Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Rushes to Change Workplace Toxin Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:37 PM
Original message
U.S. Rushes to Change Workplace Toxin Rules
Source: Washington Post

Political appointees at the Department of Labor are moving with unusual speed to push through in the final months of the Bush administration a rule making it tougher to regulate workers' on-the-job exposure to chemicals and toxins.

The agency did not disclose the proposal, as required, in public notices of regulatory plans that it filed in December and May. Instead, Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao's intention to push for the rule first surfaced on July 7, when the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) posted on its Web site that it was reviewing the proposal, identified only by its nine-word title.

The text of the proposed rule has not been made public, but according to sources briefed on the change and to an early draft obtained by The Washington Post, it would call for reexamining the methods used to measure risks posed by workplace exposure to toxins. The change would address long-standing complaints from businesses that the government overestimates the risk posed by job exposure to chemicals.

The rule would also require the agency to take an extra step before setting new limits on chemicals in the workplace by allowing an extra round of challenges to agency risk assessments.
ad_icon

The department's speed in trying to make the regulatory change contrasts with its reluctance to alter workplace safety rules over the past 7 1/2 years. In that time, the department adopted only one major health rule for a chemical in the workplace, and it did so under a court order.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202838.html?nav=rss_politics/administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Zyklon B will now be reclassified by business as an irritant
that may cause some workers to become permanently lethargic and non attentive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. And creosote makes an awesome substitute for jam!
Yum!

Not only is it tasty (hot and spicy!), it serves to recycle industrial waste and, as free government issue, will help allay the high family grocery bills! Gosh, isn't deregulation great?

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Once again, we get screwed and the Govt/Big Business kills us slowly
with their greed and hate for the working class. Is it 1776 yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush wants to poison us!
again the greedy bosses win and the worker is poisoned.

They could make Bush a 'lab rat' when he gets out of office, see how he likes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Elaine Chao's on record..
...as saying : "Hey! 'at's as best os we can do! :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Don't worry I'm sure this will get a ton of coverage in the press
There will be public outrage... riots in the streets. Calls to unionise!

Do I even need this :sarcasm: tag?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's a subject
which is almost bullet proof in the UK - it's called the Health & Safety at Work Act. Methinks you need such a general Act in the USA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Everything they touch, they destroy.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Just in time to join the Third World. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. "The agency did not disclose the proposal, as required..."
Edited on Wed Jul-23-08 12:06 PM by brentspeak
Shouldn't that legally invalidate the proposal then?

Bush and his horde can't leave the White House fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. These people are unspeakably wicked. The essence of evil.
After the election, Democrats should enact a law that is effective retroactively, declaring that anyone involved in this process should be held civilly and criminally accountable for any person that dies or is injured under these new guidelines.

Conviction should carry a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years in a maximum security federal prison. Their victims should be compensated out of mandatory fines, and these monsters should be subject to civil action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Asses of Evil is my preference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. DOA
This will never get approved or survive a lawsuit when challenged.

This kind of thing has to piss of McSame since it decreases his chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. God I can't wait for these guys to go
They are gonna try to push through so much crap in their final months :puke:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC