Since this is from an FEC case, I assume the 4-paragraph rule doesn't apply and have quoted at somewhat greater length. When I first ran into this story, I was looking for evidence of Republican dirty dealing in connection with the 2002 elections. But now I'm wondering just what favors Freddie was buying with its donation and whether they got any particular plums in early 2003.
http://eqs.sdrdc.com/eqsdocs/000051B2.pdfIn February 2002, Wayne Berman, the Honorary Finance Chairman of the Republican Governors Association (“RGA”) and a consultant hired by Freddie Mac, approached Mr. Delk and asked Freddie Mac to make a $250,000 donation to the RGA. At that time, the RGA was a part of the Republican National Committee and solicited funds for the Republican National Committee’s Eisenhower Building Fund. Prior to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (“BCRA”), Freddie Mac was able to make donations to national parties via the “building fund exemption.”
At the suggestion of Mr. Berman, Freddie Mac divided its donation into two parts so that Freddie Mac could participate in events scheduled for February 2002 and November 2002.
On March 4,2002, Mr. Berman sent a statement to Mr. Delk requesting a check in the amount of $100,000 made payable to the “Republican Governors Association Eisenhower Building Fund.” Freddie Mac sent the check as requested along with a cover letter notifying the recipient that the funds could only be used for building fund purposes.
On October 24,2002, the RGA sent Freddie Mac a statement requesting the remainder of the donation, or $150,000. At this point, the RGA, in anticipation of the changes in campaign finance law as a result of BCRA, was no longer affiliated with the RNC and, most importantly, was no longer soliciting donations to the Eisenhower Building Fund. As a result, the RGA statement specified that the check be made payable to the “Republican Governors Association.”
According to Mr. Delk’s secretary, when she received the October 24, 2002, statement, she asked Mr. Delk for instructions. Mr. Delk told her to process the contribution by completing a check requisition form. She completed the form seeking a $150,000 check fiom Freddie Mac made payable to the RGA, signed Mr. Delk’s name, and submitted the form.
Mr. Delk presented the check, allegedly with a letter stating that the contribution could only be used for building fimd purposes, to Mr. Berman. Mr. Berman took the check, which the RGA attributed to Mr. Delk, and deposited it into its operating account.
On October 31,2002, John Rowland, the chairman of the RGA, sent Mr. Delk a letter thanking him for his generosity, which would enable the RGA to “invest in crucial last-minute TV and radio ads, polling, get-out-the-vote, and direct candidate support in many of our key races and provide our candidates with the support they need to win.”
According to Mr. Delk, in the summer of 2003 he learned that the RGA did not put the contribution into a building fund account. As a result, Freddie Mac asked the RGA to return the donation, which it did on June 11, 2003, approximately eight months after the contribution had been made.