Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iranian-operated cargo ship hijacked off Somalia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:56 AM
Original message
Iranian-operated cargo ship hijacked off Somalia
Source: WP/AP

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- The U.S. Navy says a cargo ship has been hijacked off the Somalia coast _ the latest in a series of attacks by pirates operating out of the African country.

Navy Commander Jane Campbell of the Bahrain-based 5th Fleet says the 26,000-ton bulk cargo carrier was attacked Tuesday in the Gulf of Aden.

She says the ship was flying a Hong Kong flag but is operated by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines.

The status of the crew or its cargo were not known. Campbell says the ship is likely heading toward an anchorage site off the Somali coast.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/18/AR2008111800583.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know, we should think about building a navy someday.
I can't believe in this day and age a handful of guys in speedboats can hijack ships with impunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They're operating out of Somalian territorial waters.
Technically it's illegal for anyone else to go in there and get them. Though with the last few attacks they've mounted, international law is looking less and less convincing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I'm not terribly concerned about violating Somalian territorial waters.
If they had a functioning government and a navy or coast guard, this would not be an issue. I'm reasonably certain the UN would pass a resolution allowing us to operate there under the circumstances, considering Chinese, Saudi, Iranian, and other nationalities have all been victims. We're talking tens or hundreds of millions of dollars going to terrorists here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I'm sure somebody's thinking along those lines right now.
Somebody already should have been, but we haven't had much of a functioning government ourselves lately. But the way these guys have stepped up their attacks is bound to raise eyebrows. There have been more attacks this month already than in the 10 weeks prior.

Of course, simply going into their waters probably wouldn't do the whole job. We (or somebody) would have to sweep the harbor and surrounding area, in order to capture or kill pirates still onshore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Territorial waters belong to nations. Does Somalia even qualify?
Somalia isn't so much a nation as it is a bunch of competing clan and religion based fiefdoms. Quite a few of those fiefdoms, representing a huge portion of Somalias land area, don't even claim to be a part of the "nation" of Somalia anymore but aspire to be independent kingdoms. Those kingdoms, in turn, generally aren't recognized by anyone but themselves. On top of all that, half of Somalia is still under the control of the Ethiopians.

Outside of the Ethiopian controlled areas, most of Somalia is simply a no-mans land governed by whomever has the most guns. Inside of the Ethiopian controlled areas, the situation is only marginally better.

Many people have argued that Somalia, as a nation, doesn't exist. It's a geographic term today, and not a government one. If there is no nation of Somalia, it cannot have territorial waters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well... it's THERE...
And it has a nominal government, albeit one which controls jack shit. So I suppose it qualifies as a "nation" under international law. Of course I'm not sure if international law is capable of recognizing an area where more than a handful of people live, but doesn't meet the traditional definitions of a country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It is not a couple of guys in speedboats. Somali pirating is a well funded big business.

With the (US backed) overthrow of Somalia government, the territorial waters off Somalia became a free-for-all. Trawlers from more than 16 different nations were recorded within its waters. EU vessels flying flags of convenience cut deals with the illegitimate authorities in Somalia, according to UN investigators.

Clashes between large, foreign fishing interests and Somali fishermen in the late 1990s were the prelude to the upsurge in piracy.

The epicenter of this piracy is the port town of Eyl. In Eyl, the streets are lined with new buildings and awash with Landcruisers, laptops, satellite phones and global positioning systems. An industry has grown up around the pirates, with restaurants to feed the kidnapped crews who as potentially tradable assets must be looked after.

There is no unified effort to stop the piracy because the trawlers are not really supposed to be there in the first place. The traffic is being conducted in Somalia territorial waters, coming and going freely because there is no real Somalian government to stop it or with which to negotiate a deal to use the waters.

It is more profitable to just use the Somalian waterway free of charge and pay the pirates ransom for any ships they may hi-jack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Well, that's a lot more than I knew about it. I had no idea it was big business.
I knew they were organized. My speedboat reference referred more to the pictures I've seen of them, and in those pictures, they are essentially using small boats and light weapons, nothing more than rpg's and rifles. It's not like it would require a destroyer to fight them. A couple marines on every ship with a few tow missiles would eliminate them all easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Behold the fruits of gun control in action
International law prohibits merchant vessels from being armed with effective weapons, e.g. machine guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Oh, yeah, gun control. That's the problem. That explains the rash of piracy around England lately.
I can't say I know the history of this particular international law, but if I had to guess it would be either related to 'merchant' vessels armed with machine guns attacking actual merchant vessels or drug-runners arming their boats with machine guns.

The problem here isn't unarmed merchant ships. It's the failed government of Somalia. And just as in some American inner-cities, the problem isn't a lack of guns among the 'dis-armed' populace. It's the lack of an effective police deterrent that allows crime and gangs to run amok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not sure I understand how they hold these ships with immunity
I can see how they get away with hijacking, but then they dock a supertanker or large cargo ship, and tell the owner they can't have it back.

What if it was an airliner held by terrorists? Would a ransom be paid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why does the U.S. military invade countries for no reason and murder its inhabitants, when pirates
are literally stealing oil from ships right beneath its nose, and it does nothing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It prefers to steal from stationary victims ...
... makes the bottom line of the accounting report look better ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. because pirates don't attack other pirates...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like "free market" economics taken to its logical extreme.
It's not the US' job to protect Iranian shipping profits, one way or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Actually, there is an international treaty that requires members to act
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 02:17 PM by AtheistCrusader
against piracy on the open seas when possible. India recovered, and prosecuted the Indonesian pirates that hijacked the Japanese freighter Alondra Rainbow (full of about 10 million in Aluminium ingots) in Indonesian waters, for this reason, because it passed through Indian waters while crewed by the pirates. This is not necessarily about protecting Iranian shipping.

It IS a good opportunity to build a little good will with Iran, by assisting them, or a joint military operation to recover the ship and it's crew, safe and sound. Opportunity doesn't knock often, I hear.

Article 105 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. So agitate for Germany, Japan, or China to intervene. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. None of whom are really in a position to do so.
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 04:12 PM by AtheistCrusader
If we are going to have this huge Navy, scattered all around the globe, might as well use it to good effect. Again, this is a chance to build bridges with Iran, instead of one of our leaders getting in front of a camera, blathering about how evil they are, and burning bridges.

I generally support a reduction in military force around the globe, but we are in the neighborhood today, and the chance to act is before us right now.

Edit: There is a Russian destroyer in the region, another nation we should be building bridges with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. "Position to do so"??? Why not?
If three of the wealthiest nations on earth are "not in a position" (???) to act, despite being *required* to do so by international treaty, what you are really saying is:

The United States has a special responsibility (which no other country has) to police international shipping lanes. That's garbage. Pax Americana is over. Time for Pax China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think you misunderstood me.
By 'not in a position' I mean they don't have any assets in the area to project force with. We are. We also have a bit of a public relations deficit with Iran. I'm not advocating a Pax Americana or anything like that. Nor does the treaty require Germany to hike it's navy all the way over there to deal with this. We don't have a responsibility to police the entire high seas, nor does any other individual nation. We're in the neighborhood. Seems reasonable to me to fix this particular situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. Ummm, this has been going on for 5 days. Germany could've "hiked it's navy" there by now.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maineman Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps shippers should hire private contractors like Blackwater to ride shotgun
This would seem to be a much more appropriate use of them than the kind of activities the Bush-Cheney gang has used them for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Not legal
Prohibited by international treaties and laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. It's illegal to have security on board ships?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. its expensive and besides...whats to keep them from going "pirate" on the company ship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Same thing that prevents any security companies from go 'pirate' on anything...
Obviously such things happen, but there is usually that whole bad for business thing... If the ships your company are protecting keep getting hijacked, then people are probably going to want to use your services.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. these pirates are damned good at what they do
how many hijackings is this so far this year? a brazillion??

seriously though. these guys are like ninjas. wait until they get a hold of some nuclear materials, or some cruise missiles. that'll be fun to watch, ey?

i hope someone is trying to track these black market sales to see whose hands this shit is ending up in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. they hijacked ship was over 200 miles out..when attacked.. they are in deeo shit now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Time for the Third Barbary War
The first and second were against the Barbary Pirates of the North African coast circa 1805 and 1815.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Always a new Holy War round the bend!
Isn't it great that the US is "uniquely positioned" to be the world's Hessian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. Aarrrgghh, these pirates are getting out of hand, aarrrgghhh! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. What ever happened to sending in the mighty American armada for "exercises?"
I mean, don't we send the fleet to "trouble spots" for "exercises" when we really want to send a message? It seems to me if we float a few ships just off the coast of Somalia, this shit would stop.

But then, does Somalia have oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. Old pirates, yes, they rob I,
Old pirates, yes, they rob I,
Sold I to the merchant ships.
Minutes after they took I,
From the bottomless pit.
But my hand was made strong,
By the hand of the All Mighty.
We forward in this generation,
Triumphantly.

Won't you help to sing
These songs of freedom ?
'Cause all I ever had,
Redemption songs,
Redemption songs.

Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery,
None but ourselves can free our minds.
Have no fear for atomic energy,
'Cause none of them can stop the time.
How long shall they kill our prophets,
While we stand aside and look?
Some say it's just a part of it,
We've got to fullfil the book.

So won't you help to sing
These songs of freedom?
'Cause all I ever had,
Redemption songs,
Redemption songs,
Redemption songs.
-
/Guitar break/
-
Old pirates, yes, they rob I,
Sold I to the merchant ships.
Minutes after they took I,
From the bottomless pit.
How long shall they kill our prophets,
While we stand aside and look?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC