Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush administration: No outsiders helped energy panel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:37 PM
Original message
Bush administration: No outsiders helped energy panel
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 06:52 PM by Newsjock
Adds link
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/02/06/national1844EST0772.DTL
Bush administration: No outsiders helped energy panel
By ANNE GEARAN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - No energy industry officials participated improperly in Vice President Dick Cheney's closed-door meetings to develop the White House energy policy, the Bush administration told the Supreme Court.

The administration is fighting to keep records of the energy policy meetings secret. Environmental and government watchdog groups sued to learn details of the task force's work, including whether any industry bigwigs such as former Enron chief Kenneth Lay were involved.

Lay and others were not official members, but the administration's critics want to find out if they were unofficial members.

In this case, an "inquiry into whether any outside individual, whether intentionally or not, crossed a poorly defined line and became a de facto member," would come up empty, Solicitor General Theodore Olson wrote in a Supreme Court filing Thursday night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then What's the Problem? Release the Records!
What have you got to hide?

Scalia: That's good enough for me! See you on our next Hunting trip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on how they define "improperly"..
I'm sure. They aren't saying no participating just no improper participation.

Yeah right.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Note the parsed language
Headline reads: No outsiders helped energy panel

Text reads: No energy industry officials participated improperly

Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Things are fine on planet Oh, Right, Sure.
whether intentionally or not yada yada yada, my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Man, they must be hiding something juicy!
otherwise those meetings should be as public as things get. Maybe they should be televised as those "officials" are our employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just because they say it, they think we will believe them?
Seriously...they seem to think this is how it works.
For every damn lie they've told, this administration simply says, "we say this, we say that, and that's all there is to it"
I call SHENANIGANS!! Enough already.
Every single person involved in this administration is dirty somehow and they need to be held to account.
We need a special prosecuter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. ROFL
you called shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush adminstration is honest in this according the headline.
To them, none of the energy executives are considered outsiders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. What's improper to them is not the same definition I see in the
dictionary. There are so many investigations of this administration that it is hard to keep abreast of all their criminal acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. They didn't need to bring in outsiders
Most of the energy execs were given high level jobs within the Bu$h administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. what they discussed would scare the crap out of america
basically, peak oil.

how to get more of the world's oil for ourselves before it is all used up. and what happens to the economy if we don't.

people don't like the truth & they know it. i believe there would be a panic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evworldeditor Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Bingo!
I'd lay odds you're exactly on the money. Matt Simmons has been warning about peak oil for sometime now and he was on Cheney's energy task force.

I came across a Pentagon study of the logistical problems of the first Gulf War a couple months back. Written in 1997 during the last legitimately elected presidency, I believe they cited 2010 as the projected year for global oil peak. More recently the "peakers" are starting to suggest 2007.

And you're absolutely right, most American's won't see this coming when it hits, despite all the warnings. There will be lots of excuses, fall-guys, and a rush for efficient cars, finally killing the US auto industry, as Toyota becomes number one, replacing GM.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formactv Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. READ THE BOOK
The Price of Loyalty-#1` NYT Bestseller!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbwarming Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. #9 on Amazon, up from #11 last night. Yeaaaagh! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe not, but Dick Cheney participated improperly and is
withholding public records that prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. lets see
saddam is preventing us from looking at his records so he must be guilty.
cheney is preventing us from looking at his records so he must be innocent.
Say What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. and it took nearly three years to state this?
a) it is not credible.
b) paid lobbyists that directly represent the energy company leader are the same thing.
c) if this were true, why the fight to keep it secret?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. According to O'Neill's book (IIRC)
the way slick Dick got around the open records requirement was by making the energy meeting an "internal staff meeting", that is, no outsider was in the closed door session. However, industry bigwigs and lobbyists were outside the door, and Cheney and other staff members were constantly going in and out from the room.

In my opinion, Cheney did cross that "poorly defined line", and even though technically they weren't behind closed doors, they most certainly were "de facto members" of the meeting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. ENRON PICKS Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...
WASHINGTON (AP) - Former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay, a friend and backer of President Bush, gave the White House recommendations for appointment to a federal energy commission last spring. Bush eventually appointed two of the people on Enron's list.

Lay gave the list of names to Clay Johnson, Bush's personnel director, White House spokeswoman Anne Womack said Thursday. Among the eight or so names were Pat Wood, now chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Nora Brownell, a member of the commission.

...MORE AT:
http://globalfreepress.com/enronomics.shtml


they just RAN the friggin show and were invited to ALL the parties

Remember the USS Greeneville?



The Japanese boat left only an oil slick, rafts, and scattered debris by the time Coast Guard rescuers arrived on the scene.



Survivors of the collision, who were aboard the Japanese fishing boat Ehime Maru, are rescued by the U.S. Coast Guard off Honolulu, Hawaii, on Friday.

more...
http://www.mainichi.co.jp/english/news/archive/200102/11/news01.html

just ask waxman he KNOWS!

waxman should be on ALL the news outlets DAILY imo but i would settle for once a week :evilgrin:

psst... pass the word ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. Depends on who you consider outsiders.
I'd guess that outsiders mean no one outside their circle of associates. Makes sense then to say no outsiders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC