Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FASB nixes Jan. 1 start date for consolidating off-balance sheet entities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:17 PM
Original message
FASB nixes Jan. 1 start date for consolidating off-balance sheet entities
Source: Financial Week

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has delayed by a year the deadline by which companies will have to consolidate qualified special-purpose entities under FAS 140.

The new rule, designed to help investors more easily gauge a company’s liabilities from off-balance-sheet securitized assets, was slated to go into effect Jan. 1 for certain preparers, with a one-year delay for existing QSPEs.

But during its meeting this morning, FASB nixed that timeline, which had been approved in June.

“There was pressure and interest from Washington for this change of heart,” Jim Vogel, an analyst with FTN Financial Group, wrote in an e-mail. “But it’s not clear how much FASB was bowing to that as they were to complaints of whipsawing accounting changes at financial institutions, which may soon have the option of moving to ” rather than complying with U.S. GAAP.


Read more: http://financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080730/REG/769034436/1036



This is bigger news than you may realize. This rule was designed as an end-around for an accounting trick that companies are using to hide how much money they're losing. The fact that there was "pressure and interest from Washington for this change of heart" speaks volumes. What is being hidden from us, and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a shock
I would have expected even quicker implementation with all the SPE's Enron used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unless you're hiding something
nothing should be off-balance sheet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. how many enrons are lurking - now further weakened
by the credit crunch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush doesn't want the bad news coming out that soon.
And most Americans won't understand why it's not Obama's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC