Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret Service Officer Arrested In Prostitution Sting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:22 AM
Original message
Secret Service Officer Arrested In Prostitution Sting
Source: WUSA

Washington, D.C. (WUSA) -- A Secret Service officer was arrested early Saturday during a prostitution sting conducted by D.C. police in Northwest.

Inspector Brian Bray, commander of Metropolitan Police Department's Narcotics and Special Investigations Division (NSID), says his squad was conducting a prostitution sting in the area of 11th and K Sts NW around 12:50 a.m. when a marked Secret Service Uniformed Division patrol car stopped to speak with an undercover female officer who was posing as a prostitute.

The patrol car was driven by a Uniformed Division sergeant who was in uniform. Insp. Bray said the NSID officers assumed he was going to tell the undercover female officer to leave the area.

But the sergeant allegedly engaged the female officer in dialog, mentioned how attractive she was, and inquired about what sex acts she would perform. They agreed on a price of $20 and he drove around the corner to meet with her.

That is when he was arrested by D.C. police officers. The sergeant was taken to the 1st District police station where he was processed and charged with solicitation for the purpose of prostitution. Insp. Bray says that is a misdemeanor.

Read more: http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=78070&catid=158&loc=interstitialskip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. I knew a Brian Bray once. :^(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. not surprised
One of Bill Clinton's detail was a complete ass saying of the line of people "put a sticker on them and they'll follow you anywhere"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Caught comitting a crime that shouldn't be a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Solicitation while in uniform and driving an official car should not be a crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Engaging in sexual activities on duty
is 'misfeasance'. It's generally punished as an infraction.

If prostitution was legal, his punishment would likely be internal. Suspension or, more likely, dismissal.

I don't think either action should be a crime, but I'd support this guy losing his job.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. how many good careers have to be destroyed by a supposed victimless crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. $20!?!?
The economy is really in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Memo to SS:
20$ whores aren't generally attractive. If you run across one and decide to solicit, assume they are undercover PD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UNCLE_Rico Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Also, Dude ...
'Whores' is NOT the preferred nomenclature. 'Sex Worker', please.

Nevertheless, your advice sounds pretty solid ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Or "independent contractor". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. He probably wasn't thinking with the brain in his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. How do you know this one was attrative?
I know a police officer here is Miami who does this type of undercover work every few weeks. She is an ok looking middle aged woman, but she does herself up to look like a crack addict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. because the article said he commented on her attractiveness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And I'm sure he would never lie to someone about thier attractiveness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. ok, have it your way, 20 hookers are most often attractive.
I'm especially attracted to the sagging skin on their bony frames that crack creates or their pocked marked skin, sores and rotten teeth from the use of meth. And those toothless 20 dollar hookers give the best....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse of greyface Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Thats good advice all the way around... Never trust an attractive streetwalker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. This is exactly the sort of "weak link" that results in a President's death.
Foreign spy agencies and organizations that seek to do us and our country's leaders harm look for these "weak links" all the time. What if it was not the D.C. police that caught this guy, but a foreign agency or group that then sought to blackmail this agent. This guy needs to be FIRED IMMEDIATELY and taken off any Presidential detail or privvy to any sensitive information.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Do Secret Service agents who guard the President
wear uniforms? I've only seen them wear business suits with those squiggy wire things coming out of their collars.
Maybe this guy was looking to unload some counterfeit currency, they do that job, too, ya know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Maybe the dark business suits and ear pieces are a uniform. Seems to fit the definition...
...otherwise I've never seen anything that looks like a police or military uniform.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. The uniformed SS look pretty similar to your typical police officer
Aside from wearing the appropriate insignia or putting two and two together from the location you saw them at, you'd probably confuse them with ordinary cops at a glance in any of the areas they're serving. The ones who look like police are in a unit explicitly called the Uniformed Division; the suits are special agents, who operate outside of that structure.

Loth though I generally am to refer people to Wikipedia, their article on the United States Secret Service (right here) shows the difference in appearance between the two.

I'm trying to figure out if I should be pleased or disappointed that they no longer use the ridiculously ornate formal uniforms that Nixon made 'em wear abroad..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Not all of the SS is involved in presidential protection
Their primary mission is still counterfeiting, there's a seperate division of them who are closer to conventional police in Washington and, I believe, a few other areas, etc. There's also additional ones involved in embassy protection overseas. The list goes on.

There's four or five thousand of these guys; only a fraction of them are involved in presidential protection and I'd guess the selection process for those guys is considerably more intense than I can easily imagine. Uniformed Division guys are usually more about landmark security than personal security (guarding embassies, the Naval Observatory, etc).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. This is good to know...but I'd still strip him of any data access permissions. n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Yeah. Part of the point of a security clearance...
...is that one's conduct mustn't expose one to blackmail. As said upthread, this is how security breaches happen and widen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC