Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaMu (Washington Mutual) Rating Lowered to Junk by S&P on Mortgage Losses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 05:23 PM
Original message
WaMu (Washington Mutual) Rating Lowered to Junk by S&P on Mortgage Losses
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 05:25 PM by Finnfan
Source: Bloomberg

Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Washington Mutual Inc., the biggest U.S. savings and loan, had its credit rating cut to junk by Standard & Poor's because of the deteriorating housing market.

S&P reduced its rating on Seattle-based WaMu to BB- from BBB-, leaving it three levels below investment grade, the ratings firm said today in a statement.

``Increasing market turmoil and the related impact from managing its concentrated mortgage franchise in this troubled housing and credit cycle led to the downgrade,'' S&P wrote. S&P cut its rating on the subsidiary bank to BBB- from BBB.

S&P followed similar announcements last week from Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings. WaMu, which has reported $6.3 billion of losses in the last three quarters because of soured mortgages, said on Sept. 11 that it expects a third- quarter loan loss provision of $4.5 billion.

WaMu tumbled 73 cents, or 27 percent, to $2 at 4 p.m. on the New York Stock Exchange. The shares dropped another 20 cents, or 10 percent, to $1.80 in extended trading. They've lost 94 percent of their value in the past year.



Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awDjhtIfoz_Q



If you have more than $100,000 total in Washington Mutual, get the excess out NOW.

Many analysts feel that a Washington Mutual failure would use up the FDIC's remaining reserves. What happens then is anyone's guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh lord....
this is getting surreal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. S&P says not to panic
It says, as quoted in that same article:

``On a more positive note, we recognize that WaMu's holding company liquidity position is currently solidly positioned to meet all of its fixed obligations through 2010,'' S&P said. ``The bank is operating with adequate capital positions from a regulatory perspective and has demonstrated funding resilience as the deposit franchise has remained stable.''


WAMU is not going to go belly up because it's an actual bank. It's different from Bear and Lehman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Frankly, I'm tired of being told not to panic.
For the past couple of years, EVERY TIME we've been told not to panic it turns out that we really should have panicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Sit tight in your office
The explosion was at the North Tower. The South Tower is not affected by this incident...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If people follow the advice
in the OP that could change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. The big financial institutions will follow the advice in the OP while telling
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 07:01 PM by superconnected
the little people not to. That's how all the stock plunges happen - regardless of the corruption/not-corruption that trigger them.

At the institution level a 3% loss is enough to trigger most to pullout their bets while they tell the average investor to sit tight.

And btw, this mammoth stock plunge is the institution level showing that they're getting out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sentelle Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Not Like Bear Stearns
More like IndyMac

WooHoo.

I'm a little worried because of all of the WAMolians that live where I do, and work at the mothership in Seattle. I wonder what its going to do to them, and if too many of them put their houses on the market, It will drive down the price on my own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. WaMu has $143 billion in insured deposits.
FDIC has $50 billion in reserves. You don't need to be a hedge fund quant to see the problem here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You can't assume 100% of the deposits are at risk or lost.
The FDIC closes the bank way before that happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. So far this year, the FDIC is averaging over 30% loss to assets.
30% of 140 billion is 42 Billion.

If the trend follows, that leaves 8 billion to cover everyone else.

35% would put the FDIC on the hook for 49 billion. They'll be busted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Fair enough. Let's look at IndyMac.
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 07:24 PM by lurky
The bank had $16.5 billion in insured deposits, and according to an LA Times article from July, the bailout was expected to cost FDIC between $4 billion and $8 billion.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-indymac12-2008jul12,0,6071779.story

If we can generalize that expectation of a 25% to 50% loss, then a WaMu bailout could cost the FDIC from $35 billion to $70 billion, give or take. That's easily enough to break FDIC, barring a huge infusion from the govt.

I don't think there's any way the government wouldn't bail them out, however. If people lost all their money in WaMu, there would be a loss of confidence in other banks, and you would end up with a huge panic. Not to mention all the businesses that would be shut down, causing an economic disaster. Congress would never let that happen.

So, actually, I'm more worried about all the bailing-out our government is going to have to do than with my bank balances disappearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. If this keeps up, it would not surprise me if we see another Resolution Trust Company
to accept, unravel and liquidate underperforming assets of closed or merged banks in an orderly manner. Fire sales don't usually net the biggest payout.

Look for the FDIC insurance premium to go up at some point, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. And, they all fall down......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. I was about to post this FinnFan. Glad you did.
WaMu is next on the death watch. UBS, though a different banking animal than WaMu, is also on the ropes. There are very few (to none) suitors for either of them should they wish for a rescue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I just saw the CEO of Wachovia on CNBC.
I didn't catch the first part, but apparently Maria had just interviewed Meredith Whitney before he came on.

He was talking about what a great position they were in despite all their exposure to the California real estate market. Maria said that Meredith said that he was using some very overly optimistic numbers. He said that anyone can use the numbers they want, and it was a matter of interpretation.

So, if I walk into Wachovia tomorrow and ask them for the 20k I have deposited there, and they say that I only have 10k, can I say that's just a matter of interpretation?

I do know one thing. I do have 10k in a Wachovia money market account. First thing tomorrow, it will still be in Wachovia, but in a safe deposit box in the form of Krugerrands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wah!


Moo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. WaMu ShaMu
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 07:38 PM by hay rick
What's another whale going belly up? I sold all my WaMu stock and put my money in AIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lse7581011 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oops! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I bank at wamu so I'm a bit more afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. If you have ANY money in WaMu, take it out now before it's too late
My wife and I both bank with WaMu, I'm already looking for another bank to put my money in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow that's huge.
They have my mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. want to know who's on who's board of directors? quite the
incestuous bunch

check out THEYRULE.net

Please note that you will need Flash Player 7.

A Brief Explanation
They Rule allows you to create maps of the interlocking directories of the top companies in the US in 2004.
The data was collected from their websites and SEC filings in early 2004, so it may not be completely accurate - companies merge and disappear and directors shift boards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC