|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
deminks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:13 PM Original message |
Rather’s Lawsuit Shows Role of G.O.P. in Inquiry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Unbelievable an established network would stoop this low! From the NY Times article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. CBS management needs to step down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
53. putting couric in the anchor spot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phred42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
54. See BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
79. OMFG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:00 AM Response to Reply #79 |
103. Limbaugh? Coulter? Ailes? That says it all. Judgment for the Plaintiff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJCher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #103 |
123. that is the point where I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
88. Shove this in their faces everytime wingnuts claim that Libruls control the MainStream Media. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. Whether he wins or loses the case, Rather has won a victory in the court of history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:16 AM Response to Reply #3 |
34. (he wasn't fired in the mid sixties - It was 2005) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJazz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:56 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I think JD was talking about the copy of Bush's bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
57. hey, even email uses CC, or Carbon Copy, in its 'reply to' header. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroglodyteScholar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #57 |
80. I believe that's "courtesy copy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Oh---ok, that makes sense too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:09 AM Response to Reply #80 |
105. Not according to wiki. Wiki says it's carbon carbon (cc) and blind carbon copy (bcc). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAcyclist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
63. JD was referring to the RNC claims of fraudulent documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhrobbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
78. You're funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
135. I was referring to the practices in offices in the 60s which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jellen (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
58. Rather |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #58 |
82. It's actually over 100 years old, in that usage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #58 |
136. It's probably a shortened version of investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
60. As I recall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petersjo02 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #60 |
71. I think you mean "provenance" rather than "providence." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Thanks, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
104. Supposedly, the margins were justified. And, supposedly, a blogger noticed this and exposed the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. KnR. CBS tried to make itself into a friendlier version of a wholly-owned propaganda organ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. Go All The Way Dan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chelsea0011 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 05:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
31. MSM was hoping for a slow death, but they are up against someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
74. main street media is on the side of CBS and not the TRUTH as reported by Dan Rather -- K&R !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. the wheels of the truth gods grind slowly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
83. Mari!!! Happy to see your post again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danascot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. Related Thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. The panel was chosen to cover up Bush's role |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Nonsense ... this report was verified by the female military aide who confirmed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
67. The secretary didn't verify the information in the documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. No -- she verified it word-for-word ...stressed exactly what she had typed -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #70 |
87. Upon further rereading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 01:26 AM Response to Reply #87 |
100. No-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:22 AM Response to Reply #87 |
107. It's not interesting that we focus on her statement that the facts in the documents were true while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #107 |
139. No...She did NOT say that the dicuments were "not authentic" .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. She SPECIFICALLY STATED what was IN the documents was ACCURATE, but SHE didn't type them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #76 |
89. Please see response #87 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #67 |
85. What a bonch of booolcheeet...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #67 |
90. Yes, she did, here is a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:16 AM Response to Reply #67 |
106. I saw that show and she most certainly did verify the contents of the documents in every |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 09:20 AM Response to Reply #106 |
121. Yes. The "not the typewriter" bullshit is just that. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #121 |
125. When we look at content |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4bucksagallon (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #67 |
132. Hmmmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. No silly, the report was true. An Atlanta lawyer named Harry MacDougald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. That is exactly how this will pan out. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mojowork_n (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
68. Harry MacDougald claimed he downloaded pdf's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:28 AM Response to Reply #68 |
108. Just like the authencity of the documents in Rather's hands was a straw man. That is why I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 07:03 AM Response to Reply #68 |
118. OMG! I had no idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulfcoastliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
73. Seems like a typical Rove-orchestrated operation: the talking points, the orders when & where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:33 AM Response to Reply #73 |
109. The conspiracy was against Kerry and the American voter. Rather was collateral damage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
92. Most of that fits with my theory that the White House let CBS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 02:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
26. Horseshit. There was no "overwhelming evidence of forgery" from the start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
93. The documents were definitely forged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 08:05 AM Response to Reply #93 |
119. I don't think this stuff you are saying is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #119 |
127. If we go with the far fetched idea that Lt. Colonel Killian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #127 |
133. Everybody had someone who they could send this stuff out to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #93 |
124. Baloney - with a few million dollars to use the panel COULD EASILY discover if document was forged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. They went into extensive discussion about whether the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #126 |
131. WITHOUT coming to a conclusion should've clued you in. They would've LOVED to conclude forgery but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:19 AM Response to Reply #9 |
35. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:14 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 03:58 AM Response to Reply #38 |
114. That, too, is a distraction. The only material issue in the physical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #114 |
128. Those may be the issues to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:57 AM Response to Reply #9 |
37. Rather's in it for his own ego? Good thing we have people here like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
94. The report wasn't true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mojowork_n (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. "Without a doubt," *what* was "false?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #99 |
129. Killian was not under pressure from General Staudt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #129 |
134. I don't understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #134 |
137. Bush did not show up for his physical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. The dates make perfect sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #138 |
140. Bush's time period to take his physical wasn't up until July 31 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mojowork_n (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-20-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #140 |
143. What was the name of the website, and where's the post, or a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mojowork_n (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #129 |
142. So if you're aware of such trivial inconsistencies, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 03:17 AM Response to Reply #94 |
112. Which material facts asserted in the report were "without a doubt" false? Please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #112 |
130. Please see response #129 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 08:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
42. Is there any evidence that the documents were forgeries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #42 |
95. Please read the CBS investigative report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
56. I don't think the report was forged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #56 |
97. The assistant said the documents were forgeries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mojowork_n (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
61. Dan Bartlett and George Bush, credible sources??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
96. Of course I don't trust Bush or Bartlett |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mojowork_n (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #96 |
141. Did Bush tell Bartlett the "facts" were false......? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
10. Dan Rather is a frickin' National Treasure. We could use more like him. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Rather I think was used re JFK coup -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ammonium (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:02 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. We was absolutely involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:51 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Yes ...but there's speculation they showed him an altered film... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ammonium (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
65. It depends on who you believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Maybe one day we'll know truth of this ....but if your idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
75. Apparently, there was not wound in the temple. Read the article THE DAY KENNEDY DIED, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. We were all young once. And most of us did things we are not proud of in our youth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:52 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. We'll see...and hope you're right --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 02:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. I hope I'm right too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 03:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
110. You "think" he owns property with Rumfeld? That is your reason for asserting that Rather remains a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSPS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
13. William Paley is spinning in his grave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:58 AM Response to Reply #13 |
24. Whoa ...don't think Paley was ever the innocent in "events" like this ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatrynXX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
14. coming from the same CBS that kinda screwed Lowell Bergman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iwillnevergiveup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. GO DAN AND DON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
16. And here is WHY Viacom/CBS had to kiss Bush's you know what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:42 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. sorry I'm too late to k or r the O.P. you refer to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 03:25 AM Response to Reply #16 |
113. Have you suggested this anywhere that PE Obama might learn of it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
27. taking time to K&R for Dan The Man.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 03:15 AM Response to Original message |
28. this is important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
29. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
30. This is great news. Go Dan...kick butt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
32. What price justice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
33. The crux of the matter: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Good summary here-yes Gen. Tunripseed's secretary said that she didn't type THOSE documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
39. CBS kissing republicon ass, and failing the American people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
40. Dan Rather was scapegoated and blacklisted in the same way that McCarthyism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
41. If you step away from argument and you try to get a picture of all the machinations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. the cia infiltrated the media many years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #43 |
47. That's an excellent way to phrase it. And since they always figure out how to get six for one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
45. What goes around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 03:14 AM Response to Reply #45 |
111. Only if Democrats like you and me see to it. American voters are too passive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
46. from FDL on Nov 7th: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. Indeed. This is why they sandbagged Palin with Katie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 07:01 AM Response to Reply #59 |
117. Is Fox talking smack about Sarah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
77. Lest we forget WHY Kerry's campaign was HEAVILY EDITED by msm and Bush had 24/7 protection: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #77 |
86. Lest we forget? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 04:49 AM Response to Reply #46 |
115. They needed to protect themselves from charges of liberal bias? But, they did not mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JawJaw (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
48. Go For It, Dan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flying Dream Blues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
49. Kicking....everyone should read this... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waiting For Everyman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
50. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maestro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
51. I hope CBS is nailed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
52. In Your Face MSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naipes (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
55. Liberal Media, my ass... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #55 |
66. The reason the righties keep that myth afloat is the exact opposite is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
62. proof that the media has been infiltrated by the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
64. This paragraph tells you, CBS didn't give a flying fecal speck about journalism, just publicity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
84. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
investintrains (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
91. God give Rather a speedy victory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4bucksagallon (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
98. GO Dan Go!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
101. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
102. Bush was not in the National Guard. He was in the Texas Air |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 05:11 AM Response to Original message |
116. This convinces me of something I suspected since I heard that a blogger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pam4water (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
120. He wasn't paranoid they were out to get him! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisainmilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
122. kicked and rec! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC