Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold: Mukasey trying to 'create election-year security issue'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:31 PM
Original message
Feingold: Mukasey trying to 'create election-year security issue'
Source: Raw Story

A top Democratic senator is accusing the Attorney General of trying "to create an election-year security issue where there isn’t one."

Congress, and not judges, should decide how to give Guantanamo Bay detainees their day in court, the attorney general said Monday in calling for new laws governing how foreign terror suspects seek their release.

It's doubtful, however, that Congress will approve the legal measures Attorney General Michael Mukasey wants before the end of the election-season year.

A federal court in Washington is currently working on rules for judicial hearings for about 200 suspected al-Qaida and Taliban foot soldiers who charge they're being illegally held at the prison at the U.S. naval base in Cuba. A Supreme Court ruling last month gave the detainees the right to challenge their capture in U.S. civilian courts.




Read more: http://rawstory.com//news/2008/Feingold_Mukasey_trying_to_create_electionyear_0721.html



In a statement sent to RAW STORY, Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) complains that "The Attorney General’s comments today appeared to be an attempt to create an election-year security issue where there isn’t one."

"Our federal courts are capable of handling these cases, and no dangerous detainees held at Guantanamo will be released anytime soon," Feingold's statement continued. "By repeatedly mishandling these cases, the administration has delayed justice from being served. If congressional action is needed to clean up the mess the administration created at Guantanamo, it should be taken alongside a new administration that doesn’t have such contempt for the rule of law."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mukasey should spend less time trying to scare people and more time refreshing his resume.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Mukasey-
Only 182 days left until Jan. 20,2009.

I wonder- will Mukasey become a lobbyist or a consultant as Ashcroft has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. There has never been a security issue. It's always been an electioneering tool.
The only time there was a security problem was when Bush ignored briefings.

Notice how Clinton nailed all of those millenium plots? Things work alright when people who give a fuck about running the country and doing their jobs are in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. So it sounds like he believes the Judicial Branch should have no say
Where in the law does he see that?

And he's supposed to be the top lawyer in the country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC