Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal court: Bush can indefinitely detain civilians

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:32 PM
Original message
Federal court: Bush can indefinitely detain civilians
Source: The Raw Story

A federal court has issued two rulings, the New York Times reports: One favoring President Bush's indefinite detentions of "enemy combatants," and another granting one of said "enemy combatants" the opportunity to challenge his detention in court.

The court effectively ruled that President Bush has the same right to indefinitely detain a civilian on American soil as he does an enemy soldier on a battlefield.

Ali al-Marri, the only "enemy combatant" to be held in the continental United States, is in military custody in Charleston, South Carolina. He was arrested in Peoria, Illinois on December 12, 2001 on charges of credit card fraud and lying to federal agents before being sent to Charleston in 2003. A 5-4 majority of the United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, said that a sworn statement from an intelligence official as the government's sole testimony in an earlier proceeding was "inadequate." The official, Jeffrey N. Rapp, said that al-Marri was an al-Qaeda sleeper agent whose objective in the United States was to "commit mass murder and disrupt the banking system."

The other ruling effectively reverses an earlier ruling by a three-judge panel with the same court that ordered that al-Marri be either charged with a crime or released.



Read more: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Federal_court_Bush_can_indefinitely_detain_0715.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. *head explodes*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. With this kind of power, why would Bush* leave office on 1/20/09?
Anyone who challenged him, would be indefinitely detained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. When you think about Cheney and Chertoff and Feith and Addington and
slews of others - you know they don't want to give up their dirty jobs and have anything revealed so they don't want to close it down. We are in a very scary last period of a reign of terror from people who want to totally own us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. he is a defiant little
prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess this will go to the Supreme Court
this cases are to tear away Habeas Corpus and put us back into the Dark Ages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm sure it will.
And just before they hear it, Cheney and Scalia will have a nice duckhunting trip once again.

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. "credit card fraud and lying to federal agents" What would be the typical
sentences for these crimes if the convicted person was a white Christian male or female whose parents parents emigrated from Western Europe? How long would they be in prison unrepresented - if imprisoned indefintiely?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. oh yeah, and what about running of statute?
does being held without charge suspend running of statute? Seems kind of counter-logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tismyself Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. and what about
the situation with Huzaifa Parhat down in Gitmo? Are those guys ever going to see the light of day again?

Another question on my mind is whether or not anything is being done to assist them with what's left of their lives when they are released. They are going to need somewhere to live, a job, clothes, etc. Does anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yet another thing Obama will have to fix. That poor man is going to be SO busy cleaning up after **
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm afraid his entire Presidency will be taken up with...
I'm afraid his entire Presidency will be taken up with returning the U.S. to its pre-Bush years...

So much to do. So little time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. This makes me wonder if Obama will even be allowed to win...
All this power? Do we really think the Republicans are going to hand this to a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. And it follows from that
that all foreign countries have the same rights to detain American citizens indefinately in their own countries blah blah blah which means kidnapping just ceased to be illegal :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Really surprised this hasn't been recommended...
So, I'll do it myself in hope that others will follow suit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. .....
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Proof positive that habeas corpus is deadern a doornail. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. From the article:
Edited on Wed Jul-16-08 01:48 PM by Zodiak Ironfist
"All of the judges who would have denied Mr. Marri any relief — Judges Wilkinson, Karen J. Williams, Paul V. Niemeyer and Allyson K. Duncan — were appointed by Republican presidents; all who would have granted him full relief were appointed by Democrats. Judge Traxler was appointed to the appeals court by President Bill Clinton.

In the conclusion of his long opinion, Judge Wilkinson said terrorism cases presented courts with special challenges.

“We may never know,” he said, “whether we have struck the proper balance between liberty and security, because we do not know every action the executive is taking and we do not know every threat global terror networks have in store.”"


This is a really crappy ruling. The 9 judges issued a total of 7 opinions....the plurality of judges ruled that the detainee should not be held without his rights, but 5 of the Repuke judges in the most conservative appeals court in the country just had to vote based on fear and ignorance, and all of their opinions were disparate, but still won the day.

I love the cute little statement at the end where the judge says he has no idea if he did the right thing because the executive branch is secretive and he is really really scared of terrorists. Glad to know he used somethng OTHER than the law to base his decision on.

I hate what these repuke pigs have done to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. "commit mass murder and disrupt the banking system."
so, that's where Junior got the idea. It wasn't even original. Those frat boy were always copying off of other papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. dang, he's good! He disrupted the whole banking system from his jail cell?
Edited on Wed Jul-16-08 03:29 PM by elehhhhna
Gotta hand it to him.

If disrupting the banking system = terrorism, there are a lotta traders (traitors? lol)bankers, and financial execs who need to report to GITMO, stat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. so, just as an example, he has the power to indefinitely detain obama?
then if obama's lawyers file suit, can shrub indefinitely detain the lawyers?
how about the reporters who cover the story?

thank god we live in the land of the free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f the letter Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Amazing.
This had best get appealed all the way to the supreme court. Unreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. god dammit. I am an al qaeda sleeper agent myself
Edited on Wed Jul-16-08 02:11 PM by sui generis
They sent me the signal just an hour ago. There were some leftover beans in the breakroom, and I ate them. Every last one, and they were good.

I am preparing to explode as I type.

George Bush you are so far beneath contempt words cannot serve. I fart in your general die-rection.

Well, terror terror terror! What are we at sage alert or up to mulberry now?

WHAT on earth is wrong with just saying "terrorism" is a criminal act?

It is a fucking crime, period, not some special needs special case hullullullullullullllulu bit of black magic that us mere mortals are not privy to understand.

When we differentiate terrorism from a criminal act we give it special status and special opportunity for abuse. As we have shown, we shirk no opportunity to abuse the term. Didn't pay your taxes? you're a terrorist. flipped somebody off in traffic? You're a terrorist. Wrong skin color, cultural background, or maybe just have a grudge against the war criminals in our current administration? You're a terrorist.

So, I believe that our president should be subject to the world court and charged with war crimes. I believe that Amnesty International has got it right, all the time, every time. I think the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security are incompetent festering tits that a five year old with a closed head injury could outwit.

I guess that makes me a terrorist. Nobody here is surprised of course.

Jeeeeee-zuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biermeister Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. we are truly fucked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe after the election, civilians will indefinitely detain Bu*h.
Life in prison for murder and war crimes is pretty indefinite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Gearing Up to Suspend Elections Indefinitely (and Everything Else to Do with Democracy)
They WILL NOT let Obama become President.

:scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
26. Wasn't this one of the things that made us declare war on Great Britain...
...in 1776?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
27. um . . . isn't this unconstitutional? . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
28. "commit mass murder and disrupt the banking system." !!!1!1
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 08:05 AM by Amonester
RRRRRReally....

"commit mass murder and disrupt the banking system."

It sure looks like What this bunch of war criminals in the WH and their appointee sycophants have been bu$y doin' for 7.5 years!

One Of The Most Accurate Description Of This $tupid pResidency.


Edited to say these accusations should be brought up against * and his PNAC mobsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. WOW!!! Think of all the POWER DEMS will have!!!
The next DEM President will be able to lock up ANYONE they want, FOREVER!!!

THANKS, rightwingnuts!!!










Think they're getting the fucking clue yet???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC