Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Uncalls Minnesota Senate Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:36 AM
Original message
AP Uncalls Minnesota Senate Race
Source: Associated Press

AP Uncalls Minnesota Senate Race
12 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press is uncalling the Minnesota Senate race.

Republican Sen. Norm Coleman finished ahead of Democrat Al Franken early Wednesday in the final vote count, but his 571-vote margin falls within the state's mandatory recount law. That law requires a recount any time the margin between the top two candidates is less than one-half of one percent.

The AP called the race prematurely.

Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie said the recount won't begin until mid-November at the earliest and will probably stretch into December. It will involve local election officials from around the state.


Read more: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gMpTmr96V5hKIfyHT4Av4jsVQgrQD948RG485
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Smells like vote theft, Franken should not concede!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sohndrsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. AP Uncalls Minnesota Senate Race
Source: Washington DC -AP


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press is uncalling the Minnesota Senate race.

Republican Sen. Norm Coleman finished ahead of Democrat Al Franken early Wednesday in the final vote count, but his 571-vote margin falls within the state's mandatory recount law. That law requires a recount any time the margin between the top two candidates is less than one-half of one percent.

The AP called the race prematurely.

Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie said the recount won't begin until mid-November at the earliest and will probably stretch into December. It will involve local election officials from around the state.

Read more: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gMpTmr96V5hKIfyHT4Av4jsVQgrQD948RG485
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. i hope franken wins!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Recommended!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud progressive Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. what about the brewing scandle?
if he goes back to the senate and this 'kickback' thing blows-up, will that not just be another stain on his wonderful party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUgosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why the wait till mid November?
SOunds like the fix is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Generally there's a two week period for absentee ballots to arrive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too much of a margin in my opinion. Thank the third party candidate for giving Coleman 6 more years.
Fuck third parties!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. 521 votes is hardly a large margin.
Franken could pull ahead easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. What is going on with provisional ballots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Aaaack! Chain of custody for the ballots!!
I'm having palpitations. It's not Coleman that I think is a potential thief, but the miserable Republican machine. Anyone around from the FLP who can tell us about security measures both in transit from each precinct and in storage? Will they be counting on locks and burgler alarms or have they hired human security for the warehouse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I was an Election Judge yesterday in MN.
Might not allay your fears much, but ballot security is not that tight. After all votes are tabulated, they are placed into ballot boxes and sealed with a label signed by the Election Judges. The head Election Judge then throws the boxes in his/her car and delivers them to City Hall. I doubt there is a standard for ballot storage.

This is an amazing result. There are approximately 4200 precincts in MN. As of two minutes ago, CNN has 1,211,089 for Franken, 1,211,403 for Coleman, a difference of 314 votes. That's essentially a ONE BALLOT difference every 14 PRECINCTS! And I'll tell you this: just reviewing absentee ballots in *my* precinct last night, there was a lot more than one ballot that was unmarked in the Senatorial race. Absolutely unbelievable. If there's just one miscounted vote every 14 precincts, it can flip to Al just like that!

I SO did not want it to come down to this. I'm furious with Dean Barkley, and sent him an angry email in the middle of the night last night. He truly Naderized Al - along with the newly-turned-right-wing-rag Star Tribune, which buries coverage of Coleman's criminal activity after they endorsed the slimeball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. If the head Election Judge is the only person transporting the boxes -- that is wrong.
It should be required that a Republican and a Democrat be present during the transport.

There should NEVER be only one person involved in transporting election results from the election site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. From the MN 2008 Election Judge Guide, page 38, "13.4 Delivering Election Returns":
As soon as possible, one or more judges deliver the required election materials to the clerk or county auditor.
These materials include:

  1. sets of ballot counter tapes or summary statements;

  2. sealed envelopes or containers with all voted ballots

  3. all spoiled ballots;

  4. polling place rosters;

  5. completed voter registration applications, Election Day rosters; and

  6. other election materials (as directed by your clerk).


That's as specific as it gets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. They need to require a Democrat and a Republican to travel together for the delivery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. The Star-Tribune was giving slanted coverage even before they endorsed Coleman.
Having been a longtime listener to Franken's Air America Radio show, I was following the race a bit. I saw them distorting stories about Franken's taxes, making it appear that he was evading paying them, and, as you say, downplaying Coleman's outright criminal acts. I think that paper's early smearing of Franken is what gave Barkley a rationale to enter the race. Especially since the paper still has credibility from its pre-wingnut days.

Yes, I agree with you. Franken could take it. That's why I'm so nervous about the ballots. Everyone knows which are the Democratic areas, so if one of Rove's protegees decides he's going to be a hero and keep the nation safe for neocons or fundamentalists or whatever, he'll know from just which places to steal or swap a box. Ten days is enough time to devise and execute a plan.

On the up side, I heard that the recount, unlike the original count, would be manual. If that's so, handcounting will often reveal marks the machines missed. Correct me if I'm wrong about going manual for the recount.

Thank you for the info even if there is no Minnesotan ballot Fort Knox. Do you know if the validity of the provisional votes are being determined in the interim? Especially in Democratic counties?

Oh, and apologies for calling the party the FLP when it is actually the DFL. I realized my mistake too late to edit.

Again, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I started to wonder about that, too.
Looked it up in the state statutes, and yes, it is a manual hand recount!

No worries on FLP - trying to figure out if it was the Furiously Loud Party or what... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie said the recount won't begin until mid-November..."
"...at the earliest and will probably stretch into December. It will involve local election officials from around the state."

In other words, 'we ain't gonna hurry on this and you're really putting us out, Smalley, so take one for Amurkuh and just go ahead and concede already.'

Seriously, it looks like they are strong-arming him. I really hope that he will not give in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Negative on that.
Mark Ritchie is a good guy and a staunch Dem. He has no reason to strong-arm Al. I really think it's just the mechanics of the thing. You've got to get machines and people to run the process through again. I can tell you from experience that it takes a while to run the ballots through the optical scanner! We did 200+ absentee ballots last night, and that took probably 40-45 minutes. Multiply that by 10 for my precinct alone and you're at about 7 hours. And that's not factoring in ballot custody, unpacking, repacking, a break once in awhile, etc. Multiply that by 8 precincts for my city, and you're talking over 2 solid days - no breaks - of work. And that's after you get all the other mechanics worked out!

It'll be an arduous process, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. OK, it just seemed very poorly worded, as if to imply that Franken should give up...
But that was just my first reaction. It is really a shame it will take so long and I think Franken will be getting pummeled the whole time for the same kind of crap that was flung at Gore. I hope that this Al holds out to the bitter end, unlike the other Al. (With all due respect to Gore, which is very much indeed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. Mark Ritchie might not be strong arming, but Sleazy Norman already is
I heard him on the radio on the way home this evening saying that Al can "Save all those tax dollars" by specifying that the recount not be done. Change those totals around and Norm would have already filed a lawsuit to guarantee the recount.

They estimated the cost of the recount at $90,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Would you rather the recount be fast, or correct?
The the Congress does not convene until January. What is the big rush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. "Fast" and "correct" are not mutually exclusive.
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 01:02 PM by ExPatLeftist
And I have no "big rush", I just know that such uncertainty can be very hard on the candidates - and their constituents. And the pressure from the GOP for Franken to cave, along weith smears and dirty tricks, will be unbearable, a la 2000, on a smaller scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dear Al.........
... DO NOT CONCEDE to that lying shitbag, Coleslaw. Make him wait while his dressing turns rancid. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Do they have PAPER to count or is this computer voting -- ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. MN uses a paper ballot with ovals to fill in - like taking the PSAT/ACT/SAT
Then, depending on precinct, ballots are either hand-counted or run through an optical scanning tabulator. We were using the ES&S Model 100 in our precinct. The software update on it was 1996 - or at least it was programmed to display that! - and I feel fairly confident that it was tallying votes correctly. My heavily neocon precinct came in roughly 1100 vs 1000 (McSame vs Obama), which is far closer than I would have predicted the Big O would have come here.

Curiously, many cross-votes on the absentee ballots I reviewed: Obama for President, Coleman for Senate. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. At least they'll have a paper trail.
I noticed McCain and Palin voting on optical scanning ballots. If it's good enough for them, then it should be good enough for everyone else. Yet, they place Diebold machines in poor precincts where the constituents hardly knows how to use computers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyInTheHeartland Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. YES!
We can't let Coleman win this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC