Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Day of Stunning Palin Disclosures (McCain Advisors: "Life Happens" "An American Family")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:30 PM
Original message
Day of Stunning Palin Disclosures (McCain Advisors: "Life Happens" "An American Family")
Source: International Herald Tribune

Day of stunning Palin disclosures

The Associated Press
Published: September 2, 2008

ST. PAUL, Minn.: In a day of stunning disclosures, John McCain's running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, said Monday her 17-year-old unmarried daughter was five months pregnant, and it was revealed that an attorney was hired to defend the governor in a probe into the firing of her public safety commissioner.

The revelations threatened to steal any remaining thunder from Day One of the Republican National Convention, which already was overshadowed by Hurricane Gustav — and brought unwanted attention to the 44-year-old governor, who has little experience on the national stage.

The Republican convention, taking place just three days after McCain named Palin has his running mate, had already been scaled back because of the hurricane. Coming after the randomness of Gustav, the revelations added to the sense of unscriptedness hanging over the convention.

"Life happens," said McCain adviser Steve Schmidt, talking about the pregnancy story. "An American family," added colleague Mark Salter.

Read more: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/09/01/america/NA-POL-US-Elections-Palin.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. "An American Family"?
Isnt this the sort of thing a christian conservative would declare an attack on family values, or condemn them to hell? Sex ed doesnt seem so crazy huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some animals are more equal than other animals. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. "An American Family"
refers to a 1970s PBS reality series on the Loud family (including one gay child) who allowed cameras into their home, and during the filming period actually decided to divorce.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_American_Family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. Actually, they DID, and just recently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Life happens", what does that mean....an American family..
if her family is representative of all American families than that is an insult. Perhaps he means "shit happens" because the more we learn the more I can think of a Jerry Springer episode.
When your running on a holier than thou platform you wouldn't expect these disclosures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I think you nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't you remember the episode of Leave it to Beaver where Wally knocked up some girl...
....and had to tell June and Ward?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misskittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ask them what their response would be if a 17 year old Obama daughter
got pregnant (and was unmarried too).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkoDonkey Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree,
but we are the good guys and need to act like it. It drives me absolutely crazy to see all of their stupid, small minded, abstinence-only, so-called family values blow up in their face and not be able to in good conscience press the political advantage. It's driving me absolutely bonkers (enough so that after reading here for 6 years I finally started posting) but we should follow Obama's lead. It was wrong of Sarah Palin to use her family as political props, to accept the VP nod knowing full well what it would do to her daughter--but it is also wrong for us to make political hay off of her 17 year old girl. I hope we really can change America and American politics. I hope Obama wins and that in the future the private lives of candidates families are left out of the public sphere. But in the meantime...there is a weak and fearful part of me that wants to use this for all that it is worth. I'm not too happy with that. But there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
torbird Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Respectfully, you are wrong.
No, we are not "the good guys," we are the party that loses elections because we'd rather believe we are the good guys than win. Politics is not a personal moral journey. That's church. Public policy isn't done by saviors and saints; it's done by people who work within limits and use the tools they have been given.

McCain and Palin are bad people repping for bad policies. And I, for one, would rather call a spade a spade and win the election than sit on my hands and let them skate on being hypocrites, liars, and persons of highly questionable judgment. You can't fix what's wrong with our government until you get elected. I don't advocate winning at any cost, but this leftwing martyr complex, where we "can't" talk about conservative scandals that THEY made for THEMSELVES, is a sickness and has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norepubsin08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Fuck that!
I advocate winning at any cost as long as it's not illegal. If you want to clean up the electoral landscape you first have to have the power to do it..that means getting elected under "todays" way of campaigning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blossomstar Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. True that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. "Politics is not a personal moral journey. That's church."
True dat.

Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norepubsin08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You're full of shit
With an attitude like that we will get our asses handed to us in November. Haven't you been watching the past few elections. The only thing that works is the gutter. The biggest problem the Democrats have is that they are a bunch of pussies. We should be accusing the repukes of any and everything...some of it will stick even if it's not true...ask Lee Attwater and Karl Rove!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. No, dear. We're Democrats.
And you need to learn something about our history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Yeah, we don't have to do anything at all. The GOP is unraveling
and it's driving them batshit crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
39. Welcome to DU
and don't let the nasties get you down. There are more than usual around here these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. If you're a Dem even THIS will provoke a frenzy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Loose liberal morals... the decline of the family... Obama can't
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 01:19 PM by Feles Mala
be moral leader because he comes from single-parent household...

We should all be thankful that something like this hasn't happened in Obama household.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. All of these pale in comparison to news that she is a secessionist.
That finishes her off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. First Rule of American Politics: IOKIYAR
It's O.K. If You're A Republican. Doesn't matter what you do, what you preach, how you think other people should live and are willing to put the power of the law behind your opinion. It's O.K. If You're A Republican. And how dare you question their choices or seek to meddle in their personal family or financial affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
29. I like your definition.
I will have to copy this down - hate to have to use it, but you did nail it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyDawg Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. All I can think about...
...is that this 'story' of the young lady being 5-months PG (and she no more looks it than her momma did at 5,6 or 7) is a smoke screen to end the speculation of who had the baby Trig...the second thing is the phrase 'Oh what a tangled web we weave...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahPalinTooRisky Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I think she looks it...

She is just petite. How old is she though.. exactly? if she is 5 months pregnant and less than 17 year 4 months old then that would be a 16 year old with a 18 to 26 year old? wouldnt he be going to jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Its hammer time and everything is fair game.......you know they would use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think this is working for us pretty well for a change...
They got one less day to blast Obama b/c of the hurricane, for one thing. Then they got this on top of it. We dished the dirt and got it noticed, but Obama got to "rebuke" us and also be Presidential about the hurricane. And the Reps look pretty f'd up in general.

Plus now, the secessionist stuff. And the other scandals aren't dry-wells yet by a long shot.

I'm liking this approach so far.

So now we step up the research and drumbeat on issues, scandals, whatever we can... I see it working. Hope so.

I don't think we're as bad as the Reps smear machine, which is all about lies - but I think we're beginning to pull as much weight, and get as much done. Just an opinion.

Hey, look at this article in the OP. International. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Just imagine all the Palin scandals we won't hear of until next week!
And more the week after that. And the week after that. The first few days produced the low-hanging fruit, stuff that is old news up in Alaska. But with the whole nation looking into everything Palin, we're sure to coax out a few things over the coming weeks that will surprise even our friends Up North!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Least important issue is pregnancy - CNN keeps emphasizing
Palin has hundreds of defects, but the only one the mass media is paying attention to today is the pregnancy.

I wonder about her judgement. It is incomprehensible to me how a person with a 4 month old with Down's Syndrome and a pregnant 17 year old daughter, plus 3 other kids, would say yes to running for running for VP. I would have responded that the timing was wrong, and that I wanted to put my kids first.

When my kids were young, it was difficult enough just trying to get enough sleep so I could function.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Given all of the vacations George has taken, maybe Republicans don't worry so much
about the responsibilities of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanTheGOP Donating Member (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. We NEED to POUND THIS ISSUE!!
The republican party, which has evolved to an entity which is NOT political but is a HATE CRIME in ITSELF, MUST be destroyed any way possible. We MUST POUND the ISSUE of her daugher breaking virtually EVERY republican / nazi edict, and ensure that we show the moderates that the repukes are ***NOT*** to be trusted with ANY level of trust, ANY level of respect, or ANY level of control.

The republican party MUST be destroyed, and if we have to pound on the decision of a rich, never-to-be-poor 17 year old girl (unless we can successfully indict and convict her she-devil of a mother and fine them out of their ill-gotten gains), we will pound, pound, pound on it!

This is NOT a debate...this is WAR! And I do NOT DOUBT IT FOR ONE MINUTE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty1 Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
50. Her big speech is tomorrow nite. It'll be the first impression for many
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Check out the New York Times article:
Disclosures on Palin Raise Questions on Vetting Process

By ELISABETH BUMILLER
Published: September 1, 2008

ST. PAUL — A series of disclosures about Gov. Sarah Palin, Senator John McCain’s choice as running mate, called into question on Monday how thoroughly Mr. McCain had examined her background before putting her on the Republican presidential ticket.

On Monday morning, Ms. Palin and her husband, Todd, issued a statement saying that their 17-year-old unmarried daughter, Bristol, was five months pregnant and that she intended to marry the father.

Among other less attention-grabbing news of the day: it was learned that Ms. Palin now has a private lawyer in a legislative ethics investigation in Alaska into whether she abused her power in dismissing the state’s public safety commissioner; that she was a member for two years in the 1990s of the Alaska Independence Party, which has at times sought a vote on whether the state should secede; and that Mr. Palin was arrested 22 years ago on a drunken-driving charge.

Aides to Mr. McCain said they had a team on the ground in Alaska now to look more thoroughly into Ms. Palin’s background. A Republican with ties to the campaign said the team assigned to vet Ms. Palin in Alaska had not arrived there until Thursday, a day before Mr. McCain stunned the political world with his vice-presidential choice.

Much more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/us/politics/02vetting.html?hp


This article nails it, if you'll pardon the pun: McCain's judgment is so bad it's downright scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. McCain's judgment?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. "McCain's judgment" is an oxymoron. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
32. I know Sara Palin.
I've known her for a couple of years now. She is a true believer and a nice person. She is fearless. She is honest to the point of self destruction. She is hated by the Republican Party of Alaska. She has been the object of a campaign of destruction by conservative operatives here in Alaska. Trooper Wooten abused her sister and threatened to kill her father. He tasered his stepson (Sara's 10 year old nephew). Sara was on the Gas and Oil commission. They gave her this crony job to shut her up and get her out of the way. She then proceeded to rat out Randy Ruidrich ( a fellow commissioner and head of the RPA) for e-mailing inside information to oil industry organization. He was found guilty and given a hefty fine and booted from the commission. This was before she was elected governor. She has been an outspoken foe of the oil industry. The Voice of the Times ( a veco funded online journal) has been slandering her for years. I really don't know what to say about what I've been reading here.

I've never voted for her. I won't vote for her because she supports, for the most part, the republican platform. But, she is no corporatist. She is a populist...and an honest one at that...I wonder if the repugs realize that if Sara finds out someone is breaking the law...She will rat them out. Hopefully they will find out the hard way.

Almost every single Talk Radio Host in Alaska has be trying to destroy her since she took office. And many Republican legislatures (Lyda Green etc)have been trying to block everything she does. Even with all this organized opposition she has managed to pass one of the largest taxes on the oil industry in the world. She has a popularity rating here of about 70-80 per cent. He husband is a hell of a guy. I like them both. And even with all their flaws...they have some cool kids too. They are not rich people...they were born poor (middle class).

Hell, I can't think of anything else to say about her. If you have any questions ask and I will do my best to answer them.

I will end with this...do not underestimate this woman. She is not stupid nor is she weak. She is not this cartoon character I see portrayed now in the media.


















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. She wants to take her narrow-minded religion and shove it down my throat
That's my problem with her. I don't give a damn how nice she is. When she's trying to put a straitjacket on people and make them live according to her rules, she's the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Not sure where you got that...
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 08:22 AM by Steerpike1
Gay people still get state employee benefits, despite the local republican party howling for her (Palin's) head becouse she won't deny them. And, she refused to call a special session to block a state supreme court ruling that allows young teens to get an abortion without parental consent. The local christian right consider her a traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Her policy as stated is what concerns me -- I don't want to risk my freedom to her tender mercies
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 08:30 AM by melody
Or anything else

She SAYS she wants to outlaw all abortion. She has *said* that. I have heard those words come out of her mouth. She opposes any sex education other than abstinence ed. She also is actively right-wing in many other ways.

BTW, what are you doing here stumping for the GOP? This is a board for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. well...
I did not vote for her. I will vote happily for Obama! I would not vote for her becouse of her position on abortion and gay rights. She has not thus far forced her views down Alaskans throats.
I just wanted to say something reality based about someone I know.

I asked a republican on Friday what they would think if Sara got elected and then proceeded to rat out all the illegal acts she would see in a rethug administration, becouse jesus told her too. His face just turned blank...a priceless moment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Okay. I must say another major problem I have with her is she seems simple-minded
Anyone who thinks we rode dinosaurs ... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. must be
all those flinstone cartoons she saw as a kid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. "She has been an outspoken foe of the oil industry."
Pull the other one!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Hahaha!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. Exactly how well do you know "Sara"?
PSA: It's "Sarah", with the silent 'h'. My true and actual name, as it happens, is "Mark"; those who know me well hardly ever spell it "Marc".

PSA 2: Don't believe everything that gets thrown out in a nasty divorce case and custody battle. Especially when one side is connected to the repukes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. SORRY...You are correct on the spelling,,,
I used to have her on my friends and family list for e-mail (though I could not say we are "friends"). We've spoken on the phone, and even once at the grocery store. I don't hang out with her or her family. But, I'm pretty well connected. I've met Tony Knowles, Alan Halcro, Mark Begich, Ted Stevens, Lisa Murkowski and Ethan Berkowitz (just to name a few). They all know who I am by name and by sight. For the biggest state in the union...it can be a pretty small place.

I am a very bad speller...so no good excuses for misspelling Sarah's name.

I could tell you a little bit about alot of the politicos up here...

As to trooper Wooten...his violations are a matter of public record...if you are curious I might provide some links tomorrow when I have more time. And, by the way, Wooten and his cronies are republicans too. The big problem he had was with all the witnesses, and his own testimony. Fortunately for Wooten the power of the troopers union trumps all.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not endorsing Sarah. I just feel a tad uncomfortable with all the rhetoric. Of course I never met Mccain, so I have no reservations about slandering his bad name. I have known Sarah for a couple of years now, and even though I've never voted for her...I just can't see throwing her under the bus for politics. There are plenty of good reasons not to vote for Mccain/Palin that don't include telling fairy tales...

Heck I'll work on a top ten list of reasons not to vote for Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
47. Why aren't they focusing on Appalling and Mcsames attack on womens rights?
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 04:45 PM by superconnected
As long as they're they mentioning the pregnant 17yr?

You'd think them vowing to overturn roe v. wade would be completely relevant.

Is the kid made to bare the child? Is she being forced into marriage? Looks like the dad doesn't want to go. Come on, here's a mother who doesn't believe her daughter should have a choice. Why not interview appalling-to-womens-rights on THAT?

And btw, appalling has way too many kids - why aren't they asking her if she even believes in BC - then talk about her preggers unmarried 17yo. Was the kid denied BC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. That's what I keep asking.
All I get is snide remarks about my use of capital letters. But, if this were a face-to-face conversation, I would actually be screaming, "ABSTINENCE ONLY DOES NOT WORK" and I'm not ashamed to spell it out in caps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
49. Oh, shes 44 with an infant and a preggers daughter...again DOES PALIN BELIEVE IN BC at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC