Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schwarzenegger says he will veto Calif. budget (despite likely override)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:24 PM
Original message
Schwarzenegger says he will veto Calif. budget (despite likely override)
Source: Fresno Bee

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday rejected the budget passed hours earlier by the Legislature, pledging to veto it for failing to meet his reform demands and solve California's persistent fiscal problems.

If Schwarzenegger follows through on his threat, it would mark the first time in modern history that a California governor would veto a state spending plan. It set in motion a historic showdown with the Democratically controlled Legislature, which has said it is prepared to override the pending veto.

... The budget deal generated just enough Republican support to reach the two-thirds threshold needed for approval. Its main feature requires Californians to pay their income taxes sooner, a maneuver designed to close a $15.2 billion deficit without borrowing or imposing new taxes.

... He also reiterated a threat he made during the impasse to veto any bills sent to him until a budget deal had been struck. If lawmakers override his budget veto, he will take a hard line on their legislation, potentially wiping away a year's worth of work.

Read more: http://www.fresnobee.com/updates/story/869337.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. that would be a big mistake
people are getting impatient as it is .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope he hangs from it.
Once we get rid of him, how are we going to make sure an elected governor is never recalled for petty political reasons again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Me too, but I fear what the state party will put in his place.
The parties, like Sacramento itself, are always a decade behind and too heavily skewed toward Big Ag and the north.

CA has my sincere sympathies, as screwed up politically with more unrealized potential than anyplace I've seen.

Governors aren't recalled easily, Davis screwed the pooch really bad in 2001 and would've lost to anybody else in the election. So don't put in another Davis and the recall issue is solved. If we had a national recall, we might have shortened the reign of terror we've lived under.:shrug:

:kick: & R



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. How does paying income taxes earlier increase revenue by $15 billion?
The only thing that comes to mind would be earning interest on it but the state isn't going to get fifteen billion dollars worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They're taking a *lot*
Edited on Tue Sep-16-08 06:38 PM by Newsjock
State tax withholding is being increased by 10%, which amounts to about a 1% *cut* in everyone's take-home pay for the next year. It's only a "loan," of course, and we get it back in our refund in 2009, but we lose that money until then.

Way to "stimulate" the California economy, morans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If they increase withholding rate, I will have to increase my state exemptions to compensate
I am running a VERY tight budget, and didn't plan for having to loan money to the state of California.

FUCK THAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The budget consists mostly of accounting gimmicks
Shell-game tricks that would get the CEO of a public stock corporation indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. More $$ in sooner gives some, not taking bridge loans gives a lot more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Time for "Total Recall, The Sequel"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC