

129. I think any jury would convict on the Libby pardon

The trouble is getting the facts and circumstances in front of a jury. Clearly bush/cheney violated the Espionage Act, only in Euphemedia dreamworld does the authority to declassify include the right to abuse that authority. And just as clearly his pardon of Libby was a continuance of that criminal conspiracy.

It might even be remotely possible that a sealed indictment awaits their leaving office -- though I don't give the plodder Fitzgerald that much credit. With Libby perjuring himself to conceal cheney's actions and the probability of pardons looming, the case would be virtually unprosecutable until then.

Now, Fitzgerald didn't have the bushkid's admission of culpability (via McClellan). That would help any future prosecution.

But unlike Bugliosi's murder charge, there wouldn't appear to be a state charge to hang it on -- it would have to be a federal prosecution. And even if an Obama administration puts the Justice Dept. back together again, I can't see that fence-sitter recognizing his duty to set the record straight and provide accountability for the American People.

If that were true, he wouldn't already be the Standard Bearer For Impeachophobia.

----

[flvegan]

23. Gotta love Kucinich.

Hope Pelosi's "may" is a good omen.

[tekisui]

27. Her "may" is a helluva lot more then we've even gotten from her.

Maybe Kucinich's 35 Articles, with promises of 60 got to her. She couldn't allow the Judiciary to proceed on the 35 because of complicity. The 60 would have made her look even worse.

Something happened, though. Kucinich found one Article she could allow to be heard.

[ellie]

24. Full of sound and fury,

signifying nothing. But thanks for the bone, Nancy.

[Radio_Lady]

100. Well, Ellie, let's not get all "Shakespearian" about it!

That comment was meant to describe an entire lifespan.

I'm not going that far.

Cordially,

Radio Lady Ellen

[tekisui]

25. DO IT!!!!

[AndyTiedye]

26. IMPEACH!!

[bdamomma]

28. yea sure, while Rove is thumbing his finger at the Committee now

like they will go through with something like this.:sarcasm:

[Jackpine Radical]

93. There is no Executive Privilege in an impeachment.

I'm wondering if this may not be what's going on.

[kmac3]

29. Judging her track record I'll believe it when it happens . . . .

The big word here is "May"

[PATRICK]

30. This gets interesting even if it leads nowhere

I take it the main change here has to to do with Kucinich unexpectedly reducing the articles to one.
it makes even a dead end committee investigation look feasible, focused and on target for October politics. She went out of her way to squelch the Committee taking up the first articles. This time, OK with the extra wording thrown in to diminish any resurgent expectations for a debate in the House. Sizzle and fizzle. I think the clock is running and some usefulness is seen in dealing with immanent Bush/Cheney adventures.

Time to stop running away and begin asserting control over the government? Who knows? It is little enough. Definitely DK found a way in and they NEED to counter the planned surge success draw down tripe or any Iran scare to cover in the very possible meltdown of the necessary Bush/Cheney political strategy.

With all deliberate speed, impeachment slides under a place mat.

[BonnieJW]

34. Plenty of time.

The Watergate hearings were held over a three-month period.

[postulater]

36. I just looked outside. There's no pigs flying yet.

[Zorra]

46. Well, Air Force One is usually pretty hard to spot from the ground.

;-)

[Tiggeroshii]

37. 6 months is still enough time for him to do a lot of damage.

Holding impeachment hearings would keep this administration too distracted to do a lot more illegal things before he leaves office. That is, invading Iran, etc..

[EFerrari]

39. That's what I've been thinking. This is the most dangerous part

of his tenure. They have nothing to lose.

[rateyes]

38. Yeah. And, I might win the lottery.

[Wizard777]

40. She must have seen the peon's she represents lighting their torches.

After stonewalling this for so long. I'm not ready to forgive & forget. I will not applaud her doing the bare minimum of what is expected. She needs to get out there and start corralling votes for the impeachment.

[The Stranger]

42. The sad thing is that the Pelosi Piece of Shit could have used it as leverage to keep Chimp in line.

But, by "taking it off the table," she essentially gave him free reign, without any leverage whatsoever, even became complicit in the ongoing criminal enterprise.

[Broadslidin]

48. Yes, Ice Cream West Texas Cowboy Representative Pelosi harbors fond feelings for blood soaked George

:nuke: :hide: :nuke:

[madmom]

43. Trying to get back in the good graces of the dem constituents are we?

[Mira]

118. My thoughts exactly - plus she probably is tired of all the protesters in her front yard all the tim

[mvd]

45. Good for Kucinich - his persistence may yet pay off

:thumbsup:

Remember, there's no legal immunity for BushCo yet with the spying.

[ejbr]

47. still hate her n/t

[specimenfred1984]

50. This won't get 250 recs, it actually presents (D)s in a good way.

As if (D)s are open-minded, fair and reasonable, we all know "Pelosi is a traitor"! Isn't that right all you lying stinking repukes who post around here?

[Patriot Abroad]

90. Pelosi's not a traitor . . .

She's a good representative. But she's not the bold leader that was needed to unite the Dems into standing firm against Bush. Think of Newt G and the machine he put in place for fighting every step of the second half of the Clinton administration - in comparison, I've seen wet noodles with more backbone than the current congress.

[Phred42]

51. About damn time

She still needs to be replaced asap

If Pelosi had started Impeachment (when we were promised) How much destruction would have been averted?

Here's One: Would the FISA bill have even come up?

How much other damage has he done since 2006 and how much more can and will he do before January?

[defendandprotect]

52. Cheers!! Were they simply waiting to get closer to election??

What's happened????

[Algorem]

53. she's going to be vice president,so she has to lighten up a little on

the 'lefties' for a few months.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

55. now is the time before it's too late!!!!!!!!!!!!

[defendandprotect]

57. I don't see problems with "time" . . . I do see problems

with trying to get him on "lying" re Iraq . .
because they can always fall back on intelligence "interpretations" ---

I think Signing Statements and TORTURE, FISA violations immediately upon
taking office --- and other issues would be easier.

This is a lawless administration --- there are many ways to go.

The DOJ issues --- also as important as lying re the war . . . but again
I think difficult to prove "politicization" . . .

[nam78_two]

58. Just saw this elsewhere too-very cool

http://www.rollcall.com/news/26578-1.html


Pelosi Softens Impeachment Stance
By Jennifer Bendery
Roll Call Staff
July 10, 2008, 3:08 p.m.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday signaled that she may allow committee hearings on a resolution aimed at impeaching President Bush in a shift from previous comments showing she was eager to avoid the issue.

[beac]

60. Was that a pig I just saw fly by my window??

Or is Nancy just stringing us along only to yell "Psych!" at the last minute?

[bow-tie]

61. She's up for re-election isn't she?

Must've heard the the growling in the belly of the beast.

[LynneSin]

62. The way her district is drawn it would take a miracle to beat her

even if Cindy Sheehan is running against her. Her job is safe and Cindy probably won't touch more than 10% of her votes tops.

[stimbox]

91. Cindy has a lot more name recognition than Shirley Golub did.

Shirley got 11% of the vote with little media coverage and almost no support from the Democratic party.
The so called progressives in the local PDA associated group, Democratic InAction, didn't even support Golub.
Cindy has a lot of support here in the city as well as around the nation. She'll probably do well in the election.

[Freddie Stubbs]

126. She just won her primary against a pro-impeachment activist 89%-11%

[paparush]

64. What's this 'May' shit? C'mon Nance! Play a little hardball here.

Maybe this is her attempt to tone down all the US/Israeli/Iran saber rattling..?

[Carni]

66. Geez -- Nancy doing her job?

Sounds like too much to expect...

[derby378]

67. Holeeeee cow...

Does this mean Pelosi has just rediscovered her spine?

Memo to the Speaker: Talk is cheap. We want action.

[jeanruss]

69. Cindy

She must be concerned about Cindy's progress. I know I sent her money and I'm from Pennsylvania. Nancy has been a HUGE disappointment. She turned out to be just your run-of-the-mill oligarch. Her performance taints all professional women. It shows that if a PERSON has no integrity, gender is moot.

[mzmolly]

70. Pelosi has always said "let's see where hearings take us".

Hmmm..............

[davidwparker]

71. ...

:popcorn:

[debbierlus]

73. Hmmmm. We will see.

I hope so.

[apnu]

74. Fuck Pelosi, she's only doing this because her job is on the line.

Spineless! throw the bums out!

[Sunnyshine]

75. Pelosi added: "My expectation is that there will be some review of that in the committee."

I want MUCH review. Not some. :mad: Even if it's only 1 article, get it done.

[Fovea]

76. It is not even about ousting him.

It is about preventing him from pardoning any of his crime ring.
It's about a whole bunch of critters who will never be able to hold public office again.

And some who will go to jail.

[DRoseDARs]

77. Pres. Clinton was impeached in four months which, if I've done my math right, is less than six...

How Long Did It Take To Impeach Clinton

[paparush]

79. You and your pesky facts! :- ) Now go away or we'll be forced to taunt you a 2nd time!

[jmowreader]

107. There's a difference here...

It takes a while to turn "lied about oral sex" into an impeachable offense. I will continue to maintain that with the level of malfeasance the Bush administration, especially its titular head, has displayed, it should be possible to impeach Bush, get it through both houses of Congress and order a rail to run him out of town on in no more than six weeks.

We're also going to be helped by a few Republican senators: this time around, most of the senators who are up for reelection are Republicans. They know if they allow Bush to walk scot-free after all the malfeasance we'll lay down in the trial, getting reelected is going to be very difficult. "Hi, reelect me even though I allowed one of the worst mass murderers of the last fifty years to escape justice."

[Kelvin Mace]

78. And I might be bitten by a radioactive spider

and become Superman.

[Tight_rope]

80. The BITCH better step up to the plate. No one has time for bullshit with Congress these days.

Everyone is broke, busted and disgusted. And the American people have had enough of the pussyfooting around from people we elect to represent us. For the last 7+ yes, we have had taxation without representation. And I for one am sick of it. Everyone where I go I bring of the topic of the price of gas, the economy (especially the price of food), the lies from Bushco and how useless our Congress has been in getting things done to resolve any of the issues I just named. I simply can not wait till January 20, 2009 for Obama to get the WH. Go forbid it's McCain, I will pack up and leave this country. They can take their citizenship and shove it that point, because it would mean nothing.

[Baby Snooks]

83. There is still time...

If the House moved on this, there would still be time to impeach him before the election. And depending on the mood of the country, not being helped by inflation, the Senate might actually threaten to convict as it did with Richard Nixon. The problem, of course, is then Dick Cheney would become president. Who of course would pardon George W Bush. But of course he would have been convicted and removed from office which history would record. And at this point only history will be able to hold him accountable.

The Empress is still serving the Emperor. This is nothing more than political pandering to herself. She probably is facing some angry constituents in November. And so now will pretend she has represented them along with the American people all along.

[FunMe]

84. "may" hold hearings?

Yaaaaaaaaaaawn.

Another dog and pony show that does NOTHING.

Get rid of all the 9% bums starting with Pelosi!

[snappyturtle]

85. It's 'safe' for Nancy to offer this tidbit now....few days left in Congress.

July is about gone and it will be August recess...back after the 8th of September, then a few more days and then off for campaigning.......just not enough time ....now! Gee, thanks Nancy for nothing.

[lonestarnot]

86. hmmmmf.

[pleah]

88. "May" ?

Yeah, I bet.




A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.
- Edward R. Murrow




To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men.
- Abraham Lincoln
_________________________________

[Homer Wells]

89. Until I actually SEE some serious Impeachment action

by Congress, I will refrain from commentary one way or the other. Right now I plan on sitting back and

:popcorn: , and since that is so thirsty making, perhaps a :beer: or two.

[LWolf]

95. One small step for Pelosi

may lead to one giant step for restoration of constitutional integrity.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Let's keep her, and the judiciary committee, in the hot seat to move forward.

[KoKo]

97. Uh Oh...Pelosi is feeling "Threatened? " ....Is Sheehan doing a little to much "CHALLENGE?"

Last, I recall, NANCY was criticizing "Code Pink" for what "she said: them hanging their underwear in her fine shrubber in her SF Homesite."

WOW! Is US HOUSE approval numbers "taking a dive" so now that NANCY has GIVEN AWAY EVERYTHING...she's worried about her "postion?" :eyes: Amazing ...isn't it.

[iamthebandfanman]

101. and then we woke up.

'may'.

[jwirr]

102. Just read an article in the Hill that said congress would probably only

be in cession 6 more weeks this year. How does that effect committee hearings?

[natrat]

104. why would anyone with any intelligence even listen to these fucks

excepting kucinich and a hsndful of others

[Doctor_J]

105. Is that a definite maybe, or a possible maybe?

:shrug:

[iconicgnom]

106. er, wow. hearings. maybe. well, sorta, like, half-assed lip service to hearings. maybe.

[bluesmail]

109. It is possible that Rep Kucinich had to redo the Impeachment

Articles because the speaker Pelosi realized that there were D's guilty along with mostly R's, so he had to enter the one article. With the one article honed down, he may get Speaker Pelosi to go along.

[salguine]

112. And while he's at it, why not remove Pelosi, too.

[tinrobot]

113. Maybe the charge of lying about war is aimed at the Iran rhetoric

If they held hearings about the falsehoods that lead up to Iraq, it would totally shine a light on the falsehoods happening today.

[jeff30997]

114. Pelosi :

Sit on the Washington Monument and enjoy!

[wpelb]

115. The key word

The key word in the headline (and probably the article as well) is "may." It would be just as accurate (probably more so, if you think about it) to insert a "not" afterward. Most likely Speaker Pelosi is trying to con voters in her district who might be inclined to vote for Cindy Sheehan into thinking that she has supported the impeachment of Pres. Bush all along.

Given the level of intellect and political awareness of the average American voter (liberal, conservative, moderate, whatever), she'll probably be successful in her con job--even (indeed, especially) if the impeachment resolution never amounts to more than a short hearing or two.

[AntiFascist]

116. K&R, I hope we have broken through. n/t

[NoodleyAppendage]

117. Impeachment. For what? YOU JUST GAVE THEM COVER WITH FISA...you traitorous good-for-nothing DINO!!

Pelosi is a heap of stinking dung. Worst Dem Speaker in decades!

I look forward to the day that she is VOTED OUT OF OFFICE.

J

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

123. She's finally feelin' the burn.

All that heat from the fax machine overheating and those explosive emails and phone calls are takin' a toll.

I really, really hope it's causing her to lie wide awake all night. I really do. Complicity in treason SHOULD give a person bad nights.

[lovuian]

127. And if she didn't do it she was going to be removed as House

Speaker...Kucinich had enough votes to do it

Plus Pelosi is obviously worried that she is looking as being in collusion which she is

[WhiteTara]

128. wer need to call her office

and encourage her to continue to do the right thing...even if it is 3 1/2 years late on her watch.

[classysassy]

130. Vote her out

if there is a repug running against her,I would vote for the repug,just get rid of her.

[Individualist]

131. ...and I may win the Publisher's Clearing House sweepstakes

:eyes: