Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evangelicals rally behind Palin after pregnancy news

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:16 PM
Original message
Evangelicals rally behind Palin after pregnancy news
Source: CNN.COM

Key evangelical leaders rallied to Sarah Palin's support Monday amid news that her 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, was having a child.

"Before, they were excited about her, with the Down syndrome baby," conservative, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist said. "But now with this, they are over the moon. It reinforces the fact that this family lives its pro-life values."

Palin and John McCain oppose abortion and have supported promoting abstinence in schools, which would seem to make Bristol Palin's pregnancy an inconveniently timed development.

<snip>
The immediate support of these major figures, who offered universal praise for the Palins' actions after learning their daughter was pregnant, provides the filter through which conservative Christian voters will process the development.



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/01/palin.evangelicals/index.html



Well, I guess we lose the evangelical vote :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is messed up:
"Before, they were excited about her, with the Down syndrome baby," conservative, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist said. "But now with this, they are over the moon. It reinforces the fact that this family lives its pro-life values."

Fucking ghouls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Glad it wasn't just me that thought that was a repulsive statement. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. They wouldn't be so over the fucking moon
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 10:30 PM by liberalhistorian
if it were a Democrat, believe you me. They'd immediately start ranting and raving about how "perverse librul values" have corrupted everything, what kind of parents would allow their teenage daughters to have sex or not know she was having sex, the librul media has ruined everything, what a horrible example she's setting for other girls, yaddayaddablahblahblah. They'd also be ranting about how she should be staying home with her children and not out galivanting all over the place, yaddayaddablahblahblah. But, of course, she's a republican, so that makes all the difference.

Remember how they went nuts over Jamie Lynn Spears and said those exact same things? So I'm not getting what the difference here is, except for her being a theocrat and republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
65. remember Dan Quayle and Murphy Brown?
and that was a fictional character!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoodooGuru Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. What a loathsome being.
What do you expect from a guy who compared taxes to the Holocaust, though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Guess He likes to play
Hide the Kielbasa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. Eh?
What's that supposed to mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
60. "Hide the kielbasa" is a reference to sex.
Also referenced as "hide the salami" etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. Yeah, I got that. Just not sure why it was said.
Funny how it usually references to gay sex. Some Democrats seem just as hung up on it as some Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. "Hide the kielbasa" is a "weiner" joke. Gay or straight is not specified, however.
I mean, why would "hide the kielbasa" mean gay sex as opposed to straight sex? It doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. And exactly what...
Does the reference entail then? The comment makes no logical sense in regards to anything that I can see.

And if I'm mistaken I do apologize, but I never hear the reference unless it somehow involves "gay" as the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
44. They're just trying to spin it any way they can.
Palin is a disaster for the Pukes (and a GIFT for us!!).

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. McCain could perform a human sacrifice on the White House Lawn...
and the evangilicals would vote for him, claiming he had "Strong Religious Values".

Meanwhile, Senator Obama could walk on water and they'd mock him for being unable to swim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can you imagine the reaction if a teenaged daughter of Obama or Biden
turned up pregnant? Coulter and Limbaugh and all the conservative ranters would condemn such bad parenting and immorality, which are the result of godless liberal ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. The goofy people vote. by by
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. They'ed rally behind her even if she
ate that baby on national television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. they would rally behind her..
if she took a coat hanger to her daughter, trashed the fetus, poured gasoline on her and torched her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUlover2909 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I don't know about that....
kinda extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skoalyman Donating Member (751 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
63. yes I'd agree they would probably need Xanax after something that evil
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
71. The bible sanctions burning as a penalty for fornication
Edited on Wed Sep-03-08 04:28 AM by kayell
and Palin is a bible literalist.

A priest's daughter who loses her honor by committing fornication and thereby dishonors her father also, shall be burned to death. (Leviticus 21:9 NAB)

Lucky Bristol that mom went into politics rather than preaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do they rally around Britney Spears sister also?
Or how about that school where it was claim there was a baby-pack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. The RW leaders may be spouting this stuff, but I'm not all that convinced
that the solid evangelical extremists will do so! They will support the daughter for not aborting the baby, but they're really pretty strong on the anti-sex before marriage thing. Again the leaders and the media is pushing this story, but the strong single issue voters aren't necessarily on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. What do you expect,
these people would Swiftboat Jesus if he ran as a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. If these whackjobs are over the moon
why don't they just keep on going, and don't stop until they hit Uranus...or Theiranus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I hate to say I told you so,
but I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. It doesn't matter. McCain doesn't need more right-wing votes.
This scandal is not going to do much to impress independent voters. The AIP association and further clarification on her relentless opposition to abortion will show her to be a dangerous, inexperienced extremist. McCain will probably stick with her because that's what he does, even when doing so is illogical or even suicidal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. They are all goofy nuts anyway....everyone that I know. They are either psycho or they wise up...
and come around to being normal and ashamed of their stupidity later on.

I have friends and family members that fit this "evangelical" bill. Talk about nut cases!! And we think the Muslim radicals are scary. Watch out for these idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. "pro life values"... and of course, pro death penalty. And pregnant teenagers.
Unmarried pregnant teenagers.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. pro-life
except when it comes to Iraqi women and children. Nothing wrong, evidently, with blowing the limbs off a few hundred thousand of them in the name of Jesus and GWB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atjrpsych Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is getting kind of weird
I don't understand their contradiction on role models and family values. Pick a line and stick with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
59. Welcome to DU - Here is a link to an unusual post that might help you understand their POV a little
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Aren't these the adoption fanatics?
Isn't that the only 'right' thing for a young girl to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. ya.... marry her off to a 18yr old that does`t want kids
dumb fucking "christians"...they would have her marry hitler if it suited their purpose. it`s all about them not this girl or the baby`s dad.

norquist and his buddies ain`t getting into heaven...i`ll help st peter kick there asses down to hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. IOKIYAR
If any event in history ever supported that acronym, this is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Of course they're over the moon. The purpose of women is making babies.
Bristol Palin's parents are making sure she gets an early start on her purpose in life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dick Seepenz Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. What if Gov. Palin gets pregnant HERSELF in office as VP? who cares about the daughter!
-forget her daughter--
What if Palin as VP scores herself another hit?
CAN you imagine us having a PREGNANT VP?
And what if McCain gets ill?
A PREGNANT PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!
WOW!! talk about an image for the Republican Party!
She just had one so she doesn't seem to opposed to having them lately.
********
And how the hell is she going to take care of her new 5 month old?
******** much less help with her daughters newborn ? WTF?
Sounds like a case of "bad judgment" for both her and for McPain
*******
It's hard enough to have a hard job when you are not in the" child bearing" phase of your life.

************

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
26. Reaction Might be Generational
I suspect that the reaction among undecideds and independents will break along generation lines. Of course among the real kool-aid drinkers it won't matter because their ticket talks the talk... but others I expect will be more forgiving the younger they are. Those folks in the AARP age bracket are probably more locked into the morality of the 40s and 50s when this was just not acceptable... the children of the sixties could break fifty-fifty and those younger will probably be more accepting.

I agree that the spin being put out by the James Dobsons of the world will not necessarily have much effect. The people susceptible to that point of view are voting for that ticket anyway.

Of course, if our side allows itself to be painted as victimizing Palin or her daughter (which you know the right will try to do), the equation could shift substantially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
51. Interesting take. I do think that how independents view this and how we deal with it
is very important. None of us were going to vote for McCain anyway and none of the repubs were going to vote for Obama. This may do something to turnout among Democratic or repub voters, but the main effect will be how it affects the votes of independents.

Will more independents share our view this as representative of conservative hypocrisy and bad parenting? Or will they look at it as a "bad things happen to good people" kind of thing that is personal and that may also remind them of things that have happened in their own family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. well, duh....of course they would
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 12:24 AM by Solly Mack
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Mon Sep-01-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It wouldn't. She's going to carry to term..and she's marrying the father
so they're satisfied she took the proper course of action.

She's not aborting and she's not desiring to raise the kid herself....all things they would damn her for

and Palin looks even more the pro-life darling because her child's "unwed" teenage pregnancy is being sanctified through birth and marriage



and noting that one of Palin's religious right wing reagan loving vetters is coming out from behind the scenes now (Grover Norquist)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
28. They're hypocrites, but we all knew that.
Like they'd actually spoil their chances at more political power by condemning Bristol as a harlot like they do every other teenage mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
29. Yeah, values that force a young girl to marry far too young...
.. to someone that would have been nothing more than one in a series of teen boyfriends that all girls will have in their young adulthood. Judging from the info surrounding the boy and his friends and family, he is NOT ready to be married or even a father. What is WRONG with these people? Forcing teens to get married (as if they'd have gotten married if this was not in the media like this.) You don't force a child to marry another high school senior just to appease the religious wingnuts.

What an awful family... truly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stern21 Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. They would ralley around Pol Pot if he said he was against choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. Look at the bright side....
at least this martyr is a lot easier to look at than most of the ones they give us.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Beauty is only skin deep, but...
... the kind of ugliness that Palin represents is bone deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
32. Weirdos.
Yeah, it's so wonderful Bristol or her boyfriend were never taught about birth control. :crazy:

Those are some seriously screwed up people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. Palin endangered her life as well as that of her unborn fetus
by allowing a stupid speech to take precedence over proper medical care when she began leaking amniotic fluid.

THEN, instead of checking into the nearest Texas hospital, she chose to add further risk to the recipe by flying home to Alaska to have the baby.

What do the culture of "life" folks think about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. She WANTED that "child" to die ...
... while in flight so that she could have sympathy and plausible deniability.

There is no other explanation that is close is rational. It's sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
74. This is correct. I truly believe.
It was a case in her warped mind of "let is be god's will"...

This woman is very scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. Which evangelicals? The ones I know aren't going to be happy about this.
Sure, they're pressuring her to get married and keep the baby, but who was helping Bristol and keeping her from sleeping with the guy in the first place? First we hear how Palin risked her and her baby's life for a political stunt and now this?! I don't know a whole lot of evangelicals who are going to be okay with that. Screw the "leadership" (those guys don't have as much power as many seem to think--it's not like they're popes or anything), what's the rank-and-file saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
36. Norquist what a POS he is.
pump out those babies no matter what. God, I hate these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
37. Teenage unmarried sex is "Pro-Life Values"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
40. I'm sure Evangelicals would've rallied behind an pregnant, unmarried Chelsea...
...or a pregnant, unmarried Amy. :sarcasm:

Christofascists are f*cking hyprocrites...:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
41. i though according to fundies, a down syndrome kid was a sign
of god's punishment for sin??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
42. having unwed preggers 16-17 yr old is a family value?
what the fuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. They will use this
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 11:51 AM by kwolf68
Pregnancy...it will do the following

-Show the wonderful decision to have 'chosen life'
-Show the Palins are like most American families..dysfunctional and otherwise fucked up
-Give the Repukes fodder as Democrats challenge the hypocrisy of opposing sex ed while promoting abstinence only education, the right wing media echo chamber can then transfer that legitimate question into a 'vicious attack on a women and her mother', in other words, ready-made propaganda
-Since this type of thing equates to tabloid news, the other more serious issues (her stands on choice, science, confederacy) will be pushed to the back burner and no serious discussions will take place as he prattle on about her kid.

This issue will be effectively used by the right to not only showcase their one major fringe issue (abortion), but can also be used to shine the Dems in a negative light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
43. Over the moon? What would they be saying if this was one of Obama or Biden's daughters?
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 09:42 AM by krabigirl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
46. anti-choicers.... there is nothing "pro-life" about them
remember DUers... language does matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. Friggin Hypocrites
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 12:19 PM by daggahead
Noun
hypocrite - a person who professes beliefs and opinions that he or she does not hold in order to conceal his or her real feelings or motives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
49. Gee....They must have missed the Father/Daughter Chastity Ball. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
50. dupe
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 12:19 PM by zanne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
52. "Evangelicals cheer 17 year old having unprotected sex"
there, fixed the headline ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
53. dupe
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 12:37 PM by GTRMAN
delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
54. Excited about a 17-year-old who has ruined her life? Nice.
These assclowns were NEVER going to vote for Obama, anyway. Not even if Jeebus descended from heaven and pleaded with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
55. Hypocritical motherfuckers. How dare they. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
56. Imagine if that had been Chelsea, eleven years ago
OMFG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Shit, remember Rush Limbaugh back in '92? 'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
57. To them, that's all that matters.
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 05:34 PM by AngryOldDem
I've read some posts on other sites that say this alone proves that Palin is fit to lead.

I should really make a compendium of the "wisdom" that is floating around out there. Most of it is downright frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
61. This is the most hypocritical thing I have heard, so it fits with Evangelicals.
If it were ANY OTHER PERSON's child, they would be labeled as bad parents and their whore children would be damned to hell. but since its McLames VP pick its ok, its something that happens. Why don't the Evangelicals show this type of compasssion for the other 6.6 billion people in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmutt Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
62. Please God, let this baby be black.

I swear I won't ask anything else for Christmas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
66. Soon we'll be hearing that it was an immaculate conception
and the baby will be Christ Reborn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
69. I thought evangelicals were against "lust-ridden" teens...
what gives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
70. ...she is a creationist idiot as well right?
...need we say more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
72. Wonder how they'd respond to this ...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
73. If your daughters have functioning ovaries, you'll have 110% of OUR support!!!
USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC