Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Millions spend half of income on housing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:40 AM
Original message
Millions spend half of income on housing
Source: AP

Millions spend half of income on housing By ADRIAN SAINZ and ALAN ZIBEL, AP Business Writers
1 hour, 31 minutes ago

Al Ray is so strapped for cash, the only time he eats out is on Wednesday or Sunday, when the local McDonald's sells hamburgers for 49 cents.

Ray lost his engineering job last November, and has been working as high school tutor, scratching out about $1,000 a month — if he's lucky. He struggled to make his $1,400 monthly mortgage payment and $330 monthly homeowners' association fee until May, when he stopped paying.

Ray, 44, is looking for work and renting out a room in his two-bedroom condo in Davie, Fla., for $500, but his monthly income doesn't match his expenses and he's facing foreclosure.

"I barely have money to survive," he said.





Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080923/ap_on_bi_ge/cash_strapped_homeowners



This is what happens when you only have minimum wage McJobs available to a lot of people, and some are lucky to even find one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. One week's pay is all you should be spending
Any more, and you're in over your head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Including real estate taxes, or not?
because I pay as much in real estate taxes as my mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ideally, yes
But factor in the impact of your collective interest and tax deductions and things will look better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. The "one week's pay" guideline is intended to cover PITI
The underwriting guideline is generally slightly higher than one week's pay, with a max of about 28% of monthly income as the guideline.

In addition, monthly income is slightly more than 4 weeks' pay because there are 52 paid weeks in a complete year. If you make $100/week your monthly income isn't $400, it's
about $433 (($100 x 52)/12).

So, if you make $100/week your monthly payment for mortgage,taxes, and insurance should be at or less than 28% of $433, or $121 in order to meet the ideal housing debt to income ratio (this is called the "front ratio" IIRC.)

There's also a second calculation of the overall debt to income ratio called the "back ratio." Including your PITI and your other debts from car and student loans, required payments on credit cards, etc. your overall debt to income ratio should be no more than about 36% to meet conventional loan standards.


Loans that don't require these guidelines are usually called nonconventional or nonconforming loans and I don't know what the upper limits are on the front/back ratios for those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. How this guidelines can be apply to the economy in general? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I'm sorry, but I don't understand your question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I should mention the despair between income and the cost of living
how can an economic balance be created to accomplish those guidelines without blaming the individual?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Gotcha.
One of the ways to make housing more affordable is to have the government get back into the business of production of rental housing for low and moderate income people. It's a sad truth that those who live in subsidized housing are often paying a much lower percent of their income in rent than those who are trying to rent in the unsubsidized market. HUD guidelines cap the tenant payment at 30% of income in most instances, where people living in the most marginal privately owned rentals may be paying 50 or 60% of their take home pay. People are paying that much because they don't have much choice.

How to give them more choices? One way is to raise the minimum wage and increase incomes, but that doesn't create more housing units. A better plan may be to raise the minimum wage AND use government to increase the number of rental units available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. true, but the point of the OP is that a lot of people lost jobs and had to take lesser paying ones
but could not/did not move.

I do think, however, that a lot of people also chose to live in giant McMansions without thinking about it enough, but I don't think that describes most of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If you stick to the one week rule, more people would rent
And, as we've seen with this crisis, more people should have stuck to renting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. How did they know that they would lose their jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. That's a good guideline
but since salaries have not been going up and everything else has, its rarely true any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Exactly, weak salary growth is a problem.
Wages have only risen around 1% at best for a lot of workers since 2000, but housing has increased anywhere between 35-125% depending on your market. In some markets you have to be bringing home $2K net or more per week to afford housing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I am in the same housing I was in 8 years ago
and then that rule was exactly true for me- but my salary has dropped by 20% and my housing has gone up by about 5%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Even in better times, that was never really possible in some places, like California.
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 09:51 AM by krabigirl
Not 50% of salary, more like 25% of gross (including taxes and HOA - not adjusted for deductions.) One week's pay is a great target, but if you live in certain areas, it never really was like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. And, That's Why CA Leads The Nation In Foreclosures
Fundamentals are fundamentals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. When they down sized America
they forgot to down size the debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. This guy could be me
I'm working now, making enough to pay the mortgage with one week's pay but not the condo fees and association fees, they are extra, but still I'm doing pretty well. My problem is, I'm a temporary worker. I'm putting money aside for the inevitable. I took a job that was temp to perm but its not going perm because of the economy. I'm being realistic when I say that as things get worse I will lose my job. I also bought a new car this year. I might end up living in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectricGrid Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hard to feel sorry for folks who bought beyond their
means. I bought a fixer upper so I could afford the payments. Sure I don't feel like an A list celeb, but you can damn well be I will sleep at night even if I lose my job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I did the same thing...
Just put up new siding where it needed it...working on painting the whole exterior now...

When you get a little extra...buy what you need for the next project and get to it :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. One person in that article dug her own hole:
"Getting a loan during the boom was easy, Hanna knows. Too easy.

"All you had to was massage the information enough to fit it into their round hole, and they gave us a mortgage," Hanna said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. Around here, people have always spent a lot on housing. Luckily, we don't.
Thank goodness, but we bought a modest home with the regular 20% down and 30-year fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Maybe We Should Join Unions and Vote for Pols That Protect Labor
Maybe we should use our political power to help our economic situation.

Or maybe I'm just crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. Renters must be spending 75% of their income
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flirtus Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. consolidation loans
pushed my "housing" payment to 60% of my income, but I have very few other debts. Am current on all now, & have no savings! The American way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC