Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State senator causes ruckus on Alaska flight (guess which Party?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:17 AM
Original message
State senator causes ruckus on Alaska flight (guess which Party?)
Source: Anchorage Daily News

State Sen. Lesil McGuire created a disturbance on an Alaska Airlines flight earlier this month and, after landing in Anchorage, was escorted through the airport by police for questioning, according to an official report of the incident.

The Anchorage Republican was not charged with a crime and the law enforcement investigation into the incident is over. McGuire, who chairs the State Affairs Committee, is part of the Senate's ruling coalition.

On the Sept. 4 flight from Juneau to Anchorage, McGuire continued using her BlackBerry after being asked to turn it off, the report said. She kept texting, which resulted in the pilot having to stop the plane as it was taxiing, according to the report by police at Stevens International Airport. After flight attendants refused to serve her alcohol, she threw a glass of water onto the aisle floor, said passengers interviewed by police.

She was rude, used profanity, bad-mouthed the pilots, and caused further delay by getting out of her seat, according to statements to police by witnesses.


Read more: http://www.adn.com/politics/story/528486.html



Well, since John McCain invented the Blacberry, I guess we'll have to give her a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder why AK has so many crabby women in politics? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. They're tolerated? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. her hubby, Tom anderson, is in jail on the sort of Stevens-related
scandal up here. She is a dickhead from waaaaay back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. She should be in federal custody ...
Awaiting terrorism charges ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. If you or I had done this, we'd still be in jail. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Well maybe not jail, but we would have had to go.............
...........to court on some kind of charges and paid a healthy fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. She should have been....
tested for drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. In Alaska, we called her Sleazil.
State Senator Lesil McGuire was married with children. A few years ago she befriended Republican State Representative Tom Anderson - also married. The two started an affair while in Juneau and both ended up leaving their spouses and eventually marrying each other. One would have thought this would hinder their political careers... but no. They were re-elected easily.

In 2006, Tom decided not to run for re-election and do some "lobbying". In October 2007, Tom was convicted of federal corruption charges - 7 counts of conspiracy and bribery - and sentenced to five years in prison. Surprisingly to me, Sleazil has stayed married to him even though he is now in jail.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2053162

A lot of ethics allegations swirled around her too. How could you be married to a State Representative who is on the take and not be aware AT ALL? Again, one would have thought this would hinder her political career... but no. She continues her career in the State Senate.

I've met Sleazil and sleazy is the right adjective I would use. Like Palin, she has an outrageously inflated opinion of herself and uses her power, money and position to her advantage.

Oh and I read in the article that she cried while giving an interview on this incident. No suprise. I've seen her cry while giving interviews on previous occasions. It's contrived and self-serving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buenaventura Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. hence the "state affairs" committee??
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. I actually support her wholeheartedly...
The fact that you can't use a blackberry, iphone, or mp3 player during takeoff and landing is utterly ridiculous and has been proven to have ZERO effect on the instruments. They need to end that rule ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. People who disobey orders from the flight crew need to be expelled from the plane.
Just because you think a rule is stupid doesn't mean that it gives you the right to break it.

I was on a flight where a man threatened to punch a flight attendant because he wasn't allowed to sit by his wife. Why? Because they each had a child on their lap & it was a completely full flight so there was a third person in the row. That exceeds FAA regulations. He thought the rule was stupid. Too bad.

I wish I could listen to my iPod during take-off as well, but big deal. It's only a few minutes.

People who think they don't have to obey the rules really ARE a danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I heard this rule explained recently
Three seats with three adults and two kids means five people in the row; the plane only has four oxygen masks per row. People shouldn't assume they know the reason that rules have been implemented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. A) You're wrong. B) That's beside the point.
Research shows otherwise: http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/mar06/3069

And when the pilot or other crew of an aircraft give you instructions, you follow them. Period. You don't get to decide which rules you'll abide by, just because you think you remember reading somewhere that that instrumentation interference caused by cellular and other wireless electronics is a myth.

And when you're forced to follow those rules, you don't throw a temper tantrum. That shit might get you slapped in restraining straps...and you know what else? I'd help the attendants put them on you...right after I ground your Blackberry underneath my heel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Can't open your link but,
Recent studies have shown that there is no interference. I was not defending the tantrum. Just the blackberrys use. I wouldn't suggest touching me :).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. The link works, and I'm not trying to sound all hairy-chested and burly...
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 10:38 AM by Barrymores Ghost
...I'll take the www out of it, so now you can just copy and paste the link to another browser window: spectrum.ieee.org/mar06/3069

I'm not sure what recent studies you're referring to, and I don't care, quite frankly. If you say you're 100% on the side of someone who acts like an asshole on a plane because s/he's not getting her/his way -- regardless of whether you think s/he has a technical point in her/his favor, you're defending the tantrum.

And if a flight attendant or co-pilot is having difficulties in restraining an asshole, I'm going to cheerfully lend my foot to the back of said asshole's neck. My own safety is a helluva lot more important than the asshole's comfort or dignity. Since I'm sure you would never be that asshole, your last point is rather moot, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. You missed my point...
I support her use of the blackberry, not to cause a scene. I fly almost every week and I can tell you that 90% of the people on the plane pay no attention whatsoever when the emergency instructions are handed out. I often forget to turn my cellphone off and it is stuffed in my briefcase. I have to think about 10% of the passengers(at least) do the same and we have suffered zero ill effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. And you missed mine. It's not up to YOU or HER to decide...
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 06:42 PM by Barrymores Ghost
...that the concern is overblown.

You also "missed" the conclusion of recent research, which posits otherwise.

The mere fact that, to date, no ill effects have been suffered as a result of your own carelessness, or that of your estimated "10%" of your fellow passengers, is neither any sort of absolution for your collective carelessness, nor tacit or explicit proof of your argument.

If you support her (or your own) use of a Blackberry or other electronic device during takeoff or landing -- against the expressed orders of the flight crew and FAA regulations -- than I can only assume you are itching to either find yourself publicly admonished or otherwise physically forced to comply.

In other words, the point is that if you act like a complete petulant dumbass, you shouldn't act shocked when you are treated like one. And if you're holding up my flight because you can't follow instructions, I'm going make it a point to loudly and roundly embarrass you in front of your family, God and everyone else. And if you were to get physical with someone in uniform, then all options are on the table, as they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flygal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. the rule is there so you are prepared to evacuate during the most critical times
take off and landing. wearing earphones or using handies would be huge distractions. It is just a way to keep everyone in line - when you are outnumbered 50 to 1 it helps to have these rules in place. I wasn't too pushy about it, but if she was rude - that is a true sign to push the issue. And obviously she was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
58. but I'm important!
if I turn my Blackberry off for a minute I may miss an important message and the world will end! :sarcasm:

People do sometimes survive a bad takeoff or landing - not always, but enough that if there is a possible emergency I'd like everyone to be paying attention. That goes for keeping your stuff out of the way, too.

Whether it interferes with navigation I don't know: I've inadvertently had my cell phone on during long flights (it's really hard on batteries) with no problem. But I can live a few minutes without email. If you're that important, make people come to you!

Throwing water is just plain rude and childish. Infantile, really: most children of my acquaintance are much more considerate of other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. It's NOT ridiculous, and I think airlines need to change their reasoning for disallowing it.
If I understand it correctly, takeoff and landing are the times when a plane is most likely to encounter difficulty. Passengers should be alert and ready to follow directions from the flight crew.

If 40% of passengers are diddling around or talking on the phone, they are not paying attention to attendants or to pilot instructions on the public address system. These passengers are also likely interfering with other passengers' ability to listen without interruption.

It's incumbent on all fliers to learn how to put their gadgets down for five minutes. It's not hard, but people are self-absorbed and short-sighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. It is thinking like that
that has allowed this president to break the law any time he damn well pleases. If the law is bad, change it. Break it, and you may be arrested. And anyone that cannot live without a blackberry for 10 minutes has an over inflated view of their importance in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Good to know....
So marijuana prosecution should continue to the full extent of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. We are a society of laws...at least in theory.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 10:37 AM by Barrymores Ghost
Don't like a law? Get it changed. Break the law and get caught, suffer the consequences. It's really that simple. You can argue the moral nuances in front of the judge.

Oh, and your deflection is duly noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. It is against the law...
should we be filling our jails up with pot smokers? No. In more and more states it is a ticket-able offense. Even here in Texas it is up to the officer whether or not to even bother with that (2 oz and less). If the law is wrong, work to change it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Prohibition...
ended due the massive law making and the subset of crime it created. Not because of "the good fight" in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Now you're just being ridiculous.
To compare prohibition and bootlegging with regulations requiring you to hang up your cell phone or turn your Blackberry off during takeoffs and landing is completely asinine.

As the saying goes: how can you be so obtuse?

Or, is it deliberate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Huh?
I was comparing alcohol to pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. You're dragging in yet ANOTHER irrelevant comparison to the topic at issue.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 06:39 PM by Barrymores Ghost
You veered off-track with the first version of the victimless-crime meme, and now you're tacking in another direction.

Let's try to focus on the OP, shall we? If you want to argue for the decriminalization of pot, I'm all for it. But in the context of this thread, it's a non-sequitur, just like Prohibition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #41
59. Totally missed my point and...
I totally apologize for that. To sum up, I agree with the sentiment that blackberrys and iphones should be able to be used for messaging, etc. on a place. I in no way condone causing a scene. When I brought up pot, I was making the comparison to usage in one's home. I would be against lighting up in front of your kids preschool. Think I am at fault here for not making myself cleared. I still hold, that texting while a plane takes off should be allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. And if the plane takes a hop on the runway while taking off....
...and your Blackberry goes airborne (as shit often does when a plane hits a bump) and breaks the ocular socket of somebody sitting next to you, then I'm sure you can rationalize having caused the injury with your contention that, hey, at least you're pretty sure it didn't interfere with the cockpit instrumentation.

Please stop. Just...stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. Who's going to stop me from holding by blackberry...
or baby's bottle, or stapler for that matter during takeoff? No rules against holding items during takeoff, just using them. You may need to right to the FAA with this suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. "Please turn off and stow all portable electronic devices including Game Boys, cell phones...
"...and Blackberries..."

I think that pretty much covers it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. And my babies bottle?
Or the hardback copy of Desperation that I've been reading for the last 3 flights as soon as I sit down. I saw someone eating a Big Mac as they boarded the other day. Dangerous to the gut maybe, but not the eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Wow. You must be INCREDIBLY bored. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. I know...
...can you imagine even a MINUTE without the use of your blackberry. Frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Bullshit
You get 100 people using their damn "devices" and it generates all sorts of disturbances with the radios. Navigation and communication. Yes, I am an airline pilot and I would have taxied back to the gate and had her arrested. I've done it before and I'll do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
61. Thank you for not suffering that fool.
I indulged his/her idiocy far too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buenaventura Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. hey, she's a woman of convictions - er, no ... that was her husband ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. According to my son, the reason for the ban is that most accidents
take place during take-off and landing. The purpose of banning these devices then is to ensure that everyone is paying attention to any announcements and won't hold up any needed evacuation folding up and stowing such equipment. He says in-flight cell phone use is banned because a cell phone in a fast moving plane ties up a series of cell phone towers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. If you read the article at the link you may have less sympathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. Ever have a rough landing? Aborted takeoff?
How'd you like that to blackberry fly out of someone's hand and crack you in the skull?

I've been in an emergency landing, and shit flew ALL OVER that damn plane when it smacked the tarmac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indio55555 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
70. True, but
Lets just say someone decides to modify their backberry to scramble the plane's communications, instruments etc. while in the air... Then what? Also I don't want the person next to me yapping non-stop throught the whole flight on their phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Meet Ms McGuire....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I saw her interviewed several times on CNN. Shhe was a witch
during the interviews too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. This made me think of the peaceful, lawful demonstrators jailed in MN before and during the RNC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Elitist repukes don't think the law applies to them.
it's completely disgusting!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good GOP family values: Her politician husband in prison; she's a jerk.
Perfect. They rarely disappoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. Look !!!! She's carrying Palin's baby..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. Google Image the little sow...
...she looks like she's from the same litter as palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I meant...
...brood....sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
27. t's the long, long northen winter nights. In a lot of the northern states, Seasonal
Affectiveness Disorder is a problem. That is one reason many of the far north states have problems with alcoholism and depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Was she texting John McSame saying thank you for creating this wonderful device?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
44. Stevens International Airport?
As in Ted Stevens? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #44
65. That's exactly who it's named for!!!
Full disclosure: I work for Alaska Airlines here in San Francisco, and my compatriots in ANC have been dying to get that airport name changed for a long, long time.

I'm sorry I don't have any extra insight into this idiot State Sen, but I can tell you that most disruptive behaviour onboard usually results in the police waiting for you at the other end, but rarely does anyone get carted off to jail. Unless the passenger tries to break into the flight deck. Doesn't matter if you work for the govt or you're just a drunk asshole, you're probably not gonna be held for more than a few hours.

What I REALLY wish I could find out is about that trip Palin took from DFW to ANC in April supposedly when her water broke and she managed to make it all the way without incident. I'm trying to locate who the flight crew was and see if they remember anything. Of course they'd've known they had the Gov onboard, but if she just sat in 1st class without doubling over or looking green, then that would solidify our suspicions.

Still doing research. Promise to get back to you when I find anything out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
45. Too bad there wasn't any "chair throwing"
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 07:40 PM by longship
Gotta love those foreign government bodies which know how to have a real floor fight.

Bring it on. :evilgrin:

Or, maybe just a good, old fashion defenestration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
46. People have been tasered for less.
Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
47. Alaska senator accused of causing flight ruckus
Source: msnbc.com

Alaska senator accused of causing flight ruckus
State legislator kept texting, threw water when refused alcohol, police say

An Alaska state senator caused a disturbance on an Alaska Airlines flight, including throwing a glass of water when flight attendants refused to serve her alcohol, but will not be charged with a crime, authorities said.

Sen. Lesil McGuire also continued using her BlackBerry after being asked to turn it off before the flight from Juneau to Anchorage, according to an Anchorage police report of the Sept. 4 confrontation.

According to the report, McGuire continued texting, leading the pilot to stop the plane as it was taxiing. McGuire, who leads the State Affairs Committee, was questioned by police at Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport but not charged.

-----

More at link

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26761477/



I don't even find this funny. It's just disgusting the sorts of people the Republicans vomit onto our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. So she's not charged but that TV preacher's wife was charged
and had to go to court for causing a ruckus on the plane. Those flight attendents should bring a lawsuit against her but I'm not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. The preachers wife was exonerated.
It seems that the flight attendant was lying and had done the same thing a couple of years back. The crew testified for the preachers wife.Attendant wanted big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #57
68. Ah ha, I didn't know about that flight attendant doing it before.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Eww Ted Stevens has an airport named after him
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 05:59 PM by superconnected
As for that senator, I suspect she's a republican and yeah I do like the attention she's bringing to Alaskan politicians. Especially with the Palin abuse-of-postion that keeps surfacing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. He shouldn't fret - the most disfunctional one in the country is named after Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. Nothing named after you till you're DEAD!!!!

I don't believe anyone should have ANY buildings or civil landmarks named after them until after they're DEAD. It strikes me as idolatry to have buildings and airports named after you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pete2069 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Shows you just how much hate the republican voters
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 05:56 PM by Pete2069
have toward democrats in which they would rather vote for
these pigs with lipstick , then  to vote to replace them with
someone which would try to correct the corruption they have
forced on our citizens and country...

Who in the right state of mind would ever vote for McCain and
Palin to be leaders of our country and make decisions of life
and death to our citizens.

Wake up Americans before it is to d... late...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Already posted.
Actually, this one has the Anchorage Daily News story.

GOP family values, with her GOP politician husband now in prison. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3494628
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Hmmmm Baked Alaska?
Keep it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. And then we have to go thru airports named after them.
What happened to waiting until a guy died, at least for politicians of that genre, until he couldn't be indicted any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. "Ladies & gentlemen, I'm sorry for the delay but we will not be able to continue safely..."
"... to the taxiway to get in line for take off until the Very Important Lady in seat 12B finishes playing with on her crackberry and turns it off. Thank you for your patience."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
66. What is it with Republican flyers and their "water" issues
"threw a glass of water on the floor"
"leaky governor flies home"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemWynner Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
69. I hate these women!
This gives the rest of us women a bad name. why do they have to make fools out of themselves over piddly stuff like this. I have worked hard in a man's world to help garner respect for equal rights and things like this really puts us back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
71. if it had been a Dem, Homeland Security would have been called and permanent no-fly listed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC