Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As a road to a better economy, an old idea gains ground

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 09:43 PM
Original message
As a road to a better economy, an old idea gains ground
Source: L.A. Times

Reporting from Washington -- As recently as a few months ago, the idea of trying to bolster the troubled economy by pumping money into public works projects such as roads and bridges was dismissed as too slow -- not the quick pick-me-up that was needed.

But today, economists and policymakers are beginning to change their minds.

Snip~
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Economy.com, estimates that every dollar of infrastructure spending boosts the gross domestic product by $1.59.

Government and industry officials insist there are plenty of projects they can start quickly.

Jared Bernstein, a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, cited $100 billion in deferred maintenance and repairs at 16,000 public schools, involving such things as antiquated wiring and leaky plumbing. He said that most of the projects could be completed in 60 to 90 days.


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-infrastructure9-2008nov09,0,7223067.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES YES YES YES. Rebuild the infrastructure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. YES! Exactly my first response, too!
YES! :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. Just not in Utah. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Infrastructure removal?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. We should just label each road in Utah with a prefix that begins with 666 so they won't use it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Ya got my joke of the week award! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. DUzy!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too slow? Yeah, god forbid we create jobs in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. right
the corps would actually have to pay a decent wage for a change - NO OUTSOURCING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. People forget that this crisis wasn't created in a day
or even a few years. This is the result of 28 years of erosion by the Republicans (with a brief intermission with Clinton, although he arguably contributed to the crisis in some ways). It can't be fixed in a day.

What is with us Americans always wanting instant results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. and god forbid we fix the potholes & prevent bridges from crashing down
geesh, about fucking time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Please widen I64 between Richmond and Williamsburg. And another tunnell for Hampton Rds. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. I'm all for that...
especially since they are closing the Jordan Bridge today. Traffic will be a mess in the area and the tunnels will be clogged with traffic. The entire area could use an upgrade, with an expansion of light rail into Virginia Beach from Norfolk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. NO
Trains and street cars not bigger fatter roads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. BIKE LANES on all new roads also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. You obviously no nothing about I64 or the area. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. How about a replacement for the Jordon Bridge that they closed permanently on Friday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
53. When I moved to Richmond in 1994 I64 was open and empty
mostly between Toano and Bottoms' Bridge. Now it is ridiculously congested. Unfortunately I81 will get expanded (truck lane) and then 95 mostly because they have so much commerce on them. 81 is truck alley.

They need to at least pave 64 west of Richmond. It is an assault on your spine to drive that stretch of road-I am talking about 8 miles from Richmond proper to Short Pump.

BTW- if you drive in West Virginia now you see work being done on every single bridge. Every one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. A second "New Deal" is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
57. Jobs, Baby, Jobs: see Apollo Alliance on economic strategy: clean energy, green jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. FDR's way: maximize payment to workers, minimize material costs.
This made the program efficient at getting money to the workers and their families. Contrast this with the current "bailout." We've already seen how they are giving big bonuses out to a handfull of people. This is why the bailout is a complete failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. So great to see many here into and familiar with FDR and his positions ...
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 10:23 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. I'm an FDR Democrat all the way!
My great-uncle got work through the WPA. It helped small-town America a lot...though the Repuke ingrates refuse to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. The work program under WPA called the CCC
helped my family by putting my young brothers to work on public roads (in Alaska) when there was no other work available for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Almost all state and national parks were CCC created/built
At least west of the Rockies. Every national park, national monument, every state park in Nevada except one, every bridge to Sequoia, every flood-control dam in Nevada and California's central valley -- all of it was CCC.

How much money has been generated over the last 75 years for places that desperately need an economic boost? How many small businesses and jobs across the country depend on families vacationing and tourists stopping at a place originally designed and built by the CCC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
52. But some people "Thank God It Passed!"
Gee, you mean we were right about the failout?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. PLUS there are generations of environmental jobs to be done ...
why build bombs --????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. The 'green'
revolution will generate a lot of jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnyrocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. They're "beginning to change their minds"...no shit sherlock.
Maybe because they've been so wrong, for such a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. 'Economists' and 'policymakers'
have to have brains in their heads, too, before they're BELIEVED, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. darn....
....and here I was getting ready to spend my new stimulus check....couldn't we have public works and some stimulation?

....screw the trickle-down repug mentality....does it really matter where money enters the system so long as it's spent in a timely way within our borders?....

....if everyone went out and bought Ripple with a stimulus check (if you can find Ripple) then the wine/distillers would simply hire more people, build additional plants to meet demand, buy more equipment and taxes would accrue for roads and bridges....

....and in the process we'd all have a tasty beverage, well, maybe....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. How about this?
Instead of $150 billion every two years back to taxpayers in the form of $300 rebate checks, it can be used to create ONE MILLION jobs paying an average of $40,000 per year for 3 years.

$40,000 x 1,000,000 = $40 billion in wages.

Add in $10 billion for materials costs, which also indirectly creates jobs in manufacturing to create those materials.

$50 billion per year.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rebuilding the infrastructure is long overdue.
It will not only be an investment for the future but will provide productive work that people can be proud of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe Joe the Unlicensed Plumber
could create a contracting company and hire some real plumbers to start fixing schools at government expense. I spose he'd still grumble about his taxes, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Too slow" means it's gotta go through the hands of the working class
before the bankers can get their greedy mitts on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. Dr. Paul Krugman and Vice President Gore call for the same thing today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'll probably get flamed, but jobs to rebuild the infrastructure has
to be given to U.S. citizens and at a decent wage; wages they would get before contractors started hiring illegals to do the work. It's about time we started enforcing the laws re: labor that we have on the books now instead of looking the other way because it's cheaper. Cheaper is what got us in the mess in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You're absolutely right
These need to be good union jobs. No outsourcing for material or labor. Domestic production of the steel in domestic union shops assembled with union workers making a decent wage. Even in Iraq, where we're flushing billions a week, they outsource everything to cheap foreign (mostly Filipino but also Egyptian and other) workers while Halliburton and other bush cronies pocket the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Well the no-bid contracts will be gone in a few months, and I'm pretty sure
that there's going to be some labor reform happening as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. I agree whole heartedly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
54. I don't like the dehumanization of the term "illegals".
But I do agree that employers need to be held accountable for breaking the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. It's time to build a new power grid. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. Change empty malls into high schools
it would save some money & be large enough for teens, with plumbing & electricity
already present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. Now THAT'S an excellent idea! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Thanks, I think of that every time I pass an empty mall
For the post below-yes! I love old films & just thinking about all the peripheral
jobs that go with trains: local farms get to supply food for train meals, baggage
handlers, laundry services, cooks, engineers, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. California voted for fast rail. That's where we need to go.
Reduce air travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
27. It could come in the form of tax credits for energy efficient
improvements around the house and transportation. It needs to go to the working class in one way or another and I am not sure the means that it gets there is all that important, but a new deal jobs program will help to create more jobs in areas that support those jobs.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
28. It's odd how Keynes gets dismissed
and then gets revisited from time to time.

Keynes argued that the solution to depression was to stimulate the economy ("inducement to invest") through some combination of two approaches :

* a reduction in interest rates.
* Government investment in infrastructure - the injection of income results in more spending in the general economy, which in turn stimulates more production and investment involving still more income and spending and so forth. The initial stimulation starts a cascade of events, whose total increase in economic activity is a multiple of the original investment.<1>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. He was deliberately shoved aside because the Upper One Percent
Edited on Sun Nov-09-08 01:08 PM by truedelphi
has always hated the middle class.

So the move was to ensure the adoption of the bastardized version of Milton Friedman's Supply Side economics. You can read pages and pages of those theories - the "trickle down, globalize" theories of economics, and never find the words "Job creation" or tariffs.

Those were words that the Founding Fathers used liberally, because THEIR citizenry was educated and thoughtful enough to know that the middle class ain't got a class if there are no local jobs due to tariffs being non-existant.

Since Reagan, it has been all about cheap goods. Globalization. Service economy here, producion economy overseas.

The deliberate destruction of our democracy - and the Democrats including Clinton helped push those notions along with such instruments as NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. "The government spending multiplier effect" - first-year economics material.
Edited on Sun Nov-09-08 03:57 PM by OmelasExpat
Just goes to prove how little many financiers (even successful ones) and politicians know about basic econ.

If that was part of their basic business training, maybe the economy would operate a little more smoothly? Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. That's it -
just basics. I learned that over 35 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
35. And fix the thousands of bridges that need repair so we have no more collapses.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkoDonkey Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
37. Yes we build!
The sidewalk on my street still bears the imprint "WPA 36"--as in the Works Progress Administration. I also drove a bit on the Eisenhower Interstate System while moving this summer. Infrastructure investments provide jobs, help the economy in the long term, and if done well provide one heck of a legacy for the leader responsible. My point is that this sort of investment, this sort of spending (as opposed to, say, dumping the national fortune into the quicksands of Iraq) has some pretty long lasting, positive effects.

As New Dealer Harry Hopkins was fond of saying: "Tax, tax, tax; spend, spend, spend; elect, elect, elect."

If you build it they will come...to the polling place and vote Democratic. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. About F-ing time! Long live Keynesian Economics!
Right-wing economists always shit on Keynsianism because it's the only complete macroeconomic model proven to work, which pisses off the free-market fundamentalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
49. Asphalt is the finest job-creation substance the world has ever seen
If you want to create a lot of jobs in a hurry, start paving roads. It's like what the fundies say about abstinence--it works every time it's tried.

And the funny thing is, even the most hardened anti-government fascist likes new roads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
51. It truly is a way to help our newly founded (you know what I mean)
country transition into the used to be greatest country. I am all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. Any dollar introduced into the economy (private or public) usually multiplies 6 times
Privatization proponents cite this as scripture but conveniently ignore that public dollars have the same effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalslavery Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
58. We have 1 trillion
And we will be asking for it soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC